All posts by Algora Blog

The Dark Ramifications of Jews Controlling the Gods

As Jesus said, man doesn’t live on bread alone, whether bread means food or money. People need to feel justified, good, and whole. Even the worst of us want to be seen as ‘respectable’, even righteous. The Corleones in THE GODFATHER don’t just kill and rake in profits but give to the church and do good work to burnish(and launder) their reputation.

Now, the operative morality in the business world isn’t one of personal conviction or true principles. Rather, it’s a status-based morality and quasi-spirituality. Most businessmen lack core morality or spiritual conviction to guide them. Indeed, men of true conviction are generally unfit for business, which is about wheeling-dealing and handshakes. So, business morality flows not from deep personal conviction but anxiety of reputation. How others regard you counts for more than how you feel from within. So, if BLM or Globo-Homo is the latest fad in the righteous sweepstakes, most businessmen will support it or go along with least resistance. It’s like Democrats are proudly globo-homo and the Republicans offer no resistance as Jews(as the current masters) made it the New Normal to celebrate and revere homos and trannies as quasi-spiritual superiors.

If indeed the business world is without deep conviction and genuine principles, WHO determines their ethos and morality, their quasi-spirituality? Who controls the gods? The control of gods leads to the control of all money.

Jews control the gods, and this is why even the richest goyim bow down to Jews and their favored icons. Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Jeff Bezos are stinking rich, but they don’t shape the icons and idols. Jews do, and Jews can destroy anyone overnight by accusing him or her of ‘ungodliness’, which these days means not being sufficiently deferential to Jews, blacks, and homos. If Buffett were denounced as ‘racist’, ‘anti-Semitic’, or ‘homophobic'(quasi-godly matters in our time), he would lose his partners, supporters, friends, and top employees who will go work for another firm that is ‘godly’ than ‘evil’. No matter how rich you are in the US, you better go with GloboHomo, which is now a ‘spiritual’ matter. If you don’t, you can no longer be part of the game as a player. Jews understand the dynamics of ‘sacronicity’, the electronic idolization of what are currently deemed most holy-shmoly. As Jews determine what is ‘sacronic’, they control the empty deracinated neon-souls of the modern ‘consumerian’.

While money = power, it is only a base kind of power. You can buy favors, services, and lots of things. You can hire people to do things. But it doesn’t mean you are good and justified. Money as money lacks sanctity. It’s like a rich guy can buy sex but can’t buy love. It’s like a rich guy can buy a lot of toadies and flunkies but can’t buy genuine friendship, deep loyalty. He can buy fawning obedience but not real respect.

This is what libertarians don’t understand about capitalism and about themselves. They talk of liberty, individualism, and success, and those are good things, but a ‘spiritual’ sense of righteousness doesn’t arise from those qualities. Being successful means you’re better off, it doesn’t mean you’re on the side of angels, let alone the gods. Even Ayn Rand’s mythic cult of the individual failed in the creation of gods.

It is then no wonder that even libertarians worship the gods controlled by Jews. For all their talk of liberty and individuality over they years, they’ve feel empty without some sense of sanctity and righteousness that transcend issue of mere freedom. So, they glom onto the globo-homo cult and MLK worship and even support ‘hate speech’ laws and monopolist suppression of freedom and liberty. Supporting free speech is just a matter of rights, whereas suppressing ‘hate speech’ makes one feel righteous, on the side of the gods against the devils. And they dare not support BDS even though its suppression is a clear violation of the Constitution and libertarian principles. Soul-empty libertarians are so taken with the godly thrills of worshiping Jews and celebrating globo-homo that there is a definite limit to their commitment to soullessfreedom. Their quasi-spiritual worship of Jews is more emotionally stirring and satisfying than any rational commitment to liberty.

Capitalism can generate wealth but it cannot create gods. At most, it can create idols, mostly in the form of celebrities of music, entertainment, and sports. But even mere idolatry, for all its popularity, doesn’t come with righteousness. Compare Muhammad Ali and Mike Tyson. Both were top champions, but why did Ali get more respect? Not only was he more colorful and entertaining but became associated with spiritualized themes. He turned to Islam at a time when it was bold for a black man to move in that direction. And coming to prominence during the Civil Rights Era, he came to symbolize a righteous cause. And his refusal to serve in Vietnam for personal conviction elevated his standing in the radical era. In contrast, Mike Tyson was only about power and money, unassociated with anything higher than self-aggrandizement. Ali would have been a popular idol without ‘godly’ associations, but they made him much bigger than a mere celebrity.

