Unvaccinated Will Have ‘Miserable, Very Lonely Life,’ Top Australian Doc Warns


The head of the Australian Medical Association in Queensland has issued a dark warning to those who refuse anti-Covid vaccination, saying they not only face fines and fraud charges, but will be separated from the rest of society.

Life will be miserable without being vaccinated. You won’t be able to hide,” Dr. Chris Perry said this week, while speaking to Channel 9 television network in Australia.

The medical association president was discussing the future of Queensland residents who decide to dodge a vaccination mandate. Calling those who have decided against vaccination “crazy,” he said, “There’s a whole pile of issues, a whole pile of problems if you try and get around the system.”

Even those who have an exemption from mandatory vaccination will face difficulties, as they “won’t be able to get a doctor to sign [that] off,” Perry said during his speech, warning clinicians of possible fines for deciding to exclude someone from the jab. “The patients who tell lies can be charged with fraud,” he added.

This week, the Queensland government announced it would extend vaccine mandates against coronavirus to include all private healthcare staff. People have been given until December 15 to get double-jabbed and present proof in order to continue not only with their work, but also their private life as normal.

You won’t be able to go anywhere for any entertainment,” Perry told viewers, pointing out that proof of a person being fully vaccinated will be needed to go “into most venues.” To those who don’t have a certificate, he said,

You will have a very, very lonely life.

Fines of AU$1,378 have been announced for those Queensland residents who are believed to have breached the pandemic-related orders. Meanwhile, businesses have been advised to call the police in the event of a suspected breach. “The pubs and the clubs are going to have to find out whether people are vaccinated before they allow them in, otherwise their businesses will go bankrupt,” according to the medical chief. 

WATCH Thousands protest over Covid-19 ‘tyranny’ in Melbourne 

Australia, which has registered some 188,000 cases of the virus out of 252 million worldwide, has some of the toughest Covid-related restrictions in the world. Its citizens have experienced some of the longest and strictest lockdowns, as well as vaccine mandates in certain areas.

Amazon’s Bezos Predicts Only Limited Number of People Will Get to Remain on Earth

Humanity will move most industry into space and allow only a select few to remain on our planet, which will be turned into a natural resort, according to self-funded space explorer Jeff Bezos.

The Amazon billionaire enthusiastically shared his predictions for what human civilization will look like in the future – with him personally helping to bring that future closer – during a talk at the annual Ignatius Forum in Washington, DC.

He expects vast cylindrical space colonies spinning to create artificial gravity for millions of residents to take over most industrial production. Meanwhile, Earth will be turned into a natural reserve with restricted access similar to US national parks today.

“This place is special, we can’t ruin it,” the founder of Amazon said of our planet.

“Millions of people will move from Earth to space over time. And that’s the vision of Blue Origin – millions of people working in space,” he said, referring to his own firm.

“Over centuries, most or many of the people will be born in space. It will be their first home. They will be born on these colonies, they will live on these colonies. They may visit Earth the way you would visit Yellowstone National Park,” Bezos predicted.

He said that the colonies themselves “will have rivers and forests and wildlife,” which arguably brought his speech out of the realm of futurology and towards optimistic science fiction. Amazon is infamously resourceful when it comes to squeezing its workers for every drop of productivity. That’s why the similarly rosy description of ‘Amazon factory towns’ solving economic inequality in the US was met with horror, when it was proposed by a Bloomberg columnist in September.

Bezos referred to Princeton physicist Gerard O’Neill, who proposed the concept of space habitats in 1976, as the source of inspiration for him. He said the sort of expansion he predicted was inevitable, if humanity is to grow in a sustainable way.

“This Earth can support, let’s say, 10 billion people to a certain degree. We’d have to work really hard to figure out how to do that without degrading the planet… The solar system can support a trillion people,” he said.

The entrepreneur didn’t comment on who he thinks would decide who gets to live on Earth in the future, when asked by the host of the event, Adi Ignatius. If historic precedent is any indicator, privileges granted by wealth and status may be involved.

The perks of Bezos’ own status as one of the richest people on Earth were discussed in the interview, when Bezos bragged about managing to get a cameo in his favorite movie franchise, Star Trek.

“That was not an easy gig to get,” he said of his appearance in the 2006 feature film ‘Star Trek: Beyond’. “I insisted on a speaking role, which complicated the whole scenario,” he said.

In the movie, Bezos wore alien prosthetics and had one line: “Speak normally.” He said he “nailed it,” prompting laughter from the audience.

Talking about Blue Origin, the billionaire compared his firm to barnstormers from the early days of aviation. He said taking rich tourists on suborbital flights will turn them into “Earth ambassadors,” who would advocate for increasing space exploration in the name of protecting our planet. This will give more resources to making manned space travel routine, similar to how biplanes of old evolved into the passenger airliners of today, he said.

“The hard part is not space travel – that part was solved in the 1960s. Not reusability – the space shuttle sort of did that. The hard part is operational reusability,” he said. “It requires practice to get it right.”

via RT

Ha, ha, ha . . . Glasgow Climate Summit Ends In Tears, Failure, And Kicking-The-Can On Commitments

via ZeroHedge

The least-green climate summit in history ended in a huge win for coal – after India and China forced last minute language changes into the final text of the Glasgow Climate Pact to “Phase downinstead of “phase out” unabated coal power.

