Back to Agenda 2030

To me it looks like Trump got the memo from the Masters on his short visit to London and is changing course. There is now even talk about Agenda 2030 being back on track. See Annalena Baerbock’s speech as chair of the 2025 UN session.

And what does Agenda 2030 imply? First, I think, it is about ending all major conflicts in the world. Particularly in the Middle East and Ukraine. It is about bringing Russia back from bullying its neighbors and pursuing its maverick path. Same for Hungary.

Israel is also in the spotlight and that means accepting a Palestinian state next to it.

Any insubordination by the member states to the Master Plan is to be stopped. For better or worse, some form of global governance is to be introduced across the board, mandatory for each member state.

The current state of anarchy is to be terminated within the next five years. Every member of the human race is to be catalogued and be tracked. New forms of control and management at the macro and micro levels will make life resemble the beehive or the ant colony. The dysfunctional form of elections and political life is to be replaced by technocrats making decisions using analytical tools.

Will it work? Time will tell.

Trump, the Retroactive – How the Ante is Upped Before Trump Announces his Decisions

By John Helmer, Moscow
@bears_with

President Donald Trump (*) isn’t making the major domestic or foreign policy decisions of his administration.

Stephen Miller, the deputy chief of staff at the White House, is directing the militarization of domestic policymaking and propaganda; the Central Intelligence Agency and Pentagon are executing the foreign operations against Russia, China, Iran, Palestine, Yemen, Venezuela; Howard Lutnick and Scott Bessent, the Commerce and Treasury Secretaries, are directing the trade war schemes. Trump’s tweets, some directly authored by Miller, follow their action, stamping presidential approval after the event. Trump’s press remarks — staged in small bursts in front of media prompters — create the appearance that Trump is running the show. The show, yes; the operations, no.

To patch over the gap between what Trump’s men are doing and what Trump says he is doing, the president repeats catchwords, slogans, jingles: “I am disappointed in Putin”; “if Russia’s not selling oil, they have no choice but to settle”; “if Europe did something with respect to China, I think China would probably maybe force an end to the war”; “the United States has been a sucker long enough in the world in terms of trade. Now, we’re doing unbelievably well, and we’re making more money than we’ve ever made”; “I actually said, Charlie [Kirk], someday I think you have a good chance of being president. I think you will be president, maybe”; “the King of Saudi Arabia, a great gentleman — great gentleman, you all know him. He said, sir, your country was dead one year ago and now you have the hottest country anywhere in the world and it’s true.”

Pressed to agree with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on warfighting strategy against Russia, Trump was unable to say what he wants from President Vladimir Putin, what terms he expects Putin to accept, and what he will do if he won’t: “he’s let me down, he’s really let me down… He has let me down. I mean, he’s killing many people and he’s losing more people than he’s killing. I mean, frankly, the Russian soldiers are being killed at a higher rate than the Ukrainian soldiers. But, yeah, he’s let me down, I don’t like to see — it’s death. You know, it doesn’t affect the United States;” and then “Very simply, if the price of oil comes down, Putin’s going to drop out, he’s going to have no choice. He’s going to drop out of that war.”

As Trump flew back to Washington from the UK, a prompted reporter asked: “is it time for a ceasefire to come?” Trump didn’t know what he will do next. Instead, he replied: “Doesn’t feel like it. But at the right time, if I have to do it, it’ll be harsh.” The operation will follow; Trump’s posturing will come after.

Since Trump’s men understand this is how Trump is deciding policy retroactively, and both the NATO allies and the Kremlin understand the same thing, it is everybody’s calculation to compel Trump’s acquiescence by forcing the action pre-emptively leaving him no alternative, and presenting the successful outcome of their operations in picture-book briefings which combine shock and flattery. Trump is the first president in US history to sign written decision memoranda after the options have been pre-empted. He cannot remember what they were because he hasn’t read the papers.

[*] Trump’s facial disfigurement first became obvious with the droop on the right side of his face during his appearance at the Pentagon on September 11. A week later, when Trump was in the UK, the symptom continued to appear but it is evidently under greater control. Cosmetologists and medical experts are sure the symptom is not of a botox failure. The most likely cause, the sources believe, is Bell’s Palsy. This is a non-fatal neurological condition of uncertain cause. There is no record in Trump’s White House Physician reports that he has suffered Bell’s Palsy episodes in the past. The standard medical treatment for Bell’s Palsy symptoms as pronounced as Trump’s on September 11 is a combination of corticosteroids, such as prednisone, and antivirals like valacylcovir. If Trump has been taking corticosteroids, the side effects which may be anticipated to appear include the fluid retention which has been reported in July as caused by “chronic venous insufficiency”. The cognitive, mood, and psychological side effects of corticosteroid treatment have been reported in the scientific literature to include “euphoria and hypomania”, as well as “difficulty to maintain concentration and poor memory”.

