After all, How Sovereign is Russia’s Putin?

Here we have clear evidence of Putin outright lying  with a straight face and false conviction. Putin, so-called Leader of  the Axis of Resistance, reveals himself as a schoolboy boldface liar, afraid and humiliating himself in public. In a true show-trial display, he chokes and stumbles on his own words while professing obedience to the demands of the Western Big Lie.  He is emasculating  himself and exposing his fake independent leadership by his subservience and self-denunciation showing his compliance with the demands of, and his acquiescence to the Cult of the Western Big Lie.   

Here he clearly states that he doesn’t believe it was the American intelligence services who did  9/11 to themselves . He didn’t say exactly who he believes did it either.  So what does he believe ?

Does he believe Architects  & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?  That’s science not belief. Steel cannot melt from a kerosene fire.

Big Red Flag. Where does Russia under Putin really stand?

One can only hope that this is just a Judo moment in the fight.

 

“How We Got Here”: The Transformation Of America

Authored by Frank Miele via RealClearPolitics.com,

[ . . . ]

So what went wrong? In a word, education. In two words, “progressive education.” For the first hundred years or so of our nation’s history, education served its usual purpose of reinforcing social norms, teaching values and passing on the heritage and traditions that bind us together. All of that began to change in the 1880s, thanks in large part to one man — John Dewey, the godfather of progressive education, who insisted on teaching children what they want to learn instead of what they should learn. Essentially, what the progressive education movement wanted to accomplish — and did accomplish by the 1960s — was to jettison traditional values and replace them with transient values (those which each generation or even each student adopted individually). This meant that society was no longer tethered to the Tao. Morality had become relative. Education had switched from being a method of reinforcing social conventions and standards to uprooting them.

Time magazine in 1958 put it this way:

“In a kind of country-club existentialism, Dewey and his boys genially contended that the traditional ends of education, like God, virtue and the idea of ‘culture,’ were all highly debatable and hence not worth debating. In their place: enter life adjustment. The Deweyites thus transformed conditioning techniques into ends in themselves. … Within the schools, discipline gave way to increasingly dubious group persuasion. ‘With teen-agers,’ one high school principal said proudly, ‘there is nothing more powerful than the approval or disapproval of the group. When the majority conforms, the others will go along.’ It would not easily occur to the modern educationists that such blind fostering of group pressure is a travesty of free democracy.”

Dewey’s system of education emphasized students doing what feels good rather than learning what is good for them. Progressive education does not believe in moral, religious or cultural absolutes, but rather teaches students that they have the right to reject any system of belief, any principles, and values that they find to be “restrictive” or that make them “uncomfortable.” In essence, Dewey said to question everything and respect nothing. That model did permanent damage to the family, to the church, and to the country. Progressive education does not believe in moral, religious or cultural absolutes and makes every individual the master of his own moral universe. It also means that nothing can be taken for granted, nothing is certain, and the concept of right and wrong is malleable.

Which brings us — in this truncated history — to the 1960s. The social revolution of that decade was the illegitimate child of progressive education and the affluent society. Thanks to the sacrifices of the Greatest Generation, my own generation was able to smoke weed, skip class, and raise Cain — all while on the family allowance. Somehow along the way, these products of indulgence decided that America didn’t live up to their high standards of social justice. They rejected the principles of rugged individualism and free enterprise and substituted their socialist fantasies. The Vietnam War gave them the perfect foil to foment civil unrest and to enlist most of their generation into a war on “the establishment,” which meant a war on law and order, a war on religion, a war on the nuclear family, and a war on authority in general. These were the godchildren of John Dewey: Question everything, respect nothing.

One mastermind of the ’60s revolution was Bill Ayers, who was first a progressive educator, then a bomb-throwing revolutionary in the Weather Underground, and then a fugitive from justice. It was while he was hiding from the FBI for the entire decade of the 1970s that Ayers realized that violent revolution could not topple the government unless it was first rotted from within. In “Prairie Fire” and other radical writings, Ayers described how young people, minorities and women could be turned against the system, and most importantly how revolutionaries who wore suits and ties could infiltrate boardrooms, political parties, the military, the courts and other institutions of society in order to bring about change from within.

When you see how many millions of dollars that corporate America has voluntarily given to the communist front organization known as Black Lives Matter, you can gauge just how successful Ayers was in his strategy. When you see that the Democratic Party is led by communists and socialists like Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you can thank Bill Ayers. When you see military generals publicly condemning the commander-in-chief for his efforts to ensure public safety, you know that Bill Ayers has come close to victory. When you watch our courts chip away at our freedoms, you can bet that Bill Ayers thinks he has won. And maybe he has.

A recurring theme in “How We Got Here” is that the Constitution no longer means what it says it means, but rather what any five Supreme Court justices say it means. These justices have a remarkable knack for discovering new powers for the government hidden in nooks and crannies of the document that somehow were missed previously. Under such a scenario, the Constitution becomes a tool for social engineering rather than a protection against government excess, as was originally intended.

It too is all part of the plan. After all, judges are lawyers, and lawyers are graduated from law schools, and the top law-school students come from the top Ivy League and radical-left colleges, and most radical college students come from public schools, and public schools are to progressivism what politics is to the swamp. You can thank John Dewey, and you can thank Bill Ayers, who after he returned to public view, became an influential educator of educators at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

In “Prairie Fire,” Ayers outlined how the revolution would transform America. Yes, violence would play a role. Yes, bankrupting the system by increasing dependence on government would play a role. Yes, spurring foreign wars to spread America’s military too thin would play a role. Yes, encouraging division among the races would be part of it, as would weakening the influence of religion on the masses, but if you wanted to win the revolution, Ayers made it perfectly clear how to begin: “The real question is: Who will control the schools?”

How did we get here? The answer by now should be obvious.

* * *

Frank Miele’s new book “How We Got Here: The Left’s Assault on the Constitution” is available from his Amazon author page. Visit him at HeartlandDiaryUSA.com to read his daily commentary .

WUHAN-GATES – 12. MI6 British Intelligence former Head: “SARS-2 Built in Bio-Lab”. Pics and Proofs of HIV Test

The SIS official accuses China in a partial “false-flag” because hides the role of the EU and the US

by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio for VT Italy

VERSIONE ORIGINALE IN ITALIANO

Finally. Exactly four months after the first Gospa News reportage that previewed the theories on Covid-19 created in the laboratory, for a vaccine or a bacteriological weapon, even an authoritative intelligence official fo NATO area confirms the focal point of the 21 Gospa News reportages.

«Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of the British SIS Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), told the Telegraph’s Planet Normal podcast that a scientific report published this week by a Norwegian-British research team suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic is the result of the “escape” of the virus from a laboratory in China» SputnikNews writes in the more detailed article on the topic that bounced from the Telegraph on Daily Mail and Independent and then on many British and Italian media.

According to the new “important” report cited by Sir Dearlove, clues have been discovered within the genetic sequence of the virus, which seems to suggest that its key elements were created by man and “inserted” inside it, writes the newspaper from London.

With fairly generic references, it confirms what Gospa News anticipated on April 14 in the WuhanGates 2 investigation when we reported the revolutionary research of a group of Indian scientists from the Kuzuma School of Biological Scienses who first discovered the HIV sequences inserted in the SARS 2 virus.

Their study, published on February 1, was immediately withdrawn because «they were forced to retract» according to the famous French virologist Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine, who not only confirmed the validity of scientific research in New Delhi but added multiple other details in his study and interviews.

Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of the British SIS Secret Intelligence Service (MI6)

Today, with even suspect delay, the former MI6 executive (British counter-espionage for foreign affairs), reiterates similar things more generically but points the finger only at China although it is known to the entire international scientific community that the experiments of “splicing” genetic ”and other bioengineering techniques for creating recombinant viruses, very dangerous because they can be enhanced in a dual-use, for vaccine or bio-weapon.

In them one pathogen is associated with another as in the risky experiments that were carried out in Wuhan on the CoronaVirus strains of horseshoe bats thanks to funding from the European Commission before (EPISARS project revealed in our WuhanGates 9 investigation) and USAID, the American government agency used by the Central Intelligence Agencythen.

«I think this started as an accident … Raise the problem, if China ever admits responsibility, will it pay for repairs? I think this will make every country in the world rethink how it sets up its relations with China and how the international community will behave towards Chinese leadership» said Sir Richard Dearlove, who was head of MI6 between 1999 and 2004.

The statement by the former SIS official not only is very general and ignores the authoritative previous studies but seems oriented to identify Beijing as a scapegoat in a partial “false-flag”. It should not be forgotten that he was directing Her Majesty’s 007 which are part of the USUKA intelligence agreement between the Anglo-Saxon countries called in journalistic and espionage jargon Five Eyes (USA, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada and New Zealand). And as we show in previous post Australia also financed the tests SARS-HIV.

Montagnier, while supporting the same theory about the virus built in the laboratory, specified that it was “a business between China and the USA” as confirmed in multiple reports from Gospa News but also from Veterans Today. It was the American site of gepolitics and military intelligence (with which I collaborate) that first revealed the truth about the supervirus ended in a service of the Leonardo-TG3 Italian RAI TV transmission.

It was not made in China but in Chapel Hill in the laboratories of the University of North Carolina, but using samples of a CoronaVirs strain called WIV 1 and HIV plasmids built by the Wuhan Institute of Virology to infect it and test enzyme reactions. to the enzyme ACE2 of the protein S Spike: the one that allows the killer pathogen to attack human cells.

«While denying allegations in Beijing of intentionally releasing the virus, in the interview Dearlove accuses China of subsequently covering the scale of the epidemic» adds SputnikNews.

«Of course, the Chinese must have thought “If we are to suffer a pandemic, perhaps we should not try too hard to warn our competitors, so to speak, that they will suffer from the same disadvantages that we have”» said the ex-MI6 chief. Previously, the Chinese ambassador to the UK Liu Xiaoming said that Beijing would welcome an international investigation into the origins of the pandemic, insisting that his country has nothing to hide.

Sir Dearlove’s revelations are based on new peer-review research entitled “A reconstructed historical etiology of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic “, led by Professor Angus Dalgleish of St. George’s Hospital at the University of London and the Norwegian virologist Birger Sorensen in which it is said that «SARS-CoV-2 differs considerably from any other Sars virus previously studied and, therefore, it is doubtful whether efforts to develop a vaccine will be successful».

The analysis carried out by Professor Dalgleish and his colleagues says that the virus has “unique fingerprints”, “indicative of intentional manipulation”, thus questioning the theory that coronavirus evolved naturally. “Research suggests that COVID-19 is a “virus that is remarkably well adapted for human coexistence, “and was probably designed through a Wuhan laboratory experiment to develop “high potency chimeric viruses”.

They are the exact same things written with multiple minution technical descriptions in his study by the French professor Pierre Bricage, former director of the Department of Biological Engineering of the University of Pau, in the Pyrenees Atlantiques, a former speaker of NATO.

As anticipated in a worldwide exclusive by Gospa News in WuhanGates 8, the bio-engineer Bricage, expert in molecular genetics, highlighted the sequences of inerts of the HIV-1 virus in SARS-CoV-2 and the methods used for genetic manipulation but has also pointed the finger at the delicate experiments conducted by the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) of Winnipeg also with the DTRA funds, the USA Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the Department of Defense (Pentagon) which directly manages 25 other laboratories suspected of occult bacteriological weapons experiments.

The French professor highlighted the research of the Chinese scientist Xianggou Qiu by pointing out that she had ended up under investigation for suspected espionage, which she conducted together with the famous Canadian professor Frank Plummer who spent a lifetime looking for vaccines against HIV and SARS.

But Bricage in his study did not want to highlight that Plummer died of a sudden collapse in mysterious circumstances while he was in Kenya a few days after confirming the outbreak of the Wuhan epidemic.

This is why the claims of sri Dearlowe are certainly important because they confirm that the entire scientific community has lied knowing full well of the existence of research on recombinant SARS with inserts of HIV but also of Ebola (quoted in WuhanGates 9).

This is why the declarations of the head of British intelligence must be taken with caution regarding the responsibilities of China because today that 15 scientists in 5 studies claim that the virus was born in the laboratory it is convenient to find a scapegoat as soon as possible and to distract attention from the alleged international conspiracy of the Deep States of various nations of which we have revealed many connections and plots in 21 reports.

The summaries of all the WuhanGates reports below in chronological order.

COVID19 BIO-WEAPON – 10. THE PLOT: FROM CIA TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER

It is not a conspiracy title but conspiracy-logo: that is, the study of a conspiracy, all too evident for the increasingly well-founded suspicion that the new strain of CoronaVirus is a bacteriological weapon hand-sucked or intentionally released. In the first reports of this first cycle of investigations, American biological warfare experts supported him: former White House consultant Francis Boyle and Jeff Brown, founder with other journalists and international authors of the Bioweapon Truth Commission. So it was the Chinese Communist Party that accused the US after some scientists from their country discovered the different lethality of two CoVid-19 strains with four very killer Spike amino acids of the “killer” protein.

This brought to mind the investigations of the Bulgarian investigative journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva on the 25 top secret laboratories of the Pentagon (US State Department) opened mainly in Georgia and Ukraine, after the colored revolutions supported by the globalist plutarch George Soros, where studies on bacteriological weapons are also carried out biogenetic and ethnic.

Among the most suspicious superviruses, however, there is the chimeric SHC014 created in Chapel Hill in 2015 in the biosecurity laboratories of the University of North Carolina thanks to a contribution from USAID, the American government agency used by the Central Intelligence Agency to finance its projects. . It is the supervirus that the Leonardo RAI3 scientific transmission also spoke about.

At the time she was deputy director of the CIA was the lawyer Avril Haines, longtime Dem former consultant to Joe Biden in Congress, expert on bio-weapons of the NTI (private institution of Democratic area), who in the same year was called by the former president Democrat Barack Obama, supported in the election campaigns by super-donors Gates and Soros, to become deputy White House National Security Advisor until the arrival of Donald Trump.

She was one of the organizers of Event 201, funded by Gates, in collaboration with the John Hopkins Center of Health Security. John Brennan, her head at the CIA, one of the alleged directors of the fake RussiaGate dossier against Trump, is also a Senior Fellow for JH University, among those who publicly praised the existence of the Deep State on the occasion of the UkraineineGate. However, the reference of the lawyer Haines to the need for a World Order at a conference in 2018 in which he prophesied the pandemic like Gates was sensational.

WUHANGATE – 1- THE SAUDI SPONSORS OF GSK VACCINATIONS IN THE WORLD

Why be surprised then if it turns out that John Hopkins University, together with Columbia University where Haines is a researcher, are among the authoritative partners of the NGO EcoHealthAlliance (EHA) of New York that funded the international project PREDICT 2 with the aforementioned USAID (CIA) launched in 2009 by the Obama administration?

Other EHA supporters also include Chinese and Saudi universities. In 2014 the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia joined the USA in the VPDs vaccine immunization action package (vaccine-preventable diseases) launched in 2014 by the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), a partnership between 67 nations of the world to accelerate specific plans of the World Health Organization. Obama, together with former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, former secretary of the Democratic Party, has therefore identified Italy as a pilot project for the 10 mandatory vaccines for all school-age children.

