All posts by Algora Blog

Jewish Banking – Short History

by Anonymous

This story begins in the mid 1500s when Jews took over Amsterdam after being expelled from Spain and Portugal during the inquisitions of the early 1500s – 1820s.
Many people forget that there were attempts at forming a central bank in the United States in both 1791 and in 1816. And that the central bank of 1791 lasted 20 years and that congress’ unwillingness to renew the charter resulted in the war of 1812.

The central bank of England for example formed in 1694 formed after the “Glorious Revolution” of 1688 played a pivotal role in jewish interests in regards to the slave trade in the Americas and the ultimate realization of their plans to build central banks and “stock markets” like the one they created in Amsterdam in 1602 and 1609.

The center of European banking moved from Amsterdam to London as a result of the Glorious Revolution and the King of England had his authority transferred to the already pozzed Parliament, the notorious “City of London”, a sovereign state within England, became the center of world finance after jewish banking dynasties colonized it.

Right before this move was one of histories most infamous scams the “Dutch Tulip bubble” which enriched the newly formed financial sector in Amsterdam in the 1630s. The Jews would take that enormous wealth generated and put that towards backing William of Orange in his quest to conquer England and steal the throne from his father-in-law James II.

Once installed the centuries long civil war in England fought over absolutism and a kings “divine right to rule” came to an end and authority to rule firmly placed in the newly formed Parliament that Jews had control over. It wasn’t even a decade later in 1694 that the Jews began to build their “institutions” in London, their Central Banks, their Stock Markets, their lending houses all of that which was tested in Amsterdam came to London. England would spread this new form of “banking” to the colonies like a cancer.

Sent from my iPad

Gaza War, a Setup: The End of Israel as We Know It

by Claudiu Secara


Let’s say that Agenda 2030 is running behind schedule. And let’s say that that perception is predicated on the existence of a grand bargain among the Powers That Be (PTB) that all the major conflicts must be brought to a resolution, by 2030, so the world can start focusing on what comes next in implementing the much-delayed world management of our planet’s runaway dysfunctionality.

Ukraine is one such point of friction and the Palestinian question is another, as is Taiwan. Behind them there are major issues of tectonic consequences. The balance among the powers is shifting; the political continental plates are realigning on a geological scale of magnitude.

One hot spot that needs to be brought to rest is the Israel­­‒Palestinian conflict. But can that be done? Way over 50% of the Israelis are adamantly against making any concessions to the Palestinians, with the settler group militantly promoting the expulsion of the Palestinians from all the lands coveted by Israelis.

But the method to bring the Israelis to their senses and break their national resolve is the usual method, nothing new. It is what the French call “la politique du pire”, the “policy of the worst”. It works the same way as police entrapment. The poor target is set up to act recklessly and foolishly under the impression that it acts in full control and with the support of the shadow powers.

In this case, it is easy to recognize that the Hamas incursion on October 7 into heavily fortified Israel territory could not have been possible without the knowledge of the biggest spies of the world. It is even conceivable that Netanyahu himself was in the loop. But not, as Larry Johnson describes the conspiracy theories claims, in order to trigger the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. Au contraire. To tar with compromat the extremists in his own government, those reckless individuals such as Smotrich, Ben Gvir, etc.

Just think about it. Israel is killing untold scores of Palestinians and we all are seeing acts of utter massacre, where Palestinians, dead or alive, are literally run over by Israeli tanks, hospitals are bombed, schools and mosques desecrated, pregnant women run over on their way to the maternity ward, horrific acts of inhumanity, utter barbarism never seen by the global audience live on mass media, a killing spree unseen in the world’s memory.

Once you’ve established these facts of war, then you have the next set of events that run contrary to anything the world was led to believe in the last 70 or so years. A rag-tag army in sandals, who could not control even their own country – that is Yemen’s Houthis – brings world trade to a standstill by flying some home-made, or maybe Chinese-sold, drones above the busiest shipping thoroughfare, the Red Sea. And what do the superpowers decide to do? The US armada, the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group, claims to have to up-anchor and leave the theater of war, in which it was meant to take an active interest, and return to home base in Norfolk, U.S.A. At the same time, the US Defense Secretary is in bed in an intensive care facility without anyone in the government knowing. And what does the Chinese commercial flotilla decide would be appropriate to do when its core business is under attack by the sandal-wearing Houthis? They announced the suspension of trade with Israel and the embargo of its ports.

