De-Dollarization, A Complex Task for BRICS

South Africa’s minister of international relations and cooperation, Naledi Pandor

The BRICS group of nations will debate the feasibility of introducing a common currency for global trade as an alternative to the US dollar at the bloc’s next summit in Johannesburg, Bloomberg has reported, citing South Africa’s minister of international relations and cooperation.

“It’s a matter we must discuss and discuss properly,” Naledi Pandor said in an interview in Cape Town on Tuesday.

Talk of de-dollarization has emerged from governments keen to reduce reliance on the US currency. The dollar has increased in value due to US interest rate hikes as well as geopolitical conflicts that have negatively impacted most emerging markets.

According to Pandor, BRICS nations and other countries are questioning why they are “committed to trading through the dollar” and can’t use their own currencies instead. The BRICS group comprises Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.

South Africa has an internationally traded currency,” Pandor said, but cautioned that her country also holds significant debt in dollars, “so you know we have to approach this discussion responsibly.

The minister warned that de-dollarization would be complex and that there would be no guarantee of success.

I don’t think we should always assume the idea will work, because economics is very difficult and you have to have regard to all countries, especially in a situation of low growth when you are emerging from crises,” Pandor told Bloomberg.

The BRICS group makes up 40% of the world’s population and almost a third of the global economy. According to estimates provided by the South African government, the bloc brings together about 3.2 billion people.

Last month, 19 countries reportedly expressed interest in joining the BRICS group, which is gearing up to hold its 15th annual summit in South Africa from August 22 to 24. The United Arab Emirates, Argentina, Algeria, Egypt, Bahrain, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Iran are among the countries that have formally asked to become members.

War in the Cities, War Crimes

Ukraine and the Ukrainian leadership have made a very big mistake in moving the war to the cities.

This was stated by retired Greek Air Force Major General Pavlos Christou.

“Wars should only be fought between armies in an open space. Ukraine with its military dogma has moved the war into the cities without withdrawing the inhabitants, so there are heavy casualties on both sides. Civilians are being killed. It is a war crime when you bomb and fight and keep the population in the middle of the fighting, when you set up military bases in the city, in the hospitals. This is forbidden by international laws of warfare. The president of Ukraine is committing a crime against the people of Ukraine with thousands of civilian casualties. Yet the international community did not rise up when Ukrainian troops bombed cities for eight years. Did it not know what was going on? No one is talking about those bombings.”

Deaths by Gun Shooting in the US

Over 14,000 people have died from gun violence so far this year, according to the White House press secretary.

The US has seen 201 mass shootings in the first 128 days of 2023, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre claimed during a press briefing on Monday, citing “leading accounts.” Saturday’s massacre at an outlet mall in Allen, Texas, which left eight people dead and seven injured, allegedly marked the 201st mass shooting of the year.

Jean-Pierre’s mass shooting statistics appear to be sourced from the Gun Violence Archive, which defines a mass shooting as an incident in which a “minimum of four victims are shot, either injured or killed, not including any shooter who may also have been killed or injured in the incident.”

Deaths by suicide comprise the majority – 57% – of the 14,836 gun deaths recorded by the Gun Violence Archive for 2023, with about 66 of the 115 gun deaths recorded per day being suicides. By the Archive’s definition, the number of mass shootings actually declined from 690 in 2021 to 647 last year.

The FBI typically defines a mass shooting as one in which four or more people are killed. By that definition, there have been about 21 this year. According to the FBI, the number of “active shooter” incidents in the US declined in 2022 compared to 2021, falling from 61 to 50. While the total number of people shot increased from 243 to 313, the number killed declined from 103 to 100.

The Theater called the Cold War

by Claudiu Secara

What is important about Rogozin’s revelations, BIG: The Fake Moon Landing – Top Russian Official, is not that the Moon landing was a hoax. Anybody that had an interest in finding out the truth knows that.

The serious implications of Rogozin’s post is that he provides the smoking gun to those who always suspected a collusion – beyond the superficial – between the two Cold War adversaries. At the peak of the Cold War rhetoric, both sides were lying. Wink, wink among them, nuclear war threat for the hoi polloi to get them in line, to get them to be submissive. Even as recent as ten years ago, all the top officials in the “Soviet Union”, now Russia, were still lying. So were all the Chinese leadership lying.

