What’s Going on in Sudan?

The battle in Sudan is between these two men, the 65-year-old Al-Barhan, the coup master who overthrew Omar al-Bashir with a military coup and has been the unofficial but undisputed ruler of Sudan for almost 4 years, and the 46-year-old Mohammad Hamdan Daglu, nicknamed Hamidti, the commander of the The quick reaction and the former deputy of the Transitional Council of Sudan, who considered the coup in Sudan wrong not long ago and is against the normalization of relations with Israel.

Al-Burhan, Head of Sudan’s Transitional Governance Council: The situation is under control, the rapid response military should not be a tool of personal ambitions.

Commander Hamidati: The situation in some parts of the capital is under our control and we will not rest until al-Barhan is brought to justice.

Poland Would Not Survive a Russia vs. NATO War – Medvedev

Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has claimed that Poland would cease to exist if a direct war were to occur between Russia and NATO, regardless of the outcome. He was responding to remarks by Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, who expressed confidence that the Western alliance would win such a conflict.

Morawiecki, who is currently visiting the US, commented on the Ukrainian conflict in an interview with NBC News on Friday. Host Kristen Welker asked whether he was concerned that Ukrainian strikes outside its territory risked “a wider war, drawing Poland… into the conflict.”

The prime minister replied that he was not concerned, as it would be “a war between Russia and NATO, and Russia would lose this war very quickly.”

“They believe that fighting with Ukraine they are fighting with the West and fighting with NATO, whereas the fact of the matter is that we are only supporting a brutally invaded country”, Morawiecki said.

Medvedev, who serves as deputy chair of Russia’s National Security Council, tweeted in response that he was not so certain about which side would win, “but considering Poland’s role as a NATO outpost in Europe, this country is sure to disappear together with its stupid prime minister.”

The Russian official has previously warned against a possible escalation of the Ukraine conflict, which Moscow perceives as a proxy war against it by the US and its allies. If that were to happen, hostilities could go nuclear, Medvedev believes, and all sides would be catastrophically harmed. The former president has branded European leaders who underestimate this risk as incompetent.

Morawiecki is one of the most outspoken critics of Russia and its involvement in Ukraine. He has claimed the country is similar to Nazi Germany in its goals and methods, and accused nations in the EU that do not fully support Ukraine, of appeasing Moscow.

During his visit to the US, the Polish leader delivered a speech to the Atlantic Council, a pro-NATO think-tank, in which he reiterated his case for investing in Ukraine. If Kiev loses, he claimed, the West’s “golden age” may end. (Ed. Note: which most probably, it will.)

A New Phase in Ukraine War

Makarov says:

What is the leadership of Russia doing and why is there no offensive of the Russian army? Russia is now building a mass army for mass warfare. Prior to the SVO, Putin recreated two types of modern army. 1. Fully modern modernized strategic forces for nuclear confrontation.
2. Troops for wars in the style of a special operation. They showed themselves superbly in the Crimea and Syria.
3. But it turned out that in Ukraine the war is going on in the form of a mass war, like in the Second World War. Russia did not have such an army.
4. Yes, and no one had, except for the artificially over-militarized Ukraine. Those due to the constant civil war with the Donbass created such a massive army.
5. In 2022, they wanted to carry out the NWO as a special operation. It didn’t work out.
6. Now Putin and the Ministry of Defense are building such a massive army that Russia did not have in 2022.
7. It requires significantly more military. They are now being recruited both under contract and mobilization. And it requires massive deliveries of weapons and equipment. For this, the military-industrial complex of Russia is now being launched.
8. The timing of the implementation of the construction of this army of the third type? And the timing plans and their implementation is a strict military secret. But the building machine of this third army is running at full speed.

Also, Dmitry Medvedev said that Russia needs all of Ukraine. Otherwise, the rest of Ukraine will rot endlessly. Well, everyone knows this, even the unfortunate inhabitants of Ukraine. But Medvedev’s announcement means Russia has no plans to stop at the Dnieper.

Brazil’s Lula Calls for End to Dollar Trade Dominance

— The Financial Times https://www.ft.com/content/669260a5-82a5-4e7a-9bbf-4f41c54a6143

Brazil’s president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has called on developing countries to work towards replacing the US dollar with their own currencies in international trade, lending his voice to Beijing’s efforts to end the greenback’s dominance of global commerce. Kicking off his first state visit to China since taking office in January, Lula called for the countries of the so-called Brics group of nations — which in addition to Brazil and China includes Russia, India and South Africa — to come up with their own alternative currency for use in trade. “Every night I ask myself why all countries have to base their trade on the dollar,” Lula said in an impassioned speech at the New Development Bank in Shanghai, known as the “Brics bank”.