It’s then not surprising that so many black athletes got to ‘taking the knee’. As successful athletes, they got the money and the bling. But those only represent fame and fortune, sensationalizing them but not elevating them. They want to be associated with something higher, the ‘godly’. This sacredness could be based on something legit or something bogus. It doesn’t matter as long as it has the approval of the current gods. Most celebrity idols and businessmen don’t care about the truth. They care about reputation and the zing of being on the side of angels. Still, they themselves don’t generate the gods and angels.

Then, who does? Obviously, those who construct/control the gods need lots of money and the means. But they need something more. They need ambition, prophetic vision, ruthless megalomania, and the sheer will to control and dominate. The radical will or chutzpah. And Jews are tops in this. Why? Jewishness is built on a massive neurosis. There are three possible spiritual visions:

1. Every group has its god, and there are many groups, each with its own god. So, if there are 100 groups, there are 100 gods, with each group having special claim on its own god. This was how paganism worked. Greeks had their own gods but didn’t deny Egyptians or Hindus their own gods. This way is consistently particularist.

2. There is one God, and as there is only one, He belongs to all peoples, and all peoples are equally loved by Him. He favors no particular tribe and loves the good and righteous among all peoples. This is Christianity and Islam. This way is consistently universalist.

3. There is only one God, but for some reason, He favors one people over all others. This is an inconsistent combination of universalism and particularism. The only-one-God part is universalist, as He is the ruler of all. But then, it says this one and only God favors Jews uber alles. So, Jews have an expansive imagination of God who claims mastery over all the world and all the peoples, BUT God favors the Jewish tribe as special and more deserving than inferior goyim.

Such an attitude makes Jews highly moralistic(as the Tribe that received the laws from God) but also emotionally stingy as they claim special relationship to the one and only God. Secular Jews replaced God with History or Self-Worship. Notice how Jews incessantly pontificate about combating supremacism and related evils, but it all boils down to non-Jews of every stripe having to suck up to Jews as the master race(though masquerading as the forever victim race — the forever victim-master-race).

With such a radical will, it’s no wonder Jews are so obsessed with controlling the ‘spirituality’ or the ‘gods’ of any society. With their disproportionate representation in academia, media, history, the arts/entertainment, and advertising, they are powerfully positioned to create the narratives, idols, saints, angels, and passions that constitute the ‘gods’. So, while others are just making money, Jews mold and manipulate the gods. Jews promote them via Hollywood as the new secular vatican and the elite colleges as the new seminaries.

Unlike mere money-power that is base and crude, god-power feels holy and redeeming. And, this means that once the gods take hold in the public imagination, even the richest goy must obey them as the new faith or even mania of the masses. (But then, even before the ‘gods’ spread to the mob-majority, the elites are goaded with the initial offerings on the ‘gods’ as ‘canonical’ in the higher realm. After all, elite vanity has less to do with approval from the mob than from one’s peers and superiors. Also, as elites hold all the cards, it’s understood that whatever the elites adopt will soon spread to the masses of sheeple as well. It’s only a matter of time, like with mantras about ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’.) Military men and merely rational actors don’t create or control the gods. Indeed, notice how the Jewish-created gods of ‘globo-homo’ have resulted in the US military men fighting for the wonders of sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting. Those with guns fight under the auspices of those who wield the ‘holy’ scepter. Mere historians don’t control the gods either; if anything, most historians are mere scribes in service to the gods created by others, e.g. ‘Muh Holocaust’. Controllers of the gods are those with the will and imagination to cobble together the stories, images, and emotions into overwhelming epics for the mind, the heart, and the senses in communion. Jews wrote the Bible, and it proves they’ve long mastered the art of controlling the gods. They know how to combine ideas + stories + themes + emotions + passion + redemption + deliverance into Law & Lore. No wonder the Bible has come to be The Book, the Complete Volume, for countless peoples. In the modern era, the great Jewish dream(of vengeance) was to replace Christianity with something other, and Christianity has shown itself to be weak before the full assault of Jews with their new batch of ‘gods’.