They could have deflated the American Superman balloon by just piercing one of their myths and laughing out loud. The emperor has no clothes. But they lied ! Why? Politics? Not enough of a reason. There must have been much deeper considerations. And more sinister.

Now, the consequences of that fact, of collusion, are tremendous. All the die-hard supporters of the Cold War theater throughout these many years, including the war in Ukraine  should be . . . speechless.

Yes, the war in Ukraine is fake, as fake as the Moon landing, as fake as 9/11 and as fake as the Corona virus. And not the least as fake as WWI and WWII. Which is no longer a surprise as we know that Germany, the villain, was propped up by Standard Oil and IBM and all the rest of the Anglo-Saxon real villains.

Now, we can all go to sleep in peace.

. . . Except for the dead and the wounded and those left homeless. It is good theater for us, but is is a real tragedy for them and their families.

BIG: The Fake Moon Landing – Top Russian Official

See also this: The Theater called the Cold War

The former head of Russia’s Roscosmos space agency, Dmitry Rogozin, has expressed doubt that the US Apollo 11 mission really landed on the Moon in 1969, saying he has yet to see conclusive proof.

In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Rogozin said he began his personal quest for the truth “about ten years ago” when he was still working in the Russian government, and that he grew skeptical about whether the Americans had actually set foot on the Moon when he compared how exhausted Soviet cosmonauts looked upon returning from their flights, and how seemingly unaffected the Apollo 11 crew was by contrast.

Rogozin said he sent requests for evidence to Roscosmos at the time. All he received in response was a book featuring Soviet Cosmonaut Aleksey Leonov’s account of how he talked to the American astronauts and how they told him they had been on the Moon.

The former official wrote that he continued with his efforts when he was appointed head of Roscosmos in 2018. However, according to Rogozin, no evidence was presented to him. Instead, several unnamed academics angrily criticized him for undermining the “sacred cooperation with NASA,” he claimed.

The former Roscosmos chief also said he had “received an angry phone call from a top-ranking official” who supposedly accused him of complicating international relations.

Rogozin concluded by saying he still cannot believe that the US was able to pull off the feat, but is now unable to, despite the incredible progress in technology since the late 1960s.

What he claims to have found out, however, was that Washington has “its people in [the Russian] establishment.”

Apollo 11 was the first manned mission to the Moon, with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin going down in history as the first humans to walk on the lunar surface.

The flight was preceded by the unmanned Soviet Luna 2 program, which blazed the trail for Moon exploration.

Last April, President Vladimir Putin pledged to resume Russia’s lunar program.

via RT

From De-Dollarization to Fusion of Currencies

Authored by Ekaterina Blinova,

De-dollarization is heading for a breakthrough due to rising global discontent with US ‘casino capitalism’…

“It’s a gigantic snowball all over the world. We cannot even keep up with it,” Pepe Escobar said in an interview with the New Rules podcast.

“It’s very important what is going to be discussed at the BRICS summit in South Africa. This will probably be the crossroads moment where things are going to then go.”

Escobar explained that a growing number of countries in the Global South were doing the math and concluding that the US dollar was not a safe bet. The combination of aggressive US sanctions policy and reckless government spending have dramatically reduced the greenback’s international appeal.

“If you want to analyze the patterns these past two decades, you need to understand the fact that, if you are rich in commodities and if you are a productive capitalist nation and you decide to issue a currency, it will be internationally respected because people will know it’s based on facts, actual provenance, actual wealth,” he said. “That’s contrary to the system that we have now, which I have been calling it ‘casino capitalism’ for years. It’s futures, it’s bets, it’s suppositions. It may go right or wrong. If you lose, you lose it all. The house mostly always wins because the house is the one who prints the currency. It’s backed by nothing, literally, by a country that owes $30 trillion [in national debt] now and it will never be able to repay it.”

To make matters even worse, the US Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes has made borrowing in dollars expensive for almost everyone in the world. Prior to the Fed’s move, Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, warned in January 2022 that the US raising interest rates could backfire on the global economy and especially on countries with higher levels of dollar-denominated debt.

The ongoing US banking crisis threatens to further destabilize international financial markets. No country in the world wants to “catch a cold” when the US economy “sneezes,” as memories of the 2008 financial crisis linger.