The language changes were introduced on Saturday night during the last half-hour of the final session, when India swooped with the demand, as well as adding a clause which reads “while providing targeted support to the poorest and the most vulnerable.”

Specifically, the 197-nation pact would see parties commit to “escalating efforts to phase down unabated coal power and phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies while providing targeted support to the poorest and the most vulnerable in line with national circumstances and recognising the need for support towards a just transition.”

Previously, the text read: “including accelerating efforts towards the phaseout of unabated coal power and inefficient fossil fuel subsidies, recognising the need for support towards a just transition.”

So – India and China just kicked the door back open on what was already going to be a near-impossible task to eliminate coal, and Western nations are now committed to ‘targeted support’ in the form of taxpayer dollars for poorer nations.

Bamboozled…

And while the beneficiaries of said changes took a victory lap, India said (with a straight face) that it would “call upon parties to escalate development and deployment” of green technologies and a transition towards lower energy use – while China issued an even less specific support for the call “according to what India, China, South Africa and Bolivia delegates, and like-minded countries and other developing countries, expressed [as] concerns.”

If ever Greta should be pissed over ’empty words,’ now’s the time!

Tears of failure

In response to the last minute changes, COP26 president Alok Sharma offered his apologies, saying he was “deeply sorry” for how the event wrapped up.

“May I just say to all delegates I apologise for the way this process has unfolded and I am deeply sorry,” he told the crowd, adding “I also understand the deep disappointment but I think as you have noted, it’s also vital that we protect this package.”

Switzerland was pissed – expressing its “profound disappointment as a result of intransparent process,” adding “We do not need to phase down coal but to phase out coal.”

The Swiss representative said the last-minute change to the wording on phasing out fossil fuel use would make it harder to reach the COP26 goal.

This will not bring us closer to 1.5 but make it more difficult to reach it.

Frans Timmermans, the EU envoy, said he was disappointed with the new phrasing: “The longer you take to phase out coal, the more burden you put on the natural environment and the more burden you put on your economy.” –FT

US climate envoy John Kerry simply ‘had to go along with it.’

Commitment to signal maximum virtue

Aside from fancy pens, we’re guessing, COP26 attendees return to their countries with a most serious task – kick the can down the road for now, then come back next year with plans to strengthen their 2030 emissions reductions targets. Rich nations have the added bonus to “at least double” the amount of money they give developing countries in exchange for adapting to climate change.

As always, there are no specifics underpinning a commitment to transfer gobs of money from rich nations to poor.

Bill Gates Admits Defeat

Authored by Jordan Schachtel via The Dossier substack,

The world’s most influential “public health” advocate has come to seemingly doubt the technology behind mRNA injections, following their deployment into more than 7.34 billion arms worldwide.

A little-noticed interview from last week with a U.K. think tank saw Microsoft founder Bill Gates make some incredible statements about his most prized “solution” to the pandemic.

“We didn’t have vaccines that block transmission,” said Gates, contradicting previous interviews in which he claimed the shots significantly block transmission.

“We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the transmission,”he added.

[The vast majority of the interview involves Gates demanding totalitarian solutions to bad weather, which he refers to as climate change. The part about the COVID shots comes at minute 27.]

Gates is correct about the fact that the shots aren’t blocking transmission. With record COVID numbers coming out of Europe, it’s become obvious that the mRNA shots are doing little, if nothing at all, to stop transmission. Moreover, the impact these shots have in preventing a positive COVID test appear to expire after 6-9 months

Gates wasn’t done.

He added a pretty shocking statement to top it off:

“We need a new way of doing the vaccines.”

Just like that, Gates appears to be wiping his hands clean of his involvement in the worldwide mRNA experiment.

It’s a surprising tone from a man whose foundation has accumulated hundreds of millions of dollars (thanks to pre-IPO access to BioNtech, the maker of the “Pfizer shot”)  from the shots, in addition to his fierce advocacy for them. Additionally, Gates has added billions of dollars in income to his personal arsenal during the pandemic. 

To make matters even worse, Gates then endorsed the Police State models for COVID “mitigation” that are currently being implemented by New Zealand and Australia.

“At least Australia and New Zealand showed that competent management could keep the death rate down pretty dramatically,” he said in the interview.

He did not mention that both countries have been under lockdown for significant portions of COVID Mania, with citizens facing massive restrictions of their rights for almost two years. And on top of that, both countries, despite their heinous lockdowns and mRNA deployments, are currently facing massive outbreaks on an unprecedented scale.

Clearly, the man described by Politico as the “world’s most powerful doctor” is doubling down on the totalitarian madness that he is attempting to impose on the world.