After the resistance of Parliament, the plan became law with the new PD government of Paolo Gentiloni in 2017 giving way to an increase in the vaccine production of GlaxoSmithKline, pharmaceutical leader in the world and despite a tremendous precedent for a bribe of the SmithKline paid to the Minister of Healthcare Francesco De Lorenzo in the 90s.

In 2017, as if it were to honor a debt of gratitude, GSK plc in London increased its stake in the Saudi Arabia branch Glaxo from 49% to 75% with good profits for the Arab governmental members of Banaja KSA Holding. This was done under the leadership of the new CEO Emma Walmsley, non-executive director of Microsoft Corporation as discovered by Gospa News.

WUHAN-GATES – 2. TRACKS OF HIV IN THE CORONAVIRUS

Up to now there are normal crap of international political-economic trafficking for the “good health” of the children to be bombed with 10 vaccines, including the dangerous hexavalant, so as to provoke the vibrant protests of many Italian pediatricians. But the yellow of the pandemic becomes a thriller when we trace the disturbing results highlighted by some Indian researchers in the analysis of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, so called because it is a genetic relative of the Acute Severe Respiratory Syndrome that killed 814 people in Asia in 2003.

There would be inserts from HIV, the AIDS pathogen. According to the Kusuma School of Biological Sciences of the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IIT Delhi), the virus was most likely built in the laboratory. This sensational news appears and disappears from the scientific community within 24 hours because the research is mysteriously withdrawn.

WUHAN-GATES – 3. THE WINNER OF NOBEL: “HIV IN SARS-COV-2”

The scoop of Gospa News proves to be well founded. By a miraculous coincidence two days after the distinguished French virologist Luc Montagnier, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008 precisely for discovering human immunodeficiency related to HIV and for having isolated two strains in the 80s, not only confirms the study Indian but claims to have come to the same conclusions with the help of biomathematician Jean-Claude Perez and therefore to have the certainty that SARS-CoV-2 was built in the laboratory with molecular biology.

His interview with the microphones of the French podcast of medicine “Pourquoi Docteur” pierces the veil of silence but this is not enough to induce repentance to his colleagues, who are even deniers of the hypothesis of the articular virus they are competing against, with the mainstream media, to discredit Montagnier.

WUHAN-GATE – 4. “THE HANDLED VIRUS WITH HIV: USA-CHINA AFFAIR”

The Nobel Prize winner, first teacher at the Pasteur Institute in Paris today at the Jiao Tong University of Shanghai, remains rock-hard on his positions and increases the dose with a twenty-minute interview on French TV CNEWS. He defends the Indian biologists claiming that they have been “forced to retract” and goes into the details of his scientific research by reiterating that “the virus is not natural”.

Luc Montagnier adds a phrase that becomes a track for our investigations: «The United States is aware. They funded part of the research done in Wuhan’s labs and this is published. So it’s not just a Chinese affair. ” It’s so true! As ascertained by Gospa News, the laboratory of the Wuhan Institute of Virology is a partner of the PREDICT 2-USAID project wanted by Obama and on which the shadow of the CIA hovers

We therefore discover that there are two superviruses created in Wuhan and reworked in the USA. So, thanks to the notes of the same studies published on the Pnas website (US Prot. National Academy of Science), there is an implicit confirmation of what the French virologist asserts. These «pseudotype experiments were similar to those that used an HIV-based pseudovirus, prepared as previously described and tested on HeLa (Wuhan Institute of Virology) cells that expressed ACE2 orthologists». Whoever denies even the possibility of the virus built in the laboratory lies knowing that they are lying!!!

WUHAN-GATES – 5. THE AFFAIRS FOR THE BIG-PHARMA PENTAGON’S PARTNER

Among the drugs used to treat CoVid-19 infection there are retrovirals used against AIDS. Among these, the most widespread in the world that seems tailor-made for the new CoronaVirus strain of the pandemic, is that of the American big-pharma GILEAD Remdisivir. That’s a Pentagon partner in mysterious and lethal experiments in Georgia whose, for a certain period, chaired by a politician from the Deep State even feared by Henry Kissinger, the historic American Secretary of State.

He is Donald Henry Rumsfeld twice Secretary of the Defense Department in Washington. The drug Remdisivir from GILEAD allows the company to make a significant leap on world stock exchanges in just two months because it becomes one of the most tested in the world. Who is the first to patent its use? Just Wuhan’s laboratory! Who is among the shareholders of the American pharmaceutical corporation: one of the main donors of the Stars and Stripes Democratic Party: George Soros. The political-financial-pharmaceutical thriller becomes a horror nightmare …

WUHAN-GATES – 6. ITALIAN AND FRENCH ATHLETES INFECTED IN WUHAN

At the World Military Games held in Wuhan in mid-October 2019, many athletes fell ill with a powerful and anomalous influence from which it is difficult to heal. The French pentathlete Elodie Clouvel declares this to the television station Loire7, the Italian swordsman Matteo Tagliariol, Treviso fencing champion and Olympic gold champion in Beijing 2008, confirms it to local newspapers.

The suspicions that have been around for months become almost certain: the epidemic spread to Wuhan, and perhaps elsewhere, well before December. For some it was scattered in China by US soldiers, Intel sources claim with nano-drones thanks to CIA infiltrators, for others it was the Chinese who infected the foreigners. According to Gospa News, agents from both countries piloted by the Deep State and not by their governments have been hidden …

WUHAN-GATES – 7. DANGEROUS TESTS WITH VIRUSES INSIDE US MILITARY BIO-LABS

An extremely confidential file, publicly known but buried in the archives of UNODA, the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs in Geneva, raises suspicions against the USA for the SARS-COV-2 pandemic that exploded in the context of a war biological secret of financial, Masonic, military and intelligence powers.

Thanks to this OSINT document, recovered by the grace of Divine Providence, we ascertained that only in the year 2015, during the Barack Obama administration, the Stars and Stripes Government granted $ 824 million for the study of biological weapons to 28 BLS laboratories of level 2,3 or 4 operating on the national territory. We have viewed many researches wich was just specifically for various strains of CoronaVirus and some of those extremely dangerous. A shock video from 1952 that was declassified reveals the power of the US Navy in biological warfare as early as 1950.

WUHAN-GATES – 8. THE BIO-ENGENEER CONFIRMED THE HIV IN THE SARS-2

Among the various scientific studies published in recent months is that of the French bioengineer Pierre Bricage, former speaker at UNICEF and NATO. Based on his experience in molecular genetics, he confirms the studies of Indians and Perez-Montagnier on the traces of HIV in the SARS-CoV-2 virus that triggered the pandemic killing more than 300 thousand people.

Impossible to summarize the impressive amount of technical analytical findings therefore we report only the lapidary sentence written by this scientist in his study: «This virus cannot have emerged spontaneously from natural mutations and recombinations of wild strains, it is a genetic chimera with artificial insertions of modified genes , an engineered genome of a coronavirus inside a capsid of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)».

WUHAN-GATES – 9. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FINANCED WUHAN ESPERIMENTS

I spent nights reading dozens of bio-chemical scientific studies published in the last 15 years to confirm the construction of recombinant chimeric viruses in the laboratory with the insertion of HIV sequences in different SARS viral strains. I discovered a dozen of which 7 in China, including 3 only in Wuhan. It is the mathematical proof that the scientific community continues to lie knowing that it lies in denying the existence and probability that SARS-CoV-2 may have been artificially produced and contains amino acids from the AIDS pathogen.