Winners and Losers

by Claudiu Secara

Just finished listening to Alastair Crooke’s interview on Danielle Cambone’s show. Big, dire statements about the future.

While Alastair Crooke is a seasoned observer of world events and takes a dispassionate approach to world conflicts, he is also fixated on certain old ideas. Maybe he also spends too much time reading RT.

One major shortcoming of his analysis is his steadfast assertion that the EU is “finished”. That’s certainly the Russian (promoted by Orban) line of propaganda. He talks about people demonstrating on the streets of Europe. Funny, when did we last see people on the streets of Moscow? Was it when Wagner group marched to the capital with a message of disagreement with Kremlin policy? Oh, yeah. And that was followed by the public execution of Prigozhin, up in the sky?

So, seriously, yes, there are organized demonstrations in the EU. Organized by the Russian fifth column. Organized by Israel to undermine the declared support of a Palestinian state. Organized by the MAGA occupation, spearheaded by Vice President Vance himself. And of course by fringe groups, from the left to the right, including the subsidized immigrants.

But the EU has an economy almost twice the size of the US, many times larger than Russia’s, with an educated population and skilled work force, and, quite important, with a low debt-to-GDP ratio, unlike the US or even China.

Given the convulsions that the new world order is undergoing, I do expect to see dramatic events in the near future. But in which direction?

I definitely see China as the big winner, undeniably. China’s technological advancement is way out front, unrivaled by any combination of the rest of the world. The US is the net loser, for now in a decline accelerated by Trumpist economics, from tariffs to bad-mouthing friend and foe alike (India being one example) by an inept egomaniac supporting the lost cause of Zionism.

Russia is muddling through, so far, due to centuries-old militarism. But that policy, based on military conquest and military threats to its neighbors, can only backfire. Is China actually happy to have a neighbor plotting to rule using its weapons rather than its entrepreneurial class? I don’t think so.

At the other end of its empire, are the Europeans comfortable with talk of obliteration of their capitals by Russia’s weapons of mass destruction? Are the Muslims OK with Russia betraying Syria, who was counting on the fickle bear?

I think that Russia will be struggling more and more, squeezed between China’s giant shadow and the assertive Europeans. Sell out to China or appease the demands of the newly coalescing pole in the newly coalescing multi polar world?

Another common assertion these days is the impending collapse of the Dollar. The critical word is collapse. Are we going to see a scenario like the Weimar collapse of the German Mark? Most likely, no. So, if not collapse, then maybe a realignment of sorts. That’s a matter of degree and a gradual erosion; not a catastrophic event. How the world will look two hundred years from now is anyone’s guess, but on the scale of a human lifetime, the Dollar remains one of the pillars of the world financial structure. Our friend Alastair Crooke expects dramatic restructuring, but Trump will be around only a few more years and his reckless bullying is already showing signs of imminent, lamentable defeat.

Trump might have gone to London to have a tête-à-tête with the King in the privacy of the royal carriage. But, although he left the King visibly upset and humiliated the poor man by walking 10 meters ahead, talking to a guard as if Charles was his majordomo, Trump failed in his agenda when all of Western Europe went on to announce their recognition of the Palestinian state. Trump is already a spent force, and his pageantry and mourning at the loss of Charley Kirk further sent the Trumpists onto the defensive.

The US will indeed hit the wall sooner rather than later, but the Anglosphere is still a formidable force, and once it overcomes its Zionist obsession, it is fair to expect the US to go back to its industrious roots and innovative thinking.

Moldova Broke up a Network of Russian GRU

Moldovan security forces on Monday arrested 74 people after carrying out more than 250 searches, actions as a result of which, according to an adviser to President Maia Sandu, a sabotage network trained in Serbia by the Russian military intelligence service GRU for destabilizing operations with the September 28 parliamentary elections, while former President Igor Dodon accuses an action of intimidation of the opposition, AFP and EFE agencies report.

