Category Archives: Uncategorized

“Xi Jinping did not want to meet with Putin on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in India.”

“Xi Jinping did not want to meet with Putin on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in India.”

More likely that Mr. Xi is seeking to demonstrate to his “friend” his dissatisfaction with the “overly multi‑vector friendship.” In the current context, when D. Trump is seeking to destroy Iran — a real (albeit situational) ally of China — and is actively looking for ways to somehow “involve” Russia in resolving this problem, which is of utmost importance to the United States (even if only through making extremely broad and completely unfeasible promises), the Kremlin’s active стремление towards “American mediation” is objectively disadvantageous for China, which supports Iran in every way it can (within reason).
In the long term, Beijing rightly fears that if a “peace agreement” (which unequivocally signifies Russia’s strategic defeat) is nevertheless concluded under the “patronage” of the United States, then the “price” that the US will demand from Moscow “for the favor” will de facto be Moscow’s “return” under the US “umbrella.”

And this means (again, inevitably) The imminent transformation of the “pacified” Russia into Washington’s “satellite” SPECIFICALLY AGAINST CHINA — at present, the main and only competitor of the United States in the competition / struggle for global hegemony. Currently, Russia depends on China “more than in anything” — without Chinese imports, we (thanks to a quarter‑century‑long ideology of a “great energy power” that “doesn’t need to produce anything — we’ll buy everything!”) simply won’t be able to produce anything (or almost anything) now, including in the field of weapons, equipment, and ammunition.

Even a temporary cessation of trade with the PRC would mean the collapse of all our military (and not only military) production, trade, and the import of necessary goods, services, raw materials, etc. DUE TO OUR OWN EFFORTS (especially the “success” of our military actions against the so‑called “Ukraine”) we have found ourselves in almost complete economic isolation, and China is our only somewhat reliable “window to the outside world.”

And as long as the special military operation continues, there is no alternative to this situation, no matter how disadvantageous or inconvenient it may be for our economy and politics. Only a COMPLETE victory over the so‑called “Ukraine” will make it possible to PARTIALLY break free from dependence on access to the Chinese market, economic aid, and industrial potential. However, this is not expected in the near future (thanks to the “extraordinary” nature of our military and political leadership). (I would like to be wrong, but it’s “very unlikely”).

Even an unlikely “complete shift to the US camp” would not abolish sanctions, reparations, or the blockade for years and years (or even decades).

On the contrary, we would find ourselves even more dependent on the US than we are now on China (and by a much larger margin!) — since this dependence would be not only economic but also military‑political! Washington will be able to DIRECTLY ORDER Moscow to do absolutely anything it pleases (under this scenario, with 100 percent probability, even those “fig leaves” that will initially be used to cover up our surrender in the so‑called “Ukraine” will be revised and annulled — we will be stripped of “everything,” forced to “pay and repent,” and, most importantly, FORCED TO TURN AGAINST CHINA as a US satellite with no say in the matter).

Naturally, even a distant and unlikely (Although?!?) The possibility of such a “180‑degree turn” cannot please Beijing, nor can it be “arranged” in any way. China will not calmly observe such a “turn.” I believe that this is exactly what Mr. Xi is demonstrating — by “hinting” to his “Moscow friend” that further steps in this direction will not only “meet with no understanding” but will also be assessed accordingly by the Celestial Empire. And that in Beijing, the rulers are not so “flexible to the point of complete amorphousness” as to allow “multi‑vector allies” (the weakest in almost every respect and extremely dependent on their Chinese comrades) to “defect” to the enemy’s camp (and, incidentally, to our enemy as well!) without the most sensitive (for us) and negative consequences.

Furthermore, I dare to suggest that the person who was recently “courted at the highest level” (“almost as an equal”) The greatest geopolitical figure of our time has now (according to Chinese standards) “significantly lowered his status” by holding personal, direct negotiations with SOME relatives of the American president—relatives with whom, in China itself, no one even at the ministerial level would likely communicate, given their actual and formal status. Thus (after friendly meetings and negotiations with the ruler of the Celestial Empire himself!)

This concludes my letter. We’ll be monitoring the situation…
With respect and gratitude, sincerely appreciative of you, I. V. Girkin.
17.09.2026
(Letter to comrade Getmanov Alexander)

The End of US/Russia Condominium is Near

by Claudiu Secara

A big question has long been in the air. What would be the outcome of a direct confrontation between the 550 million Europeans and Russia’s 100 million Russians (OK, 150 million if we add the colonized peoples)? How could Russia win against the European Union? The Russians were eager to tell you: We have the only source of energy; without us they are dead. Whether by design or by accident, the Middle East is all destroyed; the African sources, especially Libyan, have been shut down, and we, we Russia are the last and the only salvation for European industries.

Zakharova and the midget Medvedev are both proclaiming the end of European Nazis. “They all are Nazis!” If you are suspicious of Russia, you are a Nazi.” Just like, if you question the war crimes committed by Israel, you are an anti-Semite. So what?

But, but… Shocking news is coming from Canada and even Australia. They have decided that the ultra Zionist America is a lost cause. They are joining forces with the Europeans. Now what? 30 million Canadians, how much do they count? Is that just a quirk bit of nonsense promoted by the existing prime minister of Canada?

Well, Canada, and Australia still listen to London, and London is coordinating the European strategy. And London has decided to bring the heavy weights into the equation. Little Canada has plentiful gas and oil and timber and minerals, you name it. And now, overnight, it’s part of Europe’s sources of energy, of know how, of vast land resources and much more. Add Australia, if it comes to that.

Now Russia is facing a really formidable adversary. No sarcasm thrown around by the Zionist Zhaharova, this time.

A second interesting development is what Lavrov just recently.warned about. He said: “there are rumors about a future condominium between China and the US. We reject that.” Wait a minute, Russia is not in the multi-polar new world order? Only the US and China?

The interesting thing is that Russia is getting cold feet about multi-polarity, but if we see these latest developments from the European perspective, is it actually possible that both, the bankrupt US and Russia, are the big losers– and the world is moving away from the condominium of US/Russia to the condominium of China and the EU. Is that possible?

At this point, it seems not only desirable but actually possible. Very possible.

The clownish America, pardon me, the clownish and lunatic Trump, is a very sad spectacle. A once great nation is coming down to ridicule. At the same time the formidable Red Army cannot defeat an improvised half unmotivated army of former co-nationals in a long 5 years of war. Russia and the United States are showing the world that they are living only on hubris and past mythologies. They both are tired and fat. Their generals are fat and corrupt. And definitely Trump is one of the fattest and most corrupt US presidents ever.

From greatness to degeneracy is only a small step, as Napoleon once said.

Revealed: Netanyahu received an explicit warning days before Oct 7

Israel Asks For A Guaranteed Share Of U.S. Weapon Purchases

via https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/06/israel-asks-for-a-guaranteed-share-of-u-s-weapon-purchases.html

The colonial expansion of Israel is openly subsidized by the U.S. with currently $3.5 billion per year. Most of that money is bound to Israel’s purchase of U.S. made weapons. The stipend is controlled by Congress and must pass the yearly budget review.

The Israeli government is trying to change the stipend into a more lucrative racket.

It has suggested to replace the yearly subsidy by a ‘deeper military cooperation’ which is code for the guaranteed U.S. purchases of Israeli made weapons and continuous profits for Israel’s weapon manufacturers. To institute the new scheme Congress will pass a law that will integrate Israel’s military-industrial complex into U.S. procurement and production lines.

Following that there will be no more yearly reviews:

Buried in the House’s version of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) released on Tuesday, is section 224, entitled “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.”
…
Section 224 lays the groundwork for bilateral research and development, co-production of weapons, joint ventures, licensing agreements, and seemingly every manner of U.S.-Israeli military-industrial complex cooperation.
…
It would fuse the U.S. and Israeli defense sectors in multiple areas vital to the battlefields of the future, like autonomous systems and cyber.

and:

If enacted, the provision could mark a major change in one of the world’s closest military relationships, shifting the two countries from a partnership centred largely on American military aid towards one in which their defence industries are more deeply intertwined.

Section 224 would require the US defence secretary to appoint an “executive agent”: a single official to coordinate military cooperation between the US and Israel.

That work would cover joint research and development, the shared production of weapons, and the linking of military systems and data.

In future the Pentagon will have to spend, by law, a part of its budget on purchases from Israel. Given the $1.5 trillion war budget proposed by Trump the profits from such an alliance for Israel will be a multiple of its current stipend.

Congress is currently in the process of passing the proposal.

The U.S. military is not happy about the prospect of having Israel involved its technology and data systems. A subtile hint of that can be seen in this current news item:

Pentagon raised threat of Israeli spying on U.S. to highest level, sources say – NBCnews
The counterintelligence threat level was raised by the Defense Intelligence Agency in recent weeks after growing concerns that Israeli espionage had become more aggressive than usual, sources say.

The Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency in recent weeks issued the new counterintelligence threat assessment amid rising tensions between Israel and the U.S. over the way forward in the war with Iran, the officials said. They said the DIA posted an internal message, viewed by one of the current officials, that raised the level for Israel to “critical.”
…
The DIA assessment includes a seven-page document and features a chart, according to one of the current U.S. officials. The document says the assessment of Israel is that its ability to conduct human espionage and technical collection is at a ”critical level,” according to the official.

It also identifies a series of specific incidents that heightened U.S. concerns, the official said.