But in making this discovery, here is the confirmation of an obsessive political plan on the search for vaccines for viruses that ARE NOT EXISTING yet, started by the European Commission in 2004 after the SARS epidemic of 2003. It is the EPISARS program launched with a budget of 2 million euros. by the presidency of Romano Prodi. A portion of that money was destined to finance the dangerous experiments with the construction of superviruses in the Wuhan laboratory (and in one in Beijing).

WUHAN-GATES – 10. SUSPICIOUS SUMMIT IN EUROPE WITH GATES’ NGOs

The whole world spoke about the famous exercise on a hypothetical pandemic from CoronaVirus called Event 201 and held in New York (CoronaVirus BioWeapon report 4) thanks to the financing of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation a few months before the official discovery of the first cases of Covid-19.

Instead, only Gospa News reported the news of an equally suspicious summit: the one organized on 12 September 2019 by the European Commission of President Jean-Claude Juncker with 4 NGOs founded by Gates himself for a global vaccination plan that could also be welcome if was voluntary and not imposed on the poorest populations.

The issue also becomes suspicious if it is recalled that the founder of Microsoft himself has enormous interests in the multinational GlaxoSmithKline, owned by the investment funds of the Weapons Lobby and in companies with Saudi Arabia which financed the immunization plan wanted by President Barack Obama (of which Gates is one of the main donors) who identified Italy – thanks to a political agreement between the Democrats of Rome and Washington – as a pilot project for the 10 mandatory vaccines for school attendance. Thanks to this project GSK has made golden deals that have allowed it to reinvest in Riad making the Saudis rich …

WUHAN-GATES – 11. DEAD AND SPIES AMONG SARS AND HIV TEST SCIENTISTS

We kept this investigation last because it was the most delicate. And our patience was rewarded. The mysterious death for a sudden collapse of the Canadian scientist Frank Plummer, former director of the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) of Winnipeg, has been added to the investigation for alleged espionage of his Chinese colleague Xianggou Qiu, one of the world’s leading experts in molecular genetics and in biological engineering.

As we deepened their scientific experiments on both the SARS CoronaVirus strain of 2003 and HIV we discovered that they also came under the lens of Professor Pierre Bricage, the bio-engineer who minutely identified the traces of inserts of sequences of the virus of the AIDS within the SARS-CoV-2 which triggered the pandemic as reported in the WuhanGates 8 report.

«What more was needed to build a candidate HIV vaccine? Only a humanized supposed harm-less coronavirus was! Could we not protect ourselves from AIDS while only risking a simple cold? What could be more dull and benign than a cold?» are the sarcastic questions that Bricage asks giving surprising and disturbing answers …

Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
no reproduction without authorization – original italian version

Major Breakthrough’: New COVID-19 Mist Treatment Largely Lowers Chance of Severe Illness

via Sputnik

British pharmaceutical company Synairgen revealed Monday that its new respiratory COVID-19 treatment reduced the number of hospitalized patients requiring intensive care in its recent clinical trial.

The drug is called SNG001 and consists of a naturally occurring antiviral protein called interferon beta that is inhaled as a mist into the lungs. According to the company, COVID-19 patients who were given the treatment had a 79% lower risk of developing severe illness compared to those who were given a placebo instead.

In fact, patients who received the treatment “were more than twice as likely to recover (defined as ‘no limitation of activities’ or ‘no clinical or virological evidence of infection’) over the course of the treatment period compared to those receiving placebo,” the company said in a Monday news release.

The findings also showed that patients who received the treatment “were more than twice as likely to recover over the course of the treatment period compared to those receiving placebo” and that the measure of breathlessness was “markedly reduced in patients” who received the treatment compared to those who just received the placebo.

The study – which was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 101 patients in the UK between March 30 and May 27 – has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, although the results appear promising.

“This assessment of SNG001 in COVID-19 patients could signal a major breakthrough in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients,” Synairgen CEO Richard Marsden said in the news release.

“Our efforts are now focused on working with the regulators and other key groups to progress this potential COVID-19 treatment as rapidly as possible.”

The trial’s chief investigator, Tom Wilkinson, also lauded the possible new treatment.

“We are delighted with the positive data produced from this trial,” Wilkinson said in the survey.

“The results confirm our belief that interferon beta, a widely known drug that, by injection, has been approved for use in a number of other indications, has huge potential as an inhaled drug to be able to restore the lung’s immune response, enhancing protection, accelerating recovery and countering the impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

Bill Gates Lying while NYC Nurses Call the Scamdemic Murder

USA: Puritanism vs. Evangelism

by Thierry Meyssan

The reactions to the murder of black George Flyod by a white policeman do not refer to the history of slavery in the United States, but – like the systemic opposition to President Trump- to a profound problem in Anglo-Saxon culture: Puritan fanaticism. The domestic violence that rocked this country during the two civil wars of Independence and Secession must be remembered in order to understand current events and prevent their resurgence. Beware: in the United States, the political class now preaches egalitarian racism. All equal, but separate.

JPEG - 75.2 kbIt could be humour, but unfortunately it is a puritanical slogan to be taken at face value: “Black Men are an endangered species”.

The Anglo-Saxon Puritans

About four hundred members of the Church of England fled their country where they were considered fanatics. They took refuge in Leiden, Holland, where they were able to live according to the Calvinist tradition, or more precisely the Puritan interpretation of Christianity. Probably at the request of King James I, they sent two groups to the Americas to fight against the Spanish Empire. The first founded what was to become the United States, the second was lost in Central America.

Later, the Puritans took power in England with Lord Cromwell. They beheaded the Papist King Charles I, established an egalitarian Commonwealth and colonized Ireland, massacring Catholics en masse. This bloodthirsty experiment was short-lived and discredited for a long time the idea of a General Interest (Res Publica) in the eyes of the English.

The 35 Pilgrim Fathers set out from Leiden, stopped in England, and then crossed the ocean on the Mayflower. They arrived in North America in 1620 to practice their religion freely. During their voyage, they signed a Covenant in which they vowed to establish a model society (strict observance of the Calvinist faith and cult, intense community life, and unfailing social and moral discipline). By creating the Colony of Plymouth, they hoped to build the “New Jerusalem” after fleeing from the “Pharaoh” (James I) and crossing the “Red Sea” (the Atlantic). After a year, they thanked God for their epic, which is commemorated each year as Thanksgiving. [1] They established their capital city 60 kilometers north, in Boston. Their community veiled its women, practiced public confessions and corporal punishment.

JPEG - 34 kbThe logo of the very powerful Pilgrim’s Society: the Pilgrim Father is depicted alongside the British lion and the American eagle.

These events are not only myths that every American should know, they shape the political system of the USA. Eight out of 45 presidents (including the Bushes) are direct descendants of the 35 “Pilgrim Fathers”. Despite the arrival of tens of millions of immigrants and institutional appearances, their ideology remained in power for four centuries, until the election of Donald Trump. A very closed club, Pilgrim’s Sociey, brought together, under the authority of the English monarch, very high British and American personalities. It set up the “Special Relationship” between London and Washington and, among other things, provided many secretaries and advisers to President Obama.

Many ceremonies planned this year for the 400th anniversary of the Mayflower have been cancelled due to the fight against the coronavirus epidemic, in particular the conference that the former British National Security Advisor was to give at Pilgrim’s Society. Bad tongues assure that the epidemic will end the day after the US presidential election, if Donald Trump loses it, and that the festivities can then take place.

There are two cultures that have always been opposed in the United States among Christians: Calvinists or Puritans on the one hand, and Catholics, Anglicans and Lutherans on the other. While some “denominations” among the eight hundred US churches resolutely line up on one side, most are crossed by both because Puritanism has no defined theological corpus. It is rather a way of thinking.