‘Since July, the prosecutor’s Office for Combating Organized Crime and special causes (PCCOCS), together with other agencies, has been investigating the preparation of massive unrest. Following searches 74 people were arrested on Monday, said the agency’s chief prosecutor, Victor Furtuna.

For his part, President Maia Sandu’s national security adviser Stanislav Secrieru said that a network supported by the GRU, the Russian military intelligence service, was ‘destroyed, a network within which’ over 100 Moldovans were trained in Serbia by Russian instructors in violent tactics against police and the use of firearms’. ‘Their mission: organizing pre – and post-election violence.

74 individuals have been arrested and are cooperating with the authorities, ‘ the presidential adviser added in a message on social network X.
According to the Chisinau prosecutor’s Office, the majority of those arrested are between 19 and 45 years old and each would have received an amount of 400 euros. ‘They were found to be affiliated with political parties or groups police chief Viorel Cernauteanu said.

Moldovan security forces announced earlier Monday that they had carried out more than 250 searches in a criminal case for ‘preparing massive unrest and destabilizing actions coordinated from the Russian Federation by criminal elements’ in the legislative elections to be held on Sunday. ‘The Kremlin is throwing hundreds of millions of euros to buy hundreds of thousands of votes on both banks of the Dniester River and abroad. People are intoxicated daily with dozens of lies. Hundreds of people are being paid to cause disorder, violence and scare the world,’ Maia Sandu said in a speech on Monday.

Maia Sandu, Moldova is Not for Sale

In the last week before the elections, the president of the Republic Of Moldova, Maia Sandu, launched a direct appeal to the citizens, warning that Russia wants to seize Moldova.

“If Russia gets to control Moldova, the consequences will be direct and dangerous for our country and for the entire region. All Moldovans will suffer, regardless of who they voted for. Europe will end at the border with Moldova. European funds will stop at the Prut. Freedom of movement could end.

Our land could become an infiltration ramp to the Odessa region. The Transnistrian region would be destabilized. These are their plans and they tell them openly.
We must keep Moldova peaceful, out of war and Russia’s attempts to attack or destabilize other states.

Russia does not act alone. The Kremlin has accomplices in Moldova. People who have shown many times in the past that for money they sell their country. They have no land, they have only Masters! They don’t believe in Russia or Europe. They only believe in money. They want a weak Moldova, a corrupt justice that will not hold them accountable for either corruption or betrayal of their homeland. We and you have already lived in times when those who buy votes today were at the helm of the country. Let us remember how much harm they did to Moldova and how hard it was to drove them from power.

After so many efforts, after so many generations sacrificed, we have no right to hand the country over to the corrupt and the traitors. The Kremlin thinks we’re all for sale. That we are too small to resist. That we are not a country, but a territory. But Moldova is our home. And our house is not for sale. Our house holds on to our worthy people — you are the wall on which peace and the future of our children are held. Our ancestors sometimes paid with their lives to defend Moldova”.

Moscow’s Interest in this Autumn’s Czech and Moldova Elections

by David Salvo & Nathaniel Myers , Washington via https://euobserver.com/eu-and-the-world/ar5ca4cf82

In the coming weeks, both Moldova and the Czech Republic will hold elections. In Moldova, authorities estimate the Kremlin will spend €100m — €31 per registered voter — to influence the outcome.

In the Czech Republic, Kremlin-linked outlets are pumping out more content each day than the country’s major news outlets combined.

This is no longer unusual: Moscow interfered in elections earlier this year in Poland, Germany, France, and Romania.

Indeed, it would be more newsworthy if there was a vote Moscow didn’t attempt to manipulate.

And its influence operations have inflicted damage far beyond the ballot box, fueling civic unrest, harming national economic interests, damaging public health, undercutting core foreign policy priorities, and straining European unity (around Ukraine, above all).

It is continually testing new tactics and increasingly leverages offline actions like paid protests, vandalism, bomb threats against polling stations, and even vote buying.

Given Moscow’s ever-more brazen attempts to foster instability in Europe; it’s no wonder that its leaders increasingly see themselves, as German chancellor Friedrich Merz said at the end of August, “already in conflict with Russia”.

Europe needs to act now on this growing sense of alarm about the urgency of the threat Russia’s interference poses to European security and democracy.

While there are models of good practice for pushing back on Russia’s destabilising operations, far from every European nation has a strategy to address these threats.

