via RT

Note from Editor: Is that why Bill Gates now is talking about the smallpox epidemic?

Chinese scientists claim to have isolated an antibody which can effectively neutralize all strains of Covid-19, referencing both lab experiments and those performed on a living organism.

In a study published on Tuesday, Chinese scientists from a variety of institutions, including Sun Yat-sen University in Guangzhou and Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, suggested that they may have the panacea to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The authors claim that monoclonal antibody 35B5 has been shown in both in vitro (laboratory or test-tube experiment) and in vivo (performed on living organism) studies to neutralize wild-type Covid-19 (without mutations) as well as variants of concern (VOCs). The in vivo tests were carried out on humanized mice.

The scientists noted that the antibody also works on the highly mutated Delta variant, which has been responsible for deadly waves of infection around the world since it first emerged in India earlier this year.

“35B5 neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 [Covid-19] by targeting a unique epitope [part of the antigen molecule which the antibody attaches itself to] that avoids the prevailing mutation sites,” the study explains. In other words, 35B5 targets a unique part of the virus that does not change during the mutation process.

By targeting part of the virus which is not impacted by the mutations identified in circulating VOCs, antibody 35B5 demonstrated capacity for “pan-neutralizing efficacy” across multiple strains. These findings, the scientists argue, could be “exploited for the rational design of a universal SARS-CoV-2 [Covid-19] vaccine.”

The part of the antigen targeted by antibody 35B5 is also present in the Omicron variant, the researchers note.

The research could prove particularly valuable amid the spread of Omicron, which is highly mutated. Leaders and scientists around the world are concerned the mutant virus could evade vaccine-induced immunity and immunity gained from previous infection.

By Jonny Tickle
https://www.rt.com/russia/540960-ex-putin-aide-surkov-claims/

The threat of “irreversible destabilization” is growing in Russia, but the country should be careful not to set up risky “liberal experiments” that could easily fail, former presidential adviser Vladimir Surkov has claimed.

In an article for the online publication Actual Comment, Surkov used the analogy of entropy to describe how chaos increases in a closed system. According to him, a strong state is necessary to restrain what he dubbed as ‘social entropy’.

The former key official, once dubbed the Kremlin’s ‘grey cardinal’, held the post of assistant to the president until February 2020 and has served under Putin in various capacities since 1999. His time in the Kremlin is best remembered by the cottage industry it spawned in the West, in which foreign commentators often characterized him as the brains behind the entire operation. He is also often described as one of Putinism’s founding fathers, with some portraying him as responsible for the idea that the security state should come above individual freedoms.

Russia reacts to US Congress bid to de-legitimize a future Putin presidency

According to Surkov, the first twenty years of the 21st century have seen stability be successfully maintained, following the social chaos of the 1990s, pulling “the traumatized country out from under the rubble of perestroika.”

“These years will surely be remembered one day as a golden age,” Surkov said.

However, sooner or later, the country will see more and more chaos as the state fails to deal with the “much-maligned desires” of citizens. However, Surkov warned that the Russian state should not attempt to deal with growing unrest by opening up the political system, claiming that it could lead to “uncontrollable releases” of civil anger and “irreversible destabilization.”

Surkov’s latest warning against change in Russia, despite the potential for chaos, isn’t the first time that he has advised against any reformation in the political sphere.

Speaking to the Financial Times earlier this year, Surkov claimed that society has to be managed to find a “good compromise between chaos and order.”

“An overdose of freedom is lethal to a state,” he said. “Anything that is medicine can be poison. It is all about the dosage.”

by By Prof. Anthony J. Hall via Global Research

The pandemic is contrived for sinister motives. Everything connected with Covid is Junk Science foisted on a fearful and gullible world. The virus, the lock downs, the masks, the abuse of PCR for diagnosis, the temperature checks at commercial entrances, the ubiquitous little bottles of alcohol, the relentless propaganda and most especially the soon-to-be-mandatory lethal injections are all Junk Science.

The people behind all this are masters – or hire masters – of crowd psychology and have the most sinister and evil intentions for all of us. – Anonymous, Comment 651, “The Covid Debate: To Vaxx or Not to Vaxx,” Unz Review, 15 August, 2021

Doing More Harm Than Good

The development, distribution and injection of COVID jabs gives new meaning to the term, “deregulation.” From beginning to end, the whole process appears to be devoid of hard-and-fast rules. Tried-and-true methods have been overturned for no apparent reason. Old methods have been set aside. These abandoned methods have sought to priorize the safety, wellbeing and security of patients over the business interests of drug makers, hospital owners and medical practitioners.

It is made to seem like the only imperative that is consistently pursued is the push plunge COVID jabs into as many arms as possible as fast and as widely distributed as possible. Other than that, the underlying philosophy could be described as… dam the reports of extremely harmful health impacts… full steam ahead.

Nothing is allowed to get in the way of the carrot and stick approach to raising the numbers of injected people. No matter how lethal, how injurious, or how fraught with other catastrophic consequences, the mass inoculation project is being pushed forward at warp speedwithout any decent regard for the precautionary principle.

Great precaution should accompany the introduction into the biosphere of all new technologies, but especially those affecting living organisms and delicate biological relationships among them. The precautionary principle has particular bearing on experiments that alter the biological workings of human beings, both individually and collectively as when contagious illness is involved.

A mostly compliant medical profession is largely going along with the infraction of many professional promises, sacred trusts, and obligations in pushing forward the scheme of jabbing every arm with untested medical products. By being instrumental in advancing the project of near-universal inoculation, scores of medical practitioners as well as the leadership of most of their professional associations and colleges are conspicuously going against a core provision of the Hippocratic oath.

On an unprecedented scale, medical doctors have been violating their professional vow that they will do no harm. In Israel, for instance, 59% of new hospitalizations for COVID-19 are fully vaccinated. This statistic is just one of a barrage of indicators that the push towards the universal vaccination of national populations is doing more harm than good.

Many vaccinated people are themselves spreading viral contagion and becoming sick themselves reportedly from the “Delta Variant.” The Delta Varian is one of many mutations of the supposedly new coronavirus.

See this.

The propagandistic press to maximize the number of injection recipients exposes a pervasive disregard for the terms of the Nuremburg Code. The Nuremburg Code was created as part of the victors’ justice trial of the Hitlerian brain trust. The Nuremberg Code stipulates that human subjects in medical experiments must not be coerced into taking part. Nor should those seeking to become human subjects in medical tests be denied the conditions enabling them to give truly informed consent for their decision to participate.

Vaccines and Bioweapons

How can the requirements of informed consent be fulfilled by glitzy advertising campaigns that consistently overstate the benefits and blatantly ignore the risks of taking the jabs? What does the publicized testimony of movie stars, pop singers, sports heroes, and business moguls have to do with enabling human subjects in medical experiments to realistically evaluate the nature of the possible dangers facing them?

In this instance, basic experimental protocols were left behind when the designers of the experimental procedures made humans stand in for lab rats and guinea pigs in the course of initial tests.

A decision was made to bypass the usual medical procedure of trying out new medical products by administering them first to animals.

By

Mark Godfrey via Seafood Source

Reports appearing across China’s tightly controlled media are suggesting COVID-19 first arrived in the country in 2019 via a shipment of lobster from the U.S. state of Maine.

“In November 2019, a shipment of frozen Maine [lobster] arrived in Wuhan and shortly afterwards several people working in the market fell very ill with a strange pneumonia,” noted an article published this week in the New Observer, a state-owned periodical.

The article suggests the shipment from Maine was a “Pandora’s box” that spread the virus around China. It also states the “American side has not owned up to the origins of the virus.”

The Sina news portal – one of the most-read on China’s state-controlled internet – reported on the issue in more detail, suggesting a shipment from Maine consisting of 55 boxes of chilled Boston lobster weighing 823.4 kilograms arrived in Shanghai Pudong Airport on 11 November, 2019, aboard a China Eastern Airlines flight was then forwarded to 26 customers across the country. One of the customers was an unnamed vendor at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, where the virus was first reported in late 2019, after an initial cover-up by local government.