The War of Independence began in 1773 with the Boston Tea Party. Its first actor was John Adams, another direct descendant of one of the 35 “Pilgrim Fathers” and second president of the United States. While the call for independence was made by the political journalist Thomas Paine based on religious arguments although he himself did not believe in anything.

In a way, the War of Independence was a continuation in the Americas of Lord Cromwell’s British Civil War (the “Great Rebellion”). This conflict would resurface a third time with the Civil War, which, it should be remembered, had nothing to do with slavery (both sides practised it at the beginning of the war and both sides repealed it during the war to hire former slaves into their armies).

The Puritans lost in England with Cromwell’s Republic, but won the next two times in the United States. Historian Kevin Phillips, who was Republican electoral adviser to Republican Richard Nixon (descendant of a brother of one of the 35 “Pilgrim Fathers”), has studied this conflict at length over the centuries. [2] It is on the basis of this data that he imagined the strategy of “Law and Order” in the face of the segregationist Democrat George Wallace in the 1968 presidential election; a strategy that Donald Trump has taken up again for the 2020 election.

All this to say that appearances are deceiving. The dividing lines are not where the rest of the world thinks they are.

- The Puritans have always supported absolute equality, but only among Christians. They long forbade Jews from entering the civil service and massacred the Indians they claimed to love. During the American Civil War, they extended their egalitarianism to blacks (unlike the Puritans in southern Africa, who defended apartheid to the end), giving rise to the false myth of a war against slavery. Today, they defend the idea that humanity is divided between equal and, if possible, separate races. They are still reluctant to call them interracial marriages.
- The Puritans place lying at the bottom of their scale of values. It cannot be for them a ruse, but always the worst of crimes, far more serious than robbery and murder. In the seventeenth century, they punished with the whip for lying to a pastor for any reason. They established laws that still punish lying to a federal official for any reason.

US Evangelism

With time, and particularly in the 19th century, another current of thought arose within American Christianity: evangelism. These are Christians of all denominations who try to get closer to the original Christianity of which they know little. So they rely on the sacred texts. Like the Puritans, the Evangelicals are fundamentalists, i.e. they give the Scriptures the role of a divine word and interpret them while refusing any contextualization of the texts. But they are much more pragmatic. On everything, they have a position of principle, but when faced with a problem, they act in conscience and not according to the rules of their community.

It is very easy to make fun of the grotesque convictions of the Evangelicals against the theory of evolution, but this is of little importance and they abandon it when necessary. It is much more significant, but unfortunately rarer, to denounce the puritanical vision of a humanity divided into distinct, equal, but separate races. Yet this has serious consequences on a daily basis.

The Puritans remained the masters of U.S. politics until 1997, when Libertine President Bill Clinton issued an executive order banning all expressions of religious faith in federal institutions. The result was a shift in religion from the Administration to the private sector. All major corporations accepted prayer groups in their workplaces. This shift favored the public emergence of Evangelicals at the expense of Puritans.

JPEG - 29.7 kbDuring the riots outside the White House, President Trump went to St. John’s Episcopal Church to present himself, Bible in hand, as the defender of the religious beliefs of all Christians in the face of Puritan fanaticism.

The Return of Puritan Fanaticism

The conflict between the Puritans and the rest of society is today taking a radical and religious turn. It opposes two mentalities, one idealist, egalitarian within their community and fanatical, the other sometimes even more extravagant, agreeing on inequalities, but realistic.

Puritan Hillary Clinton hesitated to become a Methodist pastor after her failure in the presidential election [3]. She sinned a lot (her affair with Vince Foster), was punished by God (her husband’s affair with Monica Lewinsky) repented (within the Pentagon Family [4]) and was saved. She is sure that she was chosen by God and takes pride in her violence against non-Christian peoples. She supports all wars against the “enemies of America” and hopes to see the return of Christ.

On the contrary, Donald Trump shows no interest in theology, has only an approximate knowledge of the Bible and a summary faith. He has sinned as much as anyone else, but boasts of what he has achieved rather than repenting of his sins in public. He doubts himself and compensates for his feeling of inferiority with excessive egotism. He loves to compete with his enemies, but does not want to destroy them. In any case, he embodies the will to restore the greatness of their country (“Make America Great Again!”) rather than to pursue wars always and everywhere, which makes him the champion of the Evangelicals against the Puritans. He offers the opportunity for Christians to reform themselves rather than convert the world.

In the 2016 election campaign, I asked the question, “Will the United States reform or tear itself apart? » [5] In my view, only Donald Trump could allow the USA to continue as a nation, while Hillary Clinton would provoke a civil war and probably the dissolution of the country on the model of the end of the USSR. What has happened since the death of George Flyod shows that I was not mistaken.

JPEG - 46.3 kbHillary Clinton during the 2016 election campaign.

Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party supporters are imposing their ideology. They fight against lies and destroy statues like their Puritan ancestors burned the Salem witches. They develop an absurd reading of their own society, denying social conflicts and interpreting inequalities only in terms of so-called distinct human races. They disarm the local police and force “white” personalities to apologize in public for enjoying an invisible privilege.

In the Russian case, the discontinuation of the prosecution of former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the presidential pardon granted to Donald Trump’s former advisor, Roger Stone, sparked angry protests from Puritans. Neither man harmed anyone, but they dared to lie to the FBI to keep him out of the White House.

The mayor of Minneapolis (the town of George Flyod) was publicly humiliated for refusing to disband the “racist” city police. While Seattle City Council has just cut its city police budget in half. This does not bother the upper social classes living in private residences, but deprives those who cannot afford private security guards.

The Associated Press, then the New Yok Times, the Los Angeles Times and soon almost all US media, decided to write Black with a capital letter when referring to “race” [6], but not White in the same way. Indeed, the fact of writing White with a capital letter is a distinctive sign of the white supremacists [7].

The Pentagon considered renaming its military bases with the names of southern personalities accused of being “racist” and sent an e-mail to all civilian and military personnel of the US Army denouncing as “extreme right” the claim that there is only one human race. Although these initiatives have provoked a strong reaction from the trumped-up GIs and have failed, they mark a very dangerous escalation [8].

All these decisions demonstrate a loss of collective rationality.

Translation
Roger Lagassé

[1] This Land Is Their Land: The Wampanoag Indians, Plymouth Colony, and the Troubled History of Thanksgiving, David J. Silverman, Bloomsbury Publishing (2019).

[2] The Cousins’ Wars: Religion, Politics and the Triumph of Anglo-America, Kevin Phillips, Basic Books (1999).

[3] “Hillary Wants to Preach”, Emma Green, The Atlantic, August 6, 2017.

[4] The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power, Jeff Sharlet, Harper Perennial (2009).

[5] “United States – reformation or fracture?”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Pete Kimberley, Voltaire Network, 26 October 2016.

[6] “Racism and anti-racism as lies”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 22 June 2020.

[7] Uppercasing ‘Black’, Dean Baquet and Phil Corbett, The New York Times, June 30, 2020.

[8] “US Army against Trump”, Voltaire Network, 11 July 2020.

Russia Foils the US policy of China’s ‘containment’

by Salman Rafi Sheikh via New Eastern OutlookG-7 gets photo bombed at Hiroshima event

When the US president Donald Trump recently invited Russia to participate in the G-7 summit and called his invitation an expression of ‘common sense’, he was not just intending to use the ‘Russia factor’ as a means to counter-balance Europe’s increasing assertiveness vis-à-vis the US over the G-7 summit and a host of other issues. The intention was equally to bring Russia into the ‘western fold’ to isolate China globally.