“They say, ‘look, why do we have to be subjected to this kind of arrangement?’ And of course, before, as we all know, it was ‘the Empire of bases’, over 800 military bases all over the world, ‘the power of the financial markets’, ‘the power of soft culture’, ‘the power of cancel culture’, but the Global South is not intimidated anymore. I think this is the first [time] in this new millennium. We never had this before in the past two and a half centuries, at least,” Escobar said.

BRICS Seeking to Establish New Currency

In January 2023, BRICS – an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – made a splash by announcing that it may soon explore the possibility of creating its own currency to by-pass the US dollar. The idea was articulated on both sides of the Atlantic: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov touched upon the plan during a presser after his meeting with Angolan President Joao Lourenco on January 25.

On the other side of the pond, President of Brazil Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva discussed the issue of the creation of a common currency for BRICS and the countries of Mercosur, a South American trade bloc, during his meeting with his Argentine counterpart Alberto Fernandez.

“Why can’t an institution like the BRICS bank have a currency to finance trade relations between Brazil and China, between Brazil and all the other BRICS countries? Who decided that the dollar was the (trade) currency after the end of gold parity?” Lula said during an April visit to the Shanghai-based New Development Bank.

According to Escobar, the formation and development of three organizations, namely BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the Eurasian Economic Union predetermined the end of the greenback-centered world order. BRICS members are now discussing designing an alternative currency; similar discussions are being held in the Eurasian Economic Union; they should start coordinating and then this will spill over to the SCO, the writer projected.

The trend has already been engulfing other blocs, Escobar continued, referring to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). On March 28, ASEAN finance ministers and central bank governors held a meeting in Indonesia to discuss how to move to settlements in local currencies by further enhancing an ASEAN cross-border digital payment system.

Initially, the agreement on such transactions was reached between Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Thailand in November 2022. The association is seeking to reduce dependence not only on the US dollar, but also on euros, yens, and British pounds in financial transactions.

“We have something that was absolutely unbelievable two months ago,” Escobar emphasized.

Why is De-Dollarization Gaining Steam?

De-dollarization has been discussed for decades. For instance, Mikhail Khazin, a Russian economist and publicist, who served in the Working Center for Economic Reforms under the Boris Yeltsin government in the 1990s, and his co-author Andrey Kobyakov predicted the demise of the US dollar dominance roughly 20 years ago in their book titled “The Decline of the Dollar Empire and the End of Pax Americana.” While the idea has been in the air for quite a while, why is it that this phenomenon has only now started to gain critical mass?

“We can even establish a date for it,” responded Escobar. “February last year, with that freezing, confiscation, stealing of Russian foreign reserves. And the Global South as practically as a whole started asking themselves from Latin America to Africa to South East Asia, ‘if they can do this with a nuclear superpower, they can do it with any one of us snapping their fingers’. So that’s why the coordination inside these multilateral organizations and in other forums picked up astronomic speed.”

To illustrate his point, the journalist referred to the swift development of BRICS with a staggering 19 countries currently on the list to join the organization. Among them the strongest candidates are Iran, Argentina, Algeria, as well as the United Arab Emirates, Turkiye, Egypt, Kazakhstan, and Indonesia, as per the geopolitical analyst.

“So these are all strong middle rank powers from anywhere,” Escobar said. “And they’re going to start discussing the now notorious BRICS alternative currency. So they have to speed up this conversation and let’s hope that they are going to start discussing it in conjunction with the Eurasian Economic Union, which is much more advanced, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.”

Escobar believes that nothing short of a breakthrough in this respect could occur as early as next year.

“It’s possible, it’s a feasible scenario,” he insisted. “Until a few months ago, this would be the ultra-far-fetched scenario. Not anymore, because now the speed is unbelievable. Literally every day – Bangladesh, Argentina, Algeria, countries in Southeast Asia.”

Last month, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met with his Bolivian counterpart Rogelio Mayta in the Venezuelan capital Caracas and introduced a new trade transaction system to drop the US dollar and the euro and switch to rubles and Bolivianos instead.

Together with Argentina and Chile, Bolivia forms the so-called “Lithium Triangle” which accounts for more than half of the world’s deposits of the silvery-white alkali metal. Bolivia’s Salar de Uyuni salt flat alone contains 21 million metric tons of lithium, widely used in rechargeable batteries for mobile phones, laptops, digital cameras and electric vehicles.