At The Dossier, we have reported extensively on the influence the Gates Network wields over the world of “public health.” The Gates network is primarily responsible for seeding America’s COVID policy catastrophes. You can read about it below and listen to my podcast with more detail:

How the Gates Foundation seeded America’s COVID-19 policy catastrophes

The Monopolist: How Bill Gates wields enormous influence over COVID policy

A Brief History of US Biological Experiments and Operations on Civilian Populations


“The CDC is not an independent agency. It is a vaccine company. CDC owns over twenty vaccine patents. It sells about $4.6 billion vaccines every year.” -Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Operation Warp Speed that went into effect back in the early part of 2020, after COVID-19 was officially recognized as a pandemic by the WHO, was essentially a militaristic biowarfare exercise operation to manufacture vaccines very quickly and could call upon the DOD for distribution of the vaccines to hospitals and health clinics if need be. From the vantage of hindsight, this is ball of wax that has been molded by the likes of DARPA, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and associated GAVI, the CDC, the NIH, and its Big Pharma mouthpiece for the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony Fauci as a way to not only lock down the entire global economy in preparation for a World Economic Forum (WEF) drawn up plan for a Global Reset but also to get billions of people worldwide to take a jab of an experimental and highly dangerous vaccines. Even though it’s clearly pro vaccination, Bloomberg revealed just how stunningly profitable six major pharmaceutical companies that were awarded money from the government coffers to develop SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been in opaquely awarded contracts from Operation Warp Speed (OWS) here:

Over the next six weeks, OWS handed contracts worth more than $8 billion to back five additional vaccines—those from Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, and Sanofi jointly with Glaxo. The government reluctantly released some of the contracts—heavily redacted—over the summer in response to Freedom of Information Act requests. Slaoui says the fuss is unnecessary: “They are plain-vanilla contracts. There’s nothing special about them apart from the amount of money, which relates to the cost of developing the vaccines.” In mid-October, the advocacy group Public Citizen filed a lawsuit demanding the release of coronavirus vaccine contracts. In late October, HHS released a Moderna contract, heavily redacted.

OWS deals have led to a huge payday for many pharma executives. Moderna executives netted a profit of $115.5 million from selling shares in their company from May 15 to Aug. 31, according to Accountable Pharma, a nonpartisan watchdog group. A Moderna spokesman said the share sales were done through previously scheduled programs and in accordance with insider-trading regulations. Emergent executives netted $5 million selling shares during the same period, and in September the company’s executive chairman, Fuad El-Hibri, sold an additional 80,000 shares for a net profit of $8.1 million. Emergent said in a statement that executives regularly sell stock, following all laws governing financial transactions. Emergent’s shares were up 78% this year through Oct. 23.

“It’s a perfect business,” says Eli Zupnick, a spokesman for Accountable Pharma, of the OWS companies. “Their downside is covered by taxpayers, and their upside is already in their pockets.”

Now, that millions of Americans and many millions more globally have taken these gene-therapy “vaccines” from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Astro-Zeneca, and Johnson & Johnson, we’ve already seen more severe adverse reactions as well as deaths from just the last year that they’ve been administered to people than we’ve seen from all the 70 vaccines combined from the previous 10 years according to the CDC’s VAERS own numbers. And, given that it is extremely time consuming to file all the paperwork necessary to report these adverse effects and the fact that they’re almost never filed after 48 hours along with the inherent bias of the allopathic system of medical care with regards to vaccines, you can be sure that the numbers of severe adverse effects and deaths are far higher than what’s being reported (by at least an order of magnitude of ten times but likely closer to a hundred times). However, as crazy as that obviously is, it should be remembered that the US government has a long and torturous history of performing biological experiments on its own citizens with various pathogens and agents usually without informing the citizenry beforehand. The following is a brief chronology though far from exhaustive of a handful of such biological experiments that we know of and have been documented as you can read all about in the hyperlinks I’ve included.

  • 1997: US Public Law 95-79, Title 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520 is finally modified. Prior to its modification, it read: “The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the US Department of Defense.”

In summation, allow me to quote Catherine O’Driscoll from an article entitled “Vaccines, Biowarfare, and Betrayal” published in Nexus Magazine, Vol. 24, No. 3, May-June 2017:

“Government agencies, including the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Department of Defense, the US Public Health Service as well as the Pasteur Institute and the International Agency for Research on Cancer in France, Porton Down in England, the Ivanovsky Institute in Russia, and others- scientists around the world in government departments and pharmaceutical companies- were (and still are) messing around with viruses in labs, splicing together different viruses from different species and creating super viruses under the guise of preventive health care while also delivering powerful biological weapons- and sharing them with one another!”

The Manufactured Covid Crisis

by By Prof. Anthony J. Hall via Global Research

The pandemic is contrived for sinister motives. Everything connected with Covid is Junk Science foisted on a fearful and gullible world. The virus, the lock downs, the masks, the abuse of PCR for diagnosis, the temperature checks at commercial entrances, the ubiquitous little bottles of alcohol, the relentless propaganda and most especially the soon-to-be-mandatory lethal injections are all Junk Science.

The people behind all this are masters – or hire masters – of crowd psychology and have the most sinister and evil intentions for all of us. – Anonymous, Comment 651, “The Covid Debate: To Vaxx or Not to Vaxx,” Unz Review, 15 August, 2021

Doing More Harm Than Good

The development, distribution and injection of COVID jabs gives new meaning to the term, “deregulation.” From beginning to end, the whole process appears to be devoid of hard-and-fast rules. Tried-and-true methods have been overturned for no apparent reason. Old methods have been set aside. These abandoned methods have sought to priorize the safety, wellbeing and security of patients over the business interests of drug makers, hospital owners and medical practitioners.

