Category Archives: Saving Ukrainians from Themselves

War in Ukraine

Who Ordered the Shoot Down of IL76?

by Sergey Markov

The order to kill Ukrainian prisoners was given not by Zelensky, but by Zaluzhny. Zelensky, on the contrary, wanted to make the most of the prisoner exchange on January 24 to celebrate his birthday on January 25. Make yourself the main hero of the military exchange and rescue. And use it to strengthen its declining popularity. Events have already been prepared there.

But Zaluzhny gave the order to shoot down the plane and thus broke this scenario for Zelensky.
This conspiracy theory is most widespread informally in Kyiv. Officially, of course, they say that Russia is to blame for everything, but unofficially they believe that this is a struggle between Zaluzhny and Zelensky.

Did Lenin Create Ukraine?

by Sergey Markov

Did Lenin (or more exactly the Bolsheviks) create Ukraine? Yes. More precisely, of course, Ukraine was created by the Bolsheviks.

  1. They artificially divided the Russian people, consisting of Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians. They recorded that Ukrainians are not Russians. Although this directly contradicts thousands of years of history. The goal of the Bolsheviks was to artificially reduce the number of Russian people and increase the number of national communities, according to the principle – divide and conquer.

  2. The Bolsheviks created an artificial Ukrainian language. “Little Russian” regional dialects don’t differ much from the official Russian language recorded in dictionaries. But on the instructions of the Bolsheviks, an artificial official Ukrainian language was created, seeking to use as few Russian words as possible. [Same way as they created the artificial language and the nation of Soviet Moldovans, in total disregard to the evidence that they are unmistakably ethnic Romanians.]

  3. Huge territories were assigned to Ukraine – part of Donbass and Novorossia and Slobozhanshchina (Kharkov). And later Crimea.

  4. In the 20s and 30s, the Bolsheviks actively pursued a policy of forced Ukrainization in the territories of Little Russia, Novorossiya, Slobozhanshchina, and Donbass. This policy of Ukrainization in a mild form continued in the 60-70-80s.

  5. The Bolsheviks persistently called the ancient Russian city Kiev “Kyiv”, Ukrainian.

  6. In general, the Bolsheviks adopted the Polish concept of Ukraine, abandoning the Russian concept of a united Rus’.

  7. Therefore, Lenin can be considered the creator of modern Ukraine, an artificial formation that has one goal – the division of a single large Russian people into separate groups.

  8. Ukrainians are not non-Russian. Ukrainians are Ukrainian Russians, just like there are Siberian Russians, Moscow Russians, Volga Russians, Ural Russians.

Ukraine Faces Ten to 15 Years of War

via RT

Ukraine had the chance to make peace at the 2022 Istanbul talks but something or someone changed President Vladimir Zelensky’s mind, according to an interview with his former aide, Aleksey Arestovich, published on Monday.

Freddie Sayers, the editor in chief of the British outlet UnHerd, interviewed Arestovich almost a year after Ukraine’s top spin doctor left Zelensky’s service. He has since moved to the US, saying that Kiev wants him arrested on politically trumped-up charges.

“I was a member of the Istanbul process, and it was the most profitable agreement we could have done,” Arestovich told Sayers. The Ukrainian delegation “opened the champagne bottle” when they came back to Kiev, believing the agreement was a done deal, he added.

The protocols were “90% prepared” for a direct meeting between Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Arestovich, when Ukrainian president called off the talks.

His rejection of a deal has been widely attributed to the ‘Bucha massacre’, which Ukraine accused Russia of, but Arestovich said he did not know that for a fact. Something “absolutely” changed Zelensky’s mind and “historians will have to find an answer to what happened,” Arestovich said.

“A lot of people say it was the Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who came to Kiev and put a stop to this negotiation with Russia. I don’t know exactly if that is true or false. He came to Kiev, but nobody knows what they spoke about except, I think, Zelensky and Boris Johnson himself,” he told UnHerd.

