Military Affairs

IGOR STRELKOV: THE WAR WILL CONTINUE IN THE SAME MODE

1 Comment

IGOR STRELKOV: THE WAR WILL CONTINUE IN THE SAME MODE OF A “BLOODY PULL OF THE ROPE” Machine translated

(on the letter of 30.11.2025)

I read the summary with some delay (I was on a long date with my wife and daughter) but I’m trying to respond immediately. Especially since I just received (from other sources) information about the “sources and course of the negotiation process”, which, unfortunately, refutes (unfortunately) your opinion that (quoting) “…the negotiation farce is perceived as a game of thimbles and a journey of Pinocchio to the land of fools…” – There is no doubt that the “Pinocchios” (and all other “puppets” from this “circus on horse traction”) will inevitably be deceived and “sucked in” by the “older ones” of the Jewish banking clans in the final round. However, the trouble is that while the “Pinocchios” are “full-fledged participants in the process of being led by the nose (as the owner of this nose)”, they will manage to “suck in” all of us – even before the brilliant leaders. I “suspected something wrong” from the moment that “the main negotiator” was appointed to be a “playboy” (or rather, a “gayboy”) Kirill Dmitriev – the most “liberal” of the purest breed. It became clear that our National Leader, overwhelmed and having lost his composure (what remains of it), decided to “unreservedly throw himself into the arms of Trump”, abandoning (or rather, deciding to abandon “under any guarantees”) the alliance with the “rather cold” Chinese comrades. And Trump, of course (through his loyal Jewish friends), promised “everything the soul (or what replaces it in the National Leader?) desires”. And now we are witnessing a rather absurd, completely illogical, extremely unlikely (from the point of view of practical implementation) scenario under the conditional name: “surrendering separately to America at the expense of the so-called ‘Ukraine’ and – most importantly – breaking with Beijing”. Will it be possible to surrender “on favorable terms” (which can be “sold as a victory” to the population) – even less likely. But “hopes inspire” and this is visible.</b> I don’t believe (neither from the point of view of common sense, nor, so to speak, “intuitively”) that this despicable “underground deal” will result in anything other than another deep disappointment for our National Leader, complicated by problems with the “Chinese comrades” (and, accordingly, a significant further deterioration of the military-political and economic situation). That is, we can already start analyzing the upcoming “problems”:

  1. So, the Tramp’s (named after “Habbad Lubavitch”) proposals are “divided into 4 parts”. Russia will accept some, and the so-called “Ukraine” – others. And the “bargaining” will again stumble on the impossibility of “combining the impossible”.

  2. Apparently, Zelensky will be “purged” (“sacked” in both cases: if he agrees, he will be “sacked for treason”, if he does not agree, he will be “sacked for intransigence”). But (except for the empty outcries of our reptilian media) this will not bring us any benefit: the “replacement” will be (at best) no better than the current “player”. Therefore, we can expect “moral satisfaction” from our National Leader (like, – “another clown has been outwitted!”), but not the satisfaction of Russia’s real demands.

  3. Since “packages” will be considered/accepted in parts/separately – we will “extract some serious concessions from them”, the first of which will probably be a temporary ceasefire of active combat operations. (Ukraine will, of course, not observe it, or “as conveniently as possible”). After the “partners” actually get something from us – they will, of course, refuse to implement (or even accept) it under any pretext – and we will again “be left empty-handed” (but our National Leader), having already lost the tactical advantages gained with such difficulty and blood.

  4. Meanwhile, the “romance” between Moscow and Washington will continue, and China will carefully observe this “intimacy” and – on its part – will make efforts to prevent the implementation of Moscow’s “project of a great turn” away from an alliance with Beijing – to the contrary.

In practical terms, this may result in an intensification of the “bloody tug-of-war” war, with each month increasing the chances of direct military intervention by “third countries”.</b>

  1. As for the war, it will continue in the same mode of a “bloody tug-of-war”, increasing the chances of intervention in it by “third countries” with each passing month.

  2. As for the outcome of all this – I won’t write about it… But I can guarantee that it won’t be “good”. – By his adventurous and unthoughtful actions, the Kremlin is now “splitting its own power base”, deepening and making increasingly acute and insurmountable contradictions between “differently oriented” groups of oligarchs and VIP officials. This has never ended well for any country and in any era.