The Sina article includes several maps of the Huanan market which link the Wuhan vendor with concentrations of COVID-19 infections within the market. The article also includes what it says are quotes from the report of the World Health Organization study trip to China, one of which states that “research shows that the new coronavirus can survive for a long time in conditions of frozen food, packaging, and cold-chain products.”

Sina linked the source of COVID-19 to a particular Maine county and company: the Seashell Company (the name appears in the article as 美国海贝公司 – the Mandarin article uses the term “Hai Bei,” which means sea shell). The article lists the company as being based in York County, which is in southern Maine, but SeafoodSource has been unable to confirm any such company exists.

However, a map in the article identifies the company’s headquarters, which are identical to those of York, Maine-based lobster exporter Maine Coast Shellfish, which is now owned by Premium Brands. The Sina article also lists the founding date of the company as 2011, which matches with Maine Coast’s date of founding.

“The lobsters that entered China were caught by the company from 20 October to 5 November, 2019, from the Atlantic Ocean’s FAO21 waters,” the Sina article said.

The article claims that the Maine Center for Disease Control had flagged the emergence of a series of what Sina termed “e-cigarette pneumonia” cases in July 2019 and that these cases were centered at the York Hospital, nearby the company’s headquarters. The cases were kept secret, the article claims, though it illogically also states that the outbreak was reported by local media.

“From July to the end of October 2019, the Maine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, local media, and local residents’ personal social media accounts repeatedly reported ‘e-cigarette pneumonia,’ which is a suspected new coronary pneumonia case that has been kept secret in the United States,” the article states.

Despite the claim of a cover-up, in January 2020, the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention published a statement on its website stating the agency “is working with clinical and public health partners in Maine, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S. CDC), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and others to investigate an outbreak of lung injury associated with use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products.”

A Maine CDC update in February 2020 added that “national and state data from patient reports and product sample testing show tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing e-cigarette, or vaping, products, particularly from informal sources like friends, family, or in-person or online dealers, are linked to most EVALI [ e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury] cases and play a major role in the outbreak.”

Robert Long of the Maine CDC told SeafoodSource that “there is no scientific evidence to support these claims.”

Maine Coast President Tom Adams said he has not been contacted by any Chinese media and has “no idea at all” why his company is being singled out.

“Public health organizations from around the world have stated with certainty that imported food is not the cause of COVID-19. Maine Coast has no information supporting this claim,” Adams told SeafoodSource on 1 October.

Adams expressed incredulity at the claims being made about his company’s alleged role in the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Even … a single shipment would have so many touchpoints and people along the way – drivers, handlers, customs officials in both countries, seafood handlers in the U.S. and China – if this were to be true, the potential for contamination would be high for all of them, so not having any cases along the way would be extremely surprising and unusual,” Adams said.

Adams said Maine Coast has “not heard any concern from our Chinese customers and it has not affected our current business.”

“It is my understanding that Chinese press has been since the beginning of COVID been trying to find other places, including foods from around the world, including Norwegian salmon, Australian seafood products, to blame the spread of COVID on with no success. I think we’ve all read those articles,” he said.

The World Health Organization, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization, and all major national food safety agencies report there is no connection between seafood, seafood packaging, and COVID-19, according to the National Fisheries Institute, a trade group representing the U.S. seafood industry.

“Simply stated, people cannot get COVID-19 from eating seafood. NFI’s Seafood Safety & COVID-19 website demonstrates over and over that the coronavirus is not related to seafood. Seafood is a safe and wholesome food with nutritional benefits that contribute to a strong immune system,” NFI said in a statement.

Even if unsupported by evidence, the linkage in China of COVID-19 with imported seafood cold chains has damaged the perception of imported seafood throughout the country, though Chinese distributors have been keen to focus the attention on countries where COVID-19 controls have been lax.

In a recent interview with SeafoodSource, the head of the Chinese Aquatic Products Processing and Marketing Association (CAPPMA) Cui He said China was forced to make enhancements to its COVID-19 controls because similar controls were not being instituted in some seafood-exporting countries. Indian and Ecuadorian companies – both major suppliers of shrimp to China – have faced temporary bans from the Chinese market after Chinese customs announced discovery of COVID-19 traces found on their shrimp packaging.

COVID-19 checks on inbound seafood shipments has crimped supply and put pressure on prices in Chinese markets. Traffic jams at Chinese ports exacerbated by the COVID-19 testing regime has also pushed up freight prices, depleting the margins of Chinese processors relying on export markets.

Photo courtesy of L Nunes/Shutterstock

I

Mark Godfrey

by El Gato Malo via : Bad Cattitude

covid, a highly seasonal virus, looks to be surging far earlier and more intensely in the northern US this year.

many have looked at this, myself included, but i wanted to take another shot at quantification here to see if we can get a picture that helps us see what’s coming.

to this end, i took all the states on the US northern border (excepting PA and OH, as they do not really count, barely touch, and have no population there.)

it’s hard to compare northern and southern states due to highly differentiated seasonality and the south now winding down its season as the north starts to wind up, so i chose to use states as their own controls. this also keeps demographics etc out of the picture. we’re just looking at “how is this year vs this time last year?”

i then grabbed their charts from the NYT and made a montage (in 2 parts, running west to east)

the red lines are hospitalizations and deaths on 9/29/21 (most recent data) vs the same day last year. all are 7 day moving averages to avoid day of the week fluctuation issues and to smooth the trends. data from NYT.

we would expect, given the rise in acquired immunity and in vaccination rates(which were zero this time last year) that even if vaccines are non-sterilizing but do have an effect of severity, that we’d be seeing a big drop in hospitalizations and deaths as delta is a far less deadly variant with lower hospitalization rates and that is not due to vaccines as delta case fatality rate (CFR) is actually rising as vaxx levels rise.

unfortunately, what we’re seeing is very much the opposite.

as can be readily seen, this does NOT look good vs a year ago. in every single state on the northern border, hospitalizations are up from last year ranging from up 35% in north dakota to a whopping 2100% rise in vermont.

deaths are also up YoY in all states but north dakota. vermont and maine lead the pack at up 2200% and 2000% respectively. (albeit off low bases)

i plotted all these states below. they are not normalized for population, so the raw numbers are not terribly comparable between states.

the real focus here is on percentage change year to year by state.

and it’s GRIM.

these surges are WAY ahead of last fall and we are not yet anywhere close to what is usually even seasonal ramp up in most places, much less seasonal peak which comes in early january.

perhaps this is just temporal shift and an early season, but as a number of these states are nearing or have already broken out to levels higher than their peak seasons last january, i doubt it. it looks like something else. whatever it is, this is a seriously worrying trend, especially given the vaccination rates.

BUT, and this is a meaningful but, there is a complicating factor.

cases are way up, even if we adjust for testing levels, and this seems to be driving a lot of what’s going on.

so, i added some more lines to this chart. i took the raw rise in cases (using sept 26th as that was the most recent day for which testing levels data was available) calculated the raw reported change year on year, and adjusted it for the changes in sample rate from testing level changes.

i then used this adjusted cases level to adjust the hospitalization and deaths data.

this does not mean they are really lower. they are not. they are way up.

my intention here was to try to get a sense of something a bit different: how much of the rise in hospitalization and deaths is due to the rise in cases?