“Why can’t we do trade based on our own currencies?” he added, drawing loud applause from the audience of Brazilian and Chinese dignitaries. “Who was it that decided that the dollar was the currency after the disappearance of the gold standard?” Lula’s call to shed dollar dependence dovetailed with Beijing’s increasing efforts to promote use of the renminbi in settlement of cross-border commodities trades, as Chinese policymakers seek to strengthen the role of the world’s second-largest economy in the global financial system. The warm reception in Shanghai also came as Brazil’s leftist leader has sought to redirect the country’s foreign policy to a more multilateralist stance, with an emphasis not only on good relations with the US — he visited President Joe Biden in February — but also with China and the developing world.

Lula’s far-right predecessor Jair Bolsonaro had prioritised bilateral ties with the US under former president Donald Trump and other nations led by populist leaders such as Hungary and Israel. China’s leader Xi Jinping will be keen to persuade the Brazilian president when they meet on Friday to demonstrate that appetite for rebalancing by backing a number of Beijing’s foreign policy initiatives. These range from the Belt and Road trade and infrastructure programme to other schemes that seek to create alternative international governance systems to those dominated by the US. Bilateral trade has ballooned over the past decade to $150.4bn last year, with China buying Brazil’s agricultural commodities and minerals and investing in the Latin American country’s large consumer market and infrastructure sector. On Thursday, Lula also visited Huawei, the Chinese telecom equipment company that is subject to US sanctions.

The growing economic relationship has encouraged both countries to promote greater use of their respective currencies in bilateral trade. This week, the Brazilian branch of the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China settled its first transaction directly in renminbi in the country, Chinese state media reported.

Lula, who was also in Shanghai for the inauguration of his protégé, former Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff, as head of the New Development Bank, used the occasion to make impassioned speech about the need for the Brics countries to trade in their own currencies. Aside from the Brics, the bank’s membership includes Egypt, Bangladesh, Uruguay and the United Arab Emirates. “Who decided that our currencies were weak, that they didn’t have value in other countries?” he said. “Why can’t a bank like that of the Brics have a currency to finance trade relations between Brazil and China, between Brazil and other countries? It’s difficult because we are unaccustomed [to the idea]. Everyone depends on just one currency.” Data from global payments platform Swift shows the Chinese currency’s share of trade finance has more than doubled to 4.5 per cent since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year, largely on the back of a boom in shipments between Russia and China.

On the Transformation of German Greens into Atlanticist War Mongers

by Gilbert Doctorow

A couple of days ago, the American Committee for US-Russia Accord, the successor organization to a similarly named think tank which I co-founded with the late Professor Stephen Cohen, published an essay by former U.S State Department expert on Russia and long time free-lance publicist James Carden explaining how and why the once-upon-a-time peaceable German Greens became the strident war mongers in Chancellor Scholz’s cabinet.

See https://usrussiaaccord.org/acura-viewpoint-james-w-carden-ostpolitik-down-but-not-out/

I fully agree with James Carden’s assessment of the deplorable role that the Greens have played in overturning the heritage of Ostpolitik going back 50 years to Willy Brandt and his Social Democratic party, a doctrine of rapprochement with Russia which essentially guided German foreign policy whatever the composition of coalition governments up to about 2012, when Merkel let lapse the strategic partnership with Russia.

However, I disagree with Carden and with the academic and political sources that informed his report on the peaceable nature of the German Greens until recent days. To my understanding, an anti-Russian dimension was incorporated in the party fiber by one of its early members, Joschka Fischer, and by one of its leaders in the new millennium, Daniel Cohn-Bendit. To the environmentalist agenda, which the broad public understood to be the content of Greens, they welded on a foreign policy plank that was Neocon in all but name. Like the American Neocons, Fischer and Cohn-Bendit were born again former radical Leftists.

Several readers of an early version of this text have reminded me that the support which Joschka Fischer gave to the American-led bombing of Serbia in 1999 marked their “coming out of the US/NATO Closet.” At that point, many if not most of the original pacifists among the Greens quit the party.