Petroyuan May Dethrone Petrodollar

The most important element is the coming of the petroyuan, as per Escobar. For decades, crude oil has been traded in US dollars. However, the petrodollar could be soon dethroned: last year, Beijing called on Gulf leaders to settle their gas and oil deals with China in yuan. The US and China remain the world’s top two consumers of crude, using 18.7 million and 15.4 million barrels per day, respectively. Energy settlements in yuan could deal a heavy blow to the greenback.

“We are on our way, which is something that even very good American financial analysts who have been following this story could never imagine that this would be literally around the corner,” the journalist said. “Now, the only thing that is missing, in fact, is the Chinese delegation going to Riyadh and saying, ‘okay, from now on everything is going to be in yuan, no more Western currencies anymore.’ And we already have a mechanism for it. I did a column about that, basically explaining that it’s a very simple mechanism.”

“You buy oil futures at the Shanghai Exchange priced in yuan. So from now on you have a new benchmark, an oil benchmark in yuan that you transact in Shanghai. The Chinese say, ‘look, it’s linked to gold as well. You want to change yuan into gold? Simple. We have a gold exchange here in Shanghai and we have another one here in Hong Kong. You can trade all you want for gold.’ This is the way. It’s extremely simple. But not many people are aware of it. Only a few economists, in fact. And I have not seen this discussion in American media, for that matter,” Escobar continued.

That doesn’t mean, however, that the dollar will be replaced by the yuan: instead, a whole set of currencies will be used wiping out the greenback’s hegemony, according to the geopolitical analyst.

“I think we’re going to start with having multiple replacements, and then maybe in the second stage, these multilateral organizations start thinking, okay, why don’t we think about a fusion? Because we have different priorities,” he said.

US National Debt So Vast It Could Implode World Economy: Here’s Why

by Ilya Tsukanov via Sputnik Globe

The spectacle in Washington over the debt ceiling (i.e. restrictions on how much the government is allowed to borrow), has pushed the White House to claim America’s adversaries are rubbing their hands in anticipation of a US default. But in a globalized world, the US defaulting on its obligations threatens to take the rest of the planet with it.

President Biden has launched a charm offensive aimed at Congressional Republicans amid the debt ceiling crunch, hailing GOP House leader Kevin McCarthy as an “honest man” while patting himself on the back as a leader with “a hell of a lot of wisdom” and as someone who “know[s] more than the vast majority of people.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell signaled to the White House that he’s ready to play hard ball, signing a letter together with over 40 of his GOP colleagues addressed to Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer warning that Republicans would not support “any bill that raises the debt ceiling without substantive spending and budget reforms.”

McConnell and McCarthy want deep cuts – including trillions in spending gone from the budget over the next decade on a range of programs, including hundreds of billions from Biden’s lavish climate agenda.

The US federal government is projected to run out of money and default on its debt as soon as June 1, with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen urging lawmakers to get their act together before plunging the country into economic turmoil.

Biden has taken aim at the GOP and MAGA Republicans in particular over the debt ceiling deadlock, accusing them of pushing a “manufactured crisis” and throwing shade on his good jobs statistics. “Let’s get it straight: They’re trying to hold the debt hostage for us to agree to some draconian cuts, magnificently difficult and damaging cuts. But unfortunately, they’re threatening to undo all this progress by letting us default,” he said Friday.

America’s budget deficit ballooned by more than $1.1 trillion in the first half of fiscal year 2023, $430 billion above what it was during the same period in 2022. The US hasn’t run a budget surplus since 2001. The failure to match revenue and spending has led to a ballooning of the national debt, from about $3 trillion in 1989 to over $31.7 trillion today – with the debt jumping by about $15 trillion in the past decade alone. Total debt – which includes the national debt plus state, local and individual obligations, has surpassed $96 trillion – less than 10 trillion shy of the world’s entire gross domestic product of $103.8 trillion in 2022.

US Economic Collapse: World Would Reap What America Sows

The Biden administration has sought to distract Americans from the gargantuan debt bubble caused by decades of spendthrift government policy by using the “R”-word. On Thursday, White House Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young told reporters that she agrees wholeheartedly with Director of National Intelligence chief Avril Haines’ assessment that Russia and China would love for the US to default and throw the economy into chaos.