Let’s not forget here that the various US official policy documents the Trump administration has released have repeatedly declared China as the biggest ‘threat’ the US is facing currently. Many top US officials strongly believe that China is the greatest threat. Therefore, if the ‘Chinese threat’ is to be countered, common sense would have Russia on the US side.

Indeed, this is what some US allies think should be the US strategy to counter China. Dave Sharma, a pro-US liberal Australian MP, recently stated that the western allies need to bring Russia back to the ‘world’s most exclusive group of nations’ to “manage the rise of China.”

As it stands, not only is an actual US policy of ‘containment of China’ in place and that the US is actively seeking ways and means to materialise it by asking its allies to jump on the US bandwagon of ‘trade war’, but Russia is being coaxed into becoming a part of it as well.

While the attempt has failed not only because of strong opposition from other G-7 members, including Canada, but Russia, too, has foiled this attempt by rejecting the US offer, calling it a “flawed idea.” Therefore, even if the US proposal had won some support from within the group, the fact this was a ‘trap’ against China would still have led Russia reject it.

This become pretty from the way Russia has actually responded. Beyond rejecting the offer, Russia has also made a counter-proposal. According to this, if the US does think that ‘common sense’ demands an expansion of the G-7, China, too, must be included along side Russia.

Russia’s deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov recently said that “Without China it’s simply impossible to discuss any issues in the modern world.”

Interestingly enough, Russia’s potential rebuke came only a day after the US ambassador to Russia said that Washington was “engaged with the Russian Foreign Ministry and with the other G7 governments about whether there is an appropriate role for Russia at the G7”.

Russia’s counter-proposal to include China not only signifies how both countries have developed a common global strategic outlook, but also that this common outlook has already transformed into a strong mutual respect for each other’s national interests. Indeed, this was clearly the message that Xi conveyed to his Russian counterpart in a recent telephonic conversation.

According to the details, Xi reaffirmed that China would “continue to work” with Moscow in “firmly supporting” each other’s efforts “rejecting external sabotage and intervention” so as to “preserve their respective sovereignty, security and development rights, and well safeguard their shared interests.”

The new template of ‘Sino-Russia alliance’ is deeply rooted not only in mutual understanding and respect for each other’s national interests—evident from Russian refusal to mediate India-China stand-off—but also in trade and economics.

Apart from the fact that both powers engage in trade, the fact that there is, unlike the US-China trade ties, no massive trade imbalance between them means friction over economic issues is unlikely to disrupt their bi-lateral strategic ties.

Bilateral trade between Russia and China increased 3.4% in 2019, amounting to US$110.79 billion, according to the Chinese Administration of Customs. Trade was well balanced, with Chinese exports to Russia increasing to 3.6 per cent and US$49.7 billion, while imports from Russia increased 3.2 percent to total US$61.05 billion.

Unlike the West, where the on-going constitutional reforms in Russia are being projected as Putin’s life-long plan for ‘authoritarian rule’, China came out supporting the reforms, calling it a people’s decision to choose their path of development.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said that “as Russia’s friendly neighbour and comprehensive strategic partner of coordination for a new era, China will always respect the development path independently chosen by the Russian people and support Russia’s efforts to realise lasting stability and promote socioeconomic development.”

Russia has obviously reciprocated by its open support for legislative changes introduced by China in Hong Kong.

“We respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the PRC and consider all issues pertaining to Hong Kong to be China’s domestic affair. We are against any attempts by external forces to interfere in relations between the central government and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the PRC”, recently said Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova.

Therefore, even if Washington’s calculation showed that Russia could be brought in to counter and isolate China globally, the series of events and Russia and China’s resolve to support each other show its high improbability.

On the contrary, their support for each other’s core national interests and their resolve to work towards a new multilateral world order plus the way the US and Europe have increasingly fell apart shows that the US bid to place itself once again at the helm of global affairs unilaterally is bound to fail.

What is therefore evident is that the unipolar moment of US dominance is at an end already. Decades old cold-war policies and tactics are unlikely to pay dividends in a massively changed world of today.

Salman Rafi Sheikh, research-analyst of International Relations and Pakistan’s foreign and domestic affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook

War or No War?

Veritas Vincit

“. . . there is a warfighting domain in which there is already activity underway” (Major General Gus McLachlan in a statement to Australian media during the US-Australian Talisman-Sabre military exercises)

A kinetic stage of warfare between the PRC and the US is stated in reports as increasingly probable by various analysts, such assessments recognizing the (non-kinetic) hybrid warfare domain is active and intensifying (involving US destabilization operations [Hong Kong], partition operations [Taiwan, Hong Kong, Xinjiang, etc.], trade warfare, commercial sabotage efforts [Huawei, information warfare, etc.]).

Unfortunately restraint shown by the PRC to ongoing provocations is unlikely to significantly de-escalate situations as US-allied confrontational actions are intensifying (consistent with their broader conduct of hybrid warfare operations against successive nations). The similar response (restraint) shown by the Russian Federation to Western bloc actions[1],[2],[3]  have proven to be ineffective in de-escalation efforts (or at changing US-NATO bloc actions that are progressing towards a direct kinetic stage of conflict, the proxy warfare domain being active). Observation of broader developments should also indicate situations of war may result from the escalation and expansion of various active external conflicts. The US sponsored development of offensive capabilities of the Taiwan region, particularly missile strike potential against mainland targets (and the incompatibility of the DPRK enhancing its retaliatory capabilities with US objectives) is similarly increasing the probability the PLA will in time need to respond. Peace is clearly a priority but situations of war are often imposed.

References (Note: these also apply to the situation of the PRC):

[1] “I think everybody understands that an undeclared war against us is underway…..” [Russian State Duma’s Budget and Tax Committee Andrey Makarov] said. (“Undeclared war” forces Russia to boost defense spending — minister, Tass, October 27, 2018)

[2] “Western states are now threatening and slandering Russia with a ferocity that their governments “did not take the liberty” to unleash during the Cold War, [Russian Ambassador to the UN, Vassily] Nebenzia added. “Russia has been inexcusably threatened,” he said. “Do you understand the dangerous threshold to which you are bringing the world?” the Russian envoy asked.

[3] “If data on Russia-NATO power balance at the Western direction is analyzed, as well as military activity build-up rate at our borders, scale of combat equipment deployment, if the grade of Russia’s demonization is estimated, one can say that preparation to a real war is taking place. [Such] acts are usually undertaken at the forefront of a war [and it is evident] the US is preparing for a [potential] nuclear conflict……” [Colonel General Leonid Ivashov, President of the International Centre of Geopolitical Analysis]

The Clown Cars Are Fully Loaded And Dr. Fauci’s Leading The Parade

Authored by David Stockman via Contra Corner blog,

When it comes to the topic of clown cars, we’d say Dr. Fauci gets a limo version all to himself…

Yesterday he uttered the following incoherent babble, saying the recent surge in new cases is because the Virus Patrol didn’t go far enough in throwing 50 million Americans out of work:

‘We did not shut down entirely,’ Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said. ‘We need to draw back a few yards and say, “OK, we can’t stay shut down forever.” …You’ve got to shut down but then you’ve got to gradually open.’

Got that?

What does this pretentious old windbag think – that the blooming, buzzing mass of a $21 trillion economy can be calibrated up and down by the week via some magical dimmer switch?

Never mind because he was then on to this preposterous comparison:

Fauci also said he expects the public to compare the Covid-19 pandemic to the 1918 pandemic flu, which killed around 50 million people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Well, it so happens that the US death rate from the Spanish Flu was 655 per 100,000 persons (675,000 deaths in a population of 103 million). That’s obviously orders of magnitude larger than the 39 per 100,000 deaths to date from the Covid.