The lightly camouflaged Russophobia at the core of the German Greens came to the fore at about 2012, when the United States aggressively pursued its sanctions policy against Russia under what we know as the Magnitsky Law. German Greens in the European Parliament made common cause with the viciously anti-Russian faction of about 70 MEPs headed by former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt to promote a “European Magnitsky Act.” They brought over to Europe the evil genius behind the Magnitsky Act, Bill Browder, and he twice made appearances at conferences in the Parliament to lobby for this Act. I know. I was there as an invited guest of one MEP who vehemently opposed the anti-Russian policies. At the time, the anti-Russian resolutions were supported by perhaps two-thirds of the Parliamentarians. Such measures are supported today by about 90% of the MEPs.

I mention the year 2012 as being a turning point. Coincidentally, in that year the Greens’ leader Cohn-Bendit co-authored a book with Verhofstadt entitled Debout l’Europe(Arise Europe!), thereby publicly sealing this nominally Right-Left alliance to further an agenda of creating a federal Europe with an anti-Russian foreign orientation.

Since Verhofstadt’s name is probably little known to readers outside of Belgium, allow me to mention that as the Prime Minister from the Flemish Liberals 1999-2008 his domestic policy was inspired by Margaret Thatcher. After leaving his leadership post in Belgium, he moved his office just a kilometer away to the European Parliament, where he formed the Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe. In his capacity of Chairman of this Group, he drew upon viscerally anti-Russian Estonian politicians to guide his policies towards Russia, which entailed regime change activities including support for the anti-Putin politician Boris Nemtsov, who was the Navalny, or White Knight, if you will, of the time. This is the man with whom the Greens leader Cohn-Bendit worked hand in hand.

For those who wish to pursue these questions in greater depth, I direct you to two consecutive chapters in my 2015 collection of essays entitled Does Russia Have a Future? beginning with “The Indefatigable Bill Browder: Selling the Magnitsky Act to Europe.”

To bring us up to date and see who later went where, it is worth mentioning that after the 2017 election of Macron to the Presidency in France and the election of Macron-backed candidates to the European Parliament from his en marche political movement, Verhofstadt merged his own bloc with Macron’s to form the “Renew Europe” bloc that is a major grouping in the European Parliament today and is consistently anti-Russian.

During the period from 2012 to present, I have followed voting patterns in the European Parliament fairly closely and there was never any doubt that representatives of the German Greens were vocal and highly active in promoting resolutions condemning Russia for alleged human rights violations and under any other convenient pretext. If I may be allowed to name names, Rebecca Harms (Greens MEP, 2004-2019) was surely the biggest loudmouth in all efforts to present Russia as a pariah state.

For all of these reasons, I reject out of hand any suggestion that the deplorable behavior of the Green’s bubble-headed Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbok represents a new departure in an otherwise respectable German political party in the Ostpolitik tradition.

Before closing, I take issue with a minor point in Carden’s essay, which seeks to provide an optimistic note on where German foreign policy may be headed by pointing to the mass demonstrations in Berlin and elsewhere in Germany against the supply of lethal weapons to Ukraine. In particular, he mentions the Manifesto for peace issued jointly by the Leftist politician and Bundestag member Sahra Wagenknecht and the feminist leader Alice Schwarzer. Apart from the 50,000 who may have rallied at the Brandenburg Gates at the bidding of Wagenknecht and Schwarzer, there were more than 500,000 Germans and people from around the world who signed that open Manifesto online.

Regrettably Carden has not taken note of the first paragraph of that appeal, which flatly condemns Russia as the aggressor. Coming from Wagenknecht, who has been highly principled and never minced words in her public statements, this is a vile concession to the McCarthyism rampant in today’s Germany. Any public statement by German politicians of any stripe must open with this kind of Hail Mary, lest it be denounced as coming from a Putin stooge.

What Carden may not realize is that the public information space in Germany, in Europe as a whole, is far worse than in the United States. The USA is split politically 50-50 between pro- and anti-Trump forces. The result is a degree of conflicting views on foreign policy in the air waves that is incredible to anyone seated in Brussels, as I am. We have no Tucker Carlson shows (Fox News) drawing in audiences of 4 million viewers every evening and setting out in detail why the Biden administration’s foreign (and most every other) policy is a disaster. No, in Germany, apart from the “extreme Right” party Alternativ fuer Deutschland, there is hardly a dissenting voice to give Herr Scholz and his Foreign Minister from the Greens reasons to change course or to fear for their political survival.