• in hospitals, it turns out to be all of it and then some.
• but in deaths, we see a different picture with the increase in death rates significantly outpacing the rise in case rates.

honestly, this divergence is something of a mystery to me and i’m still fishing for explanations.

how could median case hospitalization rates (CHR) be down 17% while median death rates are up 117%?

this would seem to imply that those getting sick enough for hospital are dying at 140% higher rates than last year. (or that a lot of deaths are non-hospital)

this also drives home another fact: there is simply no mathematically plausible way that this is an “epidemic of the unvaccinated.”

case counts cannot be up 220% as a median in the US northern states if vaccines are sterilizing. only about 32% of over 12’s are unvaccinated and under 12’s are not driving this.

if vaccines were perfectly sterilizing that would imply that 1/3 of the people were causing 220% of the spread and that delta was 660% more contagious. absolutely no one serious can make such a case.

a secondary attack rate (SAR) in the mid 11%’s vs 8% from alpha cannot account for anything remotely like that. and it’s not even clear delta has a higher SAR than alpha anymore.

this may point to negative VE’s from vaccines. this shows up in the UK data.

vaccines show efficacy in reducing hospitalization and death for delta but, based on the last 2 week interval in the UK variants of concern reporting, the negative VE looks to be about -16% for cases.

this is not nearly enough to account for this huge rise in cases even in conjunction with a 42% higher SAR. 1.42 X 1.16 = 1.66 = 65% predicted gain.

we’re looking at something on the order of 4X that (and in a population with more acquired immunity which IS sterilizing.)

this brings us back to the vaccinated superspread hypothesis where large number of people with leaky vaccination are actually kicking the whole pandemic up into a different valance and adding new and potent asymptomatic spread vectors that were not there before.

i am still not seeing a better explanation. it’s not just delta, it’s not just negative VE. we may be seeing some acceleration from the two week window of high vulnerability post vaccination as we saw in israel and palestine, but given the already very high rates of vaxx in the vulnerable communities in the US north and the lowish current vaxx uptake levels, this seems an less likely culprit here.

we also see some interesting confirmation in the fact that unlike the other variants, the CFR of delta has been rising, not falling. it’s still well below alpha (1.1%), but it’s basically twice what it was a a few months ago.

this is counter to expectation and to the general gradient of evolutionary pressure. higher fatality is maladaptive to maximizing spread which is what genes do.

it’s like seeing water run uphill.

when you see such things, it’s generally because some other force is working on the system. leaky vaccines have been known to do this. they select for hotter, deadlier variants.

this would seem consistent with the idea that the vaccines are now the big driver of viral evolution and perhaps spread.

the lower hospitalization per case rate but the much higher death rates are a bit of a puzzle.

all but 2 states saw CHR drop. (i have no idea what’s goin on in idaho. their adj cases are up quite little but their hospitalization is exploding. i suspect a data issue, but i’m really not sure. if anyone has any thoughts, please chime in.)

but all but three saw CFR rise.

my best guess here is that there are fewer severe cases, but that the cases that are severe are considerably MORE severe.

precisely what would create such a situation is a matter of some speculation.

• it could be a set of evolving “hotter” variants within the delta strain that affect some and not others
• it could be higher viral loads affecting some who come in contact with superspreaders. perhaps loading dose is having this effect
• “breakthrough” cases are selecting for those with high vulnerability/weak immune systems and so only the high risk are getting hospitalized leading to higher death rates as a %.
• it could be that vaccines are, in some, causing reactions that lead to cytokine storms or other autoimmune cascades. such things have been seen in other leaky vaccines (like dengue).
• it could be some sort of statistical issue where count of hospitalizations is being depressed or deaths overstated. this seems unsatisfying on hospitals (as counting is more, not less inclusive) and deaths, while overcounted, seem to be being counted the same way as before. so i’m inclined to discount that.

it could be a lot of things or a combination of things. if others have plausible theories on this, i’d love to hear them.

and no, it’s not “less lockdown and less masking.” it’s clear that none of that ever made any difference.

but one thing seems clear: something is going seriously wrong here. with all this immunity and vaccination, there is no reason we should be seeing such an explosion of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths unless we’re fundamentally altered the equation in some important way. the variants do not seem to explain anything like this size of surge or its off season nature.

if these trends hold, we could be in for a rough winter.

Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,

A great many essential components in America are on ‘indefinite back order’, including the lifestyle of endless globally sourced goodies at low, low prices.

Setting aside the “transitory inflation” parlor game for a moment, let’s look at what happens when critical parts are unavailable for whatever reason, for example, they’re on back order or indefinite back order, i.e. the supplier has no visibility on when the parts will be available.

If the part that blew out is 0.1% of the entire machine, and the other 99.9% still works perfectly, the entire machine is still dead in the water without that critical component. That is a pretty good definition of systemic vulnerability and fragility, a fragility that becomes much, much worse if there are two or three components which are on indefinite back order.

This is the problem with shipping much of your supply chain overseas: you create extreme systemic vulnerability and fragility even as you rake in big profits from reducing costs. Speaking of costs, let’s look at the costs of having a large, costly, complex mechanism sitting idle in a non-functioning state due to some broken element for which there is no substitute available. Whatever productive capacity the mechanism, process, etc. had is now stuck at zero.

Buying a new replacement is extremely costly, and that’s not always available for all the same reasons that parts and components aren’t available. Finding someone to fabricate a new component is not easy due to the wholesale transfer of manufacturing moxie and capability overseas.

You might be able to find someone to weld a replacement strut, but try finding someone to fab a new bicycle derailleur or better yet, a multilayer semiconductor chip. What about 3-D fabrication? Doesn’t that solve this problem? If the part can be “printed,” yes, but there are limits on what can be 3-D fabbed. You can’t 3-D fab a complex thermostat or controller, for example. You can’t 3-D fab a rubber gasket, either, or a great many other bits of petrochemical-based manufacturing.

Scarcities are not limited to parts and components; skilled people can be scarce, too. For example, there is a limited supply of ICU doctors and nurses. The training required to work in an ICU is specialized and experiential; throwing someone with minimal training in is not a substitution that’s going to work. You can’t order an ICU staff from China or print one digitally the way the Federal Reserve creates currency out of thin air. It takes many years to train the staff to function at a high level in ICU.

A great many such labor scarcities exist for skilled workers who cannot be replaced except by someone with the same training and years of experience. This is one reason ICUs can break down: there is no replacement staff available, and no way to “print more.”

It turns out there’s also a scarcity of people willing to do the dirty-work jobs America needs done for wages that haven’t kept up with inflation. As I have explained here, the $1.65 minimum wage I earned in 1970, if factored for real-world inflation, is around $18 per hour, and arguably closer to $20 per hour.

The solution is to raise the pay to levels that attract workers, but then this requires raising prices on the good and services to the point that customers can no longer afford them.

But wait, can’t we automate all work and deliver full-gee-whiz free-money, no-work communism to everyone? I invite everyone who reckons this is in the realm of the do-able to design, program and manufacture an automated robot that can trundle out to the laundry room, pop open a broken clothes dryer, diagnose the problem, manage to find a new controller board, fit it correctly and properly reconnect all the little wiring bits, close it up, test it, lift the dryer back on the washing machine and do all that for the relatively modest cost of a human repairperson. When you accomplish fabricating and programming that robot to do all the work without instruction or oversight, by all means let us all know how much it cost to design, program and manufacture, what the payback of the development and manufacturing process will cost amortized over the (short) life of the robot and how reliable it is in the real world.

The point is, fantasies are nice but reality is far more demanding.

There can also be scarcities of competence. There may be replacements who claim competence, but when reality intrudes on the shuck-and-jive, their competence was illusory, and the net result is the entire institution can be described by President G.W. Bush’s memorable phrase, this sucker’s going down.

There can also be scarcities of institutional infrastructure and capacity. Once the institution, enterprise, state agency, etc. has been stripmined of redundancy, institutional memory and competence, then the first scarcity that cannot be replaced is the first domino that topples all the other dominoes of systemic vulnerability and fragility.

The Federal Reserve can print trillions of dollars and the federal government can borrow and blow trillions of dollars, but neither can print or borrow supply chains, scarce skills, institutional depth or competence. That nice shiny new semiconductor fab you reckon will resolve the chip shortage? You can print the billions of dollars needed in an instant, but the machinery, expertise and time can’t be conjured quite so easily. That fab is years away from completion no matter how many freshly conjured dollars you throw into the air.

When Critical Parts Are On “Indefinite Back Order,” the Machine Grinds to a Halt: that’s the U.S. economy in a nutshell.

A great many essential components in America are on indefinite back order, including the lifestyle of endless globally sourced goodies at low, low prices.

That lifestyle is out of stock and cannot be replaced with financialization fakery.

Hey, Federal Reserve, can you conjure up a non-corrupt financial system, a domestic supply chain, and an economy of open competition, transparency, accountability and competence? If not, you are even more worthless than we feared.

by JOSEPH SILVERSTEIN – CORNELL UNIVERSITY via The College Fix

ANALYSIS: If the goal is to prevent infection, the 95 percent vaccination rate on Cornell’s campus has not accomplished that

Cornell University has aggressively pushed its students to get vaccinated, announcing a vaccine mandate for the 2021-22 academic year in April and frequently denying religious and medical exemptions.