“This – this is – this just gives to our global competitor. They love this. They love to see chaos in the American system. They love to see that we can’t do our basic jobs. It’s no less than a test of what works in this world. Does democracy still work or does the Chinese way work?” the official asked.

But the real “test” may be just how well the rest of the world will be able to manage the fallout of a US debt crisis and financial collapse.

In 1929, a market crash on Wall Street triggered a global depression that affected most of the planet and ultimately culminated in the Second World War. Eighty years later, another US market crash triggered a global “Great Recession,” shaving trillions off US and global economic growth and depriving an entire generation of young people entering the workforce of decent jobs – with many workers, both young and old, subsequently dropping out of the labor market.

China, Russia, and other BRICS economies have done their best to prepare for another US economic collapse, ramping up economic cooperation, forging new banking agreements, and making efforts to reduce dependents on the petrodollar, US technology, and escape the control of US-controlled financial institutions.

But this process remains incomplete. As some observers have pointed out, a US default would be “devastating” for global markets, undermining faith in the US financial system – the second largest in the world after China by total banking sector assets, and potentially triggering a domino effect.

The contagion of a steep US economic decline would to quickly spread to the economies of America’s allies and client states, as well as major trade partners in Asia and the Middle East – some of which are seeking independence from Washington, but continue to rely on its massive economy (US-China trade reached over $690 billion in 2022 despite tensions, for example), and the dollar.

While the US’ global share of world economic output has dropped from 32 percent in 1980 to 24 percent in 2020, and its share of global trade fell from 14 to 11 percent over the same period, the dollar remains the go-to instrument of international exchange, accounting for about 59 percent of foreign central banks’ holdings, and 74 to 96 percent of all trade in the world, depending on region.

Unsustainable Model

Washington’s spendthrift economic policy and debt-accumulating policy threatens both the United States and the rest of the world, but with no political accountability, there’s no easy solution to the problem.

“Even if Congress manages to raise the debt ceiling before anything so dire happens, its flirtation with disaster serves as a warning about the deterioration of America’s fiscal health and the difficulty of recovering it,” one European business publication pointed out.

The nub of the issue, according to former Congressional Budget Office chief Doug Elmendorf, is that neither of the major parties are willing to sacrifice popular support to make painful, but necessary reforms that could resolve the debt issue – with Republicans averse to cutting entitlements, while Democrats avoid raising taxes.

“Both those positions are obviously politically popular, but they take off the table the biggest pieces of the federal budget. So it’s increasingly hard for either party to develop a plan that puts fiscal policy on a sustainable path, much less agree on a set of policies,” Elmendorf said.

“The core measure of vulnerability is not, in the first instance, America’s debt level but rather its ballooning fiscal deficit,” British business media noted. Pointing to projections of the budget deficit averaging 7-8 percent over the next decade, the outlet pointed out that back-to-back-to-back deficits years on end will result in the national debt ballooning up to 250 percent of GDP by 2050 (it’s already 123 percent now).

Free Accounting Advice

Another factor, not accounted for by most US officials and economists, but undoubtedly playing a key role in America’s debt crisis, is Washington’s foreign policy – with the military-industrial complex, which consumes over 12 percent of federal spending and nearly half of discretionary spending, kicked into overdrive over the past two decades of empire-building in Europe, Afghanistan, and the Middle East. It’s no big mystery why the Clinton administration was able to run modest budget surpluses of 0.8-1.2 percent between 1998 and 2001, given that the end of the Cold War in 1991 allowed the nation to enjoy an unprecedented “peace dividend” stemming from the lack of the need to pamper the MIC and fund costly military adventurism abroad.

Unfortunately, the current administration seems unlikely to turn to non-interventionism to run down the debt and deficit. Instead, it seems to be bent on simultaneously fueling conflicts with adversaries ranging from Russia and China to Iran and North Korea – with all of these crisis centers requiring money – and a lot of it.

The biggest danger facing the planet may very well be that an America facing economic crisis could turn to the use of its vast military machine to even more directly exploit dependents and clients to obtain critical resources or markets, or engage in military policing operations to prevent nations from switching sides and joining adversarial emerging economic or political blocs.

Primus Inter Pares

by Claudiu Secara

It rarely happens to be able to witness the mating rituals of the elephants, but this is one such time. The elephants in this case are the Anglo-Saxons, the Russians and the Chinese. They are triangulating the rest of the world, playing their hierarchical positions within their international intercourse.