Finally, I use the opportunity to mention the interpretation of Germany’s present policy with respect to the Ukraine war and its becoming the major supplier of heavy military equipment to Kiev. I take these remarks from what I hear and see on Russia’s leading political talk shows on state television, which generally are representative of the thinking of the political, academic and social elites. They now see what is going on in Germany as the rise of Revanchisme, the enthronement of those who had their fill of Germany’s public remorse and regret for its barbaric behavior at home and abroad in the 1930s and 1940s under Hitler. Alongside the now militarizing Japan, we are witnessing the formation of a new Axis which is in confrontation with a new Entente, meaning Russia and China. If this is so, then the future orientation of German politics will be decided on the field of battle in Ukraine, not in the coffee houses of Berlin.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2023

What is the Right Way to Live?

RJ Macready says: (edited by Algora)

[ . . . ] But there’s something that needs to be talked about…What is the right way to live? What is a good life?

Religion says relinquish all to God. But this is not a feasible path. Because all life, not just human life, not just modern civilization, but all life is a struggle – a fight to survive. Christianity may have its good aspects but its emphasis on spiritual hope is its undoing. It is anti nature. And this is why the white man, who is infused with morality and charity is in the state he is in. Morality and goodwill only work with like-minded human beings – call it anything you want, high-trust people, same race and blood, the untermensch kind…. It doesn’t matter. But it is the basic necessity for morality to work. If you don’t have such a system where like-minded higher people operate, morality becomes a weakness, a huge negative. Others trample on you. This is what is happening today. The blacks, the browns (I am one, myself) do not understand such concepts. They are, simply put, lesser beings. I will not elaborate on this.

Beyond morality, what a society needs is a good economic system. And this is where things get complicated. A good economy works when people have pride in their work. Because work, and whatever you create from it is the fulcrum of a fulfilling life. This is where the jew and the white man – especially the Germanic man (and the Japanese man) – come into the picture.

There is a reason both Germany and Japan have fantastic industries and their products are the finest in the world. German-made and Japanese-made are universal symbols of excellent craftsmanship be it automobiles or jeans.

Why is this the case? Ever wondered?

Because both these higher races of humans realized that great craftsmanship requires dedication and hard work. But the fruits of their labor go beyond money. It is pride and fulfilment….and above all, honor. These aspects give purpose to life beyond the bare basics of reproduction and heritage. Honor is the greatest good. Nobody knows the purpose of life, but if one lives with a strong code of honor, it gives life meaning. And an inner peace. Of course the product also brings money to live a life (food, shelter, hobbies) and the system thrives. Any system on earth operates on hard, honest work.

The Jew, because he was always been niggardly (in all of human history), became even more so when he was found out in every nation in the earlier days of history. This led to extreme ethnocentrism for self preservation.

The very fact that he went into money lending – the muckiest of professions – speaks about him. For what good is earning money by sitting on one’s own ass and lending it? The niggardly jew, inward looking as he always was, found a way to exploit and this led not only to an immense ethnocentrism but a deep-seated hatred for others, even the host on whose very land he operated. The jew is the polar opposite of the honor-driven teutonic German or the budisho-abiding Japanese. This is important to understand.

This sums up a big part of where this world went wrong…forget the wars and the blacks/trannies. This…haggling for money, bargaining….these are traits of a low race. This is anti honor and as such the opposite of good. Good isn’t believing in a higher power and hoping for salvation. Scam artist sadhus in India have been doing this for 4000 years. Good is living in a system where one must exist and live to the highest honor. To be your own God.

The haggler, the money lender, the cheap bargainer is a low organism. But this race not only runs the world today, he has infused these traits in every place today from Japan and Germany to American Wall Street and Australian outbacks. The code of honor is gone. It’s remnants still remain in some places….The german automobile factories still have traces of such ethos and they are still punctual and orderly. In Japan small businesses still operate on the honor of code. There are videos on YouTube of Japanese denim jeans and why they are so expensive. Or why a sushi chef charges so much for an afternoon’s work. What these videos don’t see is that the worker prides himself not on the money he makes but the work he does.

Capitalism, much like morality, works well amongst a higher race of human beings. And it is a necessity for the survival of any system and nation. It was the finest system ever devised for a mass of human beings. But …. It has been corrupted.