Johnson’s role in scuttling the Istanbul peace talks was reported as early as May 2022 by the outlet Ukrainska Pravda. According to the outlet, he came to Kiev with “two simple messages,” that Russian President Vladimir Putin was “a war criminal” who should not be negotiated with, and that even if Ukraine was ready to sign some kind of agreement with Russia, the West was not.

David Arakhamia, the leader of Zelensky’s party in the Ukrainian parliament, brought up the visit in a November 2023 interview, paraphrasing Johnson’s message as telling the Ukrainians “let’s just continue fighting.”

The former British PM finally commented on the matter last week, saying he merely told Zelensky the UK would support Ukraine “a thousand percent” and that any potential agreement with Russia would be “pretty sordid.” He insisted he did not “order” anyone to do anything, however.

According to Arestovich, the conflict has now evolved beyond Russia and Ukraine, pitting the collective West against the ‘Global South’.

“We have to negotiate for an all-new security system for Europe, taking into account all sides of this problem,” he told UnHerd, adding that NATO would need to discuss with Russia “what it would take to guarantee not to use military force in Europe to decide political questions.”

“I should perhaps add that I am absolutely pessimistic that this will happen. I think we face ten or 15 years of war in Europe,” Arestovich said.

Ukraine: All Lithium Reserves and Mineral Resources in War Zones

by Simone Fant via Renewable Matter.eu

Image: Matthew De Livera (Unsplash)

Geologists call it the Ukrainian shield. That land in the middle which starts from the northern border with Belarus up to the shores of the Azov Sea, in the south of Donbass. According to the studies of the Ukrainian geological service, in the ancient rocks of this shield are hidden lithium deposits with great potential. Findings that have been identified mainly around the area of Mariupol, the port city of Donbass torn apart by Russian bombing.

Lithium deposits

Lithium deposits in Ukraine

“This may not be the main reason for the invasion, but undoubtedly Ukraine’s mineral wealth is one of the reasons why this country is so important to Russia,” said Rod Schoonover, former director of the Environment and Natural Resources Section of the U.S. National Intelligence Council.
A wealth confirmed by the fact that Ukrainian lithium had begun to attract global attention as early as last year, before the Russian invasion halted exploration. Last November, in fact, the Australian company European Lithium said it was close to securing the rights to two promising deposits of lithium in the region of Donetsk (eastern Ukraine) and Kirovograd, in the center of the country. In the same month, the Chinese company Chengxin Lithium has also asked for the rights on some deposits, a move that would allow China to win the first deposit in Europe.
“Since there are no developed deposits, I highly doubt that lithium resources are the motivation for attacks in the Southeast,” Schoonover tells Renewable Matter. “But if this region falls under Russian control, lithium reserves would certainly be a co-benefit for the Kremlin. Certainly the rest of the world would have a say. It would not import lithium from a pariah state (a nation that is not recognized by the governments of other countries due to human rights violations), especially when there are better alternatives in geopolitically more favorable countries.”

Nothing is thrown away of pegmatitic rocks

One of the few geologists to have seen these ancient rocks is Andrea Dini, a researcher at the Italian CNR’s Institute of Geosciences and Georesources, who participated in three campaigns at the Khoroshiv-Volodarsk mine in northern Ukraine. “The mine I saw never produced lithium, because its rocks contain lithium minerals (zinnwaldite, trilithionite and polylithionite) that contain fluorine,” Dini tells Renewable Matter, “and are problematic for the metallurgical processes of extracting the metal. Since 1991, Ukrainians here have been extracting mostly precious stones.”
Over the past two decades, however, the Ukrainian Geological Survey has conducted scientific and strategic research, identifying several areas with lithium minerals such as spodumene with very high potential. “The very ancient rocks that lithium producers are interested in are pegmatites containing spodumene (lithium aluminum silicate), the mineral preferred by industry,” explains Dini. “These rocks do not have polluting metals such as lead, zinc and cadmium, but they contain silicates (quartz, feldspar) that as waste material can be sold to the ceramic industry.” In short, of pegmatites, nothing is thrown away. According to the researcher, Ukraine and Serbia probably have the greatest potential for extracting lithium in all of Europe.