Is it about the Donbas, or is it about Taiwan? Or maybe about de-dollarization?

I think that ultimately it is about the WEF Agenda. That is, it is about the demographics, and it is indeed about the limits of growth, but with a twist.

The Barbarians are at the Gate! That is the concern of the Western elites. The jungle is encroaching on civilization’s garden. That is real, and it is a major concern. Hence the mysterious events of the last 30-40 years. We do need a new world order!

Now, as I have written in other essays, there are a number of red flags about many of the major events in the last 30-40 years. The war in Ukraine is only one such example. See The Fake War. Since September 2022, more bizarre things have happened in this war. Suffice it to remember the Prigozhin saga, the missing shells game, all the talk about the tanks, and the F-16s, which don’t make it to the front – and when a few do show up, they are all in a state of functioning incapacitation, etc.

Sure, there are centers of resistance against Russia taking over the whole of Europe. Witness the die-hards in Ukraine, Poland and the Baltics. They know what they know. But they will get their lesson and will fall into line.

Then we have other strange situations. The frozen $300 billion of Russian funds that are about to be confiscated – if only the Western banks can locate them! and even if they do, Western principles and legal scruples prevent the West from actual confiscation. But no legal scruples prevent them from issuing an inapplicable arrest warrant for Putin, the President of Russia, on the basis that Ukrainian children are being sheltered in Russia from the ravages of the war. Oh, yeah, and that’s when in the West, the child welfare gestapo snatch children from their parents’ arms for as little as yelling at the child.

And how about 9/11, obviously a fake, controlled demolition, as any child can see.

But the question is: why do the Russians and the Chinese go along with such a glaring embarrassment of a fake event? Seeing and listening to all the higher-ups of these countries toeing the Anglo-Saxon line is a humiliating spectacle, evincing their servitude and their impotence.

The Corona virus ruse is another glaring example. Against all medical knowledge and all practice over hundreds of years, why did these colossal superpowers, armed to the teeth and ready to spill blood in order to defend their sovereignty and national dignity, why were they all subservient to a piece of paper issued by the WHO, in unison locking down their populations for a pandemic that was not? And furthermore, why did they all poison the blood and the DNA of their national constituencies, the bedrock of their national sovereignty, when they all could have just voted a different resolution at one of the 5-star hotel WHO conferences, and do away with the madness?

Even more bizarre is the phenomenon of Selling Off the West’s Patrimony for One Ruble But Why?

At the very time of an existential war by the West against the up-and-coming challengers, Russia and China, we have the strange phenomenon of the large scale transfer of technology and know-how to China that occurred over the last 40 years. Now the same is happening with the transfer of technology, for a token fee, to Russia.

Company after company, major and not so major, after having invested heavily – transferring their technology, training the Russian workforce in Western methods of management, production and marketing, etc., – they are told to sell it all to the Russians for a ruble, thus legitimizing the ownership of this massive transfer of know-how and modernizing of the Russian economy overnight as a competitive alternative to the West.

Isn’t it the most glaring conspiracy under the full view of the confused populations? – But Why?

Are we actually going to see the demolition of Western hegemony as a result of all these developments? Are we going to see the dollar going out of existence? Is digital currency going to replace the financial overlording by the Western banks? (Could that be one positive outcome?)

Well, we just read that Russia has halted those much-heralded transactions with India on the basis of Rubles and Rupees. Why? Because of a “surplus of rupees, which stands to reach the equivalent of over $40 billion this year, in Russia’s coffers, caused by the growing trade imbalance between the two countries”.

It turns out getting rid of the dollar overnight is more complicated than that.

Yes, on the face of it, the pendulum has swung away from the West. It is the time to reassess the situation.

What is the alternative for the Western Garden in the absence of a controlled management of the growing disparities between the West and the rest of the world? Poverty? But hopeless poverty triggers hopeless actions. We see what is happening in the Mediterranean. At the risk of their lives, more and more people are finding ways to invade Europe. More and more people are taking to the highway and crossing the Rio Grande, etc.

There are certain voices who argue for tall fences, for patrol boats, for tough legislation providing for the returning of illegal immigrants to their countries of origin.