It is nearly impossible to fathom how the Hamas people managed to build an army under the conditions of total surveillance. They seem to have access not only to unlimited amounts of materiel and know-how to build guns and ammunition but access to the most modern tools, such as drones and highly-professional video-making equipment. Under “total control” by the Israeli army, they can communicate freely, releasing daily streams of videos straight out of the so-called underground tunnels. One hint that we are given is that, supposedly, Hamas was indeed a proxy army organized and financed by, or with the knowledge, of the Israelis as a force to undermine the Palestinian Authority. Was that Israeli-Hamas partnership cut at some point, or how much do the Israelis know about their own creation today?

One way or another, some important players were involved in organizing, providing, equipping and facilitating this shadowy army right under the eyes of the powerful Israeli police state. Was the Israeli police state itself, and is it still, behind Hamas, as some have implied ?

Then you have Russia. Where is Russia in this war? Not one clear word from Moscow. Do they condemn Netanyahu for the atrocities committed in Gaza? Not really. Hamas? They held talks with Hamas in Moscow but not one word indicated any animosity between the two. At the same time, Russia is maintaining a very cordial line with Netanyahu himself.

While the mass media in the West keeps more or less quiet, the world is awash with scenes of the dastardly Israelis. A newly created cottage industry in the alternative media space is pulling together former stars like Tucker Carlson and Judge Napolitano, just to name a few, who are now broadcasting the same spokesmen from within the former media ranks, rewriting history under the eyes of a mesmerized populace. The same guys pop up on every alternative channel: Scott Ritter, Larry Johnson, Jeffrey Sachs, John Mearsheimer, etc.

A slow-boiling build-up of emotion is turning world opinion against the Israelis, and not only that – they are now seen as exemplary monsters far outstripping the Nazis in personifying inhumanity. This suddenly makes it possible to reverse the 70 years of the Holocaust industry’s mythology and possibly to replace it with the Jew as the villain, in the old tradition.

So we have Netanyahu squeezed from one side by the highly-advertised corruption charges and the popular movement in Israel to put him in jail. On the other hand we have the far-right settler criminal gang getting away with murder. What a good mix to foster a total manipulation and undermining of Israel’s society.

That reminds me of Yugoslavia, or more exactly of the Serbs. Post World War II, the Serbs had a reputation as one of the darlings of the West, as the best, most balanced model of the hybrid economic system as well as being a politically astute, unaligned, country. They were promoted as the little power who could withstand the aggression of Stalin’s takeover of Eastern Europe, they had a liberal, multiparty system, open to the West, and still maintained a socialist, workers’ economic system.

The West was fighting the communist enemy, the Soviet Union, but Serbia always dared to stand next to the West. And this stance was expected only to be reinforced once the Communists were finally defeated. But it turned out that little Serbia was not subservient to anyone. They claimed their independence from the Soviet Union, but they claimed the same independence and sovereignty from the West, just as much. So our best partner became our worst enemy, hellbent on standing up to the language of vassality from the East or from the West.

A few other small countries, such as North Korea, Cuba, Israel, and Hungary, managed to straddle the fence way past the expiration date, to play both sides and survive for a long time in a sort of limbo universe, where they maintained the illusion of National Sovereignty.

But there is very little room left within Agenda 2030 for such political acrobatics. The time has come to clear these thorns sticking out here and there, and to bring everyone under the system of total vassalage. You go to China, you go to Russia, and you go under the US umbrella. No more Israel or Serbia, or North Korea thumbing their noses at their masters.

The immediate impact of Israel’s intransigency on Israeli society is a shocking defeat. The terror inculcated by the death of their sons and husbands on a level of World War I, relative to their size, is having a sobering effect. The world’s reaction to their atrocities now makes them think about what they are doing to their own future, when even the subservient Germany dares to question their agenda. The settlers are getting their pound of flesh through the pagan demand for the sacrifice of Palestinian lives, and their rabid hatred and blood thirst are being slaked, but at the same time their indictment in the court of world justice is now moving from verbal curses to the actual Nuremberg trial stage.