Israel is known for selling U.S. secrets to other countries. When Jonathan Pollard pilfered strategic deployment plans of U.S. nuclear submarines for Israel, the Zionists sold those to the Soviet Union. U.S. F-16 fighter jet technology used to develop Israel’s Lavi fighter jet ended up in China after the program was canceled.

The Pentagon’s question to Congress, camouflaged as a leaked DIA assessment, is this: ‘Do you really want to let Israel share (and sell off) our deepest secrets?”

AIPAC will pull its strings with members of Congress to get the right answer to that question.

Confirmed: Iran Has the Bomb

via https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCD_xGuK8-FeYP2-7r6kqCWQ/videos

Transcribed by TurboScribe.

On the morning of March 11th, 2026, the International Atomic Energy Agency made an announcement that stopped analysts, military planners, and world leaders cold. Iran had successfully produced uranium purified to 90% concentration. That single number changes everything.

That is the technical definition of weapons-grade material. That is the line that separates a country with nuclear ambitions from a country standing at the doorstep of a nuclear device. And as of that morning, Iran walked through that door.

The enrichment was detected at the Fordow facility, a site carved directly into the base of a mountain, roughly 180 kilometers southwest of Tehran. This was not a laboratory accident. This was not a trace reading from a single particle.

This was production at industrial scale confirmed by IAEA inspectors who conducted routine sampling at the site on March 9th. Two days later, the world learned what those samples contained. To understand why this matters so deeply, you have to understand what uranium enrichment actually involves.

In its natural state, uranium contains only about zero, 7% of the fissile isotope U-235, the component capable of sustaining a nuclear chain reaction. Civilian power reactors operate on fuel enriched to somewhere between 3% and 5%. Medical facilities working with radioactive isotopes use material at around 20%.

The threshold for weapons-grade material begins at 90%. At that level of concentration, assembling a functional nuclear device becomes a question of engineering, not of physics. Iran has now answered the physics question.

What makes this moment even more alarming is the nature of Fordow itself. This is not a conventional research installation. It is a fortress built specifically to endure military attack.

The enrichment chambers sit beneath 80 to 100 meters of solid mountain rock. Israeli bunker-busting munitions are designed to penetrate roughly 30 meters of earth and reinforced concrete. The most powerful conventional penetrating weapon in the American arsenal, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator carried by B-2 stealth bombers, can reach approximately 60 meters.

Fordow was engineered with full knowledge of those limitations. It was built to be unreachable, and it has been operating continuously since 2011. The progression of Iran’s enrichment over the past several years tells a story that Western intelligence agencies suspected but could not definitively confirm until now.

In 2020, Iran was enriching uranium to 4, 5%. By 2021, that figure had climbed to 20%. In 2023, IAEA inspectors detected particles at Fordow showing enrichment levels of 60%.

Iranian officials at the time described this as an unintentional technical fluctuation in the centrifuge process. Most analysts rejected that explanation immediately. The detection of 90% material this week confirms that their skepticism was entirely justified.

There’s a common misconception about how uranium enrichment works. Most people assume that moving from lower to higher purity levels requires equal effort at every stage, that going from 20% to 60% is just as difficult as going from 0, 7% to 20%. The physics tells a very different story.

The overwhelming majority of the total technical work involved in enrichment is concentrated in those earliest stages, moving raw uranium from its natural state up to low enrichment levels. After that, each subsequent jump becomes progressively shorter in terms of effort and time. The leap from 60% to 90% is, in purely physical terms, the fastest and least demanding step in the entire process.

The moment Iran crossed 60%, the pathway to weapons-grade material became a matter of months. Now those months have passed. What makes this timeline almost incomprehensible is the context in which it occurred.

Operation Epic Fury, the joint American and Israeli air campaign targeting Iranian military infrastructure, began on February 28, 2026. In the first week alone, more than 2,500 airstrikes were executed across Iran. Command and control facilities were obliterated.

Missile manufacturing sites were reduced to rubble. The Supreme Leader was killed. An entirely new Supreme Leader was seated in Tehran while the bombs were still falling.

And through all of it, the centrifuges at Fordow never stopped spinning. On March 1, satellite imagery confirmed that Israeli F-35s had struck the Natanz enrichment facility. The fires were visible from orbit.

Natanz was knocked offline. Fordow, protected by its mountain, was untouched. On March 3, Israeli aircraft struck the Parchin Military Complex, a location that Western intelligence has long flagged as a site potentially connected to nuclear weapons development research.

Explosions were documented. Fordow remained fully operational. By March 5, CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper stated publicly that the United States had achieved near-total air superiority over Iranian airspace, with Iran’s integrated air defense network degraded by approximately 80 percent.

None of that mattered for Fordow. Air superiority is irrelevant against a target buried under a mountain that no aircraft in either inventory can conventionally destroy. The strategic implication here is not subtle.

Iran knew from the very first hours of this conflict that Fordow was untouchable. They knew that Natanz would be struck. They knew their surface installations would be targeted.

They knew their command structure would be systematically dismantled. And in full knowledge of all of that, they made a calculated, deliberate, and extraordinarily rational decision. While the world’s attention was consumed by missile exchanges, burning oil infrastructure, and the death of a supreme leader, Iran used the cover of war to push its enrichment program across the weapons-grade threshold.

The chaos was not a distraction from their nuclear ambitions. It was the ideal environment in which to pursue them. Now consider what 90 percent enriched uranium actually means in terms of physical capability.

A primitive gun-type nuclear device, the design used in the bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945, requires approximately 50 kilograms of highly enriched uranium. The Hiroshima weapon itself used 64 kilograms enriched to roughly 80 percent. More sophisticated implosion-type designs, which are more efficient with fissile material, can achieve a nuclear yield with as little as 15 to 25 kilograms of material, enriched above 90 percent.

Iran does not need to construct a miniaturized thermonuclear warhead capable of fitting atop an intercontinental ballistic missile. They need to assemble a device that produces a nuclear detonation. That is a fundamentally lower technical bar.

According to the IAEA’s quarterly report published in February of 2026, Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent concentration stood at approximately 128 kilograms. Enriching that material further to weapons grade does not require processing the entire quantity. If Iran has produced even 10 kilograms of 90 percent material, and the IAEA detection strongly implies they have, they are within measurable technical reach of constructing a crude functional device.

David Albright, a former United Nations weapons inspector and the founder of the Institute for Science and International Security, released a public statement on March 11 that made the situation absolutely clear. His assessment was direct and unambiguous. If Iran possesses weapons-grade uranium and has been conducting parallel research into weapons design, the timeline to a crude nuclear device could now be measured in weeks rather than months.

He further emphasized that what IAEA inspectors were able to sample at Fordow almost certainly represents only a fraction of Iran’s total enriched stockpile. Whatever they found is a floor, not a ceiling. Fordow is also not Iran’s only enrichment installation.

Natanz, despite having been struck on March 1, contains redundant underground halls that may remain at least partially operational. Beyond that, in 2020, Iran began construction on a new enrichment facility at a location that has not been publicly disclosed. If that facility is operational and running Iran’s advanced IR-6 centrifuge models, Iran could be producing weapons-grade material at multiple sites simultaneously, some of which the international community may not even be monitoring.

The global response came fast. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened an emergency security cabinet session within hours of the IAEA announcement. Reports leaked to Israeli media indicated that military options were actively discussed.

A senior unnamed official told one Israeli outlet that the detection of 90 percent material had fundamentally altered Israel’s threat assessment and that all options remained under active consideration. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that the United States would not accept a nuclear-armed Iran under any circumstances. When asked directly whether military action was being contemplated, Rubio declined to rule it out, stating only that the president had made it unambiguous that Iran would not be permitted to acquire a nuclear weapon and that the United States possessed the means to guarantee that outcome.

There is a contradiction sitting at the center of this crisis that official Washington and Jerusalem have been extremely reluctant to acknowledge out loud. The stated and primary justification for Operation Epic Fury was to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Nine days into the most extensive air campaign conducted against Iran in modern history, with over 2,500 strikes executed and Iran’s military infrastructure extensively degraded, Iran has produced weapons-grade uranium for the first time in its recorded history.

The military operation launched to stop the bomb may have functioned in practice as the cover under which the bomb became possible. Financial markets processed that reality within minutes. Brent crude oil, already above $110 per barrel in the wake of the Strait of Hormuz closure, spiked an additional $6 an afternoon trading on March 11th.

Analysts at JPMorgan warned publicly that the confirmed production of weapons-grade material had introduced an entirely new dimension of risk into an already severely stressed supply environment. Gold surged sharply. The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 620 points in a single session.

Markets understand something that diplomatic statements often obscure. The nuclear threshold is not merely a military line. It is a psychological trigger for every interconnected financial system on the planet.

Iranian President Massoud Pazeshkian delivered a televised address on the evening of March 11th. He stated that Iran’s nuclear activities were entirely peaceful and legally compliant under the framework of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. He did not deny that 90% enriched material had been detected.

He offered no technical explanation for how it was produced. He simply moved past the subject entirely. That silence carries more information than any denial could have provided.

The strategic logic from Tehran’s perspective is not difficult to follow. A functioning nuclear weapon provides Iran with something that no surface-to-air missile battery, no proxy militia network, and no ballistic missile arsenal can provide on its own. Absolute deterrence.