As a result, 95 percent of the campus population, both students and faculty, is vaccinated.

Despite this, Cornell University has more than five times the amount of confirmed positive cases during its first week of this academic year than it did during its first week of the 2020-21 academic year, according to the Cornell COVID dashboard.

By the numbers, during the first week of school that ran from Aug. 27 to Sept. 2 of this academic year, Cornell reported 322 positive COVID-19 cases.

In comparison, during the first week of school last year, which ran from Sept. 3 through Sept. 9 of 2020, Cornell reported 59 positive COVID-19 cases.

That is 263 more cases, or more than five times the amount of positive cases, when comparing the first week of school.

Most students attended in-person classes in the fall of 2020 and were required to wear masks, just like this academic year. The increase in positive cases cannot be attributed to an increase in testing — in fact, more tests were administered in the first week last fall, according to the Cornell COVID dashboard.

From Sept. 3 through Sept. 9 of 2020, there were 28,951 COVID tests administered, accordingto the Cornell COVID dashboard. There were only 59 positive tests, or a 0.2 percent positivity rate.

In contrast, from Aug. 27 to Sept. 2 of this year, only 27,103 tests were administered, finding 322 positive cases, or a 1.19 percent positivity rate.

No variable changed: Cornell announced in July that it would still require all individuals, regardless of vaccination status, to wear a mask while inside. The same public health measures, often criticized as too strict, that were in place last year remain in place this year.

Due to the high amount of positive cases the Ithaca campus is currently experiencing, President Martha Pollack warned classes may be moved online if the trend continues. Meanwhile, the campus has been moved to a “Code Yellow.”

If the goal is to prevent infection, the 95 percent COVID-19 vaccination rate on Cornell’s campus has not accomplished that.

As Cornell and many other universities across the country mandate these vaccines, one must ask: to what extent are the vaccines effective? Do the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks for healthy 20-year-olds?

In August, the CDC director admitted the COVID-19 vaccines cannot prevent transmission. Cornell’s recent case surge is further evidence of that.

The risk of an adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine, while minute, is not zero.

According to CDC and FDA data, the mRNA vaccines have been linked to increased risk of myocarditis, a serious heart condition, in young people, particularly young men. While this reaction to the vaccine is exceedingly rare, the connection between the mRNA vaccines and myocarditis is higher than previously thought.

Further, Dr. Robert Malone, one of the founders of mRNA vaccines, warned on evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein’s podcast that the spike protein received from vaccination is, in his medical opinion, cytotoxic.

And according to information released by the Japanese government in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the lipid particles from the Pfizer vaccine concentrate overwhelmingly in the ovaries and also bone marrow.

Why on earth would Cornell force its students to receive this vaccine?

To be clear, Americans who are elderly, immunocompromised, or suffer from a serious underlying condition should definitely get the vaccine. But even in those cases, they must still have the freedom to make such a decision for themselves.

Cornell’s draconian COVID-19 policies have failed, and now the administration’s promises about a normal, mask-free academic year in return for achieving “herd immunity” have come crashing down against the cold reality we all face.

If the vaccines cannot prevent infection and return us to normalcy, what then, is the point of returning to campus at all?

Editor’s note: The author of this piece has requested and been denied a religious exemption from Cornell’s vaccine mandate. He received the first dose of the Moderna vaccine in June.

by Anon

“What went wrong” with WTC7? Something certainly went wrong. There are several possibilities.

Actually, this is one of the easiest questions to answer with regard to the “mysteries” of 9/11.

Some have made the assumption that the 9/11 perpetrators were always intent on destroying WTC7, because it contained critical records, or even computers that logged the frantic insider trading that went on ahead of the attacks. There is little way to prove whether this hypothesis is correct or not, since WTC7 disappeared with its contents.

But what we can be certain of is, because WTC7 was too short to be hit by a “plane” (albeit a computer-generated one), WTC7 collapsing was always likely to raise incomparably more suspicion than the destruction of the Twin Towers.
It would risk becoming an obvious smoking gun of the conspiracy, and indeed it did. Remember the “scandal” caused by film director Matthieu Kassovitz, when he stated on TV that he’d like to be explained “how it is possible to bring down 3 Towers with just 2 planes”

Demolishing WTC7 would almost completely undermine the “plane attack” scenario, and it did indeed. WTC7 became the flagship question of the 9/11 Truthers, one that had to be avoided altogether by the NIST report.

So were the perpetrators so arrogant that they took the risk to light up an unnecessary smoking gun? The answer is no, and it can be easily understood why they had to demolish WTC7 just by looking at its videos and related testimonies recorded straight after the explosion of the Twin Towers.

What is undisputable is that just after the collapse of the South Tower, WTC7 suffered irrefutable explosion collateral damage: its internal lobby was blown up, its glass cladding was projected outwards, towards the exterior.

Barry Jennings, a NYC civil servant, entered a perfectly sound WTC7 with his colleague Michael Hess just after the “plane”attack. But when the Twin Towers collapsed nearby, the internal staircase of WTC7 suddenly collapsed too. Both men got trapped in the 8th floor and had to be extracted through the windows by the NY Fire Department. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Barry_Jennings

So the collapse/demolition of the Twin Towers caused an instantaneous collateral damage to WTC7, and instantaneous can only be attributed to an explosion. WTC7 had become a smoking gun for controlled demolition, and that is an undisputable fact anybody can see by themselves watching its videos.

So how could that have happened? This is my speculation, but it is so evidently correct that I am certain of it.

What is undisputable is that the energy at play in the destruction of the WTC was of nuclear nature. The molten steel in apparent violation of Thermodynamics laws, the footprint radiating heat for over 3 months, were tell-all signs, upon which Pr Francois Roby put an elegant and irrefutable scientific demonstration. He calculated that a low estimate of the heat released by the WTC after its collapse was 10 peta Joules, a stratospheric amount of energy, in the order of the monthly production of 900 MVA nuclear reactor. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02004696

The WTC controlled demolition was executed in the same standard, classic fashion hundreds of nuclear tests have been carried out for over seven decades. By lowering a charge inside a borehole, dug up deep into the bedrock, and then detonating it into an underground explosion chamber (a Zero Box) . That is classic nuclear engineering.

But the key insider information comes from Khalezov, the Russian National who claims to be a former Soviet officer privy to US/USSR nuclear agreements, and who was in effect the first to blow the whistle on the nuclear hypothesis. The embedded demolition scheme devised in the 1960’s at construction was managed so as nuclear charges were permanently stored under WTC7, for obvious security and maintenance reasons. WTC7’s basement was connected to the Twin Towers by rail track tunnels, the shock and vibration-free standard delivery method for nuclear warheads.

When the nuclear charges were detonated, each tunnel acted as a path of less resistance, and carried over an unattenuated pressure shockwave, from under each Twin Tower to underneath WTC7. This is how and why WTC7 imploded from the inside.

There is further evidence that this hypothesis is correct, and it is the underground implosion of the WTC subway (underground train network). Any civil engineer knows that structures are independently calculated: the subway tunnels could only have been damaged by an underground detonation nearby, not by the Towers collapsing over ground. https://gothamist.com/news/photos/mta-photos-show-extent-of-911-devastation-in-lower-manhattan-subway?image=7

The nuclear demolition of the the North and South Towers was planned and executed by Israel, who leveraged and utilised a policy error foolishly made by hapless and unwitting American officials.

But the WTC7 demolition was not part of the plan. WTC7 suffered unexpected explosion collateral damage, as result of a Physics phenomenon easily explained retrospectively, but that the arrogant perpetrators did never envisage.

They were taken by surprise when they realised that WTC7 had become a smoking gun for controlled demolition , and they had to improvise damage control.
So the General-in-chief Silverstein hastily made the decision to use the 3rd nuclear charge available and blow up WTC7. This in turn set in motion a process by which the entire false flag was revealed and is now irretrievably exposed. https://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7

WTC7 was the Almighty God instant retribution to the evil-doers; any physicist or engineer, in the decades to come can, and will, understand what really happened on 9/11.

by: Mike Adams via State of the Nation

First published February 24, 2020

(Natural News) We now have bombshell, smoking gun evidence that the CoVid-19 “Wuhan” coronavirus was specifically engineered as an offensive biological warfare weapon, designed to target to exterminate human beings.