I am from India. I have put my own money and many years (two decades) into a system that is not just dysfunctional – dysfunctional isn’t bad, it can be improved – but immoral and dirty. Surrounded by low organisms, I have seen daily the struggle and pain that none of you have seen. (And trust me, to actually understand something one has to experience it first-hand; reading online or watching videos of scam artists or being taken for a ride one time doesn’t come close to actually understanding and living it daily.)

All the ills of a dysfunctional system – lack of ethics, lack of discipline, lack of punctuality, greed, avarice, jealousy – stem from this lack of honor. It surfaces physically with rudeness, haggling, pestering, ripping off the other for a small margin, etc., etc. You can see all this in any Indian or African marketplace. Go to buy a television or rice or even medicine, and you shall observe this.

I could have done a lot. I can still come to America and start a system there but…what’s the point? I come often, see the state of things and rue. You people, your system has been corrupted. And there is no returning back. This is the main crux of every problem. The trannies and lesser beings can be taken care of if a hard authoritarian system based on honor is put into place, but it won’t happen now. You should have gone the way of the Bushido samurai and the teutonic German knights but you chose the way of the jew, the slimy low-IQ Indian and the African.

Which again brings me to the question I asked above: What is the right way to live? What is a good life? Ponder over this.

Bert says:

Here is an example of the honor that you correctly identify as the principal loss that sank America.

In 1780, the British advanced their Southern Strategy, the concept of conquering the Southern Colonies after having been stalemated in the North, by besieging and taking Charles Town, South Carolina. The surrendered American Army included both Continental and militia units. The officers were paroled if they promised not to fight anymore, to go home and stay there. Colonel Andrew Pickens was one such militia officer who took parole. After a few months, a British raid into his Upcountry neighborhood involved vandalizing his home and farm. He reasoned that his oath of parole no longer applied because of the economic loss the British imposed upon him after he swore not to fight.

However, rather than simply reactivating his militia (the Long Canes Regiment), he rode to the nearest British post and informed the captain in command of the losses at his farm and of his decision to rejoin the Revolution (forthrightly explaining why he considered that he was not breaking his word but that the agreement had been annulled by the British side). He could have been seized and imprisoned, but because the captain was honorable also, Pickens left the post and became the most important militia leader in driving the British from South Carolina. Here were two men displaying honorable behavior that would be unthinkable today.

On Dying

by Gleb Georgevich Gerasimov, Slavyangrad (edited by Algora)

Many people like to say that they do not fear death, especially online. Many also mock death, again especially online. I do not quite understand the nature of what it takes to numb oneself to it, or to dehumanize someone simply because you’re viewing it with a glass barrier between you and them. But I have seen enough of these comments now to try and gather my thoughts on it and share this.

Death is pure terror.

The overwhelming majority of commentary on human behavior under life and death situations, combat stress, adrenal response, acute combat stress syndrome, and especially mockery of the dead, including the enemy, likely comes from folk who have never experienced a moment in which they truly believe they are about to die.

It doesn’t matter if it takes place in a fraction of a second in which one simply realizes that he is about to die on the spot, or takes place in the hospital where you know you’re dying and nothing can be done, or the interim period between these two.

The vast majority of human beings are not ready to die. We remain in denial to our final moments, even as our hearts and livers begin to fail, even as a matrix of prescribed medication keeps us alive. Then there comes a moment. The heart finally gives out and one wakes up in the hospital with a tube down the throat.

  • You’d want to ask so many questions – “what happened, am I ok, am I about to die, can I talk to my family?”
  • You’d want to tell them that you love them, but you cannot.
  • You’d want to apologize for every wrong you made to them, but you cannot.
  • You’d want to give them some final wise words to carry on after you’re gone, but you cannot.

You cannot speak. People are talking at you, perhaps your family is in the very room, but you are too weak to lift an arm or communicate more than perhaps a nod. You’re thirsty, extremely thirsty, but cannot ask for water. Your throat hurts. You are about to go away, about to disappear, and everything you ever were and ever could have been is about to vanish into the ether, and all the things you wish you could have left behind will be lost.

A man is shot. In that moment he likely feels no pain whatsoever, the adrenaline dulls it. But his body is no longer working as it should. He felt the “slap” of the round go in, but can’t quite tell where. He is unsure if it punctured his chest or stomach, and the fear comes that it may have been a vital organ. There is blood, but he is unsure if it’s arterial. He wants to stand, but finds that every time he gathers his legs under him he simply falls over again.