It is made to seem like the only imperative that is consistently pursued is the push plunge COVID jabs into as many arms as possible as fast and as widely distributed as possible. Other than that, the underlying philosophy could be described as… dam the reports of extremely harmful health impacts… full steam ahead.

Nothing is allowed to get in the way of the carrot and stick approach to raising the numbers of injected people. No matter how lethal, how injurious, or how fraught with other catastrophic consequences, the mass inoculation project is being pushed forward at warp speedwithout any decent regard for the precautionary principle.

Great precaution should accompany the introduction into the biosphere of all new technologies, but especially those affecting living organisms and delicate biological relationships among them. The precautionary principle has particular bearing on experiments that alter the biological workings of human beings, both individually and collectively as when contagious illness is involved.

A mostly compliant medical profession is largely going along with the infraction of many professional promises, sacred trusts, and obligations in pushing forward the scheme of jabbing every arm with untested medical products. By being instrumental in advancing the project of near-universal inoculation, scores of medical practitioners as well as the leadership of most of their professional associations and colleges are conspicuously going against a core provision of the Hippocratic oath.

On an unprecedented scale, medical doctors have been violating their professional vow that they will do no harm. In Israel, for instance, 59% of new hospitalizations for COVID-19 are fully vaccinated. This statistic is just one of a barrage of indicators that the push towards the universal vaccination of national populations is doing more harm than good.

Many vaccinated people are themselves spreading viral contagion and becoming sick themselves reportedly from the “Delta Variant.” The Delta Varian is one of many mutations of the supposedly new coronavirus.

See this.

The propagandistic press to maximize the number of injection recipients exposes a pervasive disregard for the terms of the Nuremburg Code. The Nuremburg Code was created as part of the victors’ justice trial of the Hitlerian brain trust. The Nuremberg Code stipulates that human subjects in medical experiments must not be coerced into taking part. Nor should those seeking to become human subjects in medical tests be denied the conditions enabling them to give truly informed consent for their decision to participate.

Vaccines and Bioweapons

How can the requirements of informed consent be fulfilled by glitzy advertising campaigns that consistently overstate the benefits and blatantly ignore the risks of taking the jabs? What does the publicized testimony of movie stars, pop singers, sports heroes, and business moguls have to do with enabling human subjects in medical experiments to realistically evaluate the nature of the possible dangers facing them?

In this instance, basic experimental protocols were left behind when the designers of the experimental procedures made humans stand in for lab rats and guinea pigs in the course of initial tests.

A decision was made to bypass the usual medical procedure of trying out new medical products by administering them first to animals.

Covid Totalitarianism Exposed

by 

Peter Breggin MD and his wife, Ginger Breggin, authors of Talking Back to Prozac, have written a key work on the COVID-19 pandemic, titled COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey and published September 30, 2021. They expose the totalitarian nature of the Covid pandemic.

In 547 pages of text backed with 1107 endnotes, mostly scientific citations, the authors show how “global predators” orchestrated the synthesis of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and distributed it worldwide, causing the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. These global predators comprise billionaires such as Michael Bloomberg, Klaus Schwab, and especially, Bill Gates; U.S. and Chinese government officials and scientists, notably Anthony Fauci, MD, head (for 37 years) of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID); plus Big Tech and Big Pharma.

These global predators have profited greatly from the COVID-19 pandemic, vastly increasing their  wealth, glory, and power.

The U.S. and other countries, especially Australia and New Zealand, have adopted the policy where, “The more society can be frightened, isolated, controlled, and suppressed–the safer it will be from the virus.” The Breggins maintain: “The pandemic continues to be used to justify the imposition of vast fear and oppression on the American people. All this is being done in the name of public health, but it represents authoritarian politics with worldwide ramification.” Plus, they soon discovered:

COVID-19 and the Globa…Breggin, Ginger RossBest Price: $30.17Buy New $26.99(as of 01:45 EST – Details)

“As we began our research into COVID-19 policies and practices, we became dismayed by the absence of any rational science to justify the shutdowns and to prevent the use of the very safe and only useful medication available, the inexpensive hydroxychloroquine—and now including ivermectin.”

Anthony Fauci led the way. He promoted lockdowns, mask mandates, social distancing, and experimental vaccines. He has mocked inexpensive, effective treatments for COVID-19 like vitamin D and hydroxychloroquine, dismissing their purported benefits as “anecdotal.” Many thousands of COVID-infected people have died who would have survived if given these treatments. Fauci has also forced people “to accept destructive, counterproductive restrictions on our personal, educational, business, and religious lives.”

How could a respected physician do this?  The authors of this book put it this way:

“None of Fauci’s behavior makes sense unless we view Fauci for what he is—an archetype of the global predator who feels no genuine identification or emotional ties with any nation or any specific religious or ideological viewpoint and instead remains forever devoted to increasing his own self-aggrandizement and his power, while adding a veneer of progressive idealism to his nefarious activities. Without this lens of predatory globalism, a great deal more becomes painfully clear.”