A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Antiviral Research (Vol. 16, April 2020) is entitled, “The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade.”

It reveals that the CoVid-19 coronavirus contains unique features that allow it to function as a more efficient weapon system for human-to-human transmission, which helps explain why the virus has been impossible to contain (even under “quarantine” conditions, which have universally failed in China, Japan, Korea and elsewhere).

As the science authors of the paper explain in the full text, “This furin-like cleavage site… may provide a gain-of-function to the 2019-nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population.” (Emphasis added)

Further, the science paper finds that there is no known viral ancestry to the CoVid-19 coronavirus, meaning it did not evolve from nature. It was engineered, and the science paper authors also state that the virus contains elements from MERS, stating, “Before the emergence of the 2019-nCoV, this important feature was not observed in the lineage b of betacoronaviruses.”

The abstract and full PDF (paid) of the study are available through this link at ScienceDirect.com:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528

The “smoking gun” aspects of this research were brought to light earlier today by Prof. Frances Boyle who appeared on the Alex Jones Show (2nd broadcast hour, Feb. 19th, 2020, InfoWars.com) to reveal his findings that confirm the Wuhan coronavirus was an engineered biological weapon.

Tomorrow we will publish the full transcript from that interview, containing stunning new details about the origin of the viral weapon. You can watch the full 47-minute segment here, via Brighteon.com. The full interview is also available on Banned.video.

Brighteon.com/b4e196ff-d85f-45c4-b4e0-8bc1bea6dc09

The following graphic from the published study shows some of the S-protein sequences found in the CoVid-19 “Wuhan” coronavirus which share a nearly identical pattern with MERS-CoV, but not with any previous ancestry of “lineage b” type coronavirus:

The new feature engineered into the Wuhan coronavirus has, “the potential to cleave specifically viral envelope glycoproteins, thereby enhancing viral fusion with host cell membranes,” conclude study authors.

This feature results in, “higher pathogenicity, pronounced neural symptoms and neurotropism in infected chickens,” according to the paper. That means, essentially, it kills more easily and causes nervous system damage while infecting nerve cells. Note that many of the human victims in China appear to suffer seizures and a total, almost instantaneous nervous system shutdown, literally collapsing in seconds.

Furthermore, this enhanced property of the virus results in, “a widening of the cell tropism of the virus,” meaning it allows the virus to live and thrive in a much wider variety of human cells, including respiratory system cells. This means the virus lives in both respiratory cells and nerve cells.

Interestingly, the study further confirms that “ACE2” receptors are the vector of opportunity for the virus to infect human beings, stating, “ACE2 is also the receptor of the newly emerged nCoV.”

Additionally, the study finds that another element of the CoVid-19 virus appears to have been assembled from the SARS coronavirus, further confirming Frances Boyle’s claim that the engineered weapon is a “chimera” of multiple strains of biological weapons, including SARS, MERS and HIV. From the study: “Notably, the IFPs of the 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV are identical, displaying characteristics of viral fusion peptides (Fig. 2).”

Engineered to attack the human respiratory system, but there may be a defense… (you won’t like it)

The CoVid-19 coronavirus is specifically engineered to exploit the biology of the human respiratory system. Again, from the paper text:

Since furin is highly expressed in lungs, an enveloped virus that infects the respiratory tract may successfully exploit this convertase to activate its surface glycoprotein (Bassi et al., 2017; Mbikay et al., 1997). Before the emergence of the 2019-nCoV, this important feature was not observed in the lineage b of betacoronaviruses.

Finally, study authors explain that people who have already been exposed to other viral infections may have enhanced immunity against the coronavirus. From the study:

…it was recently shown that in an effort to limit viral infections, host cells that are infected by a number of viruses provoke an interferon response to inhibit the enzymatic activity of furin-like enzymes.

Although we caution that this supposition is just theory (so far), it may turn out that one way to boost defenses against the coronavirus could be to get infected with a weaker respiratory virus first. Stated another way, people who routinely interact with the public and are exposed to a wide variety of in-the-wild circulating viruses may be automatically building improved defenses by overcoming other viral infections first.

This finding has huge implications for individuals who take vaccines, given that vaccines expose the human body to weakened viral strains that often fail to provoke the full response of “in-the-wild” viruses such as seasonal influenza. Although the research did not focus on this point, it might also turn out that people who routinely take seasonal flu shots could theoretically demonstrate a weakened immune response against the coronavirus, while those who avoid flu shots and allow their own bodies to naturally fight the flu each year will show enhanced immunity against CoVid-19 coronavirus.

Or, arguably, it might work the other way around, where people who routinely take more vaccines and are exposed to a wider variety of weaker strains therefore have more capacity to produce an “interferon response.” It’s too early to tell, but it certainly seems to be the case that people who are rarely or never exposed to other viral pathogens may be far more vulnerable to this one.

Refer to the “Hygiene Hypothesis” for more ideas on the ramifications of this research.

There’s more research yet to come, and tomorrow we post the full transcript of the interview with Frances Boyle on the Alex Jones Show.

We are about to launch Pandemic.news as a hub for podcasts, videos, science article links and news links, so be sure to check out that site over the next couple of days as we ramp it up.

And yes, if you’re wondering how we managed to acquire Pandemic.news, we saw this coming years ago. None of what we’re seeing here today surprises us in the least. In fact, it’s going to get much, much worse, which is why we also publish Collapse.news … because that’s where this ends up sooner or later.

Full transcript… SHARE this everywhere, re-post, tweet and cover:

(Please excuse any minor errors, this was transcribed in a bit of a hurry due to the urgency of the message…)

(bolding emphasis added, pay special attention to the bolded sentences…)

Alex: All right. I have not touched the coronavirus today because I was waiting for Professor Dr. Francis A. Boyle to come on, leading American expert international law; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-terrorism Act of 89, which was an adopted into world law, the American-implementing legislation for the biological weapons convention. He served the board of directors of Amnesty International and represented Bosnia and Herzegovina to World Court. He served as a legal advisor to Palestinian delegation, the Middle East peace negotiations. In 2007 he delivered the Bertrand Russell peace lectures. Professor Boyle teaches international law at University of Illinois and is author of– and it goes through all of the different books he’s written. He holds a Doctor of Law, magna cum laude; holds a PhD in political science from Harvard university. His latest book is Poems Against the Empire, which is a collection of poetry reflections on his experiences fighting for peace, justice, human rights, international law, social welfare and the United States Constitution. And he joins us now. I would call him the classical liberal. A liberal today or leftist is a fascist. It’s like a neo-con as a fascist. And so, the terms don’t mean anything. And he’s got big breaking exclusive news here. And he sent me notes, but I think the best way to do this is for at least the next three segments, he pretty much hosts, so that he can walk you through this. But this is serious news. This is very important news everybody should pay attention to. The Wuhan coronavirus came out of the biowarfare lab. That’s even being said by the White House now. Dr. Boyle and others were saying it three weeks ago. The UNC labs should be shut down, everyone investigated for violating the Biological Weapons Anti-terrorismAct. He’s got major studies that have just come out. So, he’s an expert on bioweapons and the law. We’ve got eight minutes to break here, then a nine-minute segment- a 10-minute segment. I’ll take us into break, Dr. Boyle. But you go ahead and host. You’ve got the floor here. Thanks for joining us.