He knows that he is bleeding out. He cannot tourniquet it, he cannot call his wife, he cannot even thank his comrades and wish them well. He only has time to realize that he’s about to be dead, slur out, “I’m wounded, help”, and then go still – though still conscious, but unable to move his mouth.

A man is blown over by a shell. The pain is dulled, but he cannot stand. He does not know where he has been injured. He tries to do as trained and hooks his fingers and rakes them across his chest to look for blood. There is no hand present to do so. He tries to speak; his mouth will not move, and he reaches to assess with his other hand – there is no other hand either. He may not know it, but there is no jaw.

A man takes a grenade strike from a drone while traversing a river, and he is now underwater. He has already inhaled water from the shock and trauma when struck, he’s already coughing and gasping while underwater and inhaling more liquid as he does. His head is just centimeters below the surface, he need only sit up – but his legs do not work.

His arms instinctively thrash out for help, some part of his fading consciousness hoping on instinct that someone will be there to grab his hand and lift him out. No one does.

A man falls off an APC struck by fire. He strikes the back of his head and either loses consciousness or is rendered immobile. A man whom he knew by name sees him just as the APC is reversing in position, reaches out to try and grab him and drag him out of the way, too late, and the APC runs him over and crushes him.

A civilian driving in town feels a hammer-force blow to his head, his ears are deafened, there is a ringing. He opens his car door, thinking perhaps he was in an accident, only to fall out the door. He tries to stand, falls over again.

When he looks down, he sees that his legs are no longer there. He crawls his way to the sidewalk, takes a seat, and in that moment has no comprehension of what happened. He can only see that his legs are not there. He had been going to the store, and then to visit someone he knew. That someone he was going to visit will never know what he was thinking when he died, or what he could have hoped to say to them. He himself had to realize that his legs had been torn off, then understand that he was going to die, and in those very few seconds before losing consciousness, thought over everything he wished he could have said before to those he loved and every wasted moment that he did not.

A part of him wondered how his family would afford the rent in that moment.

Death is the inability to speak. Death is the inability to make up for past mistakes. Death is a flailing, desperate fear in which you realize that no matter how hard the spasm, no matter how hard your muscles work, no matter how loudly you scream, or how softly the whimper comes from your throat when you try to scream, that it is all about to end and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

It is pain, it is terror, it is undignified; it is the fear of knowing what is about to come next and fear of that coming pain.

There is a sound I still hear sometimes in my bad dreams. It is a very particular sound, one I cannot quite properly describe or explain – but when wounded men scream, there is sometimes a very particular tone to their voice. If you have not heard it before, you cannot imagine it, and I cannot comprehend how anyone hearing it could proceed to execute such a voice – and yet, men do.

Men in this state, already shot and wounded and down, scream for help, for mercy; and begging, they cry “Stop!”

As they are being shot to death, in their final panicked moments, they are not trying to communicate “Please don’t kill me” but instead are trying to communicate, “Please, stop killing me.”

Now…

Imagine all that from the mind of a child. A child who is used to, when hurt, crying for an adult and Mom and Dad will be there instantly to make it stop hurting.

Only this time, Mom and Dad don’t come – because Dad’s face has been torn off and he is trying to comprehend through the pain why he cannot see or speak, and the nine-year-old girl lying in a street in the city of Donetsk cannot process that she has been torn apart at the pelvic girdle, for she has no concept of anatomy, death, or terror – and whatever her father’s final thoughts may have been I do not know, but that the girl’s final thoughts were cries for “Mommy, Daddy,” I am certain.

I saw the footage of this girl’s mother, almost driven mad, screaming that her daughter is here and her daughter’s legs are there.

One can harden one’s heart and steel himself to such, in war. But I will say this – it ain’t funny, and it ain’t entertainment, and anyone who finds it such should check their own headspace.

“Worried about Russia’s PMC Wagner Group”

by Peter Carroll via DC Weekly

Insiders at the United States Department of Defense have told DCW staff they are worried about Russian Paramilitary Contractor (PMC) “Wagner.” An unnamed official says Wagner is the most Highly Organized and combat-ready private military company in the world, surpassing even that of American PMC Blackwater (also known as Academi), the British PMC Aegis Defense Service, the French PMC Salamandre.