Four fightback measures
Each country will need to develop a national information defence strategy, tailored to its own specific circumstances and constraints, but focused on the same four goals: build public resilience; detect and expose; close policy loopholes and vulnerabilities that facilitate Russian operations; and push back.

In each area, they will benefit by learning from one another’s experience.

To build resilience, European nations might look first to the Baltic and Scandinavian states, which have long integrated media literacy, critical thinking, and other relevant skills into their public education programs.

Estonia, for example, has a longstanding kindergarten-through-high-school curriculum which tailors its modules to the age of students; high schoolers, for instance, are required to take a 35-hour “media and influence” course.

Sweden’s Psychological Defence Agency is mandated with working not just in the school system but in broader society to educate citizens.

The Dutch Media Literacy Network offers another approach, leaning on more than a thousand organizations to advance media literacy among priority groups across society.

Detecting and exposing interference operations is essential for raising awareness among the public, as well as to minimise the impact of a particular operation.

Analytical and investigative capabilities should be developed inside a government, as France did when it established Viginum: a government agency which tracks, identifies, and exposes foreign nation-states’ malign influence operations targeting France and its interests.

Two State Solution, End of Trumpism?

Is this the writing on the wall for Netanyahu/Trump axis?

❗️First, Canada RECOGNIZES Palestinian state, to be followed by the UK and France.

PM Carney announces goal: ‘PEACEFUL future’ for 2 states, Palestine AND Israel.

Meanwhile Sumud Flotilla is closing in on Gaza. Watch the developments in the next few days.

The Trumpists seem very much on the defensive in Arizona while Putin’s majordomo, Kiril Dmitriev, is doing the rounds of homily to the would-be emperor of the world.

Lastly, brazen Orban is about to be bribed with 500 million euros to vote for the 19th round of sanctions against Russia.

Are we at a turning point for Trumpism?

Saudi Arabia’s Defense Pact with Pakistan Is A Strategic Loss For the U.S. of A.

via MoonofAlabama

Back in 2012 U.S. foreign policy analysts were concerned about a possible nuclear alliance between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Scholars from the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies and the Stimson Center wrote an essay about it:

The Pak-Saudi Nuke, and How to Stop ItThe American Interest, March 2012

The opening paragraph:

One morning, perhaps in the not too distant future, the President of the United States may wake up to an announcement that, given new dangers in the Middle East, the Saudi government has requested the stationing of Pakistani troops on Saudi soil. The announcement might go on to explain that these troops will also bring with them the full complement of conventional and strategic weapons necessary to ensure their security and that of Saudi Arabia. Word would quickly follow from Islamabad that Pakistan has accepted a generous aid package and low-priced oil from Saudi Arabia. Both parties would stress that the agreement simply reaffirms their decades-long special relationship.

As Pakistan is a nuclear weapons state one had to assume that any such a pact would supply Saudi Arabia with nuclear weapons. It was something that the U.S. and its sidekick Israel were very concerned about.

It was assumed at that time that the reason for such a move by Saudi Arabia would be its concern over Iran and its nuclear program:

Over the past decade, Saudi Arabia’s threat perception has sharpened as the dangers from Iran have grown along with doubts about the reliability of U.S. protection.

The time to wake up to a new Saudi-Pakistani alliance has finally come today:

Saudi Arabia signs ‘strategic mutual defence’ pact with Pakistan (archived) – Financial Times

But the strategic circumstance under which the alliance happens are very different from those that had been envisioned in 2012 essay:

Saudi Arabia has signed a “strategic mutual defence” pact with Pakistan, signalling to the US and Israel that the kingdom is willing to diversify its security alliances as it looks to bolster its deterrence.

The agreement with the nuclear-armed south Asian state comes a week after Gulf states — traditionally reliant on the US as their security guarantor — were deeply rattled by Israel’s missile strikes targeting Hamas’s political leaders in Qatar.

“We hope it will reinforce our deterrence — aggression against one is aggression against the other,” a senior Saudi official told the Financial Times. “This is a comprehensive defence agreement that will utilise all defensive and military means deemed necessary depending on the specific threat.”

This is a NATO Article 5 like pact. ‘All means deemed necessary’, as empathized, undoubtedly includes Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.

The U.S. was, the FT say, not at all involved in it:

Riyadh is believed to have informed Washington about the Pakistan defence agreement after it was signed.

Saudi Arabia already has a strategic missile force which is armed with Chinese DF-21 missiles which have a range of up to 1,700 kilometer. They can hit Tehran, but also Tel Aviv. The missiles are conventionally armed but can be fitted with nuclear warheads.