As the ‘gods’ are holy, they are favored over the principles of secular liberal democracy. As Jews are the holy holocaust people according to the gods, free speech must be sacrificed at the altar of Jewish Feelings, which are holy. Holy compulsion > Devilish liberty. And facts about black criminality must be ignored or suppressed because MLK is god and blackity-ness is holy. We can’t hurt holy black feelings. So, even though blacks routinely brutalize and murder kill blacks and non-blacks alike, we must get on our knees and pretend innocent holy blacks are being sacrificed by ‘systemic racism’. Even the life and death of a thug like George Floyd must be held as more precious than all the lives killed by blacks.

And as the gods say sodomy is holy, government buildings and businesses must fly the homo flag, and politicians must show up at ‘gay pride’ parades, OR ELSE! We’ve been told we can’t have God in the school and the courts due to separation of church and state, but we must have the ‘gods’ in all of them. Though these ‘gods’ aren’t technically religious, they function in the same manner because ‘sacrosanct’ passions override secular facts and rights. (It’s taboo to have a honest and rational debate about matters that might offend and ‘desecrate’ the holy feelings of Jews, blacks, and homos.) And now, even churches fly globo-homo symbols and BLM ones too. As Jews control the gods, BLM and globo-homo are now holier than Christianity. Today, Christians feel they must justify their faith before the judgements of blacks and homos than insist that all-people-as-sinners must justify their souls before God and Jesus. Christianity must prove itself worthy of blessing by homo vanity and black megalomania. The newly imagined god seeks approval from homos and blacks, not the other way around.

Jake Tapper can tweet as he did precisely because Jews control the gods. If Tapper were truly honest about ‘hate groups’, he should name ADL and AIPAC as the premier candidates as they pressure US whore-politicians into supporting terrorist and supremacist Israel that continues to occupy West Bank and mow down people in Gaza. ADL and AIPAC work to ensure that US politicians of both parties shall never criticize Israel but support more Wars for Zion regardless of the human cost.

The Jewish-run media are a hate organization because so much hatred is spewed against Russia, Iran, or any other nation that refuses to get on with the Jewish Globo-Homo program. But Tapper ignores all that and lists a bunch of ‘white nationalist’ groups. Like many other Jews, he is more offended by the white aspiration for agency and liberty from Jewish Supremacism than by Jewish Supremacism itself. For Tapper, Jewish Supremacism is just the rightful Way of the World, like sun rising in the East. It isn’t deemed supremacist because it’s only natural that Jews should rule and be on top. As Jews control the gods(and feel as gods themselves), why should they be troubled by their own supreme authority?

The way Jews see it, it is ‘supremacism’ only when an inferior people elevate themselves as better than others. It’s like it’s perfectly natural for God to feel above humanity. It’s natural, cosmic, and holy, not to be questioned. The problem occurs only when man dares to challenge God or decides to go his own way. According to God, mankind that challenges God(as in the story of the Tower of Babel) must be ruthlessly destroyed. And, man cannot humbly walk away from God either. Man can never be independent of God and must bow down before Him.

Jews feel the same way in relation to goyim, especially white goyim. Jews should be on top, and that’s that as the spiritual law of the universe. It’s only right because Jews are holy and deserve respect. Jews are supreme but not supremacist. Jewish supreme-ness is just the way of the universe. It is a matter of ‘is’ than ‘ism’. It’s like humans are supreme over all animals not because they believe so but because they be so. So, Jewish supremacy mustn’t be regarded as supremacist because it’s based not on Jewish beliefs but on Jewish knowledge of being superior, either God-given or natural.

In contrast, when an inferior people dare to challenge the Jews, it is a case of supremacism because it is based on belief than on being. So, despite the reality of Jews BEING superior, the Nazis BELIEVED themselves to be superior. BEING SUPERIOR > BELIEVING IN SUPERIORITY. That means anyone who challenges the Jews for supremacism must be crushed.

But what about whites who have no supremacist ambitions and just want to be left alone and independent of Jewish demands & meddling? No, that can’t be allowed either because goyim exist to serve Jews. It’s just the way of things. Inferior must serve the superior. Besides, how could the Jew World Order function without white agents, experts, and managers doing the bidding of Jews? It’d be like British trying to rule India without the collaboration of brown native elites and others. Gandhi’s civil disobedience showed the Brits couldn’t maintain order without the collaboration of the Indians themselves.

