via https://inpolitics.ro/intrebarea-zilei-a-fost-victoria-zdrobitoare-a-lui-magyar-o-cacealma-orchestrata-de-orban_1860090229.html (translated from Romanian)

With the dust barely settled on the ballot boxes and a voter turnout of 79.5%, the highest in Hungary’s post-communist history, the historic victory of Péter Magyar and the Tisza party seems, at first glance, like an earthquake: the end of 16 years of absolute dominance by Viktor Orbán and Fidesz. But in some analyst circles and on Hungarian social media, an alternative theory is quickly gaining ground: was it all a brilliant bluff by Orbán? A pseudo-adversary created overnight from the very center, to lose his apparent grip on power, just as his popularity has been in irreversible decline for almost a quarter of a century?

Let’s take it methodically.

As the streets of Budapest celebrate what appears to be the “fall of the dictator,” a disturbing question is being raised in the political consulting labs: did we witness a genuine revolution yesterday or the most sophisticated exercise in political transformism in modern European history?

The theory is deeply rooted in Orbán’s political style—a master of control, captured institutions, and orchestrated narratives. Since his return to power in 2010 (and, indirectly, since his first government in 1998-2002), Fidesz has built a political system in which real opposition has been systematically weakened, marginalized, or co-opted. Critics argue that, as early as 2023-2024, the regime’s internal polls showed a steady erosion of support: endemic corruption, economic stagnation, international isolation and repeated scandals (including the one that triggered Magyar’s break with FIDESZ) made a fifth consecutive victory impossible under “normal” conditions.

Hence the question: is Péter Magyar’s entry on the scene – coincidence or construction?

Péter Magyar, 45, a former Fidesz member since 2002, is a former high-ranking official in regime-controlled state institutions and the ex-husband of a former Minister of Justice and European Affairs in the Orbán government. The son of communist lawyers and the son-in-law and nephew of former Hungarian President Ferenc Mádl, he grew up in a privileged environment, with an early interest in politics – as a child he had a poster of Viktor Orbán (then an anti-communist leader) on his wall.

With this background, Magyar suddenly appears in February 2024 as a “renegade”. He launches an anti-corruption petition, – following the child sexual abuse scandal that led to the resignation of President Katalin Novak – joins a party called Tisza with remnants of the legendary communist structure SZT (Hungarian officers undercover in civilian institutions) among its founders, and, in just two years, transforms an obscure party into a force with 53% of the vote and a two-thirds supermajority. For supporters of the bluff theory, the chronology is too perfect: an insider who knows all the mechanisms of the system, who criticizes exactly those aspects that Orbán could sacrifice (the corruption of second-rate oligarchs, not the inner circle), and who promises a European “reset” without completely dismantling the power structures (justice, media, economy).

“Why would a man so close to the regime let a mass movement build without being stopped in its tracks?”, ask various Hungarian observers. Orbán survived the 2022-2023 crisis precisely through total control. If Magyar had been a real threat, he would have been destroyed like everyone else – through dossiers, controlled press or compromise.

Arguments in favor of the theory also include Orbán’s suspiciously quick “surrender” after about 60% of the votes counted, the absence of massive contestations of the results (although Fidesz claimed minor irregularities) and the fact that Tisza maintains a conservative center-right line on issues such as immigration and national sovereignty – exactly what an “Orbán 2.0” would allow in the future, in a different form. In fact, the Hungarian parliament is currently unique: two right-wing parties, TISZA and FIDESZ, one far-right party, Mi Hazánk (Our Fatherland), and zero leftists.

In a country where Viktor Orbán has demonstrated extraordinary tactical mastery over the past 16 years, the idea of ​​a “controlled opposition” is not exactly science fiction, but a strategic possibility. The Trojan Horse scenario, if you will.

Is Péter Magyar Orbán’s great invention for the survival of the system?hT

ee hypothesis that Péter Magyar — a former member of the hard core of Fidesz and former husband of the Minister of Justice — is, in fact, a clever safety valve created by the Orbán system itself, is starting to take shape in the form of an analysis of long-term survival. Sociological data from the past 2-3 years clearly indicated that Fidesz had reached a saturation point. The erosion of power, record inflation and international isolation have created an electorate “tired of Orbán”, but still afraid of the old left opposition (associated with the Gyurcsány era).