Generally, I have a “relative deja vu”… with the spring – the beginning of summer 2023, marked by… “pogroms on Moscow” by “kitchen workers”. There are no more such “kitchen workers”, no more “kitchen”, and nothing like it.</b>

I hope that my thoughts are clear to you. As for the other topics raised in your summary:

1) Delagin. My attitude towards him is defined by the concept – “distraction on an unworthy object”. The man positions himself as a “patriot” and an “authority in patriotic circles”, and in reality – he trades this “authority” for orders from the “party of power”. Since the man is not stupid and cowardly (in one package) – without great ambitions, it turns out to be “satisfying”, long, safe, and even without obvious damage to the undeservedly gained reputation. (I can’t stand such people even more than I can stand outright scoundrels – they do more harm). My personal opinion, of course…

2) I am more than satisfied with your texts. There’s no need to change anything.

3) Regarding the events of 2023 Klimov grotesquely overestimates the capabilities of Gubarev at that moment. As for the “hint at some forces”, I don’t have a clear opinion about it. If the question concerns me personally, then my own position in the described period was, as “… on the sidelines”: I could not have any influence on the ongoing process (being completely “excluded from the political field”, and by “all interested participants”). At most, I could have “sprayed the wheels if I had been run over”. It’s sad, but I assessed the situation exactly like that then, and I assess it similarly now.

With unchanged respect,
please confirm receipt,
(signature) I. V. Girkin

04.11.2025 (note by F.V. – probably a typo in the date: 04.12.2025)
/fragment of a letter to a comrade Frol Vladimirov/

EuroSlavia, Remember?

What the Russian Nationalists Are Saying

Leave a comment

Saving Europeans from Themselves

Jews On a Losing Crusade against China

Leave a comment

by Claudiu Secara

Here is my two-cents take on the major conflict in the world these days: the looming conflict between Jewish power, ruling over the West, and the perceived threat from China.

All the rest is just jockeying for a better alignment in the upcoming big conflict/war.

The Russia-Ukraine thing is a form of arm-twisting, by the omnipresent Jewish fifth column among the warring parties, in order to force the Russians to switch sides. Russia would perform any gymnastics, bending over, jumping up and down, whatever, only to preserve its much celebrated status as a sovereign power if not, an out-of-its-league, outright the claim to equal status among the world’s superpowers. With a low population among the world giants, Russians are keenly tied to their land and to their prize of having easily conquered the whole of the native’s northern Asian continent. They hold onto their conquered lands as their unrivaled treasure, coveted by all neighbors, including not so-close neighbors, around the world.

They are instinctively willing to play the game of “fellow traveler” as long as possible and befriend anyone in order to cross the bridge to survival and continue lording it over their vassals.

But the noose gets tighter and tighter around the necks of the Jewish overlords themselves. China is almost twice as big as the white man’s world. Their industrial production is larger than that of the rest of the entire world combined. China’s industrial sector is only 27 percent of their GDP, but it already outstrips the rest of the world. On the other side, Jewish power has been pretty much disconspired in the West, never mind among the rest of the world. Their moral standing is completely compromised by their naked barbarism, showing the whole world what life would be like under an undisputed Jewish full-spectrum domination.

The Jews are scrambling to patch together an alignment and then an alliance between the West, Russia and the Muslim world against the Chinese. But the Jews are weak, splintered, and just like in the biblical story, the Israelites are gambling everything on a fantasy — that is the fantasy that a small, unrepentant tribe can withstand the colossal Roman army. They lost everything in that battle, lost their country, their claim to statehood, their standing among other peoples. But they didn’t learn from their own self-made destruction. And with the same hubris they are now tormenting the world with the challenge of how to deal with them, such enemies of the human race.

They absolutely cannot win against the multifaceted forces of opposition, all appalled by such brazen inhumanity. Slowly, but ineluctably, the world is coming to see the Tribe as a cancer that must be treated.

I see China as the ultimate supremo due to their industrious talents, and higher morals. It will end up reorganizing the world according to their better and successful principles.

Uncategorized

Trump Is Once Again Acting as Putin’s Agent

7 Comments

And that pivot does not serve American national interests.

By MICHAEL MCFAUL

Professor of Political Science, Director of Freeman Spogli Institute & Hoover Senior Fellow all at Stanford University. U.S. Ambassador to Russia, 2012-2014.

https://michaelmcfaul.substack.com/p/trump-is-once-again-acting-as-putins

I admit I made a mistake. I thought President Trump had finally realized that placating Vladimir Putin had not served either American national interests or his own reputation. The details of a new “peace plan” for Ukraine, endorsed by Trump and his team, confirm that I was wrong in this assessment. Trump has once again shunned the role of neutral mediator and is again taking Russia’s side. This pivot back to the old, pro-Putin Trump is bad for Ukraine, bad for Europe, and bad for the United States.