That’s the story of the Gaza war in a nutshell. Israel will have to face the same fate as the rest of the world. Submit to the almighty; disarm; remove its nuclear weapons stocks; and allow the world to create a Palestinian State. Or, it will face an even greater threat as a unified state in which the Palestinians outnumber the Israeli Jews, in which case the situation in Israel will be even more destabilized. The majority of the Israelis, which rallied around the manifest destiny of Greater Israel, are now faced with a mighty barrage by the military siege mounted from all sides, economic impoverishment, even a de facto embargo, etc. They are slowly coming to their senses. The war against the Palestinian people turns into a civil war within Israel proper. Israel follows the same path to self-destruction that color revolutions have caused in country after country, as we’ve witnessed since the 1980s.

“Buy Them A Bullet!”


Marwa Osman puts western “activists” in their place…

BBC Reveals Israeli Madness in Its Mass-Murder

A journalist reveals to the BBC how Israel identifies Palestinians to target and kill via AI as “suspected low-level militants.

Israelis’ Inhumanity Exposed Again

This Palestinian man tried to get aid for his family.

He was sadistically shot by the Israel army.

Jews for Palestine at the UN

— Rabbi Israel David Weiss at the UN

Is America Waking Up?

Window of accepted narrative at Daily Wire ends where Ben Shapiro’s agenda end.

Tucker Carlson and Marjory Green – All You Need to Know

Is Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, being blackmailed to do the bidding of the Left?

2+2=racist! Bill Gates Tries to Cleanse Math of ‘White Supremacy’

by Bob Unruh via wnd

Americans can thank Bill Gates and his foundation for school lessons that teach that there is “white supremacy” in mathematics lessons across the country, that those create “systemic barriers to equity for black, Latinx and multilingual students,” and that the solution is, in fact, “antiracist math education.”

And for that, teachers must examine “the ways in which they perpetuate white supremacy culture in their own classrooms.”

A report from the Washington Examiner notes the lessons come from a plan called “A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction,” which is promoted online.

“The Pathway offers guidance and resources for educators to use now as they plan their curriculum, while also offering opportunities for ongoing self-reflection as they seek to develop an anti-racist math practice. The toolkit ‘strides’ serve as multiple on-ramps for educators as they navigate the individual and collective journey from equity to anti-racism,” the programming intended for children explains.

And the Examiners notes that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation “is the only donor listed on a website for a group dedicated to eliminating racism from the nation’s math curriculum, which would be accomplished, in part, by eliminating the need for students to show their work after solving a math problem.”

Condemned in the lessons are the “focus” that insists students get the “right” answer and requiring students to “show their work.”

“White supremacy culture infiltrates math classrooms in everyday teacher actions,” the lessons charge. “Coupled with the beliefs that underlie these actions, they perpetuate educational harm on black, Latinx, and multilingual students, denying them full access to the world of mathematics.”

The lessons inform faculty, “Antiracist math educators deconstruct the ways they have been taught math to learn and teach math differently.”

Subtopics include “ethnomathematics,” “thoughtful scaffolding” and having students “reclaim their mathematical ancestry.”

Also important, it explains, is using math as “resistance,” and that includes teaching “students of color” to “disrupt the disproportionate push-out of people of color” in math and STEM fields.

Climate Alarmists Battle To Censor Film Exposing ‘Climate Crisis Scam’

Authored by Katie Spence via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
It’s been a little over a week since “Climate: The Movie,” a documentary produced by Thomas Nelson and directed by Martin Durkin, was released on Vimeo, YouTube, Rumble, and other platforms. And already, it’s garnered millions of views and thousands of reviews.
“Watch this documentary to understand the lies, the pseudoscience, but also the self-interest of government-funded parasites pushing climate alarmism,” Maxime Bernier, the founder and leader of the People’s Party of Canada, posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, about the film that details how “an eccentric environmental scare grew into a powerful global industry.”
“The final nail in the coffin for the ‘human-induced climate change’ scam. An absolute MUST-WATCH!” Wide Awake Media posted on X while linking to the movie, which features an elite list of scientists, including Nobel Laureate John Clauser, Richard Lindzen, emeritus professor of meteorology at MIT, and Steven Koonin, a theoretical physicist and professor at NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering.

