Category Archives: EuroSlavia, Remember?

Russian State TV Rhetoric Before and After the Full-scale Invasion of Ukraine

Greenland to the US, Europe to Russia

by Claudiu Secara

Gangsters against Thugs

In 1994, I published a book titled “The New CommonWealth. From Bureaucratic Corporatism to Socialist Capitalism.”

It described the so-called dismantling of the Soviet Empire as a ruse. At the pinnacle of Soviet military power, one might even say, military supremacy over the US, it was hardly conceivable that the Soviet Union would just capitulate in a war or rather, in a race to war, that it had won.

The most likely reason for the amazing turn of events — the dissolution of the Warsaw Treaty, and the exit of the Soviet states, was a pact worked out over the past few years for a redrawing of the spheres of influence. The Soviets, now Russia, would take the whole of Europe (minus the UK, at least for starters), while the US would take all of the Americas and more.

The New Russia immediately lifted all trade and travel and investment barriers to Europe. It built, at high speed, oil and gas pipelines, basically annexing all of Europe’s sources of energy. The US obliged by taking out of existence any alternative energy sources for the incredulous Europeans. Closed the coal mines, shut down Europe’s power plants and systematically crushed any alternative source from places like Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc. Not to forget the vigorous pursuit of illegal immigration, a recipe for erasing the national cohesion of the European peoples.

On the other side of the pond, Clinton agitated for NAFTA and the integration of American continental economies.

Everything seemed to be sealed; job done.

But then something else happened. By 2014 a sudden minor conflict started in Kiev over the future realignment of Ukraine. Should it cut ties with Russia, or should it align with the EU and even NATO? A minor aviation accident in a war zone under dubious circumstances the MH370 incident evolved into a real casus belli, rallying the European peoples against the supposed Russian aggression, i.e. the shutting down of a Western civilian airplane innocently carrying Western passangers. And it went downhill from there.

However, it seemed more and more that, after being taken by surprise by the Russian ruse, by Russia’s supposed disarmament, Russia’s supposedly destitute economy, the Europeans saw through the plot. It wasn’t Russia that was on the menu. It was Europe, sold out to Russia.

That also paralleled the revolt on the American side by the vigilantes. NAFTA turned out to be a big self-destructive lie, with the entire American manufacturing base relocating, as Ross Perot foresaw– with the famous sucking sound of jobs and productive capacity moving south of the border. Also, Russia’s sudden assertive role in Europe, its ubiquitous infiltration in all spheres of the Western society, subsidizing parties and candidates favorable if not outright subservient to Russian interests—all of that strange reversal of who was in control of whom—triggered a strong anti-Russian backlash.

The deal of the 1980s between Gorbachev and Bush/Cliinton was declared OFF.

Roll forward to today. What does all this add up to?

Comes Trump to the rescue. Blatantly, brazenly, uninhibited, not to say shamelessly, he pursues the old deal, with some improvements. You, Russia, can have a free hand in taking over the disarmed, hopeless Europeans, and I, Trump, am taking over Venezuela, Cuba, and especially Greenland. All of this is a deal made by and under the guidance of the Zionist interests who now control both, a weak Russia and a weak United States. Can either side refuse the offer?!

The big losers? The hated, once powerful and smart Europeans. All the other parties, the Zionists, the Russians and the US, celebrate their day of victory over their one-time Masters.

But. But while all these creepy maneuvers are consuming everyone in good standing, their financial resources and their economies and productive forces, there is another player in the shadows. And that is China.

Can the new, united pack of wolves now attack China? Can they win?

My money is on “NO”. They cannot win.

But that’s for another post.

Germany and the UK Targets of Russian Nuclear Strike

via Moscow Times https://ru.themoscowtimes.com/2026/01/15/blizkii-k-kremlyu-politolog-nazval-germaniyu-i-velikobritaniyu-glavnimi-tselyami-vozmozhnogo-yadernogo-udara-rossii-po-evrope-a184637

Moscow may launch a nuclear strike against Germany or the United Kingdom in the next one or two years in order to “punish” Europe, which continues to help Ukraine defend itself from Russian aggression, said Sergei Karaganov, an adviser to the presidential administration.

“My choice would be Britain and Germany,” he said in an interview with American journalist Tucker Carlson, answering a question about which countries could be the target of a nuclear attack by the Russian Federation. – I pray to the Almighty that this does not happen. But Germany should be the first, because Germany is the source of the worst in European history.”

The talk about a possible nuclear attack came after Tucker’s question about what consequences for Europe could be in the event of the assassination of Russian President Vladimir Putin by Ukrainians or Europeans. “Then, of course, it would mean that we would punish — hopefully not the United States — but Europe would be wiped off the map of humanity. It should be erased from the geopolitical and geostrategic map, because it is an annoying obstacle,” Karaganov said.

He clarified that a nuclear attack on Europe could occur within two years if “they do not stop this senseless war and instability in and around Ukraine,” and such an attack would be preceded by strikes with conventional conventional weapons. “Using nuclear weapons is a double sin, and I don’t want Russia to commit such a big sin. But if necessary, we must eliminate the European threat to humanity,” said Carlson’s interlocutor.
In October 2024, Karaganov stated that nuclear weapons in the hands of Russia are a “gift from the Almighty,” who helped scientists find them. “We must not anger God — we must actively use the weapons that we have been given for self—salvation,” he said. Prior to this, Karaganov also called for a nuclear bomb attack on the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Earlier, Bild wrote that Putin’s adviser, along with his wife, owns an apartment in Berlin, which he proposes to destroy. According to journalists, renting out real estate brought Karaganov 850 euros per month. In 2023, the pro-Kremlin ideologue learned that sanctions could be imposed against him, after which he decided to “donate” his share in the Berlin apartment to his wife.

Igor Strelkov on What “We Have Achieved in Four Years of War”

What the Russian Nationalists Are Saying

“Trump’s Plan” is Putin’s Plan

Points of the peace plan for Ukraine, which are now being leaked and published by the media. Obviously, “Trump’s plan” is Putin’s plan.

  1. State status for the Russian language. That is, a refusal of forced derussification.
  2. Official status of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. I will add: and the return of the seized churches to it.
  3. Reduction of the Armed Forces of Ukraine by half (this is easy. After all, a non-warring army will be much easier)
  4. Complete withdrawal of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the DPR and LPR. (and the cities of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson remain under Ukraine, this is a big concession)
  5. Russia also transfers part of the territory, referring to parts of Kharkiv, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, and Mykolaiv regions.
  6. Ban on having long-range weapons.
  7. Official recognition of Crimea and the DPR and LPR as parts of Russia and
    Also, they forgot, but there will be more.
  8. Introduction of a demilitarized zone so that the Armed Forces of Ukraine cannot shoot at Donbas.
  9. Denazification. Ban on the glorification of Bandera and other fascists. Dissolution and ban of Azov and its units and similar fascist detachments.
  10. Political amnesty. Release of political prisoners, lifting the ban on media and political parties.
  11. Free elections of the president and parliament.
  12. Official neutrality of Ukraine, which must be recognized by NATO countries. No foreign troops.
  13. This is all the minimum program.

Russia, on the Threshold of Victory or of the Doomsday?

We have very little time left to try to “exit the war” by any means (victory or through a disguised defeat), since the economic situation in the country is “on the brink of catastrophe.”