Is that the answer? Yes, as long as we are dealing with hundreds of people. Yes, when we are dealing with thousands of people. But what happens when millions show up at the gate? They are hungry, desperate, and cornered.

I see the answer to these prospects in the events that are taking place these decades. It is about a controlled transfer of economic development on the basis of three world power centers. The Russian sphere from Vladivostok to Lisbon. The Chinese sphere in Asia. And the Anglo-Saxon for the G5. Africa remains to be sliced between each one of the three. The Middle East is shared more or less at the center of the pie.

The plan is for a controlled distribution of . . . control, among the three. With the rest of the world subordinated to the three. And the Anglo-Saxons as the Primus inter pares. First among equals.

That assures the illusion of democracy in the Anglo-Saxon world while the rest are managed by authoritarian governments.

The dollar is diminished but remains more equal than its equals. The world is now manageable, and population growth can be controlled through the agency of the other two superpowers.

And the West, now, with the probable loss of Europe, can go on playing its arbitrage game for another generation or two.

Putin’s Troika: Three Russian Agents Who Infiltrated the Trump Campaign

by

Reading the Russian Tea Leaves

Ed. Note: Very rare discussion of the real internal configuration of the interests within Russia. We only disagree on one aspect with the author. And that is that in order to survive as an independent geopolitical civilizational entity, it was essential for Russia to integrate Western Europe into its own space. The last 100 years of European of wars were in fact the fight over Western Europe between the two major White European superpowers: the Anglo-Saxons and the Russians.
In light of such an objective, Russia had to be able to open its borders to integration with the “West”. At the peak of its military power in the late 1970s, it was possible to start the integration process. This is presented in The New CommonWealth published in 1997.

Posted by: shadowbanned

I know I’m like a broken record on this, but people in the West still don’t understand why and how exactly the Cold War ended.

And that includes even the anti-imperialists. Those consist mostly of two groups — a libertarian right and a Trotskyist left, and both of them have their reasons to swallow line hook and sinker the official narrative that is presented to everyone else, namely that the USSR collapsed because it was an unworkable system that history has now firmly rejected.

The libertarians like that idea because they dream of a small state, completely unregulated markets, etc. And obviously the USSR is a mortal enemy of that ideology.

The Trotskyists (and I use this term loosely — most of them don’t identify themselves as such because they have no knowledge of that history) hate the USSR because it was built by Stalin, and Trotskyists and Stalinists hate each other. Also, in later decades communist countries went in a conservative nationalist direction on cultural issues, which is unacceptable for Trotskyists too.

So we have the mainstream narrative converging with the disparate motivations of the “alternative” fringe in creating a huge blind spot, and everyone is thinking the USSR collapsed because it just had to collapse as it was a fundamentally broken system.

Nothing of the sort — if there had been a will, there would still be a USSR. It’s a long topic, but it could not only have been saved, but it would have thrived and been light years ahead of the West if the correct decisions had been taken, especially in the 1960s. You see what China looks like now.

In reality what happened was that the grandest act of treason and betrayal in human history was committed — a certain layer of the late Soviet elites made a deal with the West to surrender without a fight and hand over the USSR’s resources in exchange for a percentage on the rent extraction flow that would allow them to then live in unimaginable under communism luxury. That’s the essence of the whole story.

But again, that isn’t understood in the West, including in the anti-imperialist circles.

It is well understood in Russia though, and this is why there is so much pessimism — because that scum has been in power ever since, it has not been cleansed and purged at all, and everything about the last 14 months smells very strongly of another such betrayal.

do you have a link for this? and why would he resist at all if he were merely an agent of the west. my understanding is he had a great deal to do with transforming Russia from the wild west of the 90’s–why would he do that if he were a western agent? why would China trust him, to the extent that it does, if he were merely an agent of the west which has China next in the crosshairs?Posted by: pretzelattack

Here:

https://youtu.be/i8kkeztq70c?t=12

Putin is one person, and he is simply balancing between competing interest. He is not a dictator (even Stalin wasn’t really one and was always in danger of falling victim to a coup). Roughly it splits like this:

1) Extractive industries — pro-Western
2) Bankers — pro-Western
3) the MIC and the siloviki — patriotic, but with some western intelligence penetration in some of the agencies
4) local civilians industries — patriotic

On some issues one side prevails, on others the other.