According to the source, there is good reason for such worry; Various independent international institutions and analytical groups have recognized that the PMC Wagner as being the most effective Russian military unit, with the Military Company simultaneously performing combat missions on three continents – in Africa, Asia and Europe. This is absolutely unprecedented both in terms of geographical coverage and quality as well as quantity of missions assigned to the PMCs. One of the factors behind the success of the PMC Wagner is their ability to quickly mobilize and deploy forces anywhere in the world, responding to the changing situation on the spot. In addition, the soldiers of the armed forces are highly skilled and specialized. This allows Wagner to effectively carry out various types of tasks.

Compared with the aforementioned private military companies, (Blackwater, Aegis Defense Service and Salamandre), the operations and functions of the PMC Wagner are much more extensive and complex. Russian private fighters are not only helping leaders and governments of foreign countries in need of security. The highest level of training and equipment allows Wagner to provide security services at a level previously unattainable for private military units.

As the Russian war in Ukraine has shown, PMC Wagner is able to act in the interests of their country and maintain a high level of combat effectiveness despite obvious difficulties. Well-coordinated cooperative work of the headquarters allows their soldiers to perform the tasks set by Russia without the help or support of other units. One DOD official who acts as a liaison for American PMCs to whom we spoke, involved in these types of operations in Afghanistan said, “It’s absolutely mind boggling at their effectiveness. If we had employed similar strategies in Afghanistan, we wouldn’t have created the mess we left behind in the middle east.”

Asked why he thought they were so effective, he stated, “Well-coordinated work of all parts of the Wagner organization proves their effectiveness time after time. This factor makes it possible for Wagner soldiers to storm fortified objects without civilian casualties. In combat zones, PMC members carry out security and personnel protection tasks, as well as supporting a wide range of humanitarian operations, escorting convoys and guarding military objects.”

Obviously, with the significant volume of military missions and their geographic dispersion, a high level of organization of logistics chains and military-tactical communications are required. This is necessary to ensure the efficiency and safety of operations and includes all processes and operations related to the transportation and delivery of military vehicles, equipment, personnel, as well as various resources necessary for the successful achievement of the assigned goals. Logistics also takes into account all the conditions and specifics of a particular mission, such as the geographic, climatic and cultural aspects of the deployment location. Even the military units of the best world armies do not always manage to build a system of communications in such a way as to perform a range of combat tasks. Given the complexity and ramification of the goals of the PMC Wagner, its management is perfectly performing the assigned tasks.

According to many expert estimates, the fighters of the Wagner perform a number of tasks of increased complexity and risk. It’s not only a traditional for all PMCs missions such as protecting diplomatic missions, corteges, industrial and technological facilities such as factories, deposits of natural resources and laboratories. It is mainly the most difficult by its implementation combat operations: ground attacks, control of artillery, air weapons and air defense systems usage. Fighters of the PMC Wagner perform the tasks of intelligence, information gathering and data analysis, which later used to make strategic decisions during the missions.

The Private Military Company Wagner is one of the most discussed organizations in today’s world politics. Their effectiveness is widely recognized and beyond any doubt. The organization’s contribution to ensuring national security and protection of national interests has been the object of scrutiny of dozens of military experts around the world. War analysts are already trying to figure out the causes and factors of success of the Wagner PMCs for a long time. It should be clear that neither in today’s world nor ever before there was a structure similar to Wagner. The unique experience of Wagner will be studied by military analysts and international institutions in the field of security for years to come.

Xi Deflects Ursula, the Overseer

by Timur Fomenko, via RT

French President Emmanuel Macron has wrapped up a three-day visit to China, accompanied partly by European Commission Chief Ursula von der Leyen, who went home a day earlier.

The dual visit came at a time when EU nations, worried about a growing Sino-Russian partnership, are looking for ways to strengthen their own diplomatic engagement with Beijing.

Von der Leyen’s presence on the trip was widely seen as a “check” on Macron, there to ensure he complied with “European unity” on the matter of the EU’s relationship with China. Before the visit, she gave a hawkish address warning China against supporting Russia in the Ukraine conflict and slamming Beijing for becoming “more repressive at home and more assertive abroad.”

While she urged the bloc to reduce “dependencies” on China, she also opposed full “decoupling” of economies, as called for by the US. Enduring trade relations were made abundantly clear by the fact that Macron was accompanied by a 50-strong delegation of business leaders who came to Beijing to sign deals.