The other mineral resources in Ukraine

Ukraine has 10% of the world’s iron reserves, 6% of titanium and 20% of graphite. “In geology, this extremely flat region is called peneplain,” Andrea Dini points out, “because it is so ancient that it has been flattened by erosion. Many of the rocks are billions of years old and you don’t see them on the surface because they are covered by layers of sediment.”
There are more than just minerals in Ukraine, however. In the north east, near the Russian border, there is a 400-million-year-old sedimentary basin filled with organic material and black shale rocks. “These are black slates with large amounts of coal and methane. For example, part of US energy independence is due to the extraction of methane (Shale Gas) from these rocks on US soil.”
There is also another sector that has a close link with Ukraine’s resources: Italian ceramics. The ceramic industrial district of Sassuolo is one of the most important in the world and the quality of its tiles also depended on the importation from Ukraine of clay and kaolin, a mineral that is extracted from the quarries of Donbass. In the Italian ceramics industry, 25% of raw materials – including clay considered prized – came from Ukraine. After the Russian invasion, companies in the district will have to find compatible and competitive alternatives. According to insiders, first of all they need to find another recipe, that is, a new mixture of clays, kaolins and feldspars with material imported from other countries.

Trump’s Strategy: Escalation, More Weapons to Ukraine

Authored by Lt. General (ret.) Keith Kellogg and Dan Negrea via The National Interest,

Far from abandoning Ukraine, a second Trump administration would lift restrictions on Ukrainian military aid in order to force a peace settlement…

Donald Trump has vowed that in a second presidential term, he would end the war in Ukraine “in twenty-four hours.” Mainstream analysts have dismissed the president’s statements as hyperbole, but there is a strong possibility that Trump will be back in the Oval Office in just over a year’s time. Foreign policy experts, therefore, should take the former President’s statements seriously and assess how a Trump administration might deal with the largest conflict in Europe since World War II.

Let us start by recognizing that Biden’s Ukraine strategy leaves much room for improvement. His weaknesses encouraged Putin to launch the invasion in the first place. Biden’s own Supreme Allied Commander in Europe assessed that Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan led to Putin’s decision to re-attack Ukraine. Biden’s feeble attempts at “integrated deterrence,” threatening sanctions and aid to Ukraine, failed in their intended purpose of deterring Putin’s aggression.

Putin invaded Ukraine under both Obama and Biden, but he did not attack while Trump was president. Trump has stated that the Russia-Ukraine war would “never have happened” under his watch.

Following Putin’s invasion, Biden pursued an overly cautious wartime strategy. Instead of clearly defining a goal of victory, Biden vowed to help Ukraine “as long as it takes.” But this only raises the question: as long as it takes to do what? Biden should have provided Ukraine with the weapons it needed to win quickly, but instead, he was afraid of potential Russian “escalation” and provided a cautious IV-drip of arms. Biden opposed providing many major weapons systems, like tanks, aircraft, and long-range artillery before changing his mind. The result is that Ukraine has had enough weapons to fight but not enough to win.

Biden’s revealed wartime strategy was to spend billions of dollars only to produce a bloody and inconclusive stalemate.

In contrast, based exclusively on his public statements, one can divine a very different Trump doctrine for Ukraine. He has argued that he would use his personal relationship with Zelenskyy and Putin to negotiate a settlement to the conflict “in one day.” The one-day timeframe may be overly ambitious as neither Putin nor Zelenskyy has expressed an interest in a negotiated settlement. Both sides appear to believe that they can still prevail on the battlefield.

But Trump’s proposed approach could change that calculation. Trump said, “I would tell Putin, if you don’t make a deal, we’re going to give him a lot. We’re going to give [Ukraine] more than they ever got if we have to.”