Dr. Boyle: Well, Alex, thank you very much for having me on my best to your viewing audience. Yes. I sent your assistant an email on Monday that I had revised my opinion on certain matters and also, I had come up with what I concluded were the smoking guns that the Wuhan coronavirus came out of that BSL-4 facility. And you’ll note now that Senator Cotton saying the same thing. He was behind me at Harvard law school, and despite that, the New York Times slammed him. And as you know, Senator Cotton is a decorated combat veteran. No surprise there for the New York Times. So yes, I have these scientific studies now. Basically, I read these things over the weekend, which is why, I changed my mind and said I had new information and alerted your assistant on a Monday. And today is the first day I could give you an extensive interview. I want to go through these scientific studies so that you and the viewing audience understand their implications. I believe they are the smoking gun of what happened here. The first is by some life scientists: three from Marseilles, France and one from Montreal clinical research laboratories there. It was published on antiviral research 10 February 2020, okay. And I had a chance to read it over the weekend. You know, I read these types of things over the weekend. Now I’m not going to go through this whole study, but they did a genetic analysis of the Wuhan coronavirus. And let me just conclude, the critical part here where it says, “and may provide a gain of function to the 2019 nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population compared to other beta coronaviruses.” Let me repeat that: “and may provide a gain of function to the 2019 nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population compared to other beta coronaviruses.” And so, Alex, you recall in the first interview I gave to your colleague, Mr. Shroyer, and then the follow-up interviews I gave to you, I stated that this was clearly a gain of function, offensive biological warfare agent–

Alex: –You said that three weeks ago, you said that two weeks ago and now it’s not just a big Indian Institute. Now more live scientists have scanned it. They’re saying exactly what you were saying.

Dr. Boyle: Right? Well, this article here is the smoking gun. Okay. It clearly–

Alex: Tell people again the article and how they find it.

Dr. Boyle: Well, you can- I got it on a Science Direct Antiviral Research 10 February 2020.

Alex: Antiviral Research–

Dr. Boyle: 10 February 2020. And it’s a long title, but it starts out “The spike glycoprotein coronavirus contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade.”

Alex: So that’s exactly what the prestigious Indian Institute said is that it has the points where the artificial RNA was injected, I mean, they can see right where it happened.

Dr. Boyle: Right. But this was a genetic– as you know, that was withdrawn under political pressure. But now we have four very distinguished life scientists here. Yes, that’s it right there. And the smoking gun here is on page 11, near the bottom, the last full paragraph from the bottom where it says, “may provide a gain of function to coronavirus for efficient spreading in the human population—

Alex: Explain what that gain of function means because not all of us are experts on this like you, Doctor.

Dr. Boyle: Right. Well gain of function– Oh, so let me repeat. Alex, as I told you before, gain of function technology is DNA genetic engineering of a dangerous biological warfare substances to begin with–

Alex: It’s a souping up of already bad pathogens.

Dr. Boyle: Right. It’s a turbo charging and gain of function work can only be done safely in a BSL-4 or a BSL-3 facility. So, I think clearly, this is the smoking gun that the Wuhan coronavirus came out of that BSL-4 facility.

Alex: So, does this mirror what the Indian Institute said or is this different?

Dr. Boyle: Well, I think it goes beyond what the Indian study said, but we’ll get to that in a minute, the Indian study. Okay. I think, you know, I’ve now, excuse me– provided the smoking gun here. This is clearly a weaponized biological warfare agent and there is no legitimate scientific or medical use for gain of function technology, DNA technology on biowarfare–

Alex: So, there’s no excuse that it’s a vaccine test that got out.

Dr. Boyle: That’s baloney. This is clearly an offensive biological warfare agent and it has no legitimate medical or other–

Alex: This is beyond sensational. Is that why we’re seeing the very serious response to it?

Dr. Boyle: Well, you know, Alex, we first discussed this over three weeks ago and they’re still attacking me for being a conspiracy theorist and fake news and I’m a nutcase and a nutjob and everything else. So, there’s been a massive fight back in all the mainstream news media against this. And indeed, as I told you before, I’d been completely censored out of all the mainstream news media here in the United States.

Alex: But everything you said been confirmed and now major scientific groups come out and confirmed it. Let’s get back to that smoking gun and recap that and get to all the other documentation straight ahead.

[program break]

Alex: Well, we have a leading expert in international law who’s led major delegations in the US government; expert in biological weapons, anti-terrorism; responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-terrorism Act that got adopted as world law, Dr. Francis Boyle here.And I’m reading the same studies he’s reading. More scientists come out and look at it and say this thing is manmade and they show how, and they say it’s conclusive. You know these major Indian Institutes came out and said the same thing three weeks ago. And so, we’re going to walk through more of these studies in this segment- next segment but just as a father, as a citizen, as a human, as a citizen of the planet Earth. I’m going to ask Dr. Boyle what he really thinks the end game is here. Was this accidentally released as we were hoping and that’s bad enough or is it something even more sinister? Are they using this as the excuse to invade Taiwan as they’re now doing? Dr. Boyle. Please continue with the studies, the spike of, then we have the whole breakdown here with the study.

Dr. Boyle: All right, well, now let me get to the second study, which is another smoking gun and a bombshell, Alex; there’s no other word for it. You remember in our previous interview, you asked me if this had come out of the BSL-4 facility in Winnipeg, Canada – was stolen out of there. I said that that could have happened. Winnipeg is our equivalent of Fort Detrick. They do every type of hideous, offensive Nazi-type biological warfare work up there you can possibly imagine. But again, on the basis of materials, scientific materials, I had a chance to read over the weekend. I have changed my opinion on that. I think I have the definitive evidence where this came from and it came from the BSL-3 biowarfare lab at the University of North Carolina. Now I have condemned them before because they have done gain of function work, DNA genetic engineering on every hideous biological warfare agent you can imagine including MERS at that time, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome agent, which again, is a biowarfared coronavirus. Now it just came to my mind–

Alex: Say that again because we’re going to pull this up as you speak. You said the other study– we pulled it up.

Dr. Boyle: Study [inaudible] was there gain of function DNA genetic engineering on MERS, which is Middle East Respiratory–

Alex: –and that was the University of?

Dr. Boyle: North Carolina. Right? They have a BSL-3 biowarfare lab there.

Alex: Oh, that’s something I keep reading that they do level four stuff at level threes, right?

Dr. Boyle: I think they are, but they’re doing it with a level three. The last I saw, that’s all they had. But let me go through this study. It’s entitled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.”

Alex: Say it again because we have radio listeners. Hundreds of stations. A SARS-like cluster- the name of the paper- A SARS-like cluster

Dr. Boyle: “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.”

Alex: That’s 2015, December 21st. We have it on screen.

Dr. Boyle: That is correct. Nat Med, that’s it. Now, if you look through this carefully, first notice who was involved in this DNA genetic engineering of SARS, which is already a biological warfare agent to give it gain of function activities. And it has all these people there from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It has someone from the Food and Drug Administration, so you can’t trust the Food and Drug Administration. And then at the very bottom of the list, who is involved? Zhengli-Li Shi, Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China. So it’s very clear to me that this scientist from the Wuhan Institute of Virology got this gain of function technology for SARS from this University of North Carolina lab. And he didn’t steal it – or he or she didn’t steal it. What happened was, if you read carefully to the end of the article acknowledgements, they acknowledged a National Natural Science Foundation of China award. In other words, the Chinese government paid them to have one of their top biological warfare experts involved in this type of–

Alex: By the way, Dr. Boyle, stay right there.

Dr. Boyle: Sure.

Alex: I’m reading the paper. I mean, I know you had big news, you sent us links, but I’m just now reading it. And you talk about smoking gun – this is the Chinese government paying for the exact same thing with a US lab. How did you discover this? This is a smoking gun. How the hell did you find this?

Dr. Boyle: Well Alex, I told you that it’s part of my professional responsibilities to stay on top of biological warfare, so I came across it in my research. That’s just part of the job I do.

Alex: You’re explaining it very well sir, but just dumb it down and we got– our next guest is great, we’re going to move tomorrow. This is too big and now you’ve got time, so dumb it down for everybody. Why these two papers are so smoking gun because I’m sitting there looking at this. This is incredible. This is unbelievable.

Dr. Boyle: I have more than that.

Alex: Oh, I know.