Pakistan’s development of nuclear weapons had largely be financed by Saudi Arabia. The two countries have a long history of military cooperation:

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have a defense relationship stretching back decades, in part due to Islamabad’s willingness to defend the Islamic holy sites of Mecca and Medina in the kingdom. Pakistani troops first traveled to Saudi Arabia in the late 1960s over concerns about Egypt’s war in Yemen at the time. Those ties increased after Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution and the kingdom’s fears of a confrontation with Tehran.

Pakistan developed its nuclear weapons program to counter India’s atomic bombs. However, there long have been signals of the kingdom’s interest in the program. Retired Pakistani Brig. Gen. Feroz Hassan Khan, in his book on his country’s nuclear weapons program called “Eating Grass: The Making of the Pakistani Bomb,” said Saudi Arabia provided “generous financial support” for its effort.

Today Saudi Arabia no longer fears a confrontation with Iran. In 2023, with the help of Chinese mediation, the two countries did bury their hatchets. The move was an early sign that the U.S. was losing ground in the Middle East.

The reasons why the is being closed these days is obvious:

The agreement was signed by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif in Riyadh. Sharif’s office’s reiterated that the agreement “states that any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both”.

The Israeli attack on Doha, one of the US’s major non-Nato allies, exacerbated Gulf leaders’ long-running concerns about Washington’s unpredictability and its commitment to their defence, as well as fears about Israel acting unrestrainedly with its military across the region.

The Saudis had worked on, and hoped for, a deeper alliance with the U.S. But the genocide in Gaza, and the unlimited U.S. support for it, have made such an alliance impossible:

Riyadh had been hoping to seal a defence pact with the US, as well as co-operation with Washington’s nuclear plans, as part of a grand deal that would have led to it normalising diplomatic relations with Israel.

However, those plans were upended after Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, triggering the war in Gaza and conflict across the region.

Riyadh has become increasingly outraged by Israel’s 23-month war in Gaza and the conduct of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right government.

Prince Mohammed accuses Israel of committing genocide, and has made it clear that normalisation is off the table unless Netanyahu ends the conflict and moves to establish a Palestinian state.

China, which is allied with Pakistan, will be happy about the deal. So will be Iran. It was likely already informed about it:

Before the defense pact was signed, Iran dispatched Ali Larijani, a senior political figure who now serves as the secretary of the country’s Supreme National Security Council, to visit Saudi Arabia. That may have seen the kingdom acknowledge the pact to Tehran, with which it has had a Chinese-mediated détente with Iran since 2023.

India will be concerned about the deal. A lot of the oil it purchases is coming from Saudi Arabia. With a Saudi-Pakistani alliance in place any conflict with Pakistan will likely cause it additional difficulties with the purchase of energy.

The U.S., and Donald Trump, are the big losers in this. The unrestricted support for Israel is coming at an ever increasing price. The Gulf countries are – slowly, slowly – moving away from it.

EuroSlavia, the Selling out of Europe by the US (my headline)

Ed. Note: So, the US is basically selling out Europe to the Russians. Wrote about it in my book EuroSlavia, in 1991, presented at the Academy of International Studies conference.

via MoA

In February 2025 the U.S. started talks with Russia over ending the war in Ukraine. The Europeans were against such talks. They were still dreaming of winning the lost war – of keeping control over Ukraine by providing it with security guarantees.

The Trump administration gave them a lecture in form of a catalog of questions. As I summarized the issue at that time:

The U.S. has recognized that there aren’t enough troops, money or will to achieve a better negotiation position for what’s left of Ukraine. The European ‘elite’ still fails to get that.

There are still dreams of ‘security guarantees’ which would be given to Ukraine after it files for peace or surrenders.

No such guarantees would make any sense. When peace is achieved there will be only one manner that can prevent a new outbreak of war: good behavior towards Russians and Russia by what will be left of Ukraine.

The U.S. negotiation team handed the Europeans a list of questions that will hopefully help them to come to grips with that ..

Here are the questions with answers by me in Italic:

1) What do you view as a Europe-backed security guarantee or assurance that would serve as a sufficient deterrent to Russia while also ensuring this conflict ends with an enduring peace settlement?

There is no Europe-backed guarantee possible that would be a ‘sufficient deterrent’.

2) Which European and/or third countries do you believe could or would participate in such an arrangement?