Trump’s past actions make that threat credible. While in office, Trump showed that he was willing to push boundaries, lifting Obama-era restrictions on the rules of engagement in the fight against ISIS and killing Iranian general Qassem Soleimani. If Putin refuses to negotiate, Trump might very well remove the Biden-eras constraints on arms transfers and give Ukraine the weapons it needs to win, including long-range weapons to strike within Crimea and Russia. If faced with the prospect of a costly military defeat, Putin may very well prefer negotiations.

To bring Kyiv to the table, Trump said, “I would tell Zelenskyy, ‘no more.’ You got to make a deal.” Ukraine can only sustain the war effort due to large-scale Western support, and the prospect of losing aid would be a strong inducement to negotiation.

A ceasefire along the current lines and subsequent negotiations would preserve a sovereign, democratic Ukraine anchored in the West and capable of defending itself. Kyiv would maintain its internationally-recognized claims to sovereignty over all of Ukraine. A halt to hostilities would also facilitate the provision of reliable security guarantees, including possible NATO and EU membership, to deter Russia from resuming the conflict. While less satisfying than (what increasingly appears to be an unachievable) total military victory, this outcome would represent a strategic defeat for Russia and a strengthening of American national security and the Western alliance.

Some Republicans argue that the Ukraine conflict is a European matter of no consequence to the United States. Strategically, as his public comments reinforce, Trump disagrees. He sees ending the war as a major foreign policy issue—one that he plans to accomplish on day one.

Dismantling Ukraine

Vladimir Putin hinted at Russian support for the potential return of Western Ukrainian border regions  once annexed by Stalin from Poland, Hungary & Romania.

⚡️Putin directly inferred that Russia would not oppose the “re-annexation” of these regions back to their former countries noting that he is 100% certain this is what residents of those Ukrainian border want.

⚠️Potentially: 

Transcarpathia back to Hungary  

Galicia & Volyn back to Poland  

Bukovina back to Romania  

NATO: A Defunct Yalta Relic, Says Ukraininan

Arestovich again stated that the war in Ukraine can only be ended through global negotiations between the West and Russia, which will establish new rules of the game in Europe.

In his opinion, joining NATO will not help Ukraine, since this organization “does not work” and is a “relic” of the defunct Yalta system that emerged after the Second World War.

“We need to sit down for a very serious conversation about what the real interests of the parties are and the causes of conflicts, and build the system anew,” Arestovich said. But he believes that Western leaders are not capable of this, and Henry Kissinger, “the last politician who knew how to think like an adult,” has died.

“Everyone tried to wipe themselves with real Russian interests – they got a war. And they turned out to be unable to wage this war. And Russia, gritting its teeth and losing a huge number of people, is waging this war. Crookedly, but it is waging,” says Arestovich.

Therefore, he believes, we need to start “talking seriously with Russia” and “stop talking about democracy and dictatorship.” But Arestovich does not see such aspiration either in Ukraine or in the West. “This means that the war will continue. And if we conduct it the way we are now, then it will continue in a way that we will not like,” he added.

Source: Ukrainian

Ukraine: The Electric War

By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

In the coming winter phase of the Russian offensive in the Ukraine, the electric war will be run quite differently from the way the first electric war was directed last winter.

The impact on the Ukrainian grid and on the country’s and military’s capacities to cope will be more destructive than a year ago. The reason for this, Ukrainian sources have been saying publicly and Russian military assessments now confirm, is that most of the money which the US, the European Union, and the World Bank have provided Kiev officials over the past nine months to repair, reconstruct, and prepare the country’s power generating and distribution system for the coming winter has been stolen.

The US and NATO command and control centres inside the country for running the war will be operating in the dark, not only because of the precision of the Russian missiles and drone operations, but because of the corruption of the Ukrainians. They understand that defeat and capitulation are coming; they are running away with the loot before it’s too dark, too late.

The first electric war campaign began a year ago, in October 2022. Follow the succeeding episodes here and here.