No American administration will risk a nuclear exchange to enforce freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. No Israeli government will authorize strikes on Iranian population centers if Tehran can credibly threaten a nuclear response. The bomb is the only instrument that guarantees regime survival in the face of the kind of military pressure Iran has experienced over the past nine days.

After the assassination of its supreme leader, the destruction of its surface navy, and the degradation of its air defense network, Iran has every conceivable strategic motivation to reach that finish line as quickly as possible. But enriched uranium alone does not make a weapon. A functional nuclear device also requires a proven weapons design, precisely manufactured high explosive lenses, a reliable triggering mechanism, and extensive testing of each component system.

Western intelligence agencies assessed in 2023 that Iran had conducted weapons relevant research before 2003, but had largely suspended its structured weapons development program under the weight of international scrutiny and sanctions pressure. The operative word in that assessment is structured. In 2018, Israeli operatives extracted an enormous archive of documents from a warehouse in southern Tehran that documented Iran’s pre-2003 weapons program in extensive detail.

The IAEA reviewed those documents and confirmed their authenticity. What the archive could not answer is whether Iran quietly resumed that work after 2003 in a more fragmented and harder to detect form. That unanswered question is now the single most dangerous blind spot in the entire crisis.

IAEA inspectors can measure enrichment levels and count centrifuges. They have no visibility into Iranian military research facilities where weapons design work would take place. With inspectors evacuated from many sites and monitoring equipment potentially damaged or disabled after nine days of airstrikes, the IAEA’s ability to track the full scope of Iran’s program has never been more limited than it is right now.

On March 9th, the same date that inspectors collected the samples that revealed 90% enriched material at Fordow, satellite imagery captured fresh excavation activity at the Parchin military complex. By March 10th, the excavated area had been covered with camouflage netting. An analysis published by Albright’s Institute on March 12th suggested that Parchin may house an underground high explosives testing facility connected to weapons development work.

The combination of weapons-grade uranium in one location and suspected weapons component testing in another paints a picture that is extremely difficult to interpret as anything other than a program moving purposefully toward a device. Inside Israel, the domestic political environment has shifted dramatically. Israeli citizens have been absorbing missile fire for nine consecutive days.

More than 160 projectiles have been launched at Israeli territory since the operation began. The Israeli public was told this campaign would neutralize the Iranian threat. Public opinion surveys taken on March 11th found that 68% of Israelis now support unilateral military action to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, even without explicit American authorization.

War reshapes what populations are willing to accept, and nine days of incoming missiles has produced a supermajority ready for escalation. The United States faces a genuinely impossible set of options. American intelligence has consistently assessed that military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program would delay rather than eliminate the threat.

Destroying Fordow and Natanz would cost Iran several years of progress, but would not erase the accumulated scientific and technical knowledge that built the program. Iran would rebuild, almost certainly in deeper concealment, and the next detection might arrive too late for any response to matter. At the same time, permitting Iran to proceed to full weaponization would almost certainly trigger a regional nuclear arms race.

Saudi Arabia has stated publicly and on multiple occasions that it will pursue its own nuclear capability if Iran acquires a bomb. Turkey would follow. Egypt has already revived its previously dormant program.

A nuclear Iran does not produce a stable deterrence equilibrium in the Middle East. It produces uncontrolled proliferation across the most volatile region on Earth. As of the morning of March 11th, 2026, the IAEA has confirmed weapons-grade uranium at Fordow.

Rafael Grossi has stated that the quantities detected indicate deliberate production. Netanyahu’s cabinet is meeting under emergency conditions. Rubio has declined to rule out military force.

Oil is above $113 per barrel. Gold is near historic highs. Albright says the timeline to a functional device may now be measured in weeks.

Iran’s president has declined to deny the presence of 90% material. Satellite imagery shows concealed excavation at a suspected weapons testing site. Seven American service members are dead.

More than 1,300 Iranians are dead. And the centrifuges under that mountain kept spinning through all of it. That is not deterrence working.

That is a state that decided, under the cover of the largest air campaign in its modern history, to sprint toward a nuclear weapon. And as of this morning, they are closer than they have ever been.

(Transcribed by TurboScribe. Go Unlimited to remove this message.)

15 Russian Nuclear Engineers in Iran

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NJU5tR_trXw

(Transcribed by TurboScribe.)

On May 9th, 2026, a Russian government Tupolev 154 aircraft departed Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport and touched down nine hours later at Tehran’s Imam Khomeini International Airport. Aboard that flight were 14 nuclear weapons engineers from Rosatom, Russia’s state atomic energy corporation. These were not reactor maintenance personnel, these were warhead architects, the precise individuals who engineered the nuclear warheads currently mounted atop Russia’s intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and long-range strategic bombers.

Russia at present holds 5,189 nuclear warheads in its active arsenal. These 14 scientists contributed directly to building them. They carry within them the physics, the material science, the engineering principles, and the systems integration knowledge required to transform fissile material into a fully deployable strategic weapon.

And as of yesterday, they are sitting inside Iran, 71 days into a conflict where nuclear weapons could very well determine the final outcome. Over the next several minutes, you’re going to understand precisely who these scientists are, what specific expertise they carry that North Korean scientists simply cannot provide, how their arrival in Tehran resolves Iran’s last remaining technical obstacle to a deployable nuclear weapon, and why this development makes nuclear conflict in the Middle East not merely conceivable, but increasingly unavoidable. Before we go further, please subscribe and hit like so these critical updates keep reaching you.

Drop your thoughts in the comments below. Do you believe Russia is actively attempting to ignite a nuclear war? Here is what the available intelligence confirms. The 14 engineers are affiliated with the All Russian Scientific Research Institute of Experimental Physics, referred to by its Russian acronym VNIIF, headquartered in Sarov, a classified closed city located in Nizhny Novgorod Oblast.

VNIIF is Russia’s central nuclear weapons design institution. It is the Russian counterpart to the United States Los Alamos National Laboratory. Every nuclear warhead in Russia’s current inventory was either designed at VNIIF or at its companion facility, the All Russian Scientific Research Institute of Technical Physics in Snizhinsk.

The specialists who landed in Tehran on May 9th focused specifically on warhead miniaturization and the integration of those warheads with missile delivery platforms. That specialization is everything. North Korean scientists who arrived on May 8th brought with them a detailed working knowledge of how to construct a functional nuclear device.

They can engineer an implosion mechanism. They grasp the physics of achieving critical mass. They have conducted multiple tests and demonstrated that their designs produce nuclear yield.

But North Korea’s nuclear weapons are bulky, heavy, and engineered primarily for ground-based testing or aircraft delivery. North Korea has never successfully demonstrated a warhead compact enough and mechanically durable enough to endure the violent stresses of ballistic missile reentry. Their devices function effectively as bombs.

They do not function as missile warheads. Russia’s warheads do. And the 14 specialists from VNIIF know exactly how to make that transformation happen.

Stay focused here because the technical gap these Russian scientists bridge is the precise difference between Iran possessing a nuclear bomb sitting dormant in an underground storage facility and Iran possessing a nuclear weapon that can be fired from a missile launcher and reach Tel Aviv, Riyadh, or Abu Dhabi in under 10 minutes. A nuclear warhead configured for ballistic missile deployment must satisfy a set of engineering requirements that a stationary bomb simply does not face. It must be dimensionally compact enough to fit inside the nose cone of a missile.

It must be sufficiently lightweight for the missile to carry it across the required distance. It must be structurally robust enough to withstand the acceleration forces generated during launch, which regularly exceed 20 times the force of gravity. And it must survive the extreme thermal environment and mechanical vibration of atmospheric reentry without detonating prematurely or failing to detonate at the designated target.

Satisfying all of those requirements simultaneously is an extraordinarily complex engineering challenge. The United States invested years in developing miniaturized warheads during the 1950s and 1960s. The Soviet Union solved the same problem around the same period.

China required decades. Pakistan and India have produced warheads, but with meaningful size and weight constraints that impose limitations on their missile ranges. North Korea has tested nuclear devices but has never conducted a test definitively confirming it possesses a functional missile-deliverable warhead.

The scientists who arrived from Pyongyang on May 8th can assist Iran in assembling a bomb. They cannot guarantee that bomb will function on a missile. The Russian scientists who arrived on May 9th can make that guarantee.

Vaneef has engineered warheads for every major Russian strategic missile platform. The RT-2PM Topol intercontinental ballistic missile carries a single warhead with a yield of 800 kilotons and an operational range of 10,000 kilometers. The RS-24 Yars ICBM carries up to four independently targetable warheads.

The RS-28 Sarmat, Russia’s newest and most formidable heavy ICBM, is designed to carry between 10 and 15 warheads alongside penetration aids and decoys. Every one of those warheads was designed to survive launch, travel thousands of kilometers through the vacuum of space, re-enter the atmosphere at velocities exceeding 20,000 kilometers per hour, and detonate with precise accuracy. The engineering tolerances involved are extreme.

During re-entry, the warhead’s thermal protection system must withstand temperatures surpassing at 2,000 degrees Celsius while maintaining complete structural integrity. The fusing mechanism must differentiate between the intense vibration of re-entry and the precise moment of optimal detonation altitude. The arming sequence must be completely fail-safe.

Preventing any accidental detonation during handling or launch while simultaneously guaranteeing detonation upon reaching the designated target. Russian warhead designers have resolved all of those engineering challenges across multiple missile families and multiple warhead generations. The scientists from Vanayef, now present in Tehran, carry that institutional knowledge with them.