Anyway, in the Jewish mind, their own supremacism is never supremacism but just a ‘spiritual’ fact: Jews are holy and should rule. And because Jews are the sun of humanity, the rest of mankind must never challenge Jewish power and remain within the gravitational orbit of Jewish Power. So, if whites show any sign of their own identity, agency, and territoriality, they are labeled as ‘supremacist’ even though their only desire is white manumission from Jewish Supremacist Power and its wars, terror, and rapacity. It’s like the master in the uppermost stratum denigrating a slave as ‘uppity’ for exhibiting signs of agency. Even though the master is high up, he tags the ‘uppity’ label on someone down below. So, when Jewish supremacists on top call whites ‘supremacist’, it’s just a case of the master calling a slave ‘uppity’.

Human nature is essentially spiritual, and power is essentially theocratic, so when God is taken out of the institution, other/false gods are installed for inspiration. This is why secular education in time became quasi-spiritual and neo-theocratic. Education isn’t merely about skills and knowledge but about moral guidance, and in the absence of God and the difficulty of philosophy, there are the new myths and the idolatry of the ‘woke’. What about rationality and critical thinking? The Power eventually comes to suppress secular criticality in favor of sacrosanct correctness.

Initially, Wasp elites relented to rising Jewish Power because Jewish criticality was so incessant and irreverent of Wasp-imposed correctness. Jews eventually gnawed at the pillars of the Wasp throne until it toppled. But, with Jews firmly in control with their imposition of a new brand of canonical correctness, there is no other group to mount a culture war of aggressive criticality. And why would Jews want a truly critical culture when it may well lead to criticism of Jewish Power? So, Jews, who’d once championed secularism and the separation of Church and State, imbued the new discourse with quasi-spirituality of gods of ‘wokeness’ and ‘Muh Israel’, both of which they control. Yes, Jews control the gods, and that is the biggest challenge in our time.

Free Organ “Donation” by the Unfree

by Bradley Blankenship


State legislatures around the United States are keenly watching the fate of a Massachusetts bill allowing prisoners to receive up to one year off their jail sentence by donating their organs.

According to reports, Bill HD.3822, called the “Act to establish the Massachusetts incarcerated individual bone marrow and organ donation program,” would allow participating prisoners to receive a minimum of 60 days and up to a whole year off their sentence. It would be set up in a special parole hearing based similarly on commuted sentences for “good behavior.”

However, it would also encourage repeat donations, and since those incarcerated in the US are disproportionately minorities and low-income earners, it bears similarities to the country’s blood and plasma donation scheme. That system preys on low-income earners and students, encouraging them to consistently donate their blood at for-profit collection centers, effectively selling it in a sort of vampiric version of capitalism.

In a 2019 piece titled ‘Harvesting the Blood of America’s Poor: The Latest Stage of Capitalism,’ Alan MacLeod observed that “around 130 million Americans admit an inability to pay for basic needs like food, housing or healthcare, buying and selling blood is one of the few booming industries America has left.”

“The number of collection centers in the United States has more than doubled since 2005 and blood now makes up well over 2% of total US exports by value. To put that in perspective, Americans’ blood is now worth more than all exported corn or soy products that cover vast areas of the country’s heartland,“ he said.

According to MacLeod, “The US supplies fully 70 percent of the world’s plasma, mainly because most other countries have banned the practice on ethical and medical grounds. Exports increased by over 13 percent, to $28.6 billion, between 2016 and 2017, and the plasma market is projected to ‘grow radiantly,’ according to one industry report. The majority goes to wealthy European countries. Germany, for example, buys 15% of all US blood exports. China and Japan are also key customers.”

But low-incomers giving blood for money is a very different scenario from prisoners literally giving their organs for freedom. The most important difference is that the proposed organ donations by prisoners would be the result of a criminal penalty.

The US Constitution prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment” of convicts, and one could argue this makes the bill unconstitutional. But the way it is framed means the organ-for-freedom contract is not technically a punishment — but simply a voluntary system that can reduce a convict’s actual punishment. Neither is it necessarily cruel, since a person can live a normal everyday life without a kidney, nor unusual, because healthy people donate organs all the time.

The United States has slavery as a form of punishment codified in its constitution, via the 13th amendment. It is also a country where the death penalty is legal at the federal level, but mainly implemented by states in capital offenses, such as murder. US prisons also routinely implement long-term solitary confinement, recognized by the UN as a form of torture. The threshold to prove “cruel and unusual punishment” is thus exceptionally high.