Source: https://johnhelmer.net/russian-army-fires-old-sparky-us-loses-the-electric-war-in-the-ukraine/

In the latest Ukrainian press reports, the battlefield evidence indicates the new electric war has begun. “Kiev said,” according to this summary, “two dozen Russian drones and a missile were downed overnight as concern grows that Moscow is once again targeting Ukraine’s energy infrastructure ahead of winter. Officials in Kharkiv reported civilian targets were hit by shelling and drone attacks…Police in Kharkiv in northeastern Ukraine reported that at least 10 Russian drones hit civilian infrastructure and triggered multiple fires in the city and shelling also damaged buildings. The overnight raids are part of a recent rise in Russian attacks. More than 100 settlements in eastern Ukraine, including Kharkiv, were targeted on Wednesday, the heaviest day of shelling so far in 2023…Ukraine and its partners in the West worry that Russia could try to replicate a strategy it followed last winter, squeezing Ukraine by targeting energy infrastructure as temperatures fall.”

There is no corroboration in the latest bulletin from the Russian Ministry of Defense that the new round of aerial attacks was targeted on energy infrastructure. “From October 28 to November 3, 2023, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out fifteen group strikes with precision weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles on warehouses of rocket and artillery weapons, places of storage of weapons and military equipment, as well as temporary locations of Ukrainian servicemen, nationalists and foreign mercenaries. As a result of the strikes, hangars for preparing

Ukrainian aircraft for takeoff, production sites for unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned boats, groups of foreign instructors and mercenaries were destroyed.” The problem for the Ukrainians is that the electricity generating plants and the power grids are now more vulnerable to precision attack triggering cascading system failure than they were a year ago. Russian publication on November 3 of internal Kiev government documents reveals the extent of the problem.

Click on source to enlarge and read: https://t.me/readovkanews/68792

“Russian hackers from the group Solntsepek [literally, ‘burning sun’, name of Russian Army heavy flamethrower] who recently hacked the administration of the Kiev region, provided us with a lot of extremely interesting documents. But the editors were particularly interested in the draft regional programme for the development of housing and communal services, energy transformation and energy security of the Kiev region for 2023-2027.

“First of all, our attention was attracted by an analytical note assessing the effectiveness of strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. According to Kiev, 24 generation facilities have been damaged or destroyed since October 2022. So, Nezalezhnaya [Russian slang for “independence”, sarcasm for the Kiev regime] lost 3.8 GW from the TPP [thermal power plant] and 1 GW from the CHP [Combined Heat & Power]. In total, the enemy [Ukraine] needs to replenish 6 GW of generating capacity. At the same time, according to Ukrainian energy experts, the country has lost 8.5 GW which were produced on the territory now controlled by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

“To solve this problem, Kiev has come up with the idea of replacing the lost power units with co-generation plants. We are talking about mini-power plants with a capacity from 300 kW to 12 MW, which use the generated heat directly at the installation site. In fact, in the Ukrainian capital, they want to place similar mini-CHP plants using natural gas and biogas in [apartment building] boiler houses, and thereby kill three birds with one stone — save on heat supply, replace lost generation capacity, and build a distribution and generation network less vulnerable to Russian strikes.

“Apparently, a significant part of Ukraine’s generating capacity was irretrievably lost during the attacks and cannot be restored. Therefore, Kiev needs a cheap and quick to install replacement. The analytical paper notes that in order to replace the missing capacities, Ukrainians will need up to 1,200 such installations — indeed, no drones and missiles will be enough to hit everything. In addition, the use of these installations will provide electricity to isolated areas that are without light and heat.

“But there are also significant disadvantages behind these advantages — dispersed infrastructure is more expensive and requires significant complexity in the logistics to keep them fueled. The energy experts we consulted when writing the material say with one voice that they would watch with interest how huge convoys of liquefied gas convoys move along Ukrainian roads. The fact is that in the Kiev region there are only seven boiler houses running on gas. The rest are on fuel oil and coal, that is, their supply will need to be organized separately.