The authors of COVID-19 and the Global Predators establish that whether or not the release was intentional, “SARS-CoV-2 was made in China at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with technology developed in Fauci-funded collaborative efforts with the United States… part of the line of SARS-Co-V2s developed in labs at the University of North Carolina and at the Wuhan Institute with some involvement of other facilities in the U.S. and China.” They state: “It seems highly probable that the release of the virus was not only purposeful, but it was in fact premeditated and planned over several years. The planning goes at least as far back as 2017, when [Bill] Gates announced the equivalent of what would in 2020 be called Operation Warp Speed and the Great Reset involving corporate-government fusion.”

They note that “as long ago as late 2016 and early January 2017” billionaires like Bill Gates and corporations like Moderna and Pfizer started making billion-dollar investments in a SARS-Co-V2 vaccine with the near certainty of an upcoming coronavirus pandemic. At the start of COVID-19:

“Why would Anthony Fauci have gone to such lengths to promote and rush the approval specifically of Gilead’s medication Remdesivir and Moderna’s mRNA vaccine—both dangerous, experimental, and wholly unproven at the time—if he and Bill Gates were not sure of the need for them?”

The authors compile a Bill of Particulars against Dr. Anthony Fauci based on their research for this book. In Chapter 29 they summarize his offenses against America and humanity in this Bill and add this caveat:

“As powerful as Fauci seems at times, he is doing the bidding of masters far more powerful than he could ever be. He is carrying out the orders of Bill Gates and ultimately of the Chinese Communists, or he would never have the courage or the strength to continue funding research that bloated the billionaires of the U.S. and China, all the while giving China the capacity to make and spread SARS-CoV-2. The bill of particulars against the global predator billionaires, CEOs, and government leaders has yet to be written.”

Their Bill of Particulars has 12 categories containing 42 particulars. These are 4 of the 12 categories:

I: “Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of NIAID, has abused and continues to abuse his power, becoming and remaining the leading sponsor and funder in the world of gain-of-function research that enabled Communist China to engineer a range of deadly SARS coronaviruses (SARS-CoVs). He carried out these plans in defiance of two American Presidents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump… These activities caused and contributed to the development of SARS-CoV-2 in American and Chinese Communist labs and its release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Because Fauci is the Director of NIAID, he funds and bears primary responsibility for all gain-of-function research making deadly viruses and for all the risks to America and the world associated with these and related activities.”

Dr. Fauci spearheaded the creation of this new coronavirus by funding “gain-of-function” research, designed to render a virus more infective and lethal.

III: “Fauci has abused his power by rushing through EUAs [Emergency Use Authorizations], extremely expensive, highly experimental, very dangerous, and inadequately studied or tested vaccines. In doing this, he supports the investments of Bill Gates, on whose elite vaccine Leadership Council he serves. At the same time, he supports the pharmaceutical industry with whom he is intimate and its vast network of investors… His role is that of chief enforcer for building the wealth, glory, and power of the global predators in the arena of medicine, public health, and ultimately politics in America and worldwide.”

One particular listed in this category is: “He allowed and supported continued vaccinations even after the number of reported vaccine-related deaths rose from the hundreds into the many thousands.”

VII: “While suppressing available treatments, Fauci promoted fast-tracking with government financial support for drugs and vaccines that were and are experimental, unproven, and highly dangerous, but enormously profitable.”

Especially remdesivir, which doesn’t work, is toxic, and costs $3,000 a pop. The authors agree. They cite a study from South Korea where “the authors found that ‘HCQ [hydroxychloroquine] with antibiotic was associated with better clinical outcomes in terms of viral clearance, hospital stay, and cough symptom resolution’… compared to ‘conservative treatment.’ Nothing like this can be said for remdesivir, an expensive, dangerous, and worthless drug Fauci made sure received FDA approval for treating COVID-19.”

IX: “Anthony Fauci knew 3 years ahead of time that a coronavirus pandemic was being planned and announced in January 2017 that it would definitely occur during President Trump’s administration.” [all italics in original]

As currently managed, COVID-19 is promoting totalitarianism, where the state controls every aspect of one’s life, and all opposition is suppressed—with billionaires exempt. The Breggins write:

“Almost every single American billionaire remains deep in the predatory morass: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet (a partner with Gates until he recently resigned), Mark Zuckerberg, the Waltons, Steve Balmer, Larry Page. All are deeply invested in China… Every global predator we could identify is financially wedded to and filled with admiration for, not the United States or other Western democracies but for Communist China and totalitarianism.”

And then there is billionaire Klaus Schwab with his book COVID-19 and the Great Reset. (2020). In the Great Reset “you will own nothing and be happy.” These global predators are “eager to collaborate with anyone who shares the primary goal of controlling, dominating, and exploiting humanity.”

The COVID-19 death rate in people under age 70 is low, like that of seasonal flu. The mortality risk in children from COVID-19 is even lower than that with seasonal flu. The overall risk so low that there is “no reason or justification to impose totalitarianism on America, to crush our society and ravage our economy, to retard the education of our children and to force deadly wealth-draining vaccines on our entire nation… The motivation for the lockdowns comes from predatory globalists and not from genuine scientists or legitimate science.”