One of the primary arguments put forward by proponents of the bill is that prisoners have no way, as of now, to donate organs even if they choose to. That is a pretty sound case. After all, shouldn’t they be able to exercise that right if everyone else has it? And what’s the argument against them losing this right – especially if it helps everyone, including Massachusetts’ jammed-up donor waiting list?

Unfortunately, the easily foreseen problem is that it incentivizes people to literally give up organs, parts of their bodies, for their freedom. This is inherently immoral. The people locked up in US prisons are disproportionately from minority groups, subject to awful conditions, with little access to economic aid or rehabilitation.

This is one of the main reasons why the US has the highest recidivism rate in the world, with 76% of prisoners released being rearrested within five years and an astounding 44% returning to prison within only one year. The entire system is set up for failure and for people to return to prison, thus pushing them to donate their organs but without any financial compensation, only a reduced sentence.

This is another step in America’s descent into, as MacLeod described, a horror story of late-stage capitalism that one might dub vampiric and where the wealthy feed on the blood of the poor.

The US Must Get Over its “Impunity Syndrome”

Washington shouldn’t expect the world to forget that it fabricated its justification for the 2003 Iraq invasion, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov told RIA Novosti on Saturday.

The Russian diplomat made the remark on the eve of the 20th anniversary of the now-infamous speech by then-US Secretary of State Colin Powell at the United Nations Security Council, during which he presented alleged evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, including biological ones.

To support his case, Powell exhibited a tiny vial of white powder, which was supposed to represent anthrax, and told the council that the US had no other choice but to go to war. However, no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq.

Powell’s UN stunt “has long become the epitome of hypocrisy and the conviction of the US ruling elite in its own impunity and its unchallenged right to arrogantly teach the rest of the world,” Ryabkov stated. He added that it was also emblematic of Washington’s willingness to “use force against an obviously weaker opponent in order to preserve its own global hegemony.”

However, the diplomat suggested that – unlike in the 2000s and during the 1999 NATO bombing campaign of Yugoslavia – Washington could not get away with “international banditry” under current conditions.

“In the rapidly changing geopolitical landscape, the US is now objectively unable to resort to a use-of-force scenario every time it feels like it, without facing serious consequences,”he noted, pointing to the “humiliating flight” of US troops from Afghanistan in 2021.

However, as Washington’s “meddling” in the Ukraine conflict has shown, this setback has not stopped the US from embracing its old ways, the diplomat continued.

“The Americans will have to adjust to the new rails and get rid of the impunity syndrome that so clearly manifested itself during the [anthrax] vial scandal. The same applies to taking into account Russia and China, as well as other major international players that are shaping a more just multilateral world order,” Ryabkov said.

The US should not cherish any hope that “the memories of what happened 20 years ago would be buried in the shifting sands of modern history,” he concluded.

via RT

20 Percent of Ukraine in Exchange for Peace

via ColonelCassad LiveJournal

Report: US president offered Putin 20 percent of Ukraine in exchange for peace in January.

According to NZZ, CIA chief William Burns reportedly presented the peace plan to Kyiv and Moscow in mid-January. But both sides refused. It is reported that only after the failure of the plan Biden decided to deploy the Abrams tanks.

In mid-January, CIA chief William Burns reportedly presented a plan to end the war in Ukraine to both Kyiv and Moscow at the behest of the American president. But both sides reportedly rejected the plan. According to the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, citing high-ranking German foreign policy figures from the government and opposition, the following proposal was put forward:

“The offer to Kyiv sounded like this: peace in exchange for land, the offer to Moscow: land in exchange for peace. It is reported that the “land” was about 20 percent of the territory of Ukraine. This is approximately the size of the Donbass. Both sides, two politicians say, would refuse. Ukrainians because they don’t want their national territory to be divided, Russians because they expect to win the war in the long run anyway.”

It is reported that the head of the CIA, William Burns, got acquainted with the peace plan in Kyiv and Moscow.

NZZ further reports that, according to German foreign policy departments, Biden wanted to avoid a protracted war in Ukraine. According to him, he was ready to give part of the country. If this image is correct, Biden will not be alone in his position in Washington, writes NZZ. A new study by renowned American think tank Rand Corporation (Preventing a Long War) concludes that “preventing a long war is a higher priority for the United States” than giving Ukraine “control of its entire territory.”