They have access to seven decades of accumulated testing data, failure analysis records, and iterative design refinements that took the Soviet Union and Russia 70 years to compile. Iran currently operates the Khorramshahr-4 ballistic missile. It has a documented range of 2,000 kilometers and a payload capacity of approximately 1,800 kilograms.

That is sufficient to carry a miniaturized nuclear warhead. What Iran lacks at this moment is a warhead compact and light enough to mount on that missile. With Russian expert guidance, it can now build one.

The technical parameters are well established. A first-generation fission warhead designed for missile delivery typically weighs between 400 and 700 kilograms and measures less than one meter in diameter. Modern configurations can be considerably more compact.

Russia’s most streamlined strategic warhead weighs approximately 250 kilograms. If the Russian scientists assist Iran in designing a warhead in the 600-kilogram range, producing a yield of 15 to 20 kilotons, that warhead would integrate comfortably onto the Khorramshahr-4 while preserving the missile’s full operational range. A 20-kiloton warhead detonated above Tel Aviv would level the city center and kill hundreds of thousands of people.

The same warhead detonated above Riyadh or Abu Dhabi would produce comparable devastation. Iran already possesses the delivery systems. It has hundreds of ballistic missiles.

It has been firing them continuously throughout this war. What it has lacked until now is the capacity to mount a nuclear warhead on top of those missiles. The arrival of 14 Russian warhead engineers on May 9th directly closes that gap.

Most people assume that nuclear weapons development is a single unified challenge, that if a nation can construct a bomb, it can automatically deploy that bomb on a missile. In practice, miniaturization and ruggedization for missile delivery are entirely separate engineering disciplines requiring specialized expertise that Iran does not currently possess, that North Korea has not fully achieved, and that Russia has mastered completely. And now those two knowledge streams have converged in Tehran simultaneously.

Consider the timeline carefully because the combination of North Korean bomb designs and Russian warhead integration expertise creates a direct pathway to a deployable nuclear weapon measured in weeks, not years. North Korean scientists arrived on May 8th carrying verified implosion-type bomb designs. Those designs work.

They have been proven through multiple live tests. Iran does not need to develop its own bomb design from first principles. It can replicate a North Korean design using fissile material derived from the uranium Russia delivered on May 7th.

Russian scientists arrived on May 9th with the specific knowledge required to miniaturize those designs and integrate them with existing missile systems. They can take the North Korean bomb configuration, reduce its physical dimensions and total weight, reinforce its structure to endure launch and reentry forces, and configure it to fit within the nose cone of a Khorramshahr-4. If Iran has weapons-grade uranium available and ready, the assembly process for a missile deliverable warhead could require as little as four to six weeks with expert assistance on site.

That timeline encompasses fabricating the fissile core, constructing the implosion assembly, integrating the warhead with the missile platform, and conducting non-nuclear systems tests to confirm all components function as designed four to six weeks. That is the window Israel is currently calculating, and it assumes everything goes favorably for Israel and nothing unexpected interrupts the process on the Iranian side. Here is the full picture of what transpired across just 72 hours.

On May 7th, Russia delivered four, eight tons of enriched uranium to Iran, material that can be elevated to weapons-grade concentration at Fordow within six to eight weeks using Iran’s existing centrifuge infrastructure. On May 8th, North Korea delivered 12 nuclear bomb designers to Iran, bringing with them proven device blueprints that eliminate the need for Iran to conduct any exploratory weapons development. On May 9th, Russia delivered 14 warhead integration specialists to Iran, carrying the expertise necessary to transform those bomb blueprints into missile-compatible weapons.

Three separate deliveries across three consecutive days. Uranium, bomb designs, missile integration, every component required for a functional, deployable nuclear weapon delivered to Iran within a single 72-hour window. That is not coincidence.

That is deliberate operational coordination, and it is coordination explicitly engineered to ensure Iran crosses the nuclear threshold before Israel or the United States can move to prevent it. The parties involved are not operating out of inexperience. Russia maintains the world’s second-largest nuclear arsenal.

North Korea has conducted six confirmed successful nuclear tests. These are states transferring proven combat-tested technologies to a nation 71 days into a war with no clear path to survival except through nuclear deterrence. Now, pay close attention because the strategic consequences of missile-deliverable nuclear weapons are categorically different from those of static devices.

A nuclear bomb stored in a warehouse serves as a deterrent only if your adversary believes you can actually deliver it. Israel could theoretically conduct a commando raid on a facility, seize the device, or destroy it through precision airstrikes before it is ever used. A bomb in a storage bunker is a fixed target, not an operational weapon.

A nuclear warhead mounted on a ballistic missile is fundamentally different. It is mobile. It can launch on minimal warning from positions Israel cannot track in real-time.

Once airborne, it reaches any target in the region in under 10 minutes. No existing interception architecture can guarantee stopping it with certainty. Even if Israel’s Arrow 3 system achieves a 90% intercept rate against an incoming salvo, a single warhead penetrating that defense is sufficient to erase a city from existence.

The presence of missile-deliverable nuclear weapons alters the entire strategic equation. Israel can no longer operate on the assumption that it has sufficient time to locate and eliminate Iran’s nuclear infrastructure before a weapon is launched. The instant Iran successfully mounts a warhead on a ready missile, the threat becomes immediate and genuinely existential.

That is the threshold Russia just assisted Iran in crossing. And once that threshold is crossed, deterrence disintegrates, and preemption becomes the only logically defensible strategy from Israel’s position. Israel’s available options each carry catastrophic risk, and none of them offer guaranteed success.

A conventional strike targeting Fordow, Tehran, and any suspected weapons assembly site is possible, but has already proven insufficient. 71 days of sustained air operations have not destroyed Fordow. The facility is buried too deep beneath reinforced geology.

Strikes have degraded it, but have not eliminated it. And Iran has now dispersed its program across multiple locations, with foreign scientists operating in sites Israel may not yet have fully mapped. A ground incursion into Iranian territory to physically seize nuclear materials or destroy facilities from within would demand tens of thousands of committed troops, extended operational logistics, and acceptance of massive sustained casualties, a capacity Israel does not currently hold, while simultaneously managing Hezbollah, multiple active fronts, and ongoing operations, now more than two months in duration.

Tactical nuclear weapons could guarantee the destruction of hardened underground facilities beyond the reach of conventional munitions, but a nuclear strike would shatter every norm governing armed conflict since 1945, and almost certainly trigger direct military retaliation from Russia. The fourth option, accepting a nuclear-armed Iran and attempting to rely on mutual deterrence, depends entirely on the assumption that Iran is rational and places greater value on national survival than on achieving victory. 71 days of continued Iranian operations under extreme military pressure suggest that assumption cannot be safely held.

If Iran is prepared to endure that level of punishment and continue fighting, it may be equally prepared to launch a nuclear weapon rather than accept unconditional defeat. The historical logic reinforces this. In 1981, Israel destroyed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor in a preemptive strike executed before the facility became operationally active.

In 2007, Israel destroyed a suspected Syrian nuclear installation at al-Khebar. In both cases, Israel moved before the threat could fully materialize because waiting would have made the problem insurmountable. The difference today is Iran’s program is more technically advanced, more geographically dispersed, and directly supported by two nuclear-armed states that have openly demonstrated their commitment to its success.

The window for any decisive preemptive action is narrowing. The cost of that action is escalating toward levels that risk igniting a wider regional or global war. Every available path leads toward catastrophe, and Russia engineered this situation with deliberate precision.

Share this with every person in your network who is trying to make sense of what is genuinely unfolding in the Middle East right now. On May 9, 2026, 14 Russian nuclear warhead designers from Veneev and Sarov arrived in Tehran. Three deliveries across 72 hours.

Uranium, bomb designs, missile integration. The timeline to a deployable nuclear weapon is now four to six weeks. Russia just helped Iran cross the line that changes everything.

2014 Coup in Kiev in Hindsight: Neocons for Russia

by Claudiu Secara

It’s interesting to revisit in hindsight the events in Ukraine in February 2014.

A number of red flags were obvious right at the time. Why would the US start a coup in Kiev a few months from the elections, already scheduled for October, and not gently manipulate the outcome of the elections? $5 million spent to prepare the coup? How many votes could $5 million buy?

Furthermore, there is some inter-party mismatch of allegiances. We see today that ZioPutin is a staunch supporter of Israel and Netanyahoo. We also know that the neocons, specifically the extended family of Kaplans, which includes Victoria Nuland and her husband, are also staunchly pro Israel.

So why on Earth would the same neocons have gone on the record as being the leaders of the attack to harm Israel’s best ally, that is, Putin’s Russia? Why would they not use proxies, as in so many other cases when there is a perception of underhanded double cross? Did they act by choosing the better of two bad outcomes, supporting the European allies versus supporting Putin? Not really. As we were made aware in a very public and repeated message from Victoria herself: “F’ the Europeans”. No, Victoria Nuland didn’t profess to be acting for the benefit of the Europeans. On the contrary, she directly discredited and disparaged them.

So, then again, why the timing of the coup in Kiev, why claim that such a coup would redeem Ukrainians’ centuries-old national aspirations, and then why bring to power, in the same Ukraine for Ukrainians, one Jewish oligarch after another? Poroshenko, Timoshenko, Zelensky, Kolomoisky, just to name a few at the very top.