“In addition, such a ‘reform’ will require huge investments in the power grid of Ukraine, and the cost of operating these stations significantly exceeds the much more economical traditional power units. According to the most conservative estimates, the implementation of such a programme will cost tens of billions of dollars and will cause a significant increase in the cost of kWh for the consumer. The funny thing is that this measure still does not provide protection against attacks on the production and distribution networks. On the contrary, the commissioning of hundreds of new mini-CHP plants will increase the load on them and make the consequences of damage to electrical substations even more severe.

“It is unlikely that the Ukrainian power engineers, who have demonstrated high professionalism in the course of eliminating the consequences of the strikes, do not understand the nonsense of this plan. The only reasonable explanation is the corruption component. So far, this project has not gone beyond the government of the Kiev region. In the documents at our disposal there are no data on the allocation of funds for the purchase of co-generation plants — most of the money is directed to improving energy efficiency, that is, to reducing electricity consumption, and not to increasing generation.”

A US industrial maintenance administrator warns that “if this is the Ukrainian plan to protect and preserve electrical generation capacity, it’s already failed. The Russians have been targeting fuel infrastructure for months and will be sure to interdict attempts at refueling. They will also pick up the heat signatures of these co-generation units and strike them accordingly.”

Another US industry source says there is resistance to sending US electrical equipment to the Ukraine. “As we move into 2024, I can’t count on American politicians willing to shovel electrical gear into the Ukraine. If they do, prices will rise and availability will go down. I do not believe current inventories have a enough of a surplus to send, especially given adverse weather events and the demands of the so-called green energy projects. Regardless, the word is now out — sending gear and/or funds to the Ukrainians is pissing them both against a wall.”

Expert papers recently released on the state of the US electricity sector suggest that the recovery in the supply chain and reduction of prices since the disruptions of the coronavirus pandemic years is fragile, uncertain, and vulnerable to war risks, not only in Europe but also in the Middle East and Asia. The Heritage Foundation in Washington, a supporter of war against Russia and China, warns that “a rapidly growing shortage of transformers…is threatening the nation’s ability to remain a leader in innovation and is undermining long-term economic security…Despite a heavy reliance on HV [high voltage] transformers, the U.S. has very slim manufacturing capabilities. To meet demand, roughly 85 percent11 of these HV transformers are imported from South Korea and Germany—however, China is seizing market share and forcing out competition…[there are] the damaging security implications of secret ‘back doors’ planted within the transformers. If engaged, China or Russia could monitor and disable transformers, thus rendering the grid useless.”

Source: https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/BG3794.pdf
Another report on “global supply chain challenges”, issued on October 12, says: “Lead times are continuing the trend seen throughout 2023 of very gradual decreases. September was no exception in that overall lead times have decreased since January 1 by 8%. All market segments saw small decreases in lead times during September, including the utility market, although this market has trended up for the year. The overall consistent decreasing trend in 2023 is favorable, but lead times are still higher than the April 2020 baseline by 65%.” A Deloitte report warns that “providing secure, reliable, affordable, and clean electricity could become even more challenging. Inflation, high fuel costs, and supply chain snarls may keep electricity prices elevated, while extreme weather, cybersecurity threats, and the growth of variable renewables and DER [distributed energy resources] may continue to require innovative management to ensure grid reliability.”

“My suppliers are telling me that things are levelling out”, the US maintenance administrator reports. “Transformers, depending on the size — the larger, the longer the wait — are still 12 to 35 weeks out. Large power transformers, such as those used by utilities, can still be more than a year out. All gear is still expensive and certain equipment, such as protection relays, have long lead times. It’s easy to see that the US power grid is a handful of transformer failures away from collapse.”

Ukrainian electricity sector managers understand that the capacity of the US ally to continue supporting the sector is close to exhausted now. They also understand what the Russian winter offensive is likely to do. According to a new report from the semi-official Moscow analysis medium Vzglyad, the Ukrainians have decided to capitulate by stealing.