It was only after Burns failed with the proposed plan that the American president reportedly made the decision to supply the Abrams tanks. Both politicians tell NZZ that there are two camps in Washington over the war in Ukraine. “On one side,” two German deputies say, “are security adviser Jake Sullivan and CIA chief Burns. They wanted to end the war quickly so they could focus on China. On the other hand were Foreign Secretary Anthony Blinken and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. They did not want to allow Russia to destroy the rules-based peace order and advocated massive military support for Ukraine.

The Berlin newspaper tried to confirm this information. “There’s a lot to be said for” Biden taking the initiative, explains one opposition defense politician. According to him, if the NZZ report is correct, this is further evidence that the German chancellor does not have a strategy in helping Ukraine. After all, according to NZZ, Scholz would have been taken by surprise by the decision to supply tanks, and then reacted by announcing the supply of German Leopards.

According to the politician, it is becoming increasingly clear that the United States is preparing for a long war of attrition. In his opinion, Germany would suffer more and more from such a war – economically and financially, but also militarily. After all, sometimes the reserves of the Bundeswehr are already largely depleted. The government coalition also said that “a lot could be true in the report.”

Foreign policy spokesman for the CDU/CSU faction, Jürgen Hardt, states: “Reports of the status of the decision on battle tanks fit into a picture that shows the German chancellor as single-minded…” Putin will not enter into serious negotiations until the continuation of hostilities would mean for him the risk of military defeat. “That point has not yet been reached,” said Hardt. According to him, it is fundamentally important that no agreements be reached over Ukraine’s head. “The US had it, if the CIA Director’s mediation efforts reports are correct, but obviously didn’t suggest it.”

Left-wing foreign policy spokesman Sevim Dagdelen calls it a “sign of hope” if there are people in US government circles who want an immediate end to this war. “Unfortunately, this does not apply to German foreign policy,” Dagdelen said.

American “Exceptionalism” to the Detriment of Other Nations

The root cause of the conflict in Ukraine is linked to Washington’s belief that the US is exceptional and the contention that this supposedly justifies its dominance, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

Speaking during an interview with Russian television on Thursday, the top diplomat urged people to “dig deeper” in their analysis of the confrontation. American officials believe the US is “an exceptional nation, unlike any other in the world,” and that it has a duty to lead, because otherwise “there will be chaos.”

Lavrov cited an opinion piece by Jake Sullivan, national security adviser to President Joe Biden, which was published in The Atlantic magazine in 2019.

“No vision of American exceptionalism can succeed if the United States does not defeat the emerging vision that emphasizes ethnic and cultural identity,” he wrote at the time. The phrase referred to US domestic politics and how it affects the “core purpose of American foreign policy.”

Lavrov called the remark “terrible” because it denies other peoples “the right to remember their history.” The US government applies this principle globally, he suggested.

“Just like they melted in a pot everyone who arrived in America, they now want to melt everyone else, so they essentially become Americans,” the minister said.

“This exceptionalism, this absolute conviction of their infallibility and superiority – I am certain that it is the main reason why we are now confronting the nations that wage a proxy war against us through the Kiev regime.”

Massive Study Shows Masks Do Not Prevent COVID

via Zero Hedge

A massive international research collaboration that analyzed several dozen rigorous studies focusing on “physical interventions” against COVID-19 and influenza found that they provide little to no protection against infection or illness rates.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, is the strongest science to date refuting the basis for mask mandates worldwide.

Nearly 60% of South Korea’s population has now tested positive for COVID despite nearly three years of consistent universal masking with overwhelming compliance

When will it be enough for “experts” to admit masks don’t work? pic.twitter.com/LS0JF9niog

— Ian Miller (@ianmSC) January 25, 2023

And of course, the CDC still recommends masking in areas with “high” rates of transmission (fewer than 4% of US counties, as Just the News notes), along with indoor masking in areas with “medium” rates of transmission (27%).

Masks are still required in educational institutions in Democratic strongholds such as New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Washington and California, according to the Daily Mail. Boston Public Schools denied its “temporary masking protocol” in early January was a “mandate,” following a public letter against the policy by student Enrique Abud Evereteze.

South Korea is still requiring masks on public transport and in medical facilities after dropping COVID mandates in most indoor settings, including gyms, Monday, Reuters reported. -Just the News

According to the Cochrane study, which included the work of researchers at institutions in the U.K., Canada, Australia, Italy and Saudi Arabia, a total of 78 studies were analyzed. Most recent additions to the meta-analysis were 11 new randomized controlled trials.