Peter and Ginger Breggin make this important point: “If effective treatments are already available, the FDA cannot issue Emergency Use Authorization (EUAs), allowing the FDA to skip its usual safety and effectiveness studies to push expensive, highly remunerative drugs and vaccines down the pipeline as experiments to be inflicted on the population.” The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are still only being administered under Emergency Use Authorization.

Worse, “The COVID-19 vaccines are causing a worldwide catastrophe of unimaginable, unpredictable proportions.” They cite three ways:

First, “A substantial number of deaths that are occurring within a few days after the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine jabs. “No one in authority is paying attention to it, even though a tiny fraction of so many deaths would have led the CDC and FDA to pull any other vaccine off the market.”

Second, “It is clear that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that the vaccines force the human to make are highly toxic to humans, often causing bleeding and clotting in the endothelium or lining of blood vessels. Contrary to claims by advocates, the vaccine-induced antigenic material does not remain localized at the vaccine site but instead is produced throughout the body.” 

Third, this shocking conclusion: “This may be the most disturbing conclusion we have drawn in this book—the lethality of the COVID-19 was planned. The danger of vaccinated human patients dying after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 has been repeatedly warned since 2006 based on animal studies. These ominous reports continued to be published after the start of Operation Warp Speed [government support of vaccine production].” [all italics in original]

The mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) “vaccine” that Pfizer and Moderna market for COVID-19 is not really a vaccine. It is a form of genetic engineering, which get people to produce spike proteins, with their long-term effects yet to be determined. Instead of a “vaccine,” better to simply call it a COVID shot or jab, like President Biden does when saying, “No jab, no job.”

Animal researchers have found that “animals vaccinated for SARS-CoV infections with mRNA or DNA vaccines experience serious illness and death when challenged by SARA-CoV pathogens. The illness often resembled what we now call COVID-19.” Research funded by Fauci’s NIAID shows that vaccinated mice exposed to this virus “are not protected and instead are vulnerable to human-like severe immune reactions. Furthermore, the culprit is the spike protein that the animal or human body makes in response to the vaccine.” [italics in original]  The DNA and mRNA shots instruct our body to synthesize spike proteins identical to those on the virus.

In a damming indictment, the authors declare: “All those participating in the planning for COVID-19 were also planning for the vaccine to further the aim of the ridding humanity of its infirm or old people.” They ask:

“What is going on here? Those who fully understand what they are doing are probably certain they are doing the right thing—culling humanity. It is a principle with a long and honored history among eugenicists and euthanasia advocates, including many scientists, philanthropic organizations, and political leaders. It is twenty-first century eugenics. In the case of COVID-19 and the vaccines, there is nothing voluntary about it—and that makes it mass murder.” [italics in original]

(Standing on a remote hilltop in Georgia, the Georgia Guidestones are pertinent to such concerns about “culling humanity.” Also known as the American Stonehenge, the monument consists of 4 huge granite stones, each 16 ft. high, along with supporting structures. Each of the stones, erected in 1980 and of uncertain provenance, are inscribed with a set of ten guidelines, in 8 languages. The topmost  guideline  is “Maintain humanity under 500 million in perpetual balance with nature.” Another guideline is “Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature.” Could their emerging global agenda be another way global predators are seeking to cull humanity?)

Peter McCullough, MD, MPH; Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD; and Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, MD write Introductions to the book. Dr. McCullough showed a slide of the book COVID-19 and the Global Predators at a lecture he gave on this subject on Oct 27, 2021, at a meeting of the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, directed by the redoubtable Jane Orient, MD. Dr. McCullough considers COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey to be the best book on what is going on with COVID-19. This lecture is available here (for now). Watch it.

And, please, read this book

Great News: Biden’s Vaccine Mandate is Falling Apart!

by Ron Paul, MD via Ron Paul Institute

The Biden vaccine mandate appears to be falling apart before it’s even in place. From first responders to truck drivers to everyone in-between, the message is clear: many thousands are willing to be fired from their jobs rather than be forced to take a medical procedure they do not want.

They have leverage and they are using it. We should support them.

Grocery shelves are bare, shipping containers continue to float offshore, firehouses in New York are shut down, the Los Angeles County Sheriff warns that, in the middle of a crime wave, half of his deputies may quit or be fired. Airlines are citing non-existent “weather problems” to excuse the fact that their employees are rebelling against forced covid shots.

The country is teetering on the edge of an economic abyss and the Biden Administration is doubling down. The only question is how far down the President is willing to drag his party and his own approval numbers to continue to push an unconstitutional, deeply unpopular, and thoroughly tyrannical forced vaccine on the population.

If the vaccine provided a high level of immunity from the virus that did not wane over time, encouraging people to take the shot – which uses experimental technology – might make some sense, though mandating it would still be immoral and illegal.