In fact, the impact of the Spanish Flu was not only 17X greater in terms of the overall mortality rate, but it was also a true Grim Reaper in the sense that it struck across the entire age spectrum of the population (dark blue bars).

It actually started in the giant domestic military training compounds stood up by Woodrow Wilson to join a European war that was none of America’s business, but the virus did kill tens of thousands of 18-30 year-old draftees in their own barracks long before they got to the killing fields of France.

By contrast, as we now surely understand, and you would think Fauci would, too, the Covid (light blue bars) is primarily a harvester of elderly persons already struggling with life-threatening respiratory, heart, vascular, renal and diabetic illnesses.

Accordingly, among the 191 million Americans under the age of 45 years, there have been only 1.5 WITH-Covid deaths per 100,000, while for the elderly, the opposite is true. Nearly 70,000 or more than 60 percent of all WITH-Covid death have been among the 75 years and older population, resulting in mortality rates as follows:

  • 85 years & Over: 581 per 100,000 persons;
  • 75-84 years: 200 per 100,000 persons;

Now, you don’t need to take a single class in epidemiology to understand a core truth: That is, when nearly 60 percent of the population under 45 years accounts for only 2.5 percent of the reported WITH-Covid deaths and has a rounding error mortality rate, while the 6.5 percent of the population 75 years and older accounts for 60 percent of the deaths—you don’t fight the disease with a one-size-fits all strategy of generic lockdowns, quarantines, and social regimentation.

And surely you don’t shutdown the schools, gyms, bars, restaurants, movies, ball games, concerts, beaches, theme parks etc. because the vulnerable elderly don’t patronize these venues in appreciable numbers anyway, and could easily be warned to stay strictly away.

The key point, however, is that this whole unspeakable Lockdown Folly does not remotely stem from the “science”, as the MSM supporters of Fauci claim.

It’s just a hair-brained experiment in social control that happened because the Donald was too weak, ill-informed, distracted, and innumerate to send Fauci and his camarilla of doctors and vaccine-peddlers packing when the mid-March guidelines were first issued by the CDC.

Yes, the Donald’s political enemies in the ranks of big city mayors and Blue State governors have feasted upon the chum Fauci & Co have persistently tossed into the fetid waters of national politics, but that doesn’t let Trump off the hook.

If the truth be told, this is the Trump Lockdown Folly and ranks among the greatest blunders ever committed by a US President. That’s because even at this late date nearly four months into the resulting economic disaster:

  • there is no evidence that asymptomatic persons are transmitters of the virus,
  • there is powerful statistical evidence that 95 percent of the population can cope with the disease and recover if they do become infected.

Yet, the twin pillars of Fauci’s hare-brained social regimentation scheme assumes they very opposite: Namely, that healthy Americans must be put under house arrest because they are silent spreaders and killers of their fellow citizens; and that the disease is so virulent that its #1 enemy—the powerful immune system of every healthy American—cannot be trusted to do its job if the virus is permitted to follow its natural course of contagion and eventual herd immunity.

As to the silent spreaders trope, here is how the very head of WHO’s COVID-19 Task Force, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, recently explained that transmission of the virus from asymptomatic patients appears to be very rare:

It still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

For crying out loud. That knocks the very rationale for stay-at-home orders to hundreds of millions of healthy citizens into a cocked hat.

In a constitutional democracy, where the liberties and properties of citizens are protected by law, you need overwhelming proof of an existential threat to society before ordering mass house arrests. But in this instance, the head of the WHO task force–the agency that fomented the whole coronavirus hysteria in the first place–has said quite unequivocally: No cigar!

In a word, Dr. Fauci is peddling dangerous humbug under the banner of pseudo-science, and should have been shut-up and forced into retirement long ago. The unfortunate truth, however, is that the Donald is too chicken to use the Fake “your fired” tool that made him a short-lived TV star, if not a successful businessman.

His defenders, of course, mumble that his hands are tied because Fauci is a member of the legally protected Senior Executive Service (SES). That’s Jimmy Carter’s gift to insubordinate bureaucracy, which your editor happily voted against back in the day—but the excuse is poppycock.

Under Federal law, Fauci can be fired if he is found to have engaged in—

misconduct, neglect of duty, malfeasance, or failure to accept a direct reassignment or to accompany a position in a transfer of function”, is or to be “less than successful [in his] executive performance.

If not “malfeasance”, what would you call the absolute savaging of the livelihoods and life’s work of tens of millions of American workers and small businessmen for no good reason of state, which have resulted from Fauci’s idiotic pronouncements and guidelines?

The thing is, after four months Fauci’s blatherings and instructions to state and local authorities have fomented an outright public Hysteria of biblical proportions.

It is not just that officialdom has closed restaurants and gyms via unconstitutional “takings” of their owners’ properties. By now, Fauci’s Virus Patrol and its megaphones and misanthropes in the MSM have rendered large portions of the American public fearful about leaving their own homes.

And, needless to say, they have also given the Donald’s legions of rabid political enemies license to stage malign theatrics in the name of Covid-fighting that would be unthinkable under any other circumstances.

For instance, it has now been announced that the school districts of Los Angeles and San Diego, which collectively serve nearly one million students, will not have in-person teaching to start the school year.

But if you are conversant with any facts at all, you can only sputter: WTF!

There are nine million school age children in California, and not a single WITH-Covid death has occurred among them.

That’s right. There have been 27,400 positive tests among these nine million kids, but all of them, positively all of them, have been either asymptomatic or mildly ill—as children are wont to become—and have recovered.

Yet here is where America’s growing fleet of clown cars comes in. It seems that the politicization has gone so far off the deep end that the LA teachers union–35,000 strong—is now taking the schools hostage for their own parochial ends.

They recently proclaimed that no schools should open in LA until there is a Charter School freeze; the police are defunded; Medicare-for-all is adopted by the US Congress; new state taxes on the wealthy are enacted; and there is a Federal bailout of the LA school district.

You can’t make this stuff up. And while they were taking the children hostage in the name of Covid-fighting, they also insisted that the already dysfunctional schools of LA become completely pointless:

The union outlined numerous major provisions it says will be necessary to reopen schools again, including sequestering students in small groups throughout the school day, providing students with masks and other forms of protective equipment, and re-designing school layouts in order to facilitate ‘social distancing.’

Of course, the latest outbursts of this kind of mindless social destruction has been fueled by the absolute mendacity of the Virus Patrol and its MSM megaphones with respect to the so-called outbreak of new cases in the Sun Belt states.

But the whole brouhaha is a crock. There is no public health crisis in the so-called hot spots, as the up-to-date chart below makes abundantly clear.

Yes, the 42-day trend of “new cases” has risen sharply in tandem with far more testing, and repeat testing of the same individuals—outcomes that were inherent in re-opening plans, which required employers to have their employees tested as a condition of operating.

But, alas, the death count trend in these 50 counties has not risen at all – except for the last few days when a lot of “catch-up” data for earlier fatalities was thrown into the data hoppers by some of the counties involved.

That hasn’t stopped the Covid-Howlers from proclaiming a phony medical crisis in Texas and elsewhere, with the same old tropes about overflowing hospitals and strained ICU capacity in places like Houston.

But as the eagle-eyed maven of the corona-data, Alex Berenson, tweeted this AM, it’s just a big fat lie. While CNN may have managed to find one or two crowded facilities in the whole of the Houston-Harris county region of some 5 million souls, there are actually still more than 2,500 empty hospital beds in the area.

