“Xi Jinping did not want to meet with Putin on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in India.”

More likely that Mr. Xi is seeking to demonstrate to his “friend” his dissatisfaction with the “overly multi‑vector friendship.” In the current context, when D. Trump is seeking to destroy Iran — a real (albeit situational) ally of China — and is actively looking for ways to somehow “involve” Russia in resolving this problem, which is of utmost importance to the United States (even if only through making extremely broad and completely unfeasible promises), the Kremlin’s active стремление towards “American mediation” is objectively disadvantageous for China, which supports Iran in every way it can (within reason).
In the long term, Beijing rightly fears that if a “peace agreement” (which unequivocally signifies Russia’s strategic defeat) is nevertheless concluded under the “patronage” of the United States, then the “price” that the US will demand from Moscow “for the favor” will de facto be Moscow’s “return” under the US “umbrella.”

And this means (again, inevitably) The imminent transformation of the “pacified” Russia into Washington’s “satellite” SPECIFICALLY AGAINST CHINA — at present, the main and only competitor of the United States in the competition / struggle for global hegemony. Currently, Russia depends on China “more than in anything” — without Chinese imports, we (thanks to a quarter‑century‑long ideology of a “great energy power” that “doesn’t need to produce anything — we’ll buy everything!”) simply won’t be able to produce anything (or almost anything) now, including in the field of weapons, equipment, and ammunition.

Even a temporary cessation of trade with the PRC would mean the collapse of all our military (and not only military) production, trade, and the import of necessary goods, services, raw materials, etc. DUE TO OUR OWN EFFORTS (especially the “success” of our military actions against the so‑called “Ukraine”) we have found ourselves in almost complete economic isolation, and China is our only somewhat reliable “window to the outside world.”

And as long as the special military operation continues, there is no alternative to this situation, no matter how disadvantageous or inconvenient it may be for our economy and politics. Only a COMPLETE victory over the so‑called “Ukraine” will make it possible to PARTIALLY break free from dependence on access to the Chinese market, economic aid, and industrial potential. However, this is not expected in the near future (thanks to the “extraordinary” nature of our military and political leadership). (I would like to be wrong, but it’s “very unlikely”).

Even an unlikely “complete shift to the US camp” would not abolish sanctions, reparations, or the blockade for years and years (or even decades).

On the contrary, we would find ourselves even more dependent on the US than we are now on China (and by a much larger margin!) — since this dependence would be not only economic but also military‑political! Washington will be able to DIRECTLY ORDER Moscow to do absolutely anything it pleases (under this scenario, with 100 percent probability, even those “fig leaves” that will initially be used to cover up our surrender in the so‑called “Ukraine” will be revised and annulled — we will be stripped of “everything,” forced to “pay and repent,” and, most importantly, FORCED TO TURN AGAINST CHINA as a US satellite with no say in the matter).

Naturally, even a distant and unlikely (Although?!?) The possibility of such a “180‑degree turn” cannot please Beijing, nor can it be “arranged” in any way. China will not calmly observe such a “turn.” I believe that this is exactly what Mr. Xi is demonstrating — by “hinting” to his “Moscow friend” that further steps in this direction will not only “meet with no understanding” but will also be assessed accordingly by the Celestial Empire. And that in Beijing, the rulers are not so “flexible to the point of complete amorphousness” as to allow “multi‑vector allies” (the weakest in almost every respect and extremely dependent on their Chinese comrades) to “defect” to the enemy’s camp (and, incidentally, to our enemy as well!) without the most sensitive (for us) and negative consequences.

Furthermore, I dare to suggest that the person who was recently “courted at the highest level” (“almost as an equal”) The greatest geopolitical figure of our time has now (according to Chinese standards) “significantly lowered his status” by holding personal, direct negotiations with SOME relatives of the American president—relatives with whom, in China itself, no one even at the ministerial level would likely communicate, given their actual and formal status. Thus (after friendly meetings and negotiations with the ruler of the Celestial Empire himself!)

This concludes my letter. We’ll be monitoring the situation…
With respect and gratitude, sincerely appreciative of you, I. V. Girkin.
17.09.2026
(Letter to comrade Getmanov Alexander)

by Claudiu Secara

A big question has long been in the air. What would be the outcome of a direct confrontation between the 550 million Europeans and Russia’s 100 million Russians (OK, 150 million if we add the colonized peoples)? How could Russia win against the European Union? The Russians were eager to tell you: We have the only source of energy; without us they are dead. Whether by design or by accident, the Middle East is all destroyed; the African sources, especially Libyan, have been shut down, and we, we Russia are the last and the only salvation for European industries.

Zakharova and the midget Medvedev are both proclaiming the end of European Nazis. “They all are Nazis!” If you are suspicious of Russia, you are a Nazi.” Just like, if you question the war crimes committed by Israel, you are an anti-Semite. So what?

But, but… Shocking news is coming from Canada and even Australia. They have decided that the ultra Zionist America is a lost cause. They are joining forces with the Europeans. Now what? 30 million Canadians, how much do they count? Is that just a quirk bit of nonsense promoted by the existing prime minister of Canada?

Well, Canada, and Australia still listen to London, and London is coordinating the European strategy. And London has decided to bring the heavy weights into the equation. Little Canada has plentiful gas and oil and timber and minerals, you name it. And now, overnight, it’s part of Europe’s sources of energy, of know how, of vast land resources and much more. Add Australia, if it comes to that.

Now Russia is facing a really formidable adversary. No sarcasm thrown around by the Zionist Zhaharova, this time.

A second interesting development is what Lavrov just recently.warned about. He said: “there are rumors about a future condominium between China and the US. We reject that.” Wait a minute, Russia is not in the multi-polar new world order? Only the US and China?

The interesting thing is that Russia is getting cold feet about multi-polarity, but if we see these latest developments from the European perspective, is it actually possible that both, the bankrupt US and Russia, are the big losers– and the world is moving away from the condominium of US/Russia to the condominium of China and the EU. Is that possible?

At this point, it seems not only desirable but actually possible. Very possible.

The clownish America, pardon me, the clownish and lunatic Trump, is a very sad spectacle. A once great nation is coming down to ridicule. At the same time the formidable Red Army cannot defeat an improvised half unmotivated army of former co-nationals in a long 5 years of war. Russia and the United States are showing the world that they are living only on hubris and past mythologies. They both are tired and fat. Their generals are fat and corrupt. And definitely Trump is one of the fattest and most corrupt US presidents ever.

From greatness to degeneracy is only a small step, as Napoleon once said.