As my readers know, I have written and commented critically about President Trump’s embrace of Vladimir Putin for over a decade. During his first presidential campaign, Trump went out of his way to praise the Russian dictator. This enthusiasm for Putin continued throughout his first term, including a shocking moment at their summit in Helsinki in 2018 when Trump sided with Putin against his own intelligence community, falsely claiming there had been no Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. (Incidentally, it was in Helsinki that Trump volunteered to hand me over to Moscow for interrogation regarding crimes I allegedly committed against Russia while working at the National Security Council! Read about it here.) At the beginning of his second term, Trump continued to praise and support Putin. Most embarrassingly, the United States under Trump joined Russia, North Korea, Belarus, and a bunch of other rogue nations in voting against a UN resolution criticizing Russia for invading Ukraine. Even China abstained.

More recently, however, there were signs that Trump was beginning to understand Putin. After Trump and his aides offered Putin all sorts of concessions to end his war in Ukraine, Putin just asked for more. Trump seemed frustrated by that. In April, Trump questioned in a Truth Social post whether Putin was “tapping me along.” Putin was. Most encouragingly, in October—for the first time in 2025—the Trump administration finally implemented new sanctions on two Russian oil companies. I thought optimistically that Trump might be changing his mind about Putin.

The publication this week of a so-called new “peace plan” has undermined that optimism. Trump and his team are right back to appeasing Putin and undermining Ukrainian sovereignty. This reversal is dramatic and tragic.

Ukrainian and Western leaders had no say in the drafting of the plan, which requires extreme concessions from Kyiv and demands nothing from Moscow. It is not a “peace plan.” It is a Russian proposal for Ukrainian capitulation endorsed by the Trump administration. Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev reportedly leaked the plan to the American press to tie Trump’s hands. (I hope the president and his aides realize what a sinister move this was by Dmitriev.)

There is little new in the plan. The proposal simply repeats all of Putin’s maximalist demands from years ago. Most outrageously, this new Russian plan calls on Ukraine yet again to abandon territory still held by its soldiers in Donbas. Putin has been trying to seize this area of eastern Ukraine since 2014; it seems he has now given up on his soldiers and is just asking Trump to hand it over to him. Equally egregious are the provisions in the plan that place limits on Ukraine’s sovereignty, including caps on the size of the army and a prohibition on joining NATO. Most arrogantly, the proposal states that Ukraine will be “eligible” to join the European Union—as if Russia had any say in this matter. Trump apparently also decided unilaterally to speak on behalf of the other G-7 countries – all of which are democratic allies of the United States—when agreeing in this document to invite Russia to rejoin what would become the G-8. And, of course, in a pattern now consistent with other Trump-backed deals, the plan offers all sorts of ways for Americans to make money. One bullet point even describes how “$100 billion in frozen Russian assets will be invested in US-led efforts to rebuild and invest in Ukraine,” with the important caveat that the US “will receive 50% of the profits”! Finally, there is nothing in this document identifying Russia as the instigator of this barbaric war.

A Trump-led pressure campaign on Zelenskyy to accept this deal—the Ukrainians reportedly have only until Thursday to say yes—will not advance American national interests. Here’s why:

First, this Russian plan rewards imperialism and acknowledges annexation. Acquiescing to such an agreement will not produce long-lasting peace but only result in a temporary pause in Putin’s aggression, much like that which followed Putin’s first attack on Ukraine in 2014. And an emboldened Putin will escalate his threats to our NATO allies in Europe. Just as appeasement in the run-up to World War II eventually resulted in large-scale war, the same tactics could produce more conflict, not less—again in Europe, and in the near future.

Second, the very publication of this “peace plan” has already exacerbated tensions with our European allies. Pursuing its implementation will do even further damage to our relations with our NATO allies.

Third, the provision in the plan that weakens Ukraine, such as a cap on the size of the Ukrainian military, is antithetical to American national interests. To deter war between Russia and NATO countries, NATO—an alliance that includes the United States, in case some in the Trump administration forgot—needs a strong Ukrainian military. Right now, even after fighting the Russian army for over three years, the Armed Forces of Ukraine remain the most effective military in Europe. NATO needs that army to stay strong to deter any future aggression from Russia. Eventually, to enhance deterrence, that army should be fully integrated into NATO. The United States benefits from a strong Ukraine, not a weak Ukraine.