But Biden’s own senior health officials such as CDC Director Wallensky have been telling us since August that the shot does not prevent against infection from the virus and does not prevent transmission of the virus. So it is not a “vaccine” by any definition of the term. That’s why the CDC itself in September changed its official definition of the term “vaccine” to exclude the term “immunity.” The deception is so transparent.

They say you must take the shot because it may prevent serious illness from the virus. But we know there are plenty of other things that may prevent serious illness from the virus. Media personality Joe Rogan was widely ridiculed for using ivermectin and other drugs and procedures to treat his bout of Covid-19. But it seems to have worked. Likewise, Green Bay Packers legendary quarterback Aaron Rodgers successfully treated his Covid with ivermectin and other procedures. Even though he now has natural immunity to the virus, he has been attacked by the mainstream media for not following Fauci’s demands. Success means nothing. Only obedience matters.

A new study of the effectiveness of the Covid shots is not good news for the Biden Administration. Published November 4th in the scientific journal Nature, researchers followed 800,000 US veterans for six months after receiving the shot. Between March and November, Moderna effectiveness fell from 85 percent to 58 percent – just a little better than a coin flip. The Pfizer/BioNTech two-dose fell in effectiveness from 87 percent to 45 percent, and the Johnson & Johnson fell in effectiveness from 86 percent to 13 percent!

As the Washington Times wrote about the important new Nature study, “Factor in natural immunity and a case could be made these vaccines are nearly worthless.”

So why is the Administration pursuing this scorched earth policy on vaccine mandates? Maybe we should look at how many lobbyists Big Pharma has on Capitol Hill. Maybe look at the revolving door between the FDA, CDC, and Big Pharma. The word is “corruption,” and if the CDC’s own adverse reaction database is accurate it is killing thousands of Americans. Hold the line and resist the mandate!

Athletes Around the World are Dropping Like Flies with Heart Problems

Someone has put together a video montage showing the sheer volume of athletes around the world dropping like flies with heart problems.

And the corporate media calls this a “mystery.”

How many people ever heard of the word “myocarditis” prior to the COVID shots?

But don’t blame it on the “vaccines.” That would be politically incorrect.

Mark Payne in the UK is keeping a fast growing list of these stories here.

This is on  Bitchute and Rumble channels.

Pfizer “Vaccine”: Kill 200 to ‘Save’ One?

by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian

Analysis of official data shows the risks attached to Covid “vaccine” far outweighs any theoretical reward.

In the early days of the “vaccine” rollout, we ran several articles discussing the risk-reward of the new mRNA jabs. Dr Sadaf Gilani, in particular, did good detailed write-ups on “absolute risk reduction”.

To explain “absolute risk reduction” (ARR) in simple terms: if an unvaccinated person has a 10% chance of getting the disease, and a vaccinated person has a 1% chance, then the ARR for the vaccine is 9%.

Of course, that’s just an example, the actual ARR for the Covid “vaccines” is nowhere near 9%:

This is the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer/BioNtech (each group had over 18,000 people):

Injection Group: 8/18,198 = 0.04%
Placebo Group: 162/18,325 = 0.88%

Absolute risk reduction = 0.84%

From the “absolute risk reduction”, you can then calculate the “number needed to vaccinate” (NNTV). This is the rough number of people you need to inject in order to definitely prevent one case/death.

To continue the example above, if your vaccine reduces the odds of infection from 10% to 1% (an ARR of 9%), you need to vaccinate eleven people to prevent one infection, giving you an NNTV of 11.

Again, the NNTV of the Covid vaccines are much, much, MUCH higher than 11. Estimates range from between 88 and 700 to prevent a single case, and anything up to 100,000 to prevent one solitary death.

And remember, all this data was for adults. Children are at a far lower risk from Covid – both in terms of hospitalisation and death. In the US, children aged 5-11 have a 99.992% chance of surviving “Covid” – so it naturally follows the NNTV for this group will be far, far higher than for adults.

But, now that the FDA has approved Pfizer’s “vaccine” for emergency use on children aged 5-11, “far, far higher” is not good enough. We need to calculate an actual figure for the “number needed to vaccinate” in order to hypothetically protect one child from dying “with Covid”.

Fortunately for us, someone else has already done it.

Writing on his Substack, economist Toby Rodgers PhD has collated the numbers from Pfizer’s own trials, the FDA and the CDC and done a very thorough write up. You can read the whole thing here, we’ll just present you with some of the highlights:

As of October 30, 2021, the CDC stated that 170 children ages 5 to 11 have died of COVID-19-related illness since the start of the pandemic. (That represents less than 0.1% of all coronavirus-related deaths nationwide even though children that age make up 8.7% of the U.S. population).

The Pfizer mRNA shot only “works” for about 6 months (it increases risk in the first month, provides moderate protection in months 2 through 4 and then effectiveness begins to wane, which is why all of the FDA modeling only used a 6 month time-frame). So any modeling would have to be based on vaccine effectiveness in connection with the 57 (170/3) children who might otherwise have died of COVID-related illness during a 6-month period.

At best, the Pfizer mRNA shot might be 80% effective against hospitalizations and death. That number comes directly from the FDA modeling (p. 32). I am bending over backwards to give Pfizer the benefit of considerable doubt because again, the Pfizer clinical trial showed NO reduction in hospitalizations or death in this age group.