Young demonstrators hold placards as they attend a climate change protest opposite the Houses of Parliament in central London on Feb. 15, 2019. (Ben Stansall/AFP via Getty Images)

Still, not all the responses have been positive.
“I’m a Dutch science journalist, and I watched [Climate: The Movie],” Maarten Keulemans posted on X. “It’s full of crap.”
Some reviewers went so far as to call for censorship.
“I’m thinking we can get 10,000 people to report ‘Climate: The Movie’ on YouTube as having harmful and misleading content,” Eliot Jacobson, a retired mathematics and computer science professor, posted on X on March 23.
Following Mr. Jacobson’s call, Vimeo removed the video from its platform on March 24, citing a “violation of Vimeo’s Terms of Service and/or Guidelines.”
“The [V]imeo link to ‘Climate the Movie’ I shared two days ago has been censored!” Nir Shaviv, a physics professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem who appeared in the film, posted on X. “Fully removed beyond the mere shadow blocking [YouTube] has.”
Neither Mr. Durkin nor Mr. Nelson were surprised.
“There’s something bigger going on behind the climate thing, beyond the narrow arguments about whether it’s true that [carbon dioxide] causes all this stuff—which, of course, it doesn’t,” Mr. Durkin told The Epoch Times. “There’s almost a blanket ban on skepticism on mainstream television.
“It’s a kind of Marxism, I suppose. There’s an entire class of people who have an interest in high levels of taxation and high levels of regulation, in what might broadly be termed the ‘publicly funded establishment’ and the ‘education establishment.’”
Mr. Nelson concurred. “There’s a big difference between the climate realists and the other side,” he told The Epoch Times. “[Climate alarmists] are constantly reporting us and tattle-telling on people that don’t agree with them.
“I never see [climate realists] saying, ‘let’s report people from the other side, and let’s take down their videos, let’s censor them.’ All the censorship is coming from one side, and all the free speech and ‘let’s debate’ is coming from our side. We want to talk about it because we’re confident with our evidence.”

Censorship Unchecked

Immediately after Vimeo removed Mr. Durkin’s film, he reached out to the platform, “You know, I’m a reasonably well-known, veteran filmmaker, award-winning,” he said. “And I told them [via an electronic form], ‘Look, all the archive and music is cleared. We see absolutely no reason whatsoever why this was suspended. We’ve got a lot of good scientists in it.”
Mr. Nelson posted to X, “Hey @Vimeo: Specifically what is your justification for censoring ‘Climate: The Movie’?”
“A lot of people said they couldn’t believe it was being censored,” Mr. Nelson said. “But I never got an official response from anybody.”
Mr. Durkin didn’t get a response, either. “About 12 hours after I reached out, it went back up again. But we don’t know why. I presume that some ‘greens’ complained about it and that they automatically took it down. Fair dues to Vimeo that they put it back up, though, that was good.”

Climate the Movie: The Cold Truth. (Courtesy of Tom Nelson)

Vimeo wasn’t the only platform to take action against “Climate: The Movie.” On March 22, Food Lies, which has 44,000 subscribers, reported that when they first shared the movie on their channel, YouTube “immediately” removed it, and Food Lies had to seek special permission to repost.
When the report was granted, YouTube added the following contextual warming, “Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns. Human activities have been the main driver of climate change, primarily due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil, and gas,” and included a link to the United Nations’ “What is Climate Change?” website.
Further, Mr. Nelson said he believes Google is censoring the movie’s website. “We may have been shadow-banned, but we can’t prove it either way,” he said. “I don’t think Google wants to direct people to our site.”
However, Mr. Nelson and Mr. Durkin agree that the purchase of Twitter by Elon Musk in 2022 changed the social media censorship game.
“I love the fact that X is open right now, and we’re able to talk freely on X,” Mr. Nelson said. “Because just two years ago, if this had come out when we were all suppressed, it would have made a big difference.”