Could it be something else? Think about the war of attrition. Who wins by the loss of the best men among the Slavic nations? Not the Slavs, for sure.

But then there is another war going on and that involves the Jews against another native population. In a normal state of the world, wouldn’t it be natural to have the Slavs and the Palestinians join efforts against the same Jewish control? Yes, it would be natural, but it didn’t happen.

And that brings us back to the strange silence coming from Putin’s Russia, and that includes the “Russians” across the whole federation of Russia. Never a word of condemnation of the genocide of the Palestinians, never a word of disagreement with Netanyahoo’s slaughter. Never a single street demonstration against the atrocities perpetrated by Israel.

But Russia got its pound of flesh. It got back Crimea. It got back Donbass and certainly more to come.

Sanctions? Yes, but not really. Russia had some losses from the so-called sovereign fund, $200 billion? Or $300 billion?! But instead of incurring simple loses, it confiscated all the stupid Westerners’ investments in Russia, worth many many times more.

Now it becomes more clear. It was a quid pro quo. You, Russia, keep quiet and stay away from any support for the Palestinians. And in exchange we’ll help you invade another sovereign country, take one third or half of it and get away with it. We will create an anti-Russian coup in Ukraine. Half the world will sympathize with the poor, suffering Russians and will accept the just war that Russia will then carry out against its neighbor.

The coup in Kiev in February 2014 was a fraud. It wasn’t against Russia. It was against the poor desperate Ukrainians hoping for a better life, only to be sent to the slaughter.

Putin, the Traitor of all Time

Whether Putin (after all) is a true patriot or not, getting Russia out of the abyss of the 1990s, is an open question.

The fearful suspicions are: Putin surrounds himself with 5th column neoliberals (15 percent flat tax), who dream of becoming part of the G8. I’m not sure – But could there be truth to this?

When Lugansk and Donetsk were about to win in 2014 and 2015, when it became critical that Lugansk and Donetsk were winning – largely by their own efforts – the West panicked. Merkel flew to Moscow; Putin failed (again) and the result was Minsk 1.

And then Minsk 2 – while the West openly laughed at him and at Russia. And then Istanbul… and Astana, and Anchorage – and…

Has Putin has reduced Russia from a great power to a Stockholm Syndrome Power? – Most recently the US has been bombing Russian tankers, refineries, strategic nuclear bombers; there’s terror in the music hall, the list goes on and on – The US is actually behind everything! And everyone knows it. Putin compulsively turns the other cheek. Is this worthy of a great power (?) You have to ask yourself – Why?

After which Putin gives ‘his friend’ – the narcissistic megalomaniac and psychopathic Donald Trump – legitimacy to act as a 3rd party negotiator (!) – bad craziness indeed.

Putin and his G8 neoliberal companions ‘dare’ not win the war against NATO and US. I’m not sure – But could there be truth to this?

Putin just loves all the neo-fascists: Meloni, Le Pen, Trump, ADF, Modi, Netanyahu, Saudi-MBS, the list goes on and on.

There is nothing Putin and his companions would rather do than to be part of the (colonial) club again; to have houses in London again; to be part of the Western Jet Set. I’m not sure – But could there be truth to this?

Everyone knows that the CIA, MI6, the Deep State have planned to turn Ukraine into a Bandera terrorist state against Russia – ever since before the breakup of the CCCP. Why doesn’t Putin face the consequences of this (?)
Meanwhile, Germany is rearming and NATO is openly threatening nuclear-armed Russia with war. It could become very dangerous that Russia has not ended this war a long time ago.

Lavrov in his CCCP t-shirt obviously doesn’t trust Putin anymore. Lavrov is no longer hiding it – and is far more popular and trustworthy in Russia than Putin. So he is untouchable …While Putin has sidelined Lavrov in favor of the neoliberal Kirill Dmitriev – as the main negotiator… Dmitriev has no military or diplomatic experience. With Trump’s son-in-law Kushner as part of the negotiations, these have apparently been reduced to an amateur freak show – which has been running on its own inertia for 10 months (?)

Putin let Israel and his special friend Netanyahu bomb Syria hundreds of times while he was talking – and talking – in Astana with his special friend and traitor Erdogan.

Putin denied Iran the S300 for years, even though Iran had paid for them. Iran doesn’t trust Putin anymore.

Putin received (without Lavrov) the IS leader from Syria. It’s not realpolitik – it’s just shameful considering the attack on Iran, Syria, Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen… And all the suffering that could have been avoided had it not been for the very special friendship between Putin, Netanyahu and Erdogan. Bon appetit !

So – Why still be a blind apologist (defender) for the autocrat Putin (?)

Do people really still think Putin is a super strategist – playing 5G chess?

Putin apparently thinks he is so clever and classless and free. But (maybe) he’s still a f–king peasant as far as I can see.

U.S. Calls For New Colonial Era

by MoA

In a speech held at the Munich Security Conference Secretary of State Marco Rubio called for a renewal of the colonial age:

In a perfect world, all of these problems and more would be solved by diplomats and strongly worded resolutions. But we do not live in a perfect world, and we cannot continue to allow those who blatantly and openly threaten our citizens and endanger our global stability to shield themselves behind abstractions of international law which they themselves routinely violate.
This is the path that President Trump and the United States has embarked upon. It is the path we ask you here in Europe to join us on. It is a path we have walked together before and hope to walk together again. For five centuries, before the end of the Second World War, the West had been expanding – its missionaries, its pilgrims, its soldiers, its explorers pouring out from its shores to cross oceans, settle new continents, build vast empires extending out across the globe.
But in 1945, for the first time since the age of Columbus, it was contracting. Europe was in ruins. Half of it lived behind an Iron Curtain and the rest looked like it would soon follow. The great Western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come.
Against that backdrop, then, as now, many came to believe that the West’s age of dominance had come to an end and that our future was destined to be a faint and feeble echo of our past. But together, our predecessors recognized that decline was a choice, and it was a choice they refused to make. This is what we did together once before, and this is what President Trump and the United States want to do again now, together with you.

Arnaud Bertrand summarizes:

The man literally laments the outcome of WW2 because it marked the end of the era during which “the West had been expanding”, a “path” he “hopes [the US and Europe] walk together again.”
And just to ensure you’re clear about what he means: he wants to restore the building of “vast empires extending across the globe” and blames “anti-colonial uprisings” for what they did to “the great Western empires.”
He also says that “we cannot continue” to allow “abstractions of international law” get in the way of US interests.
Basically the man is openly saying that the whole post-colonial order was a mistake and he’s calling on Europe to share the spoils of building a new one.
Some of the dimwits in the room did applaud that revisionist nonsense.

Bertrand cautiones:

What’s the thinking here? That Trump’s America – “America first” – would suddenly become magnanimous and share with Europe just out of sentiment? That’s not how imperialism works: the whole premise of it is that the strong dominate the weak.

When an imperial power is speaking to you of sentiments, of how much they like you and how they want to partner with you – the much weaker party – that’s cause for worry, not applause …

Rubio’s speech was a call up of satraps who are willing to be the proxy forces fo fight for U.S. global hegemony – just as the Europeans already are with regards to Ukraine.

But Rubio is living in the past. A past in which the Europeans, through their supremacy in warfare, could conquer and devastate vast areas of the planet:

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”
Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

The West, thankfully, no longer has exclusive access to weaponry. It can no longer raise the forces needed – the technology, money, people and ideology – to subjugate the planet. Any attempt to do so will only end in disaster.

Europe would thereby be well advised to stay away Rubio’s unhinged nonsense.

How and Why Was WWI Planned and Prolonged

Ed. Note: This article writing in 2017 describes pretty much today’s events.

Mujahid Kamran

August 1, 2017

The history of the First World War is a deliberately concocted lie. Not the sacrifice, the heroism, the horrendous waste of life or the misery that followed. No, these were very real but the truth of how it all began and how it was unnecessarily and deliberately prolonged beyond 1915 has been successfully covered up for a century. A carefully falsified history was created to conceal the fact that Britain, not Germany, was responsible for the war. Had the truth become known after 1918, the consequences for the British Establishment would have been cataclysmic.”
Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor

The Planners and the Plan
The First World War did not just happen. There is undeniable evidence that the war was planned by the international-banker controlled British oligarchy almost two decades before it broke out (see e.g. [1-3]). In their outstanding book Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor have established beyond reasonable doubt that indeed the First World War was planned by a tiny group of members of the British oligarchy including Nathaniel Rothschild [1].
King Edward VII
While building upon what was first revealed by the late Professor Carrol Quigley, they have not only provided detailed evidence in favor of this thesis, but have also revealed the astonishing role of the British monarch, King Edward VII, in secretly building alliances against Germany. They have provided ample evidence that the playboy King, much disliked by his mother Queen Victoria, went along with the secret group that had, in the first place, planned this horrific war.
The secret group of people, whose existence was first revealed by Professor Carrol Quigley, thus putting his own life in danger, decided to work behind the scenes with the utmost secrecy. The revelations of Professor Quigley were based on documents provided by the Secret Elite, as they are referred to sometimes. The documents were provided for the purpose of writing a sanitized history.
The goal of the Secret Elite was the expansion of the British empire to the total exclusion of other powers.
This cabal was extremely wealthy. Cecil Rhodes, who, with Rothschild help, had amassed a huge fortune in South Africa, first discussed his plans with Nathaniel Rothschild in February 1890 in the presence of a few members of the British oligarchy.
In 1891 a five-member secret group comprising Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel Rothschild, William Stead, Lord Esher and Alfred Milner became, unknown to anyone else, the core group that decided to steer the world towards a war aimed at the destruction of Germany. They called themselves the Society of the Elect. Around themselves they built, as if in a concentric circle, The Association of Helpers, eminent men, who did not know of the Society of the Elect. Other men were gradually involved in the plan but they were not aware of the separate existence of the five-member core. Together, these men steered and controlled the course of British foreign policy, unknown to the Parliament, the people, the Cabinet, and others who were constitutionally relevant.
These men represented a new phenomenon on the world stage – the money kings, who held no office and yet had real power to decide the fate of nations. When Rhodes died at age 48, he left all his money to these men for the sole purpose of extending the British empire over the entire globe. Secrecy was of utmost importance to this group.