So injecting all 28,384,878 children ages 5 to 11 with two doses of Pfizer (which is what the Biden administration wants to do) would save, at most, 45 lives (0.8 effectiveness x 57 fatalities that otherwise would have occurred during that time period = 45).

So then the NNTV to prevent a single fatality in this age group is 630,775 (28,384,878 / 45). But it’s a two dose regimen so if one wants to calculate the NNTV per injection the number doubles to 1,261,550. It’s literally the worst NNTV in the history of vaccination.

630,000 children injected with 1.2 million doses to save one life. That’s incredibly inefficient. However, it could be even worse than that.

As we covered last week, according to statistics cited at the VRBPAC meeting, only 94 children from the 5-11 age group have died. If this lower figure is correct, the NNTV to prevent a single death jumps up to915,641.

In other words, in order to hypothetically prevent a single child from dying over a six month period, you would have to inject nearly one million children with almost two million doses of the Pfizer vaccine.

What kind of risk are those 915,641 children facing from their two doses of Pfizer mRNA soup?

Well, early studies found around 11.1 cases of severe anaphylaxis per million doses of the Pfizer shot, so already any “fully vaccinated” child is almost 22x more likely to have an allergic reaction than to actually be protected from Covid.

Other severe reactions are harder to calculate.

It is known, for example, that Pfizer’s own trial showed increased all-cause mortality in the vaccinated group vs the placebo group, to the point the trial was abandoned after six months and all remaining placebo members were given the vaccine, effectively destroying the control group. To quote Rodgers again:

As Bobby Kennedy explains, Pfizer’s clinical trial in adults showed alarming increases in all cause mortality in the vaccinated:

“In Pfizer’s 6 month clinical trial in adults — there was 1 covid death out of 22,000 in the vaccine (“treatment”) group and 2 Covid deaths out of 22,000 in the placebo group (see Table s4). So NNTV = 22,000. The catch is there were 5 heart attack deaths in the vaccine group and only 1 in placebo group. So for every 1 life saved from Covid, the Pfizer vaccine kills 4 from heart attacks. All cause mortality in the 6 month study was 20 in vaccine group and 14 in placebo group.

So a 42% all cause mortality increase among the vaccinated. The vaccine loses practically all efficacy after 6 months so they had to curtail the study. They unblinded and offered the vaccine to the placebo group. At that point the rising harm line had long ago intersected the sinking efficacy line.

Former NY Times investigative reporter Alex Berenson also wrote about the bad outcomes for the vaccinated in the Pfizer clinical trial in adults (here). Berenson received a lifetime ban from Twitter for posting Pfizer’s own clinical trial data.

It’s not in Big Pharma’s interest to have an accurate collation of severe vaccine reactions, combine this with the (acknowledged) potential for totally unknown long-term side effects, and calculating the complete potential risk becomes very complicated.

However, Rodgers – using the VAERS data as his basis – makes a very reasonable effort:

  • Because the Pfizer clinical trial has no useable data, I have to immuno-bridge from the nearest age group.
  • 31,761,099 people (so just about 10% more people than in the 5 to 11 age bracket) ages 12 to 24 have gotten at least one coronavirus shot.
  • The COVID-19 vaccine program has only existed for 10 months and younger people have only had access more recently (children 12 to 15 have had access for five months; since May 10) — so we’re looking at roughly the same observational time period as modeled above.
  • During that time, there are 128 reports of fatal side effects following coronavirus mRNA injections in people 12 to 24. (That’s through October 22, 2021. There is a reporting lag though so the actual number of reports that have been filed is surely higher).

At this point, going purely off official data and VAERS reports, you can conclude that injecting every 5-11 year old in the US would theoretically save approximately 31 lives, but kill roughly 116 children.

That’s clearly already a very bad outcome. However, if the predictions for under-reporting of vaccine harms are accurate, it’s potentially much worse than that:

  • Kirsch, Rose, and Crawford (2021) estimate that VAERS undercounts fatal reactions by a factor of 41 which would put the total fatal side effects in this age-range at 5,248. (Kirsch et al. represents a conservative estimate because others have put the underreporting factor at 100.)
  • With potentially deadly side effects including myo- and pericarditis disproportionately impacting youth it is reasonable to think that over time the rate of fatal side effects from mRNA shots in children ages 5 to 11 might be similar to those in ages 12 to 24.

[…]Imagine that, at most half of American parents will be foolish enough to inject this toxic product into their kids. At a 50% uptake rate, the ACIP decision to approve the Pfizer shot will likely kill 2,624 children via adverse reactions in order to potentially save 12 from COVID-19-related illness.

In conclusion, going purely off official data, vaccinating 5-11 year olds will create 22 allergic reactions per death prevented, and could very well result in four deaths per life saved.

And, if Rodgers’ calculations are correct, the Pfizer shot could kill over 200 children before it has saved a single one.

As always, the point of this analysis is to illustrate that even the establishment’s own data doesn’t support their conclusions, it is NOT necessarily an endorsement of that data, or of the idea that “Covid” is indeed a “pandemic” that poses any kind of risk to anyone.