So why is Russia even fighting? Why not just break it into saleable parts and get their $$$ and be done with it? Certainly their cohorts in the West would have made it very much worth their while. But that didn’t happen.
I’d like to hear your reasoning why they are betraying Russia and fighting for Russia all at the same time when they could have just competed the process 20 years ago with Yeltsin.I do get the pessimism though, anyone who has suffered trauma would feel the same.
Posted by: K | May 6 2023 12:31 utc | 321

See above. There is a strong patriotic faction, but it has not won the internal war.

Also, and that is very important, the reason why Russia started resisting after Putin became president is that even the extractive industries, while pro-Western, weren’t satisfied with their cut of the loot. And not just that — the original deal from the 1970s and 1980s was made with the understanding on the Russian side that they would be accepted as equal members of the world’s elite. But in fact they weren’t accepted — their money was welcome, but they themselves were always seen as second-class elites. And again, both sides got greedier than what the loot could support in terms of demands on it.

It’s nothing new — vassals have rebelled against their feudal lords because they weren’t satisfied with the terms of their mutual arrangements for many centuries. But vassals and their lords have always been in full agreement that the peasants should be totally suppressed, and that the system should be preserved.

Same thing here — the way things were 15-20 years ago was ideal for them, and that is what those sabotaging the SMO are dreaming about returning to. That ship has sailed though…

Not really. You might say that GDR collapsed in 1990 around the time Deng was changing policy in China – compare and contrast China with former GDR under West German management !China has a sea coast and had Hong Kong and New Territories where UK had let a business culture thrive – it had export ports. ALL Chinese wealth is concentrated in its coastal regions
USSR had no real coastal ports for exports.
USSR offered Akio Morita cheap labour to produce SONY products in Soviet factories – he declined. Outside Mil-Spec USSR quality was pitiful especially in consumer goods.
The areas of USSR best suited to technically advanced optics and electronics were Ukraine and Baltic States which is why USSR produced there and in GDR at Carl Zeiss Jena.
Dreamers like you are big on drama but weak on detail
Posted by: Paul Greenwood

Not at all. We are not talking about business — the whole point of the USSR was to move away from the “business” mentality — and definitely not about exports.

An entirely separate autarkic system had to be created.

If humanity is to survive in the long run, everyone who talks about business must as quickly as possible have their head and body separated from each other and buried in shallow unmarked graves, and everyone who ever talks about “business” again needs to be immediately lined up and shot. There is no viable future that is not based on careful material balancing of physical resources that ensures there is no growth in their use, and in which the ideas of “profit” and “interest” do not become heresies punishable by death. The alternative is extinction for the species and much of life on the planet.

The point is that the USSR refused to pursue the tech that would have allowed independent development along a different trajectory. Computer tech is key indeed, but not so much as a consumer item. And a lot of opportunities were missed.

Disastrous decisions were taken in the late 1950s and the 1960s.

First, not to pursue OGAS, which would have developed an internal Soviet internet before the Western version, and, critically, would have solved the real-time material balance problem (early on central planners had to plan for a few hundred items, but that eventually grew to complexity two orders of magnitude higher, which they couldn’t handle; a problem that was foreseen — there were people there who were not dummies and knew what had to be done — and OGAS would have been the solution). OGAS, in simplest terms, would have been much like what Amazon uses today to manage its logistics, but coming half a century earlier. The problem is that would have taken away the power of the bureaucrats so they blocked it.

Second, the decision was made to not pursue indigenous chip designs but to copy the Western ones. That ensured that they would always be half a decade behind. They were not as far behind initially, especially in theoretical work, and it’s not as if they didn’t have the brains to work on their own tech. Look up the early literature on machine learning, a lot of it is Soviet, and the first examples of what we now call deep learning were also Soviet.

Third, the Sino-Soviet split put them in permanent disadvantage. Circa 1965 it could have been 1.1-1.2 billion Chinese + Soviets + the rest of the communist countries in a single consolidated area of exchange of technology and ideas versus ~800 million in the West. After the Sino-Soviet split, the Eastern bloc was left with less than 400M people, vastly outnumbered by the West, while now having to spend double on the military to guard the eastern borders too.

What happened instead was that in the 1960s resource exports to the West started, which set the process of deep corruption of the system in motion. Why invest in local computer tech if you can just sell oil and buy them ready made?