Each could provide a few dozen soldiers (plus rotations). None has the size of forces and/or stamina to really commit to the mission.

Are there any countries you believe would be indispensable?

The U.S. – if it would give nuclear guarantees to prevent the eventual annihilation of any ‘security guarantee’ force.

Would your country be willing to deploy its troops to Ukraine as part of a peace settlement?

No!

3) If third country military forces were to be deployed to Ukraine as part of a peace arrangement, what would you consider to be the necessary size of such a European-led force?

The purpose and point of the six questions the U.S. gave to the Europeans was to induce some realist thinking:

Applying such one will come to the conclusion that nothing but a long term peace agreement, which does not necessitate ‘guarantees’, makes any sense.

But they still did not get it.

It took the Europeans seven month of highly publicized discussion to finally acknowledge that there was no way for them to provide Ukraine with ‘security guarantees’. The only realistic variant they could think of was to threaten Russia with a nuclear war which they can’t but did wanted the U.S. to do. The U.S. wont do that. Neither Trump nor any other U.S. president will agree to risk New York over Kiev.

But the Europeans still do not want to make peace. Their new idea was to push the U.S. to put more sanctions on Russia:

The European Union is sending a delegation to Washington to ready new joint sanctions against Russia, European Council President António Costa said Friday.

“We are working with the United States and other like-minded partners to increase our pressure through further direct and secondary sanctions,” Costa said at a press conference in the western Ukrainian city of Uzhhorod, following a meeting with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Costa added “a European team is traveling to Washington, D.C. to work with our American friends” but did not reveal who would take part in the delegation.

The Trump administration is now copying the February idea of the catalog of question about security guarantees.

Trump is telling the Europeans “you jump first”:

Donald J. Trump – @realDonaldTrump – Sep 12, 2025, 23:15 UTC

A LETTER SENT BY PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP TO ALL NATO NATIONS AND, THE WORLD: “I am ready to do major Sanctions on Russia when all NATO Nations have agreed, and started, to do the same thing, and when all NATO Nations STOP BUYING OIL FROM RUSSIA. As you know, NATO’S commitment to WIN has been far less than 100%, and the purchase of Russian Oil, by some, has been shocking! It greatly weakens your negotiating position, and bargaining power, over Russia. Anyway, I am ready to “go” when you are. Just say when? I believe that this, plus NATO, as a group, placing 50% to 100% TARIFFS ON CHINA, to be fully withdrawn after the WAR with Russia and Ukraine is ended, will also be of great help in ENDING this deadly, but RIDICULOUS, WAR. China has a strong control, and even grip, over Russia, and these powerful Tariffs will break that grip. This is not TRUMP’S WAR (it would never have started if I was President!), it is Biden’s and Zelenskyy’s WAR. I am only here to help stop it, and save thousands of Russian and Ukrainian lives (7,118 lives lost last week, alone. CRAZY!). If NATO does as I say, the WAR will end quickly, and all of those lives will be saved! If not, you are just wasting my time, and the time, energy, and money of the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”

Like with the catalog of questions about security guarantees Trump is trying to induce some realist thinking into the boneheaded European ‘elite’.

Nearly every country in Europe is still consuming Russian oil. It is either bought directly from Russia or through Turkey or India. Europe can not put high tariffs on China or India. The responses from those countries would be devastating for Europe’s economies.

There is no way to sanction Russia, directly or indirectly, into ending the war.

Trump knows this. It is why he is calling the Europeans bluff.

We can only hope that they will learn from it …

A Second 9/11 in 2025

The only problem with this hysteria is that Tyler’s family was and is a strong MAGA, Republican voter. No sign of support for “liberal” causes. None.

It looks to me another 9/11 in the year 2025.  Kill your own to justify repression against your opponents when no such action is justified. Trump’s support is flagging badly, Israel’s war against everyone is going from bad to worse, and even major supporters of Israel, like Kirk started to question Israel’s actions.

Why not blame Soros and the “liberal” professors and start a dark chapter of witch hunting against any dissent?!

I can only see a dark future ahead for the fair-minded, enlightened members of our society. The enlightenment of the nineteenth century is under assault for the last hundred years through world wars and more repression.

The European civilization of rationalism, scientific revolution and humanism is to be replaced by barbarism on an endless escalatory level in order to bring to power the Messianic minority.

See also this Tyler Robinson’s family is MAGA.