(Left) SpaceX, Twitter, and  Tesla CEO Elon Musk is seen during his visit at an event in Paris, on June 16, 2023. (Right) The new Twitter logo rebranded as X, pictured on a screen in Paris on July 24, 2023. (Alain Jocard/AFP via Getty Images)

“[Social media] is not so much a problem,” Mr. Durkin said. “Social media is leaky enough now that it gets out there.
“The bigger point is that I pitched this idea to the BBC and Channel Four about a year before I [was on Tom Nelson’s podcast]. Why, I have no idea. I knew they’d say no, but I think I wanted to satisfy myself. And, of course, they did say no.”
Mr. Durkin said that even if a station wanted to air a story expressing skepticism about the “climate crisis,” broadcast regulators in Canada, and the UK can destroy that station.
“In effect, they’re saying, ‘If you put out skeptical views, you’ll be sanctioned.’ And that can go as far as to have your broadcasting license revoked,” Mr. Durkin said. “So, you know, this is full-scale state censorship on mainstream media, and [the general public isn’t] making a fuss. We’re just sort of accepting that this is the case.”

Paying the Social Cost

When asked why “Climate: The Movie” has received such pushback, Mr. Durkin said it boils down to what he terms the “New Class.”
“Many of these characters have built their careers on the climate scam,” he said. “I mean, their reputations, their livelihoods, everything depends on it, and so they feel enormously threatened.
“But beyond that, there’s this kind of political-ideological movement; it’s not just about the weather. And the people who promote it—most of science is publicly funded, and lots of scientists are involved directly with publicly funded institutes—are part of that publicly funded establishment, so they have that worldview.
“You know, if you look at the political analysis of people in universities, they are 99 percent Democrats, or left-wing even.
“And it’s now de rigueur in those circles to hate Trump, to believe that more regulation is a civilized thing, to think that public backing for the arts, is a good thing, and so on and so forth. And when you come out and say that you don’t think the climate thing is true, you’re not just making a narrow point about the medieval warm period, or the geological record, on temperature, you’re saying something much bigger, ideologically.

Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald J. Trump dances after speaking at a rally in Manchester, N.H., on Jan. 20, 2024. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)

“You’re saying that maybe Trump’s not so bad. And the Second Amendment is a good idea. And you’re suddenly lumping yourself in with the deplorables and people in pickup trucks. And if you’re in Britain with Brexiteers. You’re putting yourself in a whole other social caste, as it were.”
Mr. Durkin said that before the release of the film “The Great Global Warming Swindle,” in 2007, which  the head of science at Channel Four asked him to make, he was considered to be one of the “hottest science documentary producers around,” and was regularly tasked by Channel Four to produce films. But after that film’s release, it took three years before Channel Four asked him back.
He said the regular invites to dinner parties and social gatherings in London“media and academic types” dried up.
“My wife was extremely cross. There was a huge backlash, and she has really bad memories of the immediate aftermath of putting ‘Swindle’ out, and that’s why she was very, very reluctant to have me make another film,” Mr. Durkin said.
“So that part of the film, where we talked about the social cost of coming out against climate in terms of ostracism from a particular social class, the New Class, that was personal.”

The New Class

Mr. Durkin, who is publishing a book that takes a deep dive into the “New Class,” said one of the characteristics of that group is they consider themselves to be part of the intelligentsia. By that, he means those who have a university degree that has “very little application in the real world.”
“They hate capitalism because capitalism hates them, and the market hates them,” he said. “If you do a degree in sociology, what use are you to man or beast? If I’m running a lawnmower company, I do not need anyone with a degree in sociology.
“So, they resent that they’re not well received in the marketplace. And historically, they’ve embraced the state because it provides them with an income and a gratifying grand title if they’re working for some big government agency or forum: for the U.N., or an NGO, or for NOAA, or whatever.”

A general view shows a screen of votes during a United Nations General Assembly meeting to vote on a non-binding resolution demanding “an immediate humanitarian ceasefire” in Gaza at UN headquarters in New York on Dec. 12, 2023. (Angela Weiss/ AFP via Getty Images)

Mr. Durkin said the class is at odds with the working class and is “enormously powerful” because it’s part of the publicly funded establishment.
“Until we understand that they are a particular group, they have a particular set of interests, and those interests involve taking away our money and taking away our freedom, then we’re in trouble,” he said.
“I keep telling people, incredibly, in the US and the UK, more than twice as many people work in government as work in manufacturing.
“If you told some American in the early part of the 19th century that that could ever happen, they would have thought you were absolutely nuts.”