The destruction of Germany, the Secret Elite knew, would entail enormous bloodshed. They also knew that Britain could not do it alone. It needed the strength of the Russian and French armies to achieve that end.

Russian soldiers WW1
And maybe the Secret Elite wanted Russia and France to shed their own and German blood for them. But France had been a traditional enemy of the British and vice versa whereas Russia and Britain had vied for the control of the Black Sea and the annexation of Constantinople i.e. Istanbul. There was rivalry between Russia and Britain regarding the Russian urge southwards and eastwards to warm waters, seaports that could function round the year. In the south lay the “jewel” of the British empire – India.
Despite these rivalries the Secret Elite was determined to befriend and woo both France and Russia because it considered Germany the most potent threat to the existence of the British empire. Germany was not fully aware of this heinous plan aimed at its utter destruction. And Russia and France, both were trapped by the Secret Elite. In fact, the Secret Elite succeeded not only in destroying Germany, they also destroyed Russia, and by prolonging the war, destroyed the Ottoman as well as the Austro-Hungarian empires. Britain, in the end, did not really benefit. The Zionists did – the Illuminati Zionist bankers emerged as the real force on the world stage. The Milners and the Eshers and Balfours, and all others became powerless eventually and faded away.
The Rothschilds have continued into the 21st century enhancing their power and wealth with every major bloodshed. They and their illuminati banking brethren were the real beneficiaries. The Christian West was the real loser. And so were the Muslims.
It is well known among historians that Queen Victoria disapproved of her son’s womanizing and kept his royal stipend at a minimum while she was in power. The expenses of the womanizing of King Edward VII, when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were borne by the Rothschilds and by Sir Ernest Cassel, both bankers of German-Jewish extraction. When he came to power Edward VII was keen to oblige his patrons who, apparently, wanted to destroy the emerging German nation. And, in any case he was under the impression that the destruction of Germany would pave the way for a global British Empire – it was to be his empire.
The Zionist/Illuminati international bankers had other plans. King Edward VII was the architect of the Entente Cordiale of 1904. His image as a playboy concealed the fact that he was traveling all over Europe to build alliances against Germany, while Germany never suspected that traditional enemies like England and France could or would become friends.
Docherty and Macgregor also describe the infiltration of the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office of Great Britain by agents of the group that had planned the First World War. They were able to control the officers of both government departments. They also controlled the War Office as well as the highly important and secret Committee of Imperial Defense. The Group had influence in both parties. Their policy of destroying Germany not only transcended party politics, it also went beyond which party was in power – it transcended governments.

The Parliaments and the prime ministers came and went without knowing that a tiny cabal was planning and relentlessly driving Britain to total war with Germany.