“The Ukrainian government has stolen billions of dollars instead of preparing for winter” is the headline in the publication on November 1. A verbatim translation follows; illustration have been added.

November 1, 2023
The Ukrainian government has stolen billions of dollars instead of
preparing for winter
By Olga Samofalova

In Ukraine, the alarm is sounding: blackouts this winter will be more serious than last winter, and it is better to get autonomous heating. And this time the residents of Ukraine will blame their problems not on Russia, but on their own authorities. The billions of dollars allocated to repair the energy infrastructure went to anything but the infrastructure itself.

Three Ukrainian high-ranking officials responsible for solving this problem said that power outages this winter are likely to be more serious, and the public reaction in Ukraine, on the contrary, will no longer be so lenient. Last year, residents of Ukraine blamed the Russians, but this year they will already blame local authorities for the interruptions.

Prime Minister of Ukraine Denis Shmygal has repeatedly said that the upcoming winter will be difficult for the country’s energy system, although funding has been allocated to prepare for winter.

According to him, foreign partners have allocated $2.3 billion for the restoration of Ukraine’s energy sector. This is money from the World Bank, the European Investment Bank, the EBRD, the USA, Japan, the Northern Environmental Finance Corporation, USAID (US Agency for International Development) and others. Ukraine’s partners supplied hundreds of cargoes with energy equipment to the country. At the same time, many in Ukraine themselves note that the energy infrastructure was not ready for the new heating season, as it did not undergo the necessary repairs.

Left: The World Bank’s $200 million of April 2023 is not a loan but a grant. “’Restoring energy infrastructure is one of the key investment needs for Ukraine at this time,’ said World Bank Vice President for Europe and Central Asia Antonella Bassani. ‘This is critical both for recovery efforts and for resuming disrupted economic production and flows.’ Restoring the energy grid is a top priority the Government of Ukraine has identified for 2023, as it accounts for 11 percent of estimated needs according to the updated Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA2) released in March.” Right: Bassani in signing ceremony with Shmygal.

The upcoming heating season in Ukraine promises problems, including rolling blackouts for several hours at least, just as this already happened last winter, and then for as long as a day at a time. There may even be local apocalypses in some areas of the country with heating turned off altogether. The Ministry of Energy of Ukraine is calling on the population to purchase autonomous generators for heating.

The problem for Ukraine is that the margin of safety for the Ukrainian energy system was radically reduced last year due to Russia’s strikes on infrastructure facilities. However, Ukraine has been allocated quite a lot of money and equipment for the repair and restoration of the power system. But now even in the Ukraine, they recognize that a very large share of these funds has gone nowhere. Franky, they were allocated a lot of money, and they did nothing. This is conspicuous.

“Ukrainian officials who participated in corruption schemes and outright theft of this money and equipment have been counting on Russia to continue systematically, as last year, to strike at the Ukrainian energy system. So the equipment sold to the left [illegally] can be written off under the Russian bombardment. But Russia has stopped its attacks on Ukraine’s energy system,
and this has complicated the lives of Ukrainian officials and power engineers”, explains Igor Yushkov [right], an expert at the Financial University under the Government and the National Energy Security Fund.

“Throughout the spring and summer, Ukraine boasted about how well they are being helped with money, how well they are repairing everything and even devising ambitious plans to export electricity to Poland and Europe. However, July and August came, the power stations entered their annual repair period, and it turned out that there was nothing by and large to export. There was a shortage of electricity in Ukraine itself, which was covered by inflows from the EU. Draconian tariffs were set for the industry at the peak of consumption. There were cases when food processing enterprises preferred to turn off everything except refrigerators in the evening, just so as not to go broke and save at least some kind of production economy,” says economist Ivan Lizan.

Berlin think-tank SWP map of the Ukraine’s connexions to the EU electricity grid through Poland and Moldova as of November 2021 – enlarge to read at source.

