Asking “who shot Charlie Kirk?”:

“…the FBI, which showed up at the scene astonishingly quickly and proceeded to take charge, may have had prior knowledge of what was about to take place.”

The first part of this assertion is incorrect, as everyone could see for themselves. By late September 2025 it was clear to anyone who closely followed the event and its aftermath, that the Tyler Robinson narrative was a hoax.

Multiple video evidence from various viewpoints unmistakably shows that Kirk was shot from at least four different directions simultaneously at close range, in two instances within a distance under two meters, from the top rear to the back of the head, the projectile exiting at the throat, and from below near his legs, entering at the left chest and exiting at the left shoulder behind the arm pit. These two projectiles were propelled by the rapid discharge of high pressure gas (theoretically at the speed of sound at the exit and very low temperature upon expansion). The projectiles were likely customized infra-red beam projectors with a sharp-edged ridge. The camera with zoom lens behind him had an infra-red sensor. Did you notice the various accomplices looking at their cell phones? They were monitoring the live camera image being sent, of the targeting beam pointing to his head. The video of Kirk being placed into the vehicle shows both the entry wound to the head and exit wound at the back of the shoulder. The still shot of Kirk’s distorted face is the result of the projectile passing through his brain while being bombarded with gas discharge at high speed from the rear and front.

Two guys just outside the inner perimeter used small gas pressure devices to shoot pellets, one from the front, identified as Rick Cutler (who was surrounded by three accomplices, the female to his right was viewing the phone camera screen), who likely triggered the other discharges. From Kirk’s right side, a man with white T-shirt and white visor cap was seen dealing with the resulting recoil from his device, which looked like a cell phone and probably also was equipped with a range finder to allow him to point it in the right direction. Another guy with white T-shirt and cap, facing the crowd while monitoring the display screen of his phone, gave the go-ahead signal immediately prior to the simultaneous discharges. Had the algorithms at X.Com boosted the incriminating videos instead of suppressing them, then publications like the Daily Mail, which specialized in sensationalism, would have amplified these revelations to the general public. Instead, not even the author of this piece seems to understand what actually happened.
A dozen suspicious characters were seen on video before and immediately after the public execution and certainly were involved in the operation. The modus operandi of this killing was obviously predicated upon any law enforcement not showing up at the murder scene to clear and investigate the site. Instead, as is evident from the video shot from a bystander immediately afterwards, the murder device behind Kirk was dismantled, and the electronics board (communications and sensors) subsequently taken from the camera and handed to another accomplice. Two guys in disguise, with firearms, were supervising the destruction of evidence and controlled the situation. This implies complicity by the FBI to allow the assassination team to their thing. The key operatives were whisked away in a Bombardier 300 jet within an hour, which then turned off its transponder in mid-flight and most certainly switched on a different code to coincide with that of an airplane destined to Los Angeles. Since all these aspects of the operation were allowed to occur, the logical deduction is simply that Netanyahu had coerced Trump to acquiesce in Kirk’s killing beforehand and order authorities to stand down.

In retrospect, it appears obvious that Trump had already made a firm commitment to attacking Iran again during the early summer of 2025, immediately after a ceasefire had been reached in the wake of the severe damage Israel had incurred by targeted bombing of its installations by Iran. In retrospect, it is not difficult to appreciate that in order to “finally finish the job” (Netanyahu’s desire to obliterate Iran, for nearly four decades), the following preparations were regarded as necessary before attempting to follow through:

• Curtail the supply of cruise missiles on behalf of Ukraine to defend from Russian attacks, so that they would be available to use against Iran instead;

• Get rid of Charlie Kirk because of his staunch opposition to attacks against Iran and his influence to sway the opinion of Christian Zionists;

• Secure the control over Tic-Tok social media, as well as key news and entertainment media outlets by Netanyahu’s friend Larry Ellison, so as to shape the propaganda narrative;

• Prepare to take control of alternative crude oil sources in Venezuela as a back-up to counteract the expected oil shortage due to Iran’s control of the Hormuz straits;

• Rename the Department of Defense to the Department of War, to manipulate and normalize the public mind-set of a stauch commitment to engage in a protracted war;

• Deliver and allow Israel to retrofit the F-35I Adir fighter jet with external fuel tanks in order to enable the attack Iran without the need to refuel on a round-trip attack mission, a crucial upgrade that did not occur until late last year.

Looking back in American history, this is now the fifth time when a US president was coerced into going to war on behalf of Zionist interests – and against American interests:

• Justice Louis Brandeis convinced a compromised Woodrow Wilson to take the United States to war in late March 1917, even though in his second inaugural speech at the beginning of the month he had reiterated a stance of neutrality; he had won re-election because he promised to keep the country out of the war but in early April, on Good Friday Congress had declared war against Germany at his request; his foolish action led to the Balfour Declaration a few months later and changed the course of history in Europe.

• Lyndon Johnson, who had coordinated the assassination of President Kennedy, apparently collaborated in an Israeli false flag attack on the USS Liberty ship in June 1967 in order to then attack Egypt on Israel’s behalf; the Israeli attack failed because the ship did not sink and was able to radio for help, so the planned attack on Egypt was called off.

• After having received a diplomatic green light from the US Ambassador, Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in August 1990, before German unification took effect, and made a retreat contingent upon Israel also abandoning control over Jerusalem, which was generally consistent with the objective of GHW Bush; however he came under intense pressure by Zionists and eventually organized a coalition for a limited counter-attack in early 1991, under UN approval.

• In the wake of the false flag attack on September 11, 2001, George W Bush was bamboozled to go to war against Iraq, under the false pretense of needing to destroy purported weapons of mass destruction there, which became an elaborate and expensive crusade (“war against terror”) that began at the spring equinox in 20023, a few days after Purim, and allowed Israel to destabilize the entire Middle East region.

• As of a few weeks ago, we are experiencing a replay of some of the aforementioned aspects. Trump has betrayed the American cause he had promised to support. His behavior is even worse than that of the two worst presidents of the 20th century, Wilson and Johnson. He will likely be remembered for being the worst US president the country has ever had. As a consequence, it may be necessary to change the US Constitution to never allow something like this again.