As unlisted study author Carl Heneghan – who directs the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford noted on Twitter: “Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks.”

Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI)/COVID‐19 like illness compared to not wearing masks (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.09; 9 trials, 276,917 participants

— Carl Heneghan (@carlheneghan) January 30, 2023

Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported (very low‐certainty evidence).

— Carl Heneghan (@carlheneghan) January 30, 2023

The Danish study had trouble finding a major journal willing to publish its controversial findings that wearing surgical masks had no statistically significant effect on infection rates, even among those who claimed to wear them “exactly as instructed.”

Mainstream media overlooked red flags in the Bangladeshi mask study, which found no effect for surgical masks under age 50 and a difference of only 20 infections between control and treatment groups among 342,000 adults. -JTN

Bottom line, mask wearing “probably makes little to no difference,” when it comes to influenza-like or COVID-like illnesses, regardless of type of mask used.

2/ LARGE Cochrane Rev (just published 1/30/23) of RCT data ALSO CONFIRMS NO BENEFIT of N95 masks vs. med/surg masks, in either community (n~8K) or HCW (n~8K) settings for prevention of flu-like illness or lab confirmed flu https://t.co/N4TkgI4uUR pic.twitter.com/0DCdYAPo7x

— Andrew Bostom, MD, MS (@andrewbostom) January 31, 2023

We’re sure the cult of Fauci will now start insisting peer-reviewed meta-analyses aren’t ‘the science.’

Recent News on Israel vs Iran

A comment on the situation regarding the attacks on Iran: Israel is most likely carrying out those unprovoked attacks on Iran out of a desire to hide embarrassment at not being able to contain the most recent stabbings and shootings.

Israeli politics are already usually a clown show, a banana country on steroids. The prime minister is proven to be corrupt, a turd you simply cannot flush: no matter what happens, power ends up in his hands.

To make it worse, the current parties that back him are the most extreme, mentally deranged fascist lunatics and that is saying a lot, considering competition on that in Israel is very high.

It is insulting, infuriating, that the same group of rich countries constantly attacking Russia supports Israel to the hilt, refusing to condemn even their most blatant and absurd crimes. Here we have them doing pretty much everything Russia is accused of, in fact, going even further, as not even the most rabid western commentators would claim that Russia started a war so the president’s popularity could rise.

Every time Netanyahu wants to take the focus away from his mistakes, people randomly die. Or when they have an election, which in Israel is every six months. Neocons usually defend Israel as the “only democracy of the middle east”, a very misleading label, as their internal politics have spiralled out of control and are now a threat to the entire world. @Slavyangrad

Marjorie Taylor Greene, Congresswoman from Georgia, U.S. is the Loser

The US dollar may cease to be a global currency as, even under heavy sanctions, Russia is showing the world that it can do without the US dollar and Washington’s friendship, Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Congresswoman representing Georgia, said on Sunday.

“Two years ago <…> we were living in times of world peace. Today <…> we are now on the verge of world war. And the innocent victims are each nation’s people paying taxes to those in power. The US proxy war with Russia, in Ukraine (a non-NATO nation), benefits China the most,” she wrote on her Twitter account. “It’s draining our military resources, driving inflation, hurting world trade, & Americans don’t support it.”

“It could also result in the dollar no longer being the world’s currency. Because of our own arrogance and “fight to save democracy” in non-NATO Ukraine, heavily sanctioned Russia is proving to the world that they don’t need the US dollar or friendship to trade and thrive,” she emphasized.

https://tass.com/world/1568651

Germany Being Set Up

by Finian Cunningham via Strategic-Culture

When the Leopard hulls are wheeled back with their turrets blown off, the political price for Berlin will become unbearable.

Germany is being played like a fiddle and the sound is a pathetic and plaintive one. Only days after Chancellor Olaf Scholz said Germany would not be supplying its Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine to fight against Russia, Berlin has done an embarrassing U-turn. The Leopards are coming.

Germany is to send “a company” of these fearsome battlefield weapons which amounts to about 14 of them, according to reports. What is more, Berlin is giving the proprietary authorization for other NATO members to also re-export the German-made tank to Ukraine.