Here’s the thing. The Virus Patrol has switched from the death count to the “case” count because the latter is not at the 3,000 per day predicted by the CDC in early May, and ballyhooed by the NYT and MSM as the leading edge of a horrid “second wave” coming down the pike.

In fact, during July to date (thru the 14th), the daily WITH-Covid death count has averaged 613, or only one-fifth of the projected June-July-August surge; and even that level is suspect, given the growing evidence that many local jurisdictions are doing retrospective death audits to pad their case counts.

In any event, the readily available state-by-state data tells you all you need to know. This so-called Sun Belt wave of cases is, indeed, the equivalent of the normal flu.

In the case of Florida, for instance, during the first 14 days of July, there have been 139,195 new cases reported, but only 4,322 new hospitalizations. So that means only 3.1 percent of this ballyhooed surge of cases was sick enough to even require hospitalization.

Needless to say, that’s not a crisis; it’s just one more part of the indictment against Fauci and his gang of malpracticing doctors. They have put the anti-Trump press into a rabid feeding frenzy, and that coverage, in turn, has caused the American public to head back into their Covid holes.

As it happened, three of the nation’s largest banks reported their totally confected earnings for Q2 this AM, but the one thing that stood out as meaningful was a collective $28 billion provision for future loan losses. That is, they see the massive wave of defaults set in motion by Fauci’s misbegotten Lockdown Nation strategy, and are getting prepared for the worst.

Meanwhile, the Fed’s lunatic $3 trillion injection of liquidity into the canyons of Wall Street since the Lockdown Nation incepted in mid-March continues to do its mischief, fueling a stock market bubble that gets more ludicrous (and dangerous) by the day.

We noted yesterday that during the Monday’s great reversal on the stock market that Tesla had gained a “GM” ($38 billion) in the morning spike, but lost a “BMW” ($42 billion) in the afternoon.

A timely piece by Bloomberg this AM helps explain how this kind of madness actually happened:

Almost 40,000 Robinhood accounts added shares of the automaker during a single fourhour span on Monday, according to website Robintrack.net, which compiles data on the investing platform that’s much beloved by day trading millennials.

The frenzy in interest means that as of the end of Monday’s trading session, there are now roughly 457,000 users on the Robinhood app that hold shares of the company in some form. That makes it the 10th-most popular stock on the platform, ahead of even Amazon.com Inc., which is held by 358,000 users.

The one-day return may not have turned out so well. Tesla was up as much as 16 percent at one point before paring gains through the day and finishing 3 percent lower. It was a rare losing day for the high flying stock, which has surged 56 percent over the past 10 days.

So how did these mindless gamblers reason about a company that has never, ever made a four-quarter profit, and which reported Q2 volumes well below last year, in coming to a peak valuation of $325 billion Monday morning?

Well, a sell-side analyst explained both that question, and the large fleet of clown cars now cruising up and down Wall Street about as well as could be expected. Said this master of the crystal ball:

‘At the current price, Tesla’s stock reflects an expectation of 2030 volume of 5 million units, which is more than ten times what the company appears on track to achieve this year,’ Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said.

Why, you don’t say!

Then again, projecting EV car sales in the year 2030 is probably as good a use for Wall Street’s clown car riders as any other.

Certainly, it would not dawn on them to ask whether a stock market held up by the Terrific Ten, and especially the FAANGs and Microsoft, has anything at all to do with the dire state of the US economy.

It seems these trading sardines make up a quarter of the S&P 500 index by value, but just 8 percent of its composite revenues and a mere 1 percent of jobs in the American workforce.

So, yes, the Acela Corridor has the clown cars coming and going – even as the stock bubble which will take down this whole fantasy reaches its historic asymptote, as we will essay further in Part 3.

Iranian Foster 25-year Deal with China

via Debka

Under the still-secret deal, China will have unrestricted access to Iran’s air bases and promises to rebuild its EW capabilities in return for cheap oil and factories with transport links to carry its exports to the West. Russia may also be involved.

Usually the butts of Tehran’s hardliners, President Hassan Rouhani and FM Mohammed Zarif, the live wires of the landmark as yet unpublished 25-year comprehensive cooperation agreement inked in between Iran and China, are now in close rapport with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the Revolutionary Guards over this deal. While promising to invest heavily in Iranian infrastructure, oil and technology, China appears to be offering military benefits that could change the geopolitical balance of power in the Middle East – provided the deal is finalized and takes off.

Meanwhile, “the lion-dragon deal,” is drawing strong objections in Iran – especially from some powerful lawmakers who say it feeds China’s “colonialist greed.” Former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad attacked its secrecy, saying in a Telegram post that any agreement with foreign parties “that does not consider the Iranian nation’s will is invalid.” One parliamentarian Hojjat al-Islam Hassan Nowrouzi, accused the government of granting China a 25-year lease of Kish Island and secretly selling fishing rights in it southern waters.

Zarif retorted to the critics: “Pay attention to the global shift in power.” A government spokesman said on June 23 that the deal proves the “failure of US policies aimed at isolating Iran.” The hardline Javan noted this week that this is the best time for the deal since the US feels “weak” against China.

Iranian sources have revealed some of the the top-secret military elements of the accord, as covering “complete aerial and naval cooperation between Iran and China” with a key role for Russia. If the final details are sewn up in the second week of August at a meeting of Iranian IRGC officials with Chinese and Russian counterparts, then from Nov. 9, Sino-Russian bombers, fighters and transport planes will be found using purpose-built dual-use facilities near the existing airports at Hamedan, Bandar Abbas, Chabahar, and Abadan.”

Iranian sources add that China and Russia will at the same time roll out electronic warfare (EW) capabilities in three key areas: electronic support (including early warning of enemy weapons use), electronic attack (including jamming systems) and electronic protection (including of enemy jamming).

“To counter U.S. and/or Israeli attacks.” The Krasukha-2 and -4 systems are also likely to feature in the overall EW architecture. The Krasukha-2 can jam Airborne Warning And Control Systems (AWACS) at up to 250 km. “One of the Russian air jamming systems is to be based in Chabahar and will be capable of completely disabling the UAE’s and Saudi Arabia’s air defenses, to the extent that they would only have around two minutes of warning for a missile or drone attack from Iran,” one of the Iran sources told the OilPrice.com publication last week.

Beijing plans to allot Iran a key position on its “One Belt, One Road” strategy by adapting its infrastructure. To begin with, China intends to use the cheap labor available in Iran to build factories that will be financed, designed and overseen by big Chinese manufacturing companies with identical specifications and operations to those in China. The manufactured products will then reach Western markets through new transport links, also planned, financed and managed by China.

Tabriz, home to a number of key sites relating to oil, gas and petrochemicals, and the starting point for the Tabriz-Ankara gas pipeline, will be a pivotal point of the 2,300 km New Silk Road that links Urumqi (the capital of China’s western Xinjiang Province) to Tehran, and connecting Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan along the way, and then via Turkey into Europe.

Oil sources report too that China will invest $400 billion to develop Iran’s oil, gas and transportation infrastructure, gaining a 32pc discount for 25 years on its purchases of Iranian oil, gas and petrochemicals. Five thousand Chinese security personnel will be deployed in Iran to protect Chinese projects.

Most analysts warn that Tehran is embarking on a risky gamble. While Tehran is desperate for a partner to face the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign, Beijing has never overtly challenged it and its global aspirations [which] extend well beyond the Middle East. Furthermore, the future of the current US campaign [against Iran] depends on the outcome of the Nov. 3 presidential election. Therefore, for its accord with China to be realized, Tehran will be heavily dependent [sic] on external factors outside its control.