Dr. Boyle: I noticed they acknowledged National Natural Science Foundation of China Award. In other words, these best scientists at the University of North Carolina took dirty money from China to allow that one of their top biowarfare experts from this Wuhan Institute of Virology and Wuhan, which has the BSL-4 facility, they knew exactly what they were doing, and they permitted this Chinese scientist to work with them to give gain of function biowarfare DNA genetic capability to SARS, which is dangerous enough to begin with. And let me just go through some of the language here. It is truly a smoking gun; clearly that laboratory must be shut down of immediately and all those scientists investigated by the United States government for this and their responsibility here and for violating my Biological Weapons and Terrorism Act of 1989. But let me continue. This is what they said. “We built a chimeric virus that encodes a novel zoonotic spike protein in the context of viable SARS. This approach characterized the threat posed by SARS coronavirus spike–

Alex: Dr. Boyle, stay there. We got to go to break. This is your bombshell. I’m reading the paper right here. They are admitting that they built the very virus that China paid the US to build and now that’s been released. And why did they release it? So Xi Jinping could grab power and invade Taiwan. Wow. This is unbelievable. No matter what you’ve ever heard on this show, this is the craziest and the most documented. This is over the top and we’ve caught them red handed. Unbelievable. We’ll be right back. Tell everybody you know to tune in right now. This is unbelievable.

[program break]

Alex: I don’t want to get metaphysical here, but my dad is a retired oral surgeon and dentist and he’s also developed some drugs that got approved with the Pentagon and some other things. And he’s got an office over here and he works here part time. And there was something about today’s show with Dr. Boyle coming on– I said, you know, my dad’s got that skull from medical school. That’s a real skull. And one of my earliest memories is being like two, three years old, and the skull’s in a black box and I like toddle over and open it up. I drop it on the floor and the German shepherd ran out in the backyard with it. My dad got real pissed off. He said, “That’s important. You respect that. That’s a real skull.” So, one of my earliest memories is a German shepherd running out in the backyard with a skull. But it’s just funny, I thought today’s show, I didn’t know why, I just went and said, “Dad, can I put your skull on air?” He’s got it in the office, and he said, “Yes, just respect the skull and everything is fine.” But the point is, is that this is real. Something big is going on. And now I’m looking at all these prestigious reports going back five years ago, how they engineered this, and Dr. Francis Boyle wrote the US biological weapons law, and he’s here laying this out and I can read the reports. It’s ridiculous how obvious this is that the Chinese paid a US university– that’s all over the news. Yale and Harvard are in trouble for 300-something million but turns out it’s billions total. That’s Wall Street Journal, New York Times, for Chinese communist funding. So, for whatever reason, we’re better at science than they are and they’re getting us to finance and build their surveillance grid, all of it. So, for whatever archetypal reason today, I’m like, I want a skull on the show today. I might’ve showed this skull in 20 something years on air once or twice. Why did I go get the skull? I just thought like today I should like do that to point out that we’re all human and it’s like Macbeth, sitting there when they dig up his old teacher and he’s talking to the skull. So, that’s all in the middle of this. Dr. Boyle. Please go back to where you were before we went to break and how big this is and what’s breaking here and the double smoking guns here. And even more you’ve got of where this came from because that’ll give us the answer hopefully of where it’s going.

Dr. Boyle: Right. Well, to continue then, it says this approach characterized the threat posed by a spike in primary human airways. In other words, they’re designing this to infect human beings by their airways and then it says, in vivo. In other words, they are using live animals–

Alex: Slow down and start over. Again, give them the paper’s name again. This is so huge. They’re making it to infect people. You’re right. They should be arrested.

Dr. Boyle: Of course, they should be prosecuted. No question at all about it. That’s the, I think, the one you already had up there. But in any case–

Alex: I’m going to stop interrupting. Just recap what you just said. Walk through this again.

Dr. Boyle: Right. “We built a chimeric virus,” so they joined these different biological warfare agents together into a chimera, as I told you, swine flu was–

Alex: And you said three weeks ago it was a chimera.

Dr. Boyle: Chimera, right. And here they are doing it to have a “spike in primary human airway cells in vivo.” That’s surrogates for us, okay. Now if you continue here, they took mice and with their technique here found robust replication comparable to SARS.

Alex: Wonderful.

Dr. Boyle: So, they’re using the gain of function technology–

Alex: They’re testing it to make sure it spreads quickly.

Dr. Boyle: That’s right. And it’s not that just SARS, it’s gain of function. “Together the data confirmed the ability to infect human airway cells,” et cetera. They know exactly what they are doing here.

Alex: I mean, just like Ford makes F-150 trucks, you just found who made this and they’re openly bragging about it.

Dr. Boyle: Right. Let me continue. “Together the data indicate that viruses utilizing what they put together are capable of inducing considerable disease in mice in the context of basically SARS.

Alex: Wow. And again, SARS is the same coronavirus family.

Dr. Boyle: Right. It’s weaponized coronavirus. They also conclude that they really couldn’t find an antibody against it.

Alex: Wow.

Dr. Boyle: So, it’s extremely dangerous.

Alex: Total jerks.

Dr. Boyle: Let me continue then–

Alex: I’m just starting to ask, you know, these people better be arrested really quick.

Dr. Boyle: Right. Now, let me continue here where they say their new DNA genetically engineered virus constitutes a gain in pathogenesis. That’s a gain of function right there; they admit it. Pathogenesis means lethality and infectiousness and we know that even Lancet has said lethality is about 15%. If you disaggregate numbers even put out by the Chinese government, it’s about 17%. So, together these data represent a crossroads of gain of function research concerns and they just make it clear they’re going to continue anyway. They also point out that they involved HIV based pseudo virus, prepared as previously described—

Alex: –which is what the Indians found. Oh my God.

Dr. Boyle: That’s why I was going to get to that. HIV is–

Alex: This is ridiculous.

Dr. Boyle: No, no. This is the type of Nazi biowarfare work these scientists do, Alex.

Alex: Oh, no, I agree. But they’re publishing. They’re admitting they did it.

Dr. Boyle: Let me continue, Alex. In a footnote it says, “Cells were originally obtained from Fort Detrick.”

Alex: Oh my God.

Dr. Boyle: That’s a biowarfare–

Alex: So that means US government biowarfare Creek was running this.

Dr. Boyle: They were involved in it, too. Yes.

Alex: Jesus. Let me ask you this. When you learned this, this weekend, what was it like? Was your heart beating faster?

Dr. Boyle: No, I decided to, well, notify your assistant there Monday morning and then later that morning, CNN in India did an interview with me on this, but that was only for about 20 minutes. And then I had to go back to my teaching. But you know, this is what I do professionally–

Alex: No, I know, but this is unbelievable. I’m reading the report right here from five years ago. Obviously, I don’t think the university knew that this would be used for this, but what did they think they were doing when they were giving a foreign authoritarian government a bioweapon? I mean–

Dr. Boyle: Well, it’s all greed. They were paid for.

Alex: It’s like you said, they just take the money, like you said, three weeks ago–

Dr. Boyle: –from communist China and their top biowarfare expert.

Alex: Well, here’s an example. I own 50 caliber rifles. If a known criminal came to me and said, “I want to buy them,” I’d say, “Hell, no.” You don’t give criminals 50 caliber rifles. Well, 50 caliber rifles are dangerous, but nothing compared to this. What the hell is going on? How are you as weapons research laboratories under the guise of safety research allowed to give the ChiComms stuff like this? You’re right. I’ve been on here 25 years. I’ve never seen a scandal this big. It’s all right here. They admit it.

Dr. Boyle: It’s even worse than that because all this work, this biological weapons work involving the Wuhan virology, was approved and funded by the National Institutes of Health—

Alex: Wow.

Dr. Boyle: –which I’ve discussed with you before, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious disease. Okay. I told you before, these agencies were up to their eyeballs in research development and testing offensive biological warfare weapon.

Alex: Dr. Boyle, stay there. You’re a great professor and amazing. When we come back, you’ve got to recap it all and boil it down for the average viewer, because I’m smart, the viewers are smart, but I’ve been on air- I’m not just being dramatic- I’ve been on air 25 years. I’ve never been this shell-shocked. I’m reading these main line reports; we pulled these up from the internet. This is it. This is the very virus five years ago, cooked up, sold to Chinese government. I know you don’t speculate, but when you come back, why is it out now? What’s the end game? How bad is it going to get?

[program break]

Alex: (Edited out promotional talk about storable food) … This is big, front and center. What we’re covering right now with Professor Dr. Francis Boyle and the admissions that a US university engineered the exact virus now spreading across the world. So, finishing up with its provenance, the fact that these are the smoking guns, sir, in synopsis, I know that limits the time we have, and I really appreciate it. Come back tomorrow if you can and then get into big picture – the response, how you think it got out, why it was released. I mean, I know that’s speculation, but we know it’s engineered; we know the US government knows it’s engineered. We know this happened before Trump five years ago, but still just how the hell could this happen?