Last Friday at a NATO-sponsored war summit at the U.S. Air Force Base in Ramstein, Germany, the Scholz government surprised many observers by resisting mounting calls from the United States and other NATO allies to release the Leopards. Scholz has been saying for months that he did not want to provoke Russia into an escalation of hostilities by such a move. How many times has he said that regarding other German weapons only to buckle and cave in?

Immediately after the Ramstein meeting, the pressure on Berlin was ratcheted up. The U.S., Britain, Poland and the Baltic states castigated and shamed Germany for showing cowardice. Warsaw taunted that it would send some of its Leopards regardless of Berlin’s say-so, thereby snubbing the German protocol that as the manufacturer of the tank it must authorize any re-export of the weapon.

The clincher move came from Washington. The Biden administration said it would send its M1 Abrams main battle tanks after previously saying it would not owing to logistical impracticalities. That surprise move pulled the stops from under Berlin’s public position that it would only supply the Leopards on condition that the U.S. would also send its tanks.

Here’s the thing though. U.S. President Joe Biden is ordering the supply of 30 Abrams but it will take months or even up to a year before the American tanks become operational in the war. This is because the Abrams is a bigger beast requiring more training of tank crews. Whereas the German Leopards are good to go.

Washington is no doubt pulling a fast one on Berlin. The Americans are daring the Germans to send their prime tanks to the front knowing that their own lumbering, gas-guzzling behemoths will be leading from the rear.

The whole sordid spectacle of Berlin’s U-turn from brow-beating and hectoring by Poland and the Baltic minions speaks of German humiliation. It does make you wonder what kind of blackmail material the Western intelligence agencies have on Scholz and his government for such a cringe-making capitulation.

History never repeats exactly. In 1941, when Nazi Germany crashed into the Soviet Union with its Panzer Tiger tanks it was the biggest land invasion in history under the steely, brutal leadership of the Third Reich. This time around, the tanks from Berlin are tokenism and under orders from a vacillating chancellor mocked even by his so-called allies as being a “liverwurst” (liver sausage).

It shows, however, that the German establishment is apprehensive about being set up in a dangerous political game by treacherous allies. Polls indicate that the German population is wary about escalating the war in Ukraine against Russia. The bitter, shameful memory of World War Two and the German-led extermination across Europe in which up to 30 million Soviet citizens died is too much to bear. For Berlin to be now indulging the U.S.-led charade about “defending democracy” in an incorrigibly corrupt Ukrainian regime is risking huge political capital at a time of intensifying social and economic hardship for the German people, as in every other Western state.

Factions within the German establishment know that obeying American orders is a reckless, bad idea. Military commanders have warned against sending the Leopards. Business leaders are also against the insane destruction of bilateral relations with Russia. Yet other factions of the establishment are bending their knee to Washington. Is it blackmail or ideological weakness? Probably both. Germany is after all an occupied US military zone with 40,000 American troops and bases, rather than a sovereign nation.

The American imperial overlords want to break Europe into suzerainty under US capital. Germany is the traction point for this American subjugation of Europe. Obliterating geo-economic relations with Russia (and China) is a vital part of the plan. However, there is a catch: the German link is brittle.

The tokenism of sending the Leopards is gravely provocative to Russia, but it won’t make a difference to the outcome of the war in Ukraine. The Kiev regime has been goading NATO for at least 300 tanks in order to purportedly push back Russian forces. A few dozen tanks from Germany and other European allies won’t cut the mustard. Furthermore, tanks in isolation under the lack of air cover won’t have the impact that is unrealistically assumed.

The provocation will nevertheless not go unanswered by Russia. Moscow has warned that it will destroy any tanks arriving from Germany, Poland, or elsewhere before these machines even get off the rail tracks and anywhere near the front line. With Russia’s air power and precision missiles, such a threat is not idle.

When the Leopard hulls are wheeled back with their turrets blown off along with incinerated corpses, the political price for Berlin will become unbearable. The squabbling among NATO minions will then go from simmering to boiling point. And the tracks will come off the NATO war machine.

The Kiev regime is shooting foot soldiers who refuse to obey orders to advance against superior Russian firepower on the battlefield. Washington’s demands on Berlin are tantamount to the same self-defeating coercion.

Strange Things Are Happening

In United States, under mysterious circumstances, 20 LNG plants have already burned down in a few months.

The same with refineries. Just yesterday, one of the oil refineries on the border with Mexico burned down.