*
Cover up and Fabricated History
Docherty and Macgregor have further revealed that (p 5, ref. [1]):
The Secret Elite dictated the writing and teaching of history, from the ivory towers of the academia down to the smallest of schools. They carefully controlled the publication of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion in the official version of the history of the First World War, and refused access to any evidence that might betray their covert existence. Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified, or deliberately rewritten, so that what remained for historians was carefully selected material.”
Docherty and Macgregor point out (their book was published in 2013) that even “To this day researchers are denied access to certain First World War documents because the Secret Elite had much to fear from the truth, as do those who have succeeded them.” Why such a vehement cover up that even a century later the British authorities do not grant access to certain documents pertaining to the first World War? They want to maintain the myth of German culpability and their innocence, whereas the reality is the reverse of what establishment history portrays. The truth will shift the onus of responsibility to the shoulders of the Secret Elite and of every other consequence that followed: the Second World War, Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank, the U.N., Israel, the Korean and Vietnam wars, continuing wars in the Middle East, right up to the dangerous situation today. They have lied to generations and rather than let the truth be known they have chosen and attempted to perpetuate the lie worldwide and for all times.
They can do so because the international illuminati-Zionist bankers are all powerful and control the American and British governments. Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom, a source of perpetual war and a possible eventual Armageddon. The academia is, by and large, part of this cover up and that is very sad, to say the least. Any historian in a university who challenges the establishment version will be ostracized, if not thrown out of his job. Nick Kollerstrom had to lose his job despite the fact that he is an outstanding academic. One of his colleagues, whom he had known for years, was so angry that he told Kollerstrom that he wanted to hit him with his racket!
Guido Preparata was ostracized for his outstanding book Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Built the Third Reich,and had to quit his job, leave the U.S., and even give up his research career for some time. It is therefore significant that Docherty and Macgregor, though British (both are Scottish) do not work for any British university. They, therefore, cannot be thrown out of their jobs.
On the surface of it, the strategic aim behind the instigated and covertly planned World War I was to destroy both Germany and Russia and thereby kill the possibility of emergence of a dominant Eurasian power, or a powerful coalition of Eurasian countries, that could threaten the British Empire. The initial group, the Circle of the Elect, appeared to have, as its aim, the establishment of a worldwide British Empire. It only included one banker, Nathaniel Rothschild. With hindsight, the evolution of global affairs indicates without any doubt that the Zionists (Communism and Zionism sprouted from the same Illuminati “tribe” and had a common origin) were the real beneficiaries and the deeper instigators of this war.
The world today is headed towards a global slave state controlled by the Illuminati cum Zionist international bankers. The Bolshevik Revolution was led and controlled by “atheistic Jews” (to use Churchill’s phrase) most of whom came from outside Russia and both Lloyd David George and President Wilson were stooges of the Zionists. Today both, the U.S. and the U.K., are completely controlled by the Zionist cum Illuminati international bankers.
However, other deeper aims of the international bankers were to weaken Christianity through widespread death and destruction of Christian life and property, to weaken European governments by exhaustively bleeding them and bringing them under deep debt bondage, to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution, to facilitate the creation of Israel and the establishment of a supra-national organization through which to set up a One World Government under their ruthless and absolute control (The New World Order). The international bankers were simultaneously Zionists and Freemasons/Illuminati.
A photo of the 1914 Christmas Truce illustrates how the British and Germans had no antipathy until it was created by propaganda and the war itself
*
Building Japan, Bruising and then Wooing Russia after Sabotaging a Russo German Treaty
It was the Secret Elite that was behind the strategy to build Japan’s navy that was then used to destroy the Russian fleet that traveled around the world to confront the Japanese navy. The Russian fleet was utterly destroyed in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905 and the small island nation managed to inflict a humiliating defeat on a giant. This was part of the strategy of the Secret Elite to curtail Russia’s ambitions in the Far East and to bruise and weaken her. Ships for the Japanese navy were quietly built in the shipyards of Britain. On the one hand, the Rothschilds in London secretly provided loans to Japan, while on the other the Rothschilds in France provided loans worth 400 million francs to the Russian government to build the 6365 miles long trans-Siberian railway (p 86, ref. [1]). The Russians had expressed their gratitude to the Rothschilds when the czar decorated Alfonso de Rothschild of Paris with Grand Cross. The London Rothschilds made double profits because the armament industry which manufactured battleships for the Japanese navy were partly owned by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had the greatest shares in Vickers armament. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 92, 93 ref [1]):
Manipulators at the heart of the Secret Elite, like Esher, facilitated meetings held on Rothschild premises to help the Japanese financial envoy, Takahashi Korekiyo, raise their war chest. While banks with strong links to the Rothschilds were prepared to raise funds for Japan quite openly, the Rothschilds had to tread carefully because of their immense Russian investments, not least in the Baku oilfields. They were also very aware of the political repercussions that might ensue for Russian Jews who bore the harsh brunt of czarist anti-Semitism. That changed once the war was over. The London and Paris Rothschilds negotiated a further £48 million issue to help Japanese recovery. At every turn the war profits flowed back to the Secret Elite.”
It was Japan that attacked the Russian fleet in Port Arthur, a Chinese port that was functional all year round and had been leased to Russia. Although Japan issued a declaration of war on Feb 8, 1904, its navy attacked the Russian fleet three hours before the ultimatum was delivered to the Russian government.
In order to go to war with Germany the Secret Elite took four decisions. These are summarized by Docherty and Macgregor in the following words (pp 73,74, ref. [1]):
“Foreign policy had to be sustained no matter what political party was in office; the British Army needed a complete overhaul to make it fit for the purpose; the Royal Navy had to maintain all its historic advantages; the general public had to be turned against Germany.”
The British public did not want to go to war with Germany and therefore a secretly driven but powerful propaganda campaign against Germany was launched in order to poison the minds of the public. The Belgian ambassador apparently noticed by 1903 that jingoism was on the rise in Britain and people were turning against Germany. He wrote to his government that this was merely because of jealousy. Docherty and Macgregor point out that the ambassador did not know that secret manipulation behind the scenes had resulted in this attitude.
The Secret Elite worked relentlessly using the vast Rhodes fortune at its disposal to buy politicians and men of influence in all countries that were relevant. One of the men in their pocket was Alexander Islovsky, who served them loyally to the immense detriment of Russia, Europe and the Christian West. Kaiser Wilhelm had made a brilliant move in 1905 – he wanted to have an agreement between Russia and Germany that would have averted the war by forming a defensive alliance.
The Kaiser and the Czar secretly met and signed an agreement on July 24, 1905 at Bjorko Finland, whereby if any one of the countries was attacked by a European power the other shall come to its aid. However, when the czar returned to Russia the agents of the Secret Elite as well as a bribed press opposed the ratification of the treaty. Actually no one knew of the contents of the treaty until the Czar confided in is his foreign minister Count Lansdorff who betrayed the secret to King Edward VII.
The Czar was in need of money after the Russo-Japanese war in which Russia suffered heavy material and human losses. He therefore needed loans and the Rothschilds in Paris were far richer than any Berlin banks. The Secret Elite threatened to block the much needed loans. This was crucial and the Czar backed off despite having signed the proposed treaty. This treaty, had it gone through, would have averted the planned world war. This caused the Kaiser immense pain and he wrote to the Czar (p 95 ref. [1]): “We joined hands and signed before God who heard our vows.” This mistake by the Czar was to cost Russia and Germany dearly during World War I.
Having sabotaged the Russo-German alliance the Secret Elite then used King Edward VII to woo Russia. The King invited the Russian navy to Britain and the British public was softened towards Russia through a media campaign. The Secret Elite managed to lure and trap Russia by a false promise of allowing Russia to control Constantinople (Istanbul) and the Black Sea Straits. A Russia that had been mauled militarily, that was in dire financial straits, and that was presented with a dangling Constantinople carrot succumbed and fell in the trap. An Anglo-Russian Convention was signed on 31 August 1907. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 95,96 ref. [1]):
The Secret Elite was prepared to use any nation as cat’s-paw and Russia became the victim of British trickery, manipulated into a different treaty that was designed not to protect her or the peace of Europe but to enable the Secret Elite to destroy Germany. . . It was yet another secret deal hidden from Parliament and the people. . .”
By such deceptions, lies, bribery and manipulations, the brutal and absolutely ruthless and utterly shameless Secret Elite proceeded to steer and goad nations to a path of unprecedented bloodshed in which Christian, and to a lesser extent Muslim blood was shed. The beneficiaries were the satanic illuminati international bankers and their brethren. Their determination to destroy Germany masked a deep and malevolent desire for a conflagration that would burn Christian Europe to ashes with tens of millions of casualties. That was their goal and they drew the deepest delight and satisfaction by turning men into savage animals.
The Myth of Belgian Neutrality
When World War I began the British public had been exposed to false propaganda for a long time. Two issues on which their mind had been falsely influenced were Belgian neutrality and German militarism. Facts were the opposite of what people were led to believe. As for Belgian neutrality, it was utterly untrue. Belgium was not only not neutral it had had close military links with Britain since 1905 when Britain offered to send “4 cavalry brigades, 2 armored corps, and a division of mounted infantry” to Belgium (p 106, ref. [1]). At that time nobody outside the close knit Secret Elite know of, or suspected, possible war with Germany.
Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 106, 107ref. [1]): “Britain’s military link with Belgium was one of the closes guarded secrets, even within privileged circles.” General Grierson, who was director of military operations was present at a secret 1905 meeting along with Lord Roberts, PM Balfour, Admiral Fisher and the head of naval intelligence, where a decision to take forward joint military planning with France and Belgium was taken. This was so secret that it was agreed that “the minutes would not be printed or circulated without special permission from the prime minister.” Docherty and MacGregor write further (p 107, ref. [1]):
Documents found in the Belgian secret archives by the Germans after they had occupied Brussels disclosed that the chief of the Belgian general staff, Major General Ducarne, held a series of meetings with the British military attache’ over action to be taken by British, French and Belgian armies against Germany in event of war. A fully elaborated plan detailed the landing and transportation of British forces, which were actually called ‘allied armies’, and in a series of meetings they discussed the allocation of Belgian officers and interpreters to the British Army and crucial details on the care and ‘accommodation of the wounded of the allied armies.’”
The British allowed Belgium to annex Congo Free State in return for a “secret agreement that was in everything but name an alliance. King Leopold II sold Belgian neutrality for African rubber and minerals.” Thus Belgium bargained away her neutral status and in return entered into a deep and hidden relationship with Britain against Germany. Docherty and Macgregor point out that here too King Edward VII played a hidden but important role because the King of Belgium was a cousin of Queen Victoria and was very fond of her. So much for Belgian neutrality that became a rallying cry to war for the misled and deliberately misinformed British public. The technique of using the media to control the public mindset continues to date and entails an incredible cost in terms of loss of human life and property.
The Myth of German Militarism
As for German militarism, Docherty and Macgregor have provided irrefutable data that clearly establishes that Britain was spending far more secretly on arming itself compared to Germany. In reality it was British militarism but the cunning and, in a sense, deep characterlessness of the Secret Elite, which hoodwinked everyone and which worked outside and in contradiction with the constitution, and which lied to and shamelessly deceived everyone, created the opposite impression. When the Liberal leader Campbell-Bannerman won a landslide victory in 1906, the Liberals were committed to peace.
Edward Grey and Haldane were committed to war and along with other members of the Secret Elite, steering the country towards war. Cabinet was never informed of this, nor was the prime minister. The crafted biographies of men like Haldane contain lies and are unreliable. And if one reads Docherty and Macgregor they have exposed the lies in Haldane’s biography and private notes. In fact, there is evidence that Campbell-Bannerman was kept in the dark about the military contacts with other countries. His untimely death in 1908 relieved the Secret Elite of the pressure for a peaceful world! In fact, the Secret Elite were very worried soon afterwards, because in 1910, their key patron King Edward VII died at age 68, while the Liberals were still in power.
False propaganda about German military preparations was carried out at the behest of the Secret Elite in the British media. As Docherty and Macgregor put it (pp 134, 135, ref. [1])
From the beginning of the twentieth century, the Secret Elite indulged in a frenzy of rumor and half-truths, of raw propaganda and lies, to create the myth of a great naval race. The story widely accepted, even by many anti-war Liberals, was that Germany was preparing a massive fleet of warships to attack and destroy the British navy before unleashing a military invasion on the east coast of England or the Firth of Forth in Scotland. It was the stuff of conspiracy novels. But it worked. The British people swallowed the lie that militarism had run amok in Germany and the ‘fact’ that it was seeking world domination through military superiority. Militarism in the United Kingdom was of God, but in Germany of the Devil, and had to be crushed before it crushed them.”
These authors are quick to point out that when Germany was defeated and all their prewar records became available to the Allies, not a shred of evidence in favor of such secret plans to invade Britain were discovered. They point out that the statistics were thoroughly abused by an “almighty alliance of armaments manufacturers, political rhetoric, and newspaper propaganda” that conjured a frightening image of a German naval armada and the German will to dominate the world.
Rothschild and Ernest Cassel, who paid for the lechery of King Edward VII when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were major owners of the largest armament factory Vickers. They point out that in the decade prior to war the British naval expenditure was £351.9 million whereas the German naval expenditure was £185.2 million, i.e. almost half of the British expenditure. Similarly, the Allies, i.e., the Triple Entente spent £675.88 million on warships in that same decade whereas Germany and Austro-Hungary spent £235.9 million, almost a third of what the Entente had spent, on their navies in the same period.
Generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff (R) lead Germany as virtual military dictators from mid-1916 to the end of the war
The German army was 7,61000 strong, the French and Russian armies had, respectively, 794,000 and 1.845 million personnel. So, where is the evidence of German militarism running amok? Who was running amok? Who was spending far more than the Germans? This lie of German military buildup has been perpetuated by establishment historians when the numbers speak out for themselves. The establishment historians should be ashamed at propagating lies and holding the so-called nonexistent German militarism responsible for the war. They have lied to, and continue to lie to their own people as well as the whole world. What a shame! The Germans should stand up with their heads high. They did not lie or deceive.
The sanitized history taught worldwide seems to hold Germany as the aggressor. This is utterly untrue as established by Docherty and Macgregor. Preparata also states in his fascinating book (published 2005) (p 14 of ref [3]):

“From the beginning Britain was the aggressor, not Germany.”

