by Claudiu Secara
Gangsters against Thugs
In 1994, I published a book titled “The New CommonWealth. From Bureaucratic Corporatism to Socialist Capitalism.”
It described the so-called dismantling of the Soviet Empire as a ruse. At the pinnacle of Soviet military power, one might even say, military supremacy over the US, it was hardly conceivable that the Soviet Union would just capitulate in a war or rather, in a race to war, that it had won.
The most likely reason for the amazing turn of events — the dissolution of the Warsaw Treaty, and the exit of the Soviet states, was a pact worked out over the past few years for a redrawing of the spheres of influence. The Soviets, now Russia, would take the whole of Europe (minus the UK, at least for starters), while the US would take all of the Americas and more.
The New Russia immediately lifted all trade and travel and investment barriers to Europe. It built, at high speed, oil and gas pipelines, basically annexing all of Europe’s sources of energy. The US obliged by taking out of existence any alternative energy sources for the incredulous Europeans. Closed the coal mines, shut down Europe’s power plants and systematically crushed any alternative source from places like Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc. Not to forget the vigorous pursuit of illegal immigration, a recipe for erasing the national cohesion of the European peoples.
On the other side of the pond, Clinton agitated for NAFTA and the integration of American continental economies.
Everything seemed to be sealed; job done.
But then something else happened. By 2014 a sudden minor conflict started in Kiev over the future realignment of Ukraine. Should it cut ties with Russia, or should it align with the EU and even NATO? A minor aviation accident in a war zone under dubious circumstances the MH370 incident evolved into a real casus belli, rallying the European peoples against the supposed Russian aggression, i.e. the shutting down of a Western civilian airplane innocently carrying Western passangers. And it went downhill from there.
However, it seemed more and more that, after being taken by surprise by the Russian ruse, by Russia’s supposed disarmament, Russia’s supposedly destitute economy, the Europeans saw through the plot. It wasn’t Russia that was on the menu. It was Europe, sold out to Russia.
That also paralleled the revolt on the American side by the vigilantes. NAFTA turned out to be a big self-destructive lie, with the entire American manufacturing base relocating, as Ross Perot foresaw– with the famous sucking sound of jobs and productive capacity moving south of the border. Also, Russia’s sudden assertive role in Europe, its ubiquitous infiltration in all spheres of the Western society, subsidizing parties and candidates favorable if not outright subservient to Russian interests—all of that strange reversal of who was in control of whom—triggered a strong anti-Russian backlash.
The deal of the 1980s between Gorbachev and Bush/Cliinton was declared OFF.
Roll forward to today. What does all this add up to?
Comes Trump to the rescue. Blatantly, brazenly, uninhibited, not to say shamelessly, he pursues the old deal, with some improvements. You, Russia, can have a free hand in taking over the disarmed, hopeless Europeans, and I, Trump, am taking over Venezuela, Cuba, and especially Greenland. All of this is a deal made by and under the guidance of the Zionist interests who now control both, a weak Russia and a weak United States. Can either side refuse the offer?!
The big losers? The hated, once powerful and smart Europeans. All the other parties, the Zionists, the Russians and the US, celebrate their day of victory over their one-time Masters.
But. But while all these creepy maneuvers are consuming everyone in good standing, their financial resources and their economies and productive forces, there is another player in the shadows. And that is China.
Can the new, united pack of wolves now attack China? Can they win?
My money is on “NO”. They cannot win.
But that’s for another post.