Fourth, acceding to the erosion of norms regarding sovereignty sends a terrible signal to Beijing that Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party can also use force for territorial gain. Such a signal could wrongly tempt Xi into trying to seize Taiwan by force, a military action that would destroy the global economy and easily drag the United States into war with the People’s Republic of China.

Fifth, supporting this Russian proposal aligns the United States with the autocratic, imperial aggressor in this war. How does that enhance our international reputation? As I wrote about in my new book, the United States needs to be firmly on the side of the free world in the fight between autocrats and democrats unfolding over the next century. Trump’s siding with Putin blurs our commitment to freedom and undermines our once iron-clad reputation as the leader of the free world.

Finally, this Russian plan, as published, will not work. It will not end this war. Even if Zelenskyy wanted to accept it, his citizens and warriors would not. Trump, therefore, will look like a weak and failed negotiator if he tries to force Ukraine to capitulate.

The only path forward is a serious amendment to this draft document that removes the most egregious violations of Ukrainian sovereignty and calls upon Putin to make concessions, too. Most importantly, Putin cannot have a say in Ukraine’s sovereign affairs, be it the size of the army, Ukraine’s agreements on security guarantees with European and American partners, or relations with multilateral organizations such as NATO and the EU. NATO leaders did not seek Stalin’s permission when they established the alliance in 1949. And no one phoned up Khrushchev and asked for his blessing to bring part of Germany into the alliance in 1955. Asking for Moscow’s permission now—giving Putin a veto over how Ukraine conducts its own foreign policy—harkens back to earlier centuries of “spheres of influence”. We all know how poorly that system ended.

Hopefully, in the coming days, our European allies will engage with Trump and his team to propose substantive amendments to this Russian plan. After Trump’s failed summit with Putin in Alaska in August, which produced no tangible gains for American security or meaningful steps to end the war in Ukraine, the Europeans came to Washington a few days later to help get us back on course. Let’s hope they will so again in the coming days.

A strong, democratic, and independent Ukraine advances American security and values, both in Europe and around the world. A weak Ukraine subjugated to Russia undermines American security and values, both in Europe and around the world. Standing up to Putin makes the United States look strong. Appeasing Putin makes the United States look weak. It’s just that simple.

I hope Trump’s reversal to his old Putin-admiring self is just a temporary relapse. But I will not be fooled again by any changes in what Trump says, I will judge the president’s policies only by changes in his actions.

EuroSlavia, Remember?, remember?

“Trump’s Plan” is Putin’s Plan

Leave a comment

Points of the peace plan for Ukraine, which are now being leaked and published by the media. Obviously, “Trump’s plan” is Putin’s plan.

  1. State status for the Russian language. That is, a refusal of forced derussification.
  2. Official status of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. I will add: and the return of the seized churches to it.
  3. Reduction of the Armed Forces of Ukraine by half (this is easy. After all, a non-warring army will be much easier)
  4. Complete withdrawal of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the DPR and LPR. (and the cities of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson remain under Ukraine, this is a big concession)
  5. Russia also transfers part of the territory, referring to parts of Kharkiv, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, and Mykolaiv regions.
  6. Ban on having long-range weapons.
  7. Official recognition of Crimea and the DPR and LPR as parts of Russia and
    Also, they forgot, but there will be more.
  8. Introduction of a demilitarized zone so that the Armed Forces of Ukraine cannot shoot at Donbas.
  9. Denazification. Ban on the glorification of Bandera and other fascists. Dissolution and ban of Azov and its units and similar fascist detachments.
  10. Political amnesty. Release of political prisoners, lifting the ban on media and political parties.
  11. Free elections of the president and parliament.
  12. Official neutrality of Ukraine, which must be recognized by NATO countries. No foreign troops.
  13. This is all the minimum program.
Current Events

Simple Coincidences?

Leave a comment

Is there any connection between the timing of the release of the Epstein files, Gaza “peace plan”, Crown Prince MBS’s visit to the WH and Trump not being listed on those files?

In other words, is Epstein used by the Masters of the Universe to force Trump to switch sides and abandon Netanyahu and possibly Putin?

The only thing that the Masters abhor is the notion of sovereignty. And that includes Israel’s sovereignty.

geopolitical issues

No Sovereignty Allowed

Leave a comment

If one is to make sense of the last 30-40 years of world events, from the “execution” of Ceaușescu to the Ukrainian war or the targeting of Venezuela – it is simply to understand that the Masters of the Universe are behind the elimination any idea of national sovereignty. No such nationalism is allowed. 

Is that now how they will deal with Netanyahu and Orban?

See it clearly spelled out by someone who knows from the inside.