It is unusual that Macron, an advocate of the EU’s so-called “strategic autonomy” in negotiating with other actors on the world stage, and von der Leyen, an ardent atlanticist who is reportedly in the wings to be the next NATO secretary general, were both in China together.

Despite their somewhat conflicting agendas, their visit was a net positive for Beijing and a net negative for US attempts to force the EU to fully take its side in its own geopolitical crusade against Beijing. The US looks upon all attempts by the EU to engage with China with disdain, and does its best to undermine it where possible.

Likewise, when it comes to the Ukraine conflict, China’s effort to open talks by presenting its 12-step peace plan was immediately dismissed by Washington, with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken accusing Beijing of providing “diplomatic cover” for what he called Russia’s attempts to “freeze the war.” However, Xi Jinping’s recent visit to Moscow has apparently shown EU leaders, who would prefer the war to end rather than drag on indefinitely, the potential consequences of “losing China” – and now Macron is urging Xi to mediate a return to the negotiating table by “bringing Russia to its senses.”

In other words, many EU leaders, bar the overzealous and fanatical ones in states such as Lithuania, now realize that they must pursue a diplomatic effort to “keep China on board,” which in turn illustrates the tactical shrewdness of Xi Jinping in preserving his partnership with Moscow without explicitly endorsing the Ukraine conflict. This has given China geopolitical leverage.

It should also be noted that China has never sought to oppose Europe, but its principal objective has been to try and keep Europe out of the American camp at all costs. The EU, after all, collectively represents the largest export market China has in the developed world and is therefore critical to China’s growth and development.

Of course, on the other hand, the US has long been pushing very aggressively to undermine China’s prospects in the EU. It has been waging a public opinion war against Beijing, using its own state-sponsored think-tanks, and pushing issues such as human rights to create negative sentiment and to block engagement, such as on the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), which was proposed back in 2013 and is still pending ratification a decade later. Similarly, the US uses bilateral and unilateral diplomacy to undermine China’s relationships with specific European countries in a bid to wreck its attempts to engage with the bloc as a whole.

For example, the US explicitly supported Lithuania in undermining the ‘One China’ principle by opening a “Taiwan representative office.” It also forced the Netherlands to agree to new export controls on sending advanced lithography machines (used for making computer chips) to China. Similarly, because the EU could never agree to a comprehensive ban of Huawei’s application in 5G networks in 2020, the US simply resorted to bilaterally approaching countries one by one, making them agree to the ban until those states that were not on board, such as Germany, were effectively isolated and could not drive the EU agenda.

Ultimately, the EU is a bloc which can only operate by consensus between all of its member states, but if the US can undermine that consensus, it can throw a spanner in the works and break the entire machine. This is why it is so difficult for Europe to truly create an “autonomous” foreign policy capable of serving coherent “European interests.” This means when nations such as France and Germany declare their desire for engagement with China, they of course have influence, but the overall effect is never truly consistent. The bloc is being subjected to a constant tug of war in its foreign policy direction, which ultimately shows that Europe remains more of a passenger, rather than a player, in the world of US-China competition.

However, despite the traditional dominance of the US over Europe, Beijing is by no means out of the game, because as much as the US can play divide and conquer against EU countries, so can China – and the outcome of the visit demonstrates that very well. Having given von der Leyen and her message of “unity” a noticeably cooler reception, the Chinese hosted a cordial tea ceremony for Macron, after signing a joint communique that spoke at length about improving trade, economic and cultural ties, but made barely any mention of the main political sticking point between China and the EU – Beijing’s good relations with Moscow and Xi’s refusal to condemn Russian President Vladimir Putin over the Ukraine crisis.

For China, this is a clear win. For France, this is a win in terms of enduring business and economic relations with China, but a loss in that all of Macron’s attempt to change Xi’s mind on Putin and Ukraine were comprehensively stonewalled.

For von der Leyen, whose mission in Beijing was purely political, it was a complete failure. Not only did her message fall on deaf ears, the wooing of France continued unabated under her nose. But perhaps most importantly, the result of this visit dealt a blow to US agenda, showing that positive relations between China and the EU are worth working towards and Washington’s attempts to drive wedges between them are, so far, futile.

Judge Napolitano on Trump’s Uphill Battle – Must See