The problem is that the money for the repair of the energy infrastructure went to everything except the repair of this infrastructure. “In fact, they have not repaired anything,” Lizan adds. “They restored only the thermal stations where there was minimal damage. Repairs were not a priority, because apparently they decided — why repair your own infrastructure if you can just buy electricity in Europe.”

Moreover, a great deal needs to be done to repair the infrastructure — to find specialists, production, equipment, spare parts, etc. It is not so easy to do this. “Many [power] stations were still operating on Soviet equipment, and it is no longer the case that the production of such turbines, aggregators, generators has still been preserved in Ukraine,” Lizan notes.

According to him, there is a similar story with the electricity networks. “Formally, the Ukraine has the production of ultra-high voltage transformers at the Zaporozhye Transformer Plant, but it is not entirely clear in what condition the factory is and whether it can produce anything. Only transformers of the lower voltage class can be delivered from abroad. That is to say, for small transformer stations in the form of units which are installed in apartment building courtyards and buzz. These won’t save the situation,” says Lizan.

In general, the energy infrastructure in the country is still fulfilling its function largely due to the fact that Ukraine started with a double margin of safety.

“Ukraine was saved by the fact that in the Soviet years this infrastructure was built for 52 million people and for heavy industry. In addition, the Ukrainian republic was a kind of power bank or back-up for the energy systems of other countries. But now part of the industry has closed, part of the population has left, electricity consumption has sharply decreased. Therefore, it turns out that the stations have not been properly repaired, and so now there is no safety margin on the electric networks,” explains Lizan [right]. “There is no systematic information about the condition of the heating plants now, and they were in even worse condition at the beginning of the war than the CHP – they were close to their last gasp,” the source notes.

“In Ukraine before the war started, the obsolescence of capacities was growing both in the grid network, in transformers, and in generation. And after Russia’s strikes, the power system began to work at the limit of its capabilities. So, if there was a strong wind that knocked down trees, a lot of consumers were cut off all at once. That is, somewhere the power cables broke down, and entire settlements were disconnected simultaneously. This just shows that there is no more redundancy in the energy capacities. This means that the rest of the infrastructure is running at the limit of its capabilities.”

“When everything is running out of steam, a chain reaction is triggered: if a substation burns out, it means that even more load goes to the remaining substations, and they also start to burn out”, the risks are explained by Igor Yushkov.

In his view, Russia intentionally stopped attacks across all of the Ukrainian energy facilities. “The strategy now is to look at where the most vulnerable infrastructure facilities are at the beginning of the heating season and hit them point-by-point. In this way, it is possible to cause a cascade of shutdowns when all the other units in the system will be unable to take on the extra load of units going down,” Yushkov believes.

The irony is that unscrupulous Ukrainian power engineers and officials have been counting on the intensification of hostilities on the part of Russia in order to write off the money they have already stolen. So now they are praying for these strikes to actually take place, Yushkov sums up.

Ukrainian Statistics, a Good Indicator of People’s IQ

About 94% of Ukrainians still believe their country will win in the conflict with Russia, though that is down from 97% in April 2022. Only 68% are convinced that Kiev will manage to win back all the territory it claims – the “1991 borders,” i.e. all the regions that have voted to join Russia, including Crimea.

The survey was carried out by the polling agency Rating, on behalf of the IRI’s Center for Insights in Survey Research. It relied on a representative sample of 2,000 adult Ukrainians and was funded by a grant from USAID.

Meanwhile, an Economist/YouGov survey published on Wednesday showed Zelensky as more popular among Americans than either President Joe Biden or his predecessor and likely 2024 challenger Donald Trump. Half of the surveyed Americans regarded the Ukrainian leader favorably and 24% unfavorably. Trump and Biden each got only 42% approval, with 55% disliking the current US president and 54% the previous one.

Outright Lying – Sign of the Despair Deepening

Russian mobilization resources continue to remain undertrained, understaffed and unprepared for combat – John Kirby

Kirby displaying a severe dose of mental illness.