Dr. Boyle: Well, let me go back here to this second study to point out – it says at the end, “the current manuscript has been reviewed by the funding agency, the National Institutes of Health. Continuation of these studies have been requested and approved by the National Institutes of Health.” Notice the National Institutes of Health under Fauci is funding this Nazi biological warfare work and they have approved and requested further development of it, which obviously, this study was 2015 and the NIH wanted it to become even a more deadly pathogenetic virus. And you can also then see here the money from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. This woman, I think you pronounce her name, [INAUDIBLE]) is out there now in public or she’s up to her eyeballs in this too, as is Fauci. And finally, I originally condemned this North Carolina lab because doing gain a function work on MERS as I said. Today in USA Today, Tony Fauci admits that the lethality rate of MERS is about 36%, whereas SARS is 10%. This Wuhan is 15% to 17%. So, notice Tony Fauci and the National Institute of Health–

Alex: –are backtracking.

Dr. Boyle: No, they know full well that they were paying this North Carolina lab in cooperation with the Wuhan BSL-4 lab and program to develop biological warfare weapons—

Alex: Is that why Senator Cotton and even the White House were like, “Hey, China, we don’t buy the provenance of this,” because they know China paid a US university to do this. Let me ask you this then. How bad is it going to be? Why did China do this? I know that’s speculation, but as just a citizen, not just a lawyer and an expert on this, what the hell– what do you think the end game is? Why is this out now? Will they use it against Taiwan? We know China bought it as a bioweapon.

Dr. Boyle: Well, let me just discuss one more scientific article with you. Archives of Virology 2010, 155. And here, Wuhan was working with an institute in Australia to DNA genetically engineer a super bioweapon involving SARS and HIV. That’s right in here; you can read it, okay. And apparently it was successful. So as far as I can tell, Alex, what happened was, the Wuhan is to the virology took the– and this was the Australian government knew all about this. And it says this work was jointly funded by the State Key Program for Basic Research Grants from the Chinese Ministry of Science, Technology and the Knowledge. And the other writer here, Australian Animal Health Laboratory in Australia. So as far as I can figure out here, what happened here, Alex, is that the Wuhan scientists took the North Carolina SARS with gain of function, which is already a biological warfare weapon, and they took the technology here behind this well-developed SARS HIV weapon and they all brought it back to the Wuhan a BSL-4 and tried to DNA genetically engineer it into a chimera, into a biological warfare weapon involving the coronavirus, the HIV virus and gain of function.

Alex: It’s all clear in the papers. They admit they did this. You’ve reverse engineered it: an incredible job. Do you think it was done on purpose then? Who stands to gain? [INAUDIBLE] as a law professor, who would do this? Who stands to gain?

Dr. Boyle: Well, clearly China has an expensive biological warfare program. They have- not as expensive as ours. I mean, we have 12 BSL-4 facilities here in the United States all doing this Nazi biowarfare work. They should all be shut down tomorrow as well as–

Alex: Oh, I totally agree. And then giving China the fruits of it. The ChiComms can come buy bioweapons from us?

Dr. Boyle: They bought it. What is interesting here, Alex, is that they didn’t steal it; they bought it. And we sold it to them, and we sold them access to it. They brought it back to that Wuhan BSL-4—

Alex: Is there any race specificness to it?

Dr. Boyle: Well, as I said before, we have seen one black African victim reported that I’ve seen. So, right now, I am withholding judgment on that, but you know, the Chinese put all this together for themselves. And of course, they were planning to use it as biological warfare against us. There’s no– I mean, who else–

Alex: Do you think that it got out on an accident or what do you think?

Dr. Boyle: As of now, Alex, I think it was an accident. The BSL-4 facility had leaks of SARS at least twice before and I believe it was an accident and that is now confirmed by Chinese scientists themselves. And this is the fourth study I want to put before you–

Alex: Stay there. We’ll do five more minutes before Paul Watson takes over. With Dr. Francis Boyle, the author of the US Biological Weapons convention and all the rest of it. I’ve been on air 25 years folks, and this just tops it all. I mean, we’re talking about our children the whole future, everything else. I had this premonition this morning. I said, let me just get that skull my dad’s got from his medical days. Let me bring this in here just as like a little prop to just think about mortality and the fact that we’re all mortal and there it is. And now we’re just laying this out. This is just end of day stuff. If not this, it’ll be something else. I mean, what are these labs doing? Why are they selling it to foreign governments? It needs to stop. It’s mad scientist behavior. They want to reduce world population. They want to distribute it out so they can deny who did it. They just want plausible deniability for bioweapons releases and mass population reduction. That’s really what’s happening.

[program break]

Alex: We’ve seen the panicked response of governments in action, but their propaganda’s everything’s fine. Dr. Francis Boyle is our guest here for another five minutes. Paul Joseph Watson is set to take back over. Our guest authored the US bioweapons law that became international law. In the four minutes we’ve got left, Doctor, we really appreciate you synopsizing or boiling it all down into what you really think is happening in the bombshells. And this new study you were trying to get into on top of all the other studies you just talked about.

Dr. Boyle: Right. This is the latest study. It just came out this week. Possible origins of 2019 nCoV coronavirus. What is significant here- you can get it at ResearchGate. What is significant here is that it is by two professors at the South China University of Technology – they’re all professors. And their conclusion of this study is that the Wuhan coronavirus leaked out of that BSL-4 facility. Let me repeat – even Chinese scientists are saying now, independently of me, it leaked out. And I believe it was probably an accident that there was a one of these death scientists there at the Wuhan BSL-4 facility trying to DNA genetically engineer the North Carolina technology, the Australian technology, HIV, SARS, gain of function together into the super biological warfare weapon and somehow got infected. There’s been speculation by these authors that animal residue, or they breathed it in or something like that. That person then got infected, but since it’s asymptomatic, they weren’t aware of it. And now, even though they’re saying it’s 14 days, a British healthcare expert estimate it could be 24 days. Whoever this expert was, this death scientist went out around and did his normal life activities for the next 14 to 24 days and it was spread all around Wuhan.

Alex: Oh, they were playing with fire and they got burned.

Dr. Boyle: Right. They shot themselves in the foot, Alex. That’s my assessment at this time, yes. They were using it– I think they were developing it for use against either us or the Russians and/or the Russians. They have a huge border up there.

Alex: Yes, the whole Russian-Sino split.

Dr. Boyle: Right. That’s no longer the case today, but still, Russia has a lot of land there and China– and not very many people.

Alex: Sure, they can wipe out the Russians, that’s their target. [INAUDIBLE] trail.

Dr. Boyle: And China has a lot of people and they need more land, so I’m not ruling out it would have been directed–

Alex: Sure. China’s always been eyeing Russia greedily. All right. All powerful. If you can come back tomorrow, the next day – we need updates. This is the biggest news ever. And I would just say that this is unbelievable. The reports, the scientific journals, Dr. Boyle – incredible. What do we call this interview? We’re still alive. I mean, I don’t know what to call this once we post it on Infowars.

Dr. Boyle: Well, Alex, let me also say we can’t trust the FBI to do the right thing here. They lied about, they covered up and they sabotaged the Amerithrax coming out of Fort Detrick. We are going to have to get some other federal law investigative agencies in here to deal with that North Carolina–

Alex: And you authored the US law on bioweapons, so I think you’re quite the authority on that. So, again, please join us again tomorrow or whenever you can. Dr. Boyle. Very powerful information and just amazing. Thank you so much.

Dr. Boyle: Well, thank you Alex and I do hope you can get this out around the world because the mainstream news media in the United States and Europe has been blackballing me and blacklisting–

Alex: Well, sure. I don’t even know what to call this. Smoking Gun, Wuhan Virus, Manmade Spreading Worldwide, Cover Up. I mean, China bought weaponized Wuhan Virus from us. Thank you, Dr. Boyle. Paul Watson takes over right now.

— End transcript

Warrant Issued for the Arrest of UCD Professor Dolores Cahill