The Russian ambassador to France Isvolsky, who was an agent of the Secret Elite, sent a telegram to Moscow on August 1, 1914 (p 320, ref. [1]):
“The French War Minister informed me, in hearty high spirits, that the Government have firmly decided on war, and begged me to endorse the hope of the French General Staff that all efforts will be directed against Germany…”
Germany did not order mobilization until 24 hours later! The Kaiser had sent a message to the Russian czar asking that Russia stop her military movements on her borders. The Kaiser waited for 24 hours without any reply before ordering mobilization. Docherty and Macgregor correctly observe that Germany was the last of the European powers to order mobilization. Does that indicate that Germany wanted war? It only indicates that Germany did her best to avoid war.
A detailed study of the interactions between the British leaders and the Germans and others during July and the first days of August reveals clearly that the British leaders were shamelessly lying to the Germans and deceiving them. Their conduct had descended to the level of common criminals and crooks.
The Germans conducted themselves with integrity and a degree of innocence. The Secret Elite had also advised the Russians and the French to mobilize to attack, but not actually attack Germany, because the British public would never support the aggressor in a European war. They wanted Germany, as Docherty and Macgregor put it, to “swallow the bait.” Britain had trapped Germany into a war, in collusion with Russia and France. Docherty and Macgregor write (p 321, ref. [1]):
“What else could Germany have done? She was provoked into a struggle for life and death. It was a stark choice: await certain destruction or strike out to defend herself. Kaiser Wilhelm had exposed his country to grave danger and almost lost one precious advantage Germany had by delaying countermeasures to Russian mobilization in the forlorn hope of peace.”
When Germany declared war against France on August 3, 1914, the French Under-Secretary of State, Abel Ferry, noted in his diary (ref. [3], p 24):
The web was spun and Germany entered it like a great buzzing fly.”
The Illuminati international bankers and other secret society members of the British oligarchy had colluded together for a destruction of Christian Europe. Only the Zionist international bankers and their fellow “tribesmen” saw this outcome clearly – they had planned for it and the non-banking oligarchy was used. The lie parroted in standard history books that Germany bore the responsibility of the war is an utter and shameful lie. The responsibility of the war rested with the Secret Elite controlled British leadership.
Western Front WW1 British soldier
Zionism and the American Involvement
Almost two months before war broke out, on May 29, 1914, the Rothschild agent Col. House, who handled and controlled President Wilson, had written to him:
“Whenever England consents, France and Russia will close in on Germany.”
It is well known that Col. Edward Mandel House was a Rothschild agent as was his father. Col. House played a diabolical role in prolonging World War I, and in dragging the U.S. into the World War. It is important to understand how influential he was with President Wilson. President Wilson had once referred to him as his alter ego. In his seminal book, that has sold over five million copies since it was first published, Gary Allen states [4]:
“Colonel” House was front man for the international banking fraternity. He manipulated President Wilson like a puppet. Wilson called him “my alter ego.” House played a major role in creating the Federal Reserve System, passing the graduated income tax and getting America into WWI. House’s influence over Wilson is an example that in the world of super-politics the real rulers are not always the ones the public sees.
Col. House represents a new phenomenon – the emergence of “advisors” to the U.S. President who do not hold any formal office, are unelected, and are intimately tied to the international banking families, apart from being members of secret societies. These advisors hold the president of the United States “captive.” In his profound book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed, a Times (London) correspondent in Central Europe right up to the beginning of WW II, mentions that four men held President Wilson captive – Col. House, Rabi Stephen Wise, Justice Brandeis and Bernard Baruch. Reed states [5]:
Thus three out of the four men around President Wilson were Jews and all three, at one time or the other, played leading parts in the re-segregation of the Jews through Zionism and its Palestinian ambition ….
Such was the grouping around a captive president as the American Republic moved towards involvement in the First World War, and such was the cause which was to be pursued through him and his country’s involvement. After his election Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.
In order to understand how and why the preplanned WWI was prolonged it is important to know who influenced or controlled the elected leadership of the U.K. and the U.S. and what were the aims of these controllers. It is also important to know that Justice Louis Brandeis had founded a secret society by the name Parushim, for promoting Zionism in U.S.A. The initiate was asked to accept the following oath at a secret initiation ceremony [6] :
You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation. By entering this brotherhood, you become a self-dedicated soldier in the army of Zion. Your obligation to Zion becomes your paramount obligation… It is the wish of your heart and of your own free will to join our fellowship, to share its duties, its tasks, and its necessary sacrifices.
Rabi Stephen Wise was on board regarding Parushim and, almost certainly, Bernard Baruch was also on board. Bernard Baruch’s connection with the international bankers is well known. It is also important to point out that the international bankers had planned World War I to, among other things, promote the Zionist cause. As Douglas Reed, using information provided in Chaim Weizmann’s book Trial and Error, stated in his book Far and Wide [7]:
The First World War began in 1914; long-memoried readers may recall that it appeared to be concerned with such matters as the rape of Belgium, ending Prussian militarism, and making the world safe for democracy. At its start Baron Edmond de Rothschild told Dr. Weizmann that it would spread to the Middle East, where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.
How did Edmond de Rothschild know right at the beginning of the war that the war would spread to the Middle East where things will work out to the great advantage of Political Zionism? He could only know this if it was planned that way and if he was one of the planners. And, as we will see, this was one of the reasons why World War I was deliberately prolonged.
Prolonging the War
The war was prolonged through several tactics. Firstly, all overtures of peace from the side of the Germans, and later the Ottomans, were defeated by agents of the international bankers. Secondly when Germans ran short of food, the deception named Belgian Relief Commission was set up by the international bankers through their front men, by which food was supplied to Germany and the German army, under guise of food supplies to Belgium, so that the German army could keep on fighting. Thirdly Germans were supplied with vital chemicals, metals, and other war materials by Allied Big Business, to enable them to keep fighting. Finally, wherever the Allied rulers seemed to resist the expansion of the war into the Middle East, they were eliminated politically, and if need be physically. They were then replaced by agents of the international banking cabal.
Sabotage of German Peace Offers of February 1915 and December 1916
A lone French soldier in a wet trench
Early in the war, on November 3, 1914, Britain declared the North Sea a theater of war. It blockaded ports of neutral countries illegally. On February 3, 1915, i.e. three months later, the Germans announced a counter blockade. They announced that with effect from February 18, 1915, the entire English channel along with territorial waters of Britain and Ireland would be considered a war zone. One must appreciate the fact that the Germans waited for three months before announcing a counter blockade. They were within their rights to do so.
However simultaneously, in February 1915, the Germans approached James W. Gerard, the U.S. ambassador in Germany, and expressed their desire to end the war. The German authorities wanted the ambassador to convey their desire for peace to President Wilson. They were however utterly unaware that President Wilson was a captive of the “advisors” installed around him by the international bankers. This German overture for peace is not something that is mentioned in textbooks but it has been mentioned by James W. Gerard in autobiography My First Eighty Three Years in America.
The response from Washington was most astonishing. Instead of commenting on the German proposal for peace, the White House directed the ambassador to communicate with Col. House instead of the President of U.S.A.! Dr. Stanley Montieth quotes from ambassador Gerard’s biography [8]:
In addition to the cable which I had already received informing me that Colonel House was “fully commissioned to act” he himself reminded me of my duty in his February 16 postscript. In his own handwriting these were the words from House. “The President has just repeated to me your cablegram to him and says he has asked you to communicate directly with me in future . . .” All authority, therefore had been vested in Colonel House direct, the President ceased to be even a conduit of communications. . . . He, who had never been appointed to any position, and who had never been passed by the Senate, was “fully instructed and commissioned” to act in the most grave situation. I have never ceased to wonder how he had managed to attain such power and influence.
One may notice that the German counter blockade was to begin on February 18, and the Germans communicated their desire for peace before that date as Colonel House’s handwritten postscript was dated February 16th. So it appears that the Germans expected that since the counter blockade represented an increased and new level of hostility, the Americans would be concerned to defuse the situation. They had no idea that Wilson was a stooge, a puppet in the hands of those who had planned a long war.
And one may recall that although the Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated as late as June 28, 1914, Col. House had, a month earlier, on May 29th, communicated to Wilson the arrangement that as soon as England indicated, France and Russia would pounce on Germany. So Colonel House wanted a long war, and destruction of both Germany and Russia, in accordance with the desire of the Zionist international bankers. Therefore, the ambassador never heard anything from Col. House about the peace proposal of February 1915. The peace proposal was sabotaged by Col. House.
Realizing that Col. House was in control of Wilson the Germans made another overture of peace in December 1916. This has been revealed by historian Leon Degrelle [9]. He mentions that on December 12, 1916, German officials expressed a desire for peace and talks with their adversaries. He also writes that Germans expressed the hope that Col. House would persuade the Allies. The freemason Col. House ruled out peace and thus helped sabotage the second peace initiative within the same year. The Germans did not know that Col. House had played an important role in precipitating the First World War by secretly entering into a secret agreement with Britain, well before Wilson’s re-election, that the U.S. would join the war, on the side of the Allies. Degrelle further writes [9]:
“On December 18, 1916, U.S. ambassador to Britain, Walter H. Page, relayed a peace offer to the Allies from Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. On January 9, 1917, Prime Minister Lloyd George quickly repudiated the offering and declared that Britain would fight to the victory, which possibly prompted the Germans to re-initiate submarine warfare. Ambassador Page, in touch with President Wilson and Secretary of State Robert Lansing, defended British policies. This was William Jenning Bryan’s resignation, after he described Britain’s collapsing financial situation and the need for America’s neutrality.”
If the war had ended in 1916 million of lives could have been saved and destruction and devastation of numerous cities avoided. But the international bankers had planned a long war. It is important to note that, according to writer Juri Lina, who had access to records of numerous important Masonic lodges, Lloyd George was a Freemason, a Masonic Grand Master, and a Jew, whose real name was David Levi-Lowitt [10]. His connections with international bankers are very well known and he was installed in power as a result of an intrigue with the object of promoting the Zionist cause, as will be described later.
The picture of dead men among trees is a censored photo that was banned from publication by the French government. Those are dead Frenchmen mowed down by German guns during the Battle of the Frontiers in August/September 1914.
*