In this context, a character like Péter Magyar is the perfect solution: he speaks the same language, because he uses sovereignist rhetoric, conservative values ​​and national symbolism, he channels the anger, taking over the votes of those disappointed with Fidesz, who would otherwise have stayed home or voted for a radical opposition. And, very importantly, he maintains the system in the family: if power passes from Orbán to a former Fidesz cadre, the economic structures and the state oligarchy have a much better chance of surviving than, say, under a radical pro-European left-wing government.

How did a “traitor” manage to organize the largest protests in Hungarian history without being legally or administratively blocked in an almost completely captured state? The cynical answer could be: because he was left.f

If this hypothesis is true, Viktor Orbán did not lose everything yesterday, but gained time. A Magyar government could bring a reset of relations with the EU, funds will start flowing to Budapest again, as Brussels will want to reward “democracy”, whitewashing the image – Hungary gets rid of the “black sheep” label, while the deep structures (the Hungarian Deep State created by Fidesz) remain intact.

Orbán can now pose as a victim of external forces, preparing a messianic comeback in 4 years (he has already announced this), if the new government, formed by people without massive administrative experience, fails to manage the economic crises.éP

terr Magyar insists that he is Orbán’s number one enemy. However, in Budapest politics, reality often has several layers. If in the coming months we see that the big oligarchs close to Fidesz keep their contracts and that no major criminal investigation touches the extended “family” of the old regime, then yesterday’s victory will be confirmed as what more and more people suspect: a brilliant bluff to save the system, changing only the facade, exactly as happened in Romania, during the Revolution. (Bogdan Tiberiu Iacob)

Asking “who shot Charlie Kirk?”:

“…the FBI, which showed up at the scene astonishingly quickly and proceeded to take charge, may have had prior knowledge of what was about to take place.”

The first part of this assertion is incorrect, as everyone could see for themselves. By late September 2025 it was clear to anyone who closely followed the event and its aftermath, that the Tyler Robinson narrative was a hoax.

Multiple video evidence from various viewpoints unmistakably shows that Kirk was shot from at least four different directions simultaneously at close range, in two instances within a distance under two meters, from the top rear to the back of the head, the projectile exiting at the throat, and from below near his legs, entering at the left chest and exiting at the left shoulder behind the arm pit. These two projectiles were propelled by the rapid discharge of high pressure gas (theoretically at the speed of sound at the exit and very low temperature upon expansion). The projectiles were likely customized infra-red beam projectors with a sharp-edged ridge. The camera with zoom lens behind him had an infra-red sensor. Did you notice the various accomplices looking at their cell phones? They were monitoring the live camera image being sent, of the targeting beam pointing to his head. The video of Kirk being placed into the vehicle shows both the entry wound to the head and exit wound at the back of the shoulder. The still shot of Kirk’s distorted face is the result of the projectile passing through his brain while being bombarded with gas discharge at high speed from the rear and front.

Two guys just outside the inner perimeter used small gas pressure devices to shoot pellets, one from the front, identified as Rick Cutler (who was surrounded by three accomplices, the female to his right was viewing the phone camera screen), who likely triggered the other discharges. From Kirk’s right side, a man with white T-shirt and white visor cap was seen dealing with the resulting recoil from his device, which looked like a cell phone and probably also was equipped with a range finder to allow him to point it in the right direction. Another guy with white T-shirt and cap, facing the crowd while monitoring the display screen of his phone, gave the go-ahead signal immediately prior to the simultaneous discharges. Had the algorithms at X.Com boosted the incriminating videos instead of suppressing them, then publications like the Daily Mail, which specialized in sensationalism, would have amplified these revelations to the general public. Instead, not even the author of this piece seems to understand what actually happened.
A dozen suspicious characters were seen on video before and immediately after the public execution and certainly were involved in the operation. The modus operandi of this killing was obviously predicated upon any law enforcement not showing up at the murder scene to clear and investigate the site. Instead, as is evident from the video shot from a bystander immediately afterwards, the murder device behind Kirk was dismantled, and the electronics board (communications and sensors) subsequently taken from the camera and handed to another accomplice. Two guys in disguise, with firearms, were supervising the destruction of evidence and controlled the situation. This implies complicity by the FBI to allow the assassination team to their thing. The key operatives were whisked away in a Bombardier 300 jet within an hour, which then turned off its transponder in mid-flight and most certainly switched on a different code to coincide with that of an airplane destined to Los Angeles. Since all these aspects of the operation were allowed to occur, the logical deduction is simply that Netanyahu had coerced Trump to acquiesce in Kirk’s killing beforehand and order authorities to stand down.

In retrospect, it appears obvious that Trump had already made a firm commitment to attacking Iran again during the early summer of 2025, immediately after a ceasefire had been reached in the wake of the severe damage Israel had incurred by targeted bombing of its installations by Iran. In retrospect, it is not difficult to appreciate that in order to “finally finish the job” (Netanyahu’s desire to obliterate Iran, for nearly four decades), the following preparations were regarded as necessary before attempting to follow through:

• Curtail the supply of cruise missiles on behalf of Ukraine to defend from Russian attacks, so that they would be available to use against Iran instead;

• Get rid of Charlie Kirk because of his staunch opposition to attacks against Iran and his influence to sway the opinion of Christian Zionists;

• Secure the control over Tic-Tok social media, as well as key news and entertainment media outlets by Netanyahu’s friend Larry Ellison, so as to shape the propaganda narrative;

• Prepare to take control of alternative crude oil sources in Venezuela as a back-up to counteract the expected oil shortage due to Iran’s control of the Hormuz straits;

• Rename the Department of Defense to the Department of War, to manipulate and normalize the public mind-set of a stauch commitment to engage in a protracted war;

• Deliver and allow Israel to retrofit the F-35I Adir fighter jet with external fuel tanks in order to enable the attack Iran without the need to refuel on a round-trip attack mission, a crucial upgrade that did not occur until late last year.

Looking back in American history, this is now the fifth time when a US president was coerced into going to war on behalf of Zionist interests – and against American interests:

• Justice Louis Brandeis convinced a compromised Woodrow Wilson to take the United States to war in late March 1917, even though in his second inaugural speech at the beginning of the month he had reiterated a stance of neutrality; he had won re-election because he promised to keep the country out of the war but in early April, on Good Friday Congress had declared war against Germany at his request; his foolish action led to the Balfour Declaration a few months later and changed the course of history in Europe.

• Lyndon Johnson, who had coordinated the assassination of President Kennedy, apparently collaborated in an Israeli false flag attack on the USS Liberty ship in June 1967 in order to then attack Egypt on Israel’s behalf; the Israeli attack failed because the ship did not sink and was able to radio for help, so the planned attack on Egypt was called off.

• After having received a diplomatic green light from the US Ambassador, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in August 1990, before German unification took effect, and made a retreat contingent upon Israel also abandoning control over Jerusalem, which was generally consistent with the objective of GHW Bush; however he came under intense pressure by Zionists and eventually organized a coalition for a limited counter-attack in early 1991, under UN approval.

• In the wake of the false flag attack on September 11, 2001, George W Bush was bamboozled to go to war against Iraq, under the false pretense of needing to destroy purported weapons of mass destruction there, which became an elaborate and expensive crusade (“war against terror”) that began at the spring equinox in 20023, a few days after Purim, and allowed Israel to destabilize the entire Middle East region.

• As of a few weeks ago, we are experiencing a replay of some of the aforementioned aspects. Trump has betrayed the American cause he had promised to support. His behavior is even worse than that of the two worst presidents of the 20th century, Wilson and Johnson. He will likely be remembered for being the worst US president the country has ever had. As a consequence, it may be necessary to change the